» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 118 | | 33 members and 85 guests | | Backwoods Presbyterian, Brad, CalvinandHodges, cbryant, christabella_warren, ChristianHedonist, ColdSilverMoon, DD2009, Dearly Bought, jambo, JDWiseman, Jen, JM, kalawine, Karnes, KSon, LeeJUk, markkoller, Michael Doyle, mvdm, Piano Hero, Simply_Nikki, T.A.G., TaylorOtwell, ThomasH., TimV | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
08-10-2009, 06:58 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,229
Thanks: 256
Thanked 223 Times in 108 Posts
| | | Ideal font size and Bible style?
What do you guys think is the ideal font size for a Bible which is read for about an hour at a time?
Also, if you had to choose between these two Bibles:
1) Larger lighter font, thin pages, more bleed through, more helpful notes but little cross references
or
2) Smaller darker font, thicker pages, less bleed through, less helpful notes but more cross references
What would you choose? My old main Bible has completely fallen apart (which was a really cheap temp Bible so as to confirm my like of the translation) and I am debating between two different Bibles of the same translation.
What would you choose?
P.S.
I don't want to discuss things like translation or notes. Suffice to say one Bible has more helpful notes than the other. I'm mainly asking about preferences in format.
__________________ Mark Maney
Edmonton Chinese Baptist Church
Master of Theological Studies
Master of Arts (Cross Cultural)
Trinity Western University, ACTS Seminaries
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada | 
08-10-2009, 07:09 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Browns Mills NJ
Posts: 2,326
Thanks: 621
Thanked 703 Times in 405 Posts
| | |
I don't like bleed-through or small fonts, so I'd keep searching. I don't have good eyesight so that is a contributing factor. I keep my computer screen @ 120%-150% to help with that.
__________________
Rich Koster
1689'er
Browns Mills NJ USA Often Goofy Reformed Eccentric
Romans 7:14-25
| 
08-10-2009, 07:14 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Cedartown
Posts: 357
Thanks: 19
Thanked 103 Times in 67 Posts
| | |
Most reading Bibles are going to be similar enough that differences will be personal rather than global. I personally prefer 14pt sepia on ecru (yes I am being serious). However I am both on the Autism spectrum and have synesthesia.
__________________
Robert K. "Kelly" Brumbelow
In Inquirer's class at Grace Presbyterian (PCA) Cedartown, GA
Cedartown, Georgia
Dear Lord and Father of mankind, Forgive our foolish ways;
Reclothe us in our rightful mind, In purer lives Thy service find,
In deeper reverence, praise. - John Greenleaf Whittier 1807-1892
| 
08-10-2009, 07:58 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,038
Thanks: 626
Thanked 680 Times in 443 Posts
| | |
I'd say a minimum of 12 point. And if you can see the type from the other side with the page on the pages underneath, the paper is too thin.
__________________
Edward
Deacon
PCA
Texas
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Edward For This Useful Post: | | 
08-10-2009, 09:06 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 585
Thanks: 228
Thanked 217 Times in 121 Posts
| | |
I like a font size that I don't need a magnifying glass to read, and paper thick enough that I'm not reading the first chapter of Acts backwards when I'm trying to read the last chapter of John forwards.
Judging from some Bible editions out there, my preferences are not universally shared.
__________________
Nathan Tyler
Reformed Baptist
University of Toronto (Student: Hons. B.A. in Philosophy)
Ontario, Canada 1689'er http://nathantyler.wordpress.com | 
08-10-2009, 09:23 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Acton, Maine
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 370
Thanked 385 Times in 247 Posts
| | |
At my age the official font size needed is called humungous.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Curt For This Useful Post: | | 
08-10-2009, 09:42 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Deep in the heart of Dixie - Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 6,151
Thanks: 767
Thanked 2,922 Times in 1,454 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Curt At my age the official font size needed is called humungous. |
__________________
We shall not adjust our Bible to the age; but before we have done with it, by God's grace, we shall adjust the age to the Bible. - Charles Haddon Spurgeon
Lawrence Underwood, Jr.
Pastor - Providence Family Fellowship / Mobile, Alabama
1644/46 LBC My Blog - Imprimis | 
08-10-2009, 09:59 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: La Grange Park, IL
Posts: 1,756
Thanks: 281
Thanked 379 Times in 217 Posts
| |
My Bible (Cambridge Pitt Minion) is set in 6.75pt/7pt in Lexicon No. 1 (presumably the font name). It sounds small, and I have glasses, but I've never had a problem reading it. It's the perfect size Bible to hold in one hand and for carrying to worship services. Might be out of your price range, but it'll last a long time if you take good care of it. I used to prefer the big study Bibles, but I got tired of carrying around bricks.
__________________
Casey, Chicagoland, OPC
| 
08-10-2009, 10:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,256
Thanks: 155
Thanked 556 Times in 340 Posts
| | |
Paper first: a good quality paper may be thin, but retain the opacity for high legibility. I'd suggest not letting the "feel" throw you -- try it out for yourself to see how easy it is to read. Its rag content -- and the presence of acids -- can make a difference in how well the pages hold up over time.
Many variables affect ease-of reading. The leading (loosely defined as the vertical space around a line of type) can make a smaller font seem much easier to read. Its x-height (the relationship of the lower case letters to upper) and counter space (the room inside closed figures) can also make a big difference.
Most folks find 10+ point type with a fair amount of white space on the page (whether in leading, the other measures, or the margins) generally easiest to read. I mentioned the other measurements because one 10-point font can appear to be much larger (and easier to read) than another because the other properties come into play. Some older publications -- with little white space on a page and tiny x-heights -- can be difficult to read because of these latter factors, not just because of the overall font size.
Different translations -- and their willingness to break sections out by paragraph and to add section headers -- can also make reading easier. (Although I have difficulties with those headers on an "addition" level -- a whole other topic).
Personally, I find the cross-references to other verses to be my most-used "reference" in a Bible and that would guide my choice greatly. I'd also want to know something about who put those notes and/or references in there.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to jwithnell For This Useful Post: | | 
08-10-2009, 10:46 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Monticello, IA
Posts: 6,151
Thanks: 3,625
Thanked 832 Times in 700 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by CaseyBessette My Bible (Cambridge Pitt Minion) is set in 6.75pt/7pt in Lexicon No. 1 (presumably the font name). It sounds small, and I have glasses, but I've never had a problem reading it. It's the perfect size Bible to hold in one hand and for carrying to worship services. Might be out of your price range, but it'll last a long time if you take good care of it. I used to prefer the big study Bibles, but I got tired of carrying around bricks.  | I believe that's also the official font size for medicine bottle labels.
__________________
Norm
IA PCA In love he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will. Ephesians 1:4-5 |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |