Which translation is linguistically better in terms of the English language?

__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College

I'm probably not the one to answer the question on a technical basis, but I am quickly falling in love with my newly-purchased 1599 Geneva. Since it retains the structure of the Geneva but updates spelling, I find it a beautiful read.

Now, on to those who are actually qualified to give answer rather than opinion...

__________________
Donald P. Grubb
theol46@embarqmail.com

Berean Baptist Church, Mansfield, OH
Mansfield, OH

John 6:63 It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing.
The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life.

One thing I noticed about the Geneva Bible is that there are commas where I really didn't expect them to be. This has the practical effect--at least for me--of pausing my breath or making a mental stop, if for only a split-second, where I see a comma. In other words, I stop mid-sentence while the train of thought is still running. It did get distracting at times. My version of the AV doesn't do this and on that point it is easier to read.

Well there's the word "Easter" in the KJV in Acts 12:4. The Geneva translates it as Passover.

Plus the "breeches" in Genesis. On those two points, I'd go with the Geneva.

Otherwise, I think they are both good reads.

__________________
Raymond Victor Bottomly
Providence Reformed Baptist Church, Tacoma, WA

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

KJV

__________________
Richard
CofE
UK

Me likes them both!!

__________________
Psa 55:16 As for me, I will call upon God; and the LORD shall save me.
Psa 55:17 Evening, and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud: and he shall hear my voice.
James Farley
Husband of Melissa and father of Ann.
Members of Redeemer Church ARP, Blacksburg Va.
http://www.redeemerblacksburg.org/

__________________
Andrew

I have seen it asserted that the KJV employs a more "elevated" style.

I can't even find my KJV since my recent move so I guess I'll have to buy a new one if it doesn't turn up soon.

__________________
Christian
One Pilgrims Progress

RE buying: Cheaper is sometimes better. I picked up a good, utility hardback at BaM for 15 dollars.

They have a paperback for about $5 on the clearance table too. However, if I have to buy another one, I'm thinking I may break down for a Thompson Chain Reference since I don't have one.

If I had the money when I was buying Thompson would definitely be it. Avoid paperbacks.

Scripture Truth, a site Fred pointed me to a while back, has probably the lowest prices on Thompsons.

King Jimmy all the way!

__________________
et

It's lonely for us, isn't it?

Commas, really? Apart from the issue, raised by some, of TR vs. CT, I still think, some words, only a few, perhaps, should be updated, for the sake, of readability.

__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

If the AV was good enough for the Apostle Paul to use then it's good enough for me!

__________________
Rich
PCA, Northern VA
Student, New Geneva Theological Seminary

WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

King James

__________________
Nigel Dixon, member of the Body of Christ, Baptist by affiliation, United Kingdom

[B]28.18 [/B] and Jesus came and spoke to them - “All power has been given to me in Heaven and on Earth. [B]28.19 [/B] So, go teach all nations, immersing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit,
[B]28.20 [/B] teaching them to observe all the things I have commanded you, and see, I am with you always, even to the end of the age. Amen”. [B]Matthew 28:18-20[/B]

Family Edition, 400th Anniversary, 1599 Geneva - all the way!

(This is an uneducated opinion and not a scholarly comment in any way, shape or form.)

__________________
Kevin, husband of a truly angelic woman, and father to ten.
Zion United Reformed Church of Sheffield
Ontario, Canada

Well Rich, Paul did have the authorized version (i.e., he wrote part of it, and had the authorized writings of the other NT writers -- those that were written and available to him at that time); but it wasn't in English yet! No uppercase A and V! I suppose the real question is, was his authorized version equivalent to our Authorized Version?

About “breeches” in Exodus, Leviticus, and Ezekiel (not Genesis): what’s a better word? Drawers? Britches? Loin cloth? Breech cloth? It’s a Biblical word – a technical word – for what the priests wore under their garments.

About Easter being an error in Acts 12:4:

I post links to some interesting articles on this. First, Will Kinney’s, which I consider the best. Then Jack Moorman’s, which although good, is based on what I believe to be faulty research by Alexander Hislop in The Two Babylons. Sir James G. Frazer, in his, The Golden Bough, does confirm Moorman’s excerpted passages re the myths/religions involving Tammuz and Ishtar (Astarte), but I do not think there is any substance to the allegation Herod was into their worship. Kinney addresses this. (Ezekiel 8:14 does show there were some in Jerusalem who worshipped Tammuz, but this is not relevant to the matter at hand.) Pastor Moorman is almost always spot on, and this is a rare exception. Then there is a link to an article (in PDF) from The Christian Research Journal of 2000 which scrutinizes the work of Hislop, and finds it wanting. This is a significant article as many Christians use Hislop’s work as though it were reliable, and it is not.

Kinney: http://www.geocities.com/brandplucked/Easter.html

This is from Jack Moorman’s book, Conies, Brass & Easter

The excellent critical review of The Two Babylons: http://www.equip.org/atf/cf/%7B9C4EE...5%7D/DC187.pdf

I think Kinney ably defends the use of Easter in Acts 12:4, for those interested in this.

Incidentally, I don't have a hard copy of the Geneva, and would like to get one, it being a highly significant version.

__________________
Steve Rafalsky
Elder, International Evangelical Church (Reformed)
Limassol, Cyprus

"I am set for the defense of the gospel" (Philippians 1:17)

"Strengthened with all might, according to His glorious
power, unto all patience and longsuffering with joyfulness..." (Colossians 1:11)

Blog: A Great and Terrible Love

The translation that the Puritans brought with them to America is the better choice.

__________________
Stephen Welch
PCA Teaching Elder
Nova Scotia :cheers:

It is surprising that so many on PB admit to using ANYthing other than the Greek (whether TR, CT, or MT).

KJV may edge out the Geneva on literary grounds, but wow were those notes in the Geneva great.

I have always used the Bible that God has blessed for almost four hundred years. I do like the Geneva though as it lines up with the same corrupt manuscripts of the King James translaters and Reformers neither was a pen knife used but now that the oldest and best manuscripts have been discovered we are going to new limits.

The Geneva is not as majestic and I question John 1:3
All things were made by it, and without it nothing was made that was made.