The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Scriptures > Translations and Manuscripts

Translations and Manuscripts Discussions regarding translations of the Bible and Bible manuscripts. This is now a moderated forum. New threads/posts will be approved at the discretion of the Admins/Mods.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 06:28 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,402
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,838 Times in 1,471 Posts
I John 5:7 - the spirit, the water and the blood - what are they?

NOTE: I am assuming that the Comma J is not really in the autographs. Let's not fight about that here.


Assuming that we except the ESV rendering: For there are three that testify: the Spirit and the water and the blood; and these three agree.

What would these 3 things be that agree and bear witness?

I heard it suggested today that they might be the preaching of the Word and the sacraments of baptism and the supper (broken body and blood).

Any thoughts?
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 11:21 PM
21st Century Calvinist's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 692
Thanks: 76
Thanked 242 Times in 154 Posts
I tend to agree with my Greek Professor.
It seems natural (to me at any rate) that the water refers to Jesus Baptism, the blood to refer to his atoning death on the Cross. I think that the spirit here is referring to the Holy Spirit who testifies. The Spirit testifies that Jesus came and to the work that he did.
Alternative views could be that John refers to the fact that after Jesus died, when his side was penetrated by the spear water and blood flowed from his side. (Jn19:34) I think it is only John who refers to this.
A further view is that John could be making the point that Jesus was a real person, who had real flesh, a real body and really died. John could well be refuting the doceticists who denied that Jesus had a human body.
So is it A, B or C? Yes! Personally, I favor the first but this is more based on inclination than study.
__________________
Donnie MacLeod
Crossroads Presbyterian Fellowship (PCA), Maplewood, MO
MDiv Student Covenant Theological Seminary

You filled my heart with greater joy
than others may have found
As they rejoiced at harvest time,
when grain and wine abound.Ps 4:7, Sing Psalms 2003
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 21st Century Calvinist For This Useful Post:
Hamalas (08-06-2009), Pergamum (08-05-2009)
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69