I have decided to use the KJV as my main teaching and preaching Bible. Many of the threads on the PB have led me to the belief that a KJV preferred position is a reasonable and tenable stance. Also, most of the Christians in my community are fierce Arminians and Pentecostals and use the KJV. I believe I will have a better chance of reasoning with them regarding the Doctrines of Grace if we are using a common Bible.

I am looking for information regarding the copyright of the KJV. Much of the material on the internet seems to come from folks who are arguing a KJVO position or in reaction to that position. I have also looked at the material on wikipedia. I was wondering if some of the knowledgeable folks on the PB could answer some questions or point me toward relevant sources of information:

(1) Is it correct to assert that the KJV is public domain in the U.S. and the rest of the world, except for the United Kingdom?

(2) Does this mean that those who produce updated KJVs (not including the NKJV) do so freely and can then copyright their updated version? I am thinking here of the Modern KJV, 21st Century KJV, etc.

(3) I am assuming one would use a generic citation for the KJV when citing it in a paper or book. Does one need to include information regarding editions (1762, 1769, 1873, etc.)? Or will a generic All Scripture quotations are taken from the King James Version of the Holy Bible. suffice?

(4) If one adapts the language marginally (like change "threescore furlongs" to "about 7 miles" in Luke 24:13 and putting the adaptations in brackets), how would one cite numerous adaptations in a paper or book? Would this suffice: All Scripture quotations are from the King James Version of the Holy Bible with adaptations by the author in brackets.

I realize some of these questions may seem picky, but I am planning on doing some writing for my congregation and others where these issues will be relevant.

Any help is much appreciated.

__________________
Chris
Teaching Elder (PCUSA)
West Virginia

Cambridge is the Royal printer in the UK, in the UK, the AV STILL has some copyright protection, (not heavily enforced) everywhere else (with the eception of annotations and maps in certain editions) the AV is Public Domain.

__________________
~etexas~

I've studied this issue for over 9 years and have a legal background... My impression is the following, regarding some of your questions:

The KJV is most definitely in the public domain, which makes it different from all of the progeny of the Revised English Version that have followed it. The KJV is only copyrighted when there are study notes, cross-references, maps and appendices added to it by some publishing houses. Those additions are what makes a copyright for any particular publishing of the KJV necessary.

Other versions, such as the NKJV, the NIV, the NASB, the ESV, etc., always have changes to the text itself that are sufficient to allow them to obtain a copyright, and thus to earn royalties. Compare, for example, the rendering of just these two verses: 2 Corinthians 2:17, and Genesis 15:1 in both the KJV and some other versions. Those are exemplary of the types of changes that are sufficient to consider them "different works" - and entitle them to avoid the "public domain" status of the KJV.

The answer to your fourth question would probably be yes, but I'm not an expert in copyright law. That's a big caveat. BTW, I believe that it's still the case that you need to make appropriate, precise attribution to a source from which you've taken something only IF you are going to make money for yourself or for the congregation from the sale of the materials you're distributing.

Any legal experts in intellectual property or copyright law out there? (I've done work in each that is pretty de minimis...) I will stand corrected if anything I've said is in error, and what I've stated here is not meant to be construed as legal advice.

__________________
Margaret
Free Church of Scotland [Continuing]
Michigan

"He must increase, but I must decrease." - John 3:30

The KJV is property of the Crown

__________________
Name: Richard
Church: Church of England, UK

Has that not expired like the ASV's copyright?

__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
http://reformedcovenanter.wordpress.com/
The Regulative Principle of Worship: Explained and Applied (Xulon Press)
A Conquered Kingdom: Biblical Civil Government (Reformed Worldview Books)

This raises the question of whether a copyright should ever expire? But that is

Richard is correct, it has been Property of The Crown since the time of James The Stuart.

KJV is Crown copyrighted in UK only; out of copyright elsewhere. We discussed this before I think but as part of another thread I guess; couldn't find it.

__________________
Chris Coldwell
Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member
• Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
• The Confessional Presbyterian, A Journal for Discussion of Presbyterian Doctrine & Practice
• The Blue Banner Archive

When heresy rises in an evangelical body, it is never frank and open. It always begins by skulking, and assuming a disguise. Its advocates, when together, boast of great improvements, and congratulate one another on having gone greatly beyond the ‘old dead orthodoxy,’ and on having left behind many of its antiquated errors: but when taxed with deviations from the received faith, they complain of the unreasonableness of their accusers, as they ‘differ from it only in words.’ This has been the standing course of errorists ever since the apostolic age. Samuel Miller, Introductory essay, The Articles of the Synod of Dort (1841).

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

Thanks to everyone for responding.

Margaret--Thanks for your detailed answer. The new versions of the KJV, like the modern KJV, are only able to be copyrighted if it is determined to be a completely new work. Sort of like what Thomas Nelson did with the NKJV. Interesting.

Richard's post made me wonder if Christians outside the UK are ethically obligated to not be so free with the KJV.

Chris--I take it from your post that the matter of the copyright is settled for us in the USA. We can assume, not just legally but ethically, that the KJV is public domain. We have been discussing issues related to this in the Sunday School class, and I want to be careful about what I say regarding this.

Yes, it is public domain except in the UK.

Yes, one can freely use the KJV as a base text to update and then copyright the work. However, it would probably have to be different enough from the updates that you mention.

The generic would suffice.

The last sentence would suffice.
I would suggest staying away from brackets as some versions use them to inform the reader that the text is questionable. Perhaps use something that isn't already used by other versions like...
purloiner {thief}

__________________
Larry Bray
Training for Elder - Reformed Presbyterian Church of Boothwyn, PCA
Boothwyn, PA
http://www.rpcb.org/

Free Online Reformed Seminary - http://www.tnars.net
-----------------------------------------------------
"The best Christian is still a poor Christian" - R.B. Kuiper

Thanks Larry.

I think your suggestion is a good one. I will use something other than brackets.

Just remember never to purloin!

Mega Ditto's on your decision!! And yes, you will have a better chance. I'll never forget my dealings with the Mormons in Texas. When I found out they were young-earther's, we had an instant rapport, and when I whipped out my KJV from my back pocket, they were 10 times more open to listening to me. Alot of 'Arminians and Pentecostals' think that modern Christians use the modern versions, and using a KJV definitely gets your foot in the door. With the negative image of the KJV in the modern church, when you interact with these people, it form a temporary quick bond that can be used to your advantage.

God Bless - Grymir

__________________
Timothy Johnson
First United Presbyterian of Moline
PCUSA (Yea, I know)
Theology/Philosophy Sunday School Teacher
Davenport, IA

Although, it's better to be a purloiner than an anthropophaginian.

The worst thing is skulking! I can't abide a sculker!

The copyright to the KJV may indeed belong to the crown, however the Geneva Bible of 1599 which preceded, and prompted, the KJV would not be.

__________________
Rev. Timothy P. Cotton
Sr. Pastor, Truth and Way Ministries
Hopewell Jct., NY

Sir,
Perhaps this article would interest you. Believers Beware of Counterfeit King James Bibles
I do not endorse the web site or the writer.

I think we should say "Scripture cited is taken from the King James (Authorized) Version"

Peace,

Goofy fellow there - I didn't read the whole thing, but he seems to be claiming an inspiration of the English Authorized Version. Hence, changing labour to labor, from the British to the American spelling, makes a reprint a "counterfeit?"

__________________
Thomas Weddle
Member, Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church
Evansville, Indiana

This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever read! Wow!

__________________
Nathan Eshelman
Grand Rapids, MI
First Reformed Presbyterian Church

PRESBYTERIAN THOUGHTS

First Reformed Presbyterian Church

I think there may be some truth to this.




.

__________________
William Letus
Trinity Reformed Baptist Church
Home: upstate NY

Mr. Johnson (Grymir)--Thanks so much for the encouragement. We are going to start using the KJV in family devotions as well, so my wife can also be a better witness to some of those who work around her.

Rev. Cotton--I considered using the Geneva. The decision to use the KJV was partly motivated by the widespread use of the KJV in this area.

I agree that the idea of updating the KJV solely to please some "readers," so sales will go up and profits will increase, is repugnant. My questions were motivated by wanting to be exact and ethical when I made adaptations for my congregation or when writing papers, etc.