» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 36 | | 1 members and 35 guests | | TimV | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
08-28-2008, 09:27 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 539
Thanked 469 Times in 220 Posts
| | | Modern Version of the Textus Receptus?
I never read the King James Bible because I prefer reading the Bible in my own language (sorry for the jab . . . ). So I alternate between the NAS, the ESV, and the NIV.
I've never heard of a modern version of the Textus Receptus. For those who are advocates of the TR, do you know of any modern English versions?
__________________
Kim G
Non-denom church (holds to the WCF) Zion Community Church, Greenville, SC Teach me Your way, O LORD;
I will walk in Your truth;
Unite my heart to fear Your name. Psalm 86:11 | 
08-28-2008, 09:29 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,133
Thanks: 676
Thanked 807 Times in 438 Posts
| | |
The NKJV is based on the TR. It has marginal notes that indicate variant readings in both the Majority Text (MT) and the Critical Text (NA26).
__________________
Jim
1689 LBCF
Independent Bible Church
North Texas, USA
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jimmy the Greek For This Useful Post: | | 
08-28-2008, 09:42 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 539
Thanked 469 Times in 220 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Gomarus It has marginal notes that indicate variant readings in both the Majority Text (MT) and the Critical Text (NA26). | My NAS also notes the differences, but I like the way it reads better than the NKJV.
I'm talking about a version that goes strictly back to the TR manuscripts and translates without trying to feel like the KJV as much as possible.
| 
08-28-2008, 10:06 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,133
Thanks: 676
Thanked 807 Times in 438 Posts
| | |
Based on the Textus Receptus:
-Webster Bible (1833)
-Young's Literal Translation (1862/1898)
-New King James Version (1982)
-Revised Webster Bible (1998, with Strong's and other codes)
However, I believe these all relied on the KJV (to some extent) in the process.
Last edited by Jimmy the Greek; 08-28-2008 at 10:18 AM.
Reason: add note
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jimmy the Greek For This Useful Post: | | 
08-28-2008, 10:17 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 539
Thanked 469 Times in 220 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Gomarus Based on the Textus Receptus:
-Webster Bible (1833)
-Young's Literal Translation (1862/1898)
-New King James Version (1982)
-Revised Webster Bible (1998, with Strong's and other codes) |  I didn't even know those existed. Are they good (i.e., faithful translations)?
| 
08-28-2008, 10:23 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,133
Thanks: 676
Thanked 807 Times in 438 Posts
| | |
Sorry, I have not used them. I am merely passing on information. As I mentioned in my added note above, I believe these all relied on the KJV (to some extent). Webster refers to Noah Webster -- his revised translation is public domain and can be found online for free.
| 
08-28-2008, 11:21 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 979
Thanks: 136
Thanked 91 Times in 60 Posts
| | |
KJVII is also based on the majority test.
Thanks for pointing out that Strongs was based on the majority test. I was not aware of that.
__________________
Thomas Yeutter,
Mason, MI
Member St. Patrick's Anglican Church, Comstock, MI
Ezra 7:10 For Ezra had set his heart to study the law of the Lord and to do it and to teach its statues in Isreal.
| 
08-28-2008, 11:24 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 979
Thanks: 136
Thanked 91 Times in 60 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim G Quote:
Originally Posted by Gomarus Based on the Textus Receptus:
-Webster Bible (1833)
-Young's Literal Translation (1862/1898)
-New King James Version (1982)
-Revised Webster Bible (1998, with Strong's and other codes) |  I didn't even know those existed. Are they good (i.e., faithful translations)? | Youngs in style is similar to the ASV. It is painfully literal at times.
| 
08-28-2008, 01:55 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 2,105
Thanks: 316
Thanked 524 Times in 292 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by yeutter Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim G Quote:
Originally Posted by Gomarus Based on the Textus Receptus:
-Webster Bible (1833)
-Young's Literal Translation (1862/1898)
-New King James Version (1982)
-Revised Webster Bible (1998, with Strong's and other codes) |  I didn't even know those existed. Are they good (i.e., faithful translations)? | Youngs in style is similar to the ASV. It is painfully literal at times. | Here is a painfully notable example:
Mat 25:46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal. (NKJV)
Mat 25:46 And these shall go away to punishment age-during, but the righteous to life age-during. (Youngs)
Hmm. I sure do hope Heaven isn't of a limited duration.
__________________ Jonathan Hunt
Elder-Who-Preaches-A lot Cheltenham Evangelical Free Church (Confessionally Based)
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.
-- Thomas Elsworth
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |