04-01-2008, 04:40 PM
|
 | McFadderator Maximus | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 2,531
Thanks: 493
Thanked 684 Times in 421 Posts
| |
The short answer is "no." The longer answer (if you count punctuation, casing, spelling, and formatting) is "yes." "For all intents and purposes, these are the same texts. They were produced by the same people, with the same scholarship, even though (in print) they are intended for different purposes."
The critical apparatus is a bit different in that they are intended for different audiences. Quote:
The UBS4 Greek New Testament, in print, was designed to be used by translators. It provides information on major variants that may affect one's translation. Thus, the UBS4 apparatus is smaller, but where it does provide information on variants, it traditionally supplies a lot of information. The UBS4 has, in actuality, two different apparatuses -- the textual (or critical) apparatus and the discourse segmentation (i.e., punctuation) apparatus. In addition, a cross-reference system is also meshed in the apparatuses.
The NA27 Novum Testamentum Graece, on the other hand, is geared more toward scholars and textual critics who often have different concerns than do translators. Thus, the NA27 apparatus has information on many more variants, but it is presented in a more compact notation and often to less of a degree. It also treats variants that may not have translational significance (e.g., variants in word order or orthography). The NA27 also has a huge amount of information in the margins of the text (cross references, Eusebian canon references for the Gospels, and more).
|
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
|
Linear Mode
