The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Scriptures > Translations and Manuscripts

Translations and Manuscripts Discussions regarding translations of the Bible and Bible manuscripts. This is now a moderated forum. New threads/posts will be approved at the discretion of the Admins/Mods.

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

» Online Users: 75
15 members and 60 guests
Amazing Grace, buggy, christabella_warren, cih1355, CredoFidoSpero, dannyhyde, Jen, Jerusalem Blade, Montanablue, Reformed Thomist, TimV
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2009, 04:07 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wick, Caithness, Scotland
Posts: 386
Thanks: 20
Thanked 50 Times in 37 Posts
Hebrew original of Mathew

I am hearing a lot about an original Hebrew text for Mathew. To support this the following are quoted:
  • Papius Bishop of Heirapolis
  • Iraneus Bishop of Lyons
  • Origen
  • Eusebius Bishop of Caeserea
  • Epiphanius
  • Jerome

I have no detailed knowledge of these characters so fill me in. How reliable is our record of what they say? How reliable are they?
__________________
Eoghan
member,Thurso Baptist Church
Scotland

specialist subject: Creationist Genetics (Bottleneck effect of the Ark)
interests: holiness (practical theology)
member of Biblical Creation Society (available as a guest speaker in the far north of Scotland)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2009, 01:12 AM
Contra_Mundum's Avatar
Pilgrim, Alien, Stranger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 5,190
Thanks: 74
Thanked 3,365 Times in 1,190 Posts
The problem with the theory, even if true, is...

we don't have such a work.

IOW, God was pleased to preserve Matthew in Koine, and not in Aramaic (or Hebrew, even less likely since it wasn't the language used in everyday discourse in 1st cent. Judea or Galilee).

If Mark is, actually, chronologically prior to Matthew, then a Hebrew original of Matthew is even more far-fetched.

If Matthew is the first Gospel written, it could have been preceded by scraps of Hebrew writing, as Christians all over Judea and Galilee (and beyond) might record the Apostle's preaching in bits and pieces (probably in Aramaic).

However, at some point the standard version was penned, practically without question by Matthew, and that version was Greek. Attempting to scrounge for pre-inscripturated revelation, by trying to get "behind" the text that was given to us, is speculative at best. It is trying to be wiser than God.
__________________
Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI

Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer
Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12

When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:

Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us.
--Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? --
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Contra_Mundum For This Useful Post:
Berean (09-11-2009), bug (09-11-2009), Jimmy the Greek (09-11-2009), PointyHaired Calvinist (09-11-2009), Sonoftheday (09-11-2009)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2009, 02:43 AM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 999 Times in 572 Posts
This theory of a Hebrew Matthew does not explain why the vantage point of Matthew is Greek, since when quoting Aramaic or Hebrew words, the Holy Spirit inspired the author to translate such phrases into Greek, for the sake of the Greek speaking audience.

Cheers,
__________________
Adam B., Wine Country, California, PCA

"I fear not to hold with Junius, de Politia Mosis cap. 6, that he who was punishable by death under that Judicial law, is punishable by death still; and he who was not punished by death then, is not to be punished by death now."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2009, 12:27 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wick, Caithness, Scotland
Posts: 386
Thanks: 20
Thanked 50 Times in 37 Posts
I think what annoys me is the suggestion that Papius et al. were overlooked by scholars and the matter was not addressed.

Just before I got up this morning I went back to bed with Donald Guthrie. Starting at the bottom of page 33 of "Introduction to the New Testament" he discusses the tradition of the Hebrew text reputed to be the "original" and continues through to page 43. It was a fair treatment I thought although indecisive.

What annoys me in the Hebrew text scholars is that they do not give the counter arguments of
1. Aramaic sayings / quotations
2. the universal (?) quoting of the LXX
3. examples of 1st century Greek (koinone?)and Aramaic

They do produce examples of Hebrew and Hebrew idioms in the gospels but one swallow doth not a summer make.

Can you redirect me to a discussion of the Greek/Aramaic idioms and language in the NT? I have the afformentioned Intro to the NT by Donald Guthrie, The Canon of Scripture and Studies in Non-Pauline Christianity both by FF Bruce.

Is there a small, popular (I need something not overtly scholarly - FF Bruce type?) paperback giving the influence of Greek thought and idiom on the NT, Something to serve as a counterbalance to "Yeshua" by Ron Moseley who trys to show the numerous Jewish (i.e. Hebrew) idioms in the teachings of Jesus.

Last edited by Eoghan; 09-12-2009 at 04:23 AM. Reason: swallow typed twice
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2009, 04:41 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wick, Caithness, Scotland
Posts: 386
Thanks: 20
Thanked 50 Times in 37 Posts
Exegetical Fallacies - D.A. Carson

This (book above) has helped a lot. It explains a lot about caution in exegesis and the priority you have to give to context.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2009, 07:36 PM
PointyHaired Calvinist's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Fairview, NC
Posts: 482
Thanks: 299
Thanked 94 Times in 35 Posts
If a Hebrew Matthew were found, would we need to take it into account as a new textual variant? Maybe refer to it in footnotes of Bible translations? This is assuming it isn't just the "Gospel of the Hebrews" or another lost apocryphal work.
__________________
Johnathan Tate
Cornerstone Presbyterian Church (OPC), Arden, NC

Husband of one, father of 3 (1 in-utero); Time's "Man of the Year" 2006
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69