» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 54 | | 22 members and 32 guests | | APuritansMind, Chaplainintraining, CovenantalBaptist, Ed Franklin, gene_mingo, Glosi, GMcClain20, JDKetterman, jfschultz, KMK, LarryCook, LawrenceU, nleshelman, Randall Pederson, satz, SolaScriptura | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
10-03-2008, 11:50 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Utah
Posts: 1,985
Thanks: 350
Thanked 440 Times in 290 Posts
| | | Chapter and Verse
Does anyone know when chapter and verses first appeared in Bible translations?
And who were the individuals who first started using chapter and verse.
I want to say it was between the 12th-13th century.
__________________
John
Member Under Care
Christ Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Salt Lake City, Utah www.christpres.net | 
10-03-2008, 11:53 AM
|  | Puritanboard Librarian | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 23,352
Thanks: 2,366
Thanked 3,152 Times in 1,859 Posts
| |
__________________
Andrew Myers
Husband of Jessica, Father of Jackson, Katie and Samuel
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church of Northern Virginia
Warrenton, VA USA
Editor, The Matthew Poole Project
"Let your Morning Thoughts, and your last Evening Thoughts, be what shall become of you to all Eternity." -- Matthew Poole
| 
10-03-2008, 12:10 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 872
Thanks: 153
Thanked 288 Times in 182 Posts
| | |
I prefer the Apostle Paul's method: Somewhere someone once said....
| 
10-03-2008, 02:15 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 13,149
Thanks: 1,249
Thanked 2,862 Times in 1,344 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by nleshelman I prefer the Apostle Paul's method: Somewhere someone once said.... | It's funny because I've thought about that a lot.
Most people you meet have a "prooftext" mentality to the Scriptures and have a hard time comprehending, especially the Epistles, in a comprehensive manner. Commonly, somebody has an idea that they want to baptize and then they go to look for the verses that can support it, regardless of the context that the scripture is taken from. They'll even be so facile as to assume that simply because the same words are used in two places that the words are communicating the same concept.
The Book of Romans is a perfect example of a book where many of the conclusions of thoughts are interrupted by Chapter divisions. It's really only been the last several years that I've learned to try to focus on an author's overall presentation and ensure that I'm following the train of thought as it develops.
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate how easy it is to find things but we also need to remind people that the divisions were not inspired and the necessity to not take shortcuts to our spiritual growth. It seems like everybody you meet these days has a "favorite verse" or a "life verse" and I can't personally decide how I could arbitrarily try to boil down what God left in its completeness down to a single verse.
| 
10-03-2008, 02:32 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 740
Thanks: 268
Thanked 184 Times in 108 Posts
| | |
I've been looking for a Bible that doesn't have chapters and verses. Does anyone know of any? The only one I can find is a TNIV version, which I know NOTHING about. Is it much different than the NIV?
__________________
Kim G
Non-denom church (holds to the WCF) Zion Community Church, Greenville, SC Teach me Your way, O LORD;
I will walk in Your truth;
Unite my heart to fear Your name. Psalm 86:11 | 
10-03-2008, 02:42 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: North Texas
Posts: 694
Thanks: 138
Thanked 210 Times in 125 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim G I've been looking for a Bible that doesn't have chapters and verses. Does anyone know of any? The only one I can find is a TNIV version, which I know NOTHING about. Is it much different than the NIV? | TNIV is updated NIV with more modern wording and gender neutral where possible.
__________________
Jim
1689 LBCF
Independent Bible Church
North Texas, USA
| 
10-03-2008, 05:38 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Lisburn, Northern Ireland, UK
Posts: 275
Thanks: 54
Thanked 105 Times in 69 Posts
| | |
The bible was divided up into chapters by Stephen Langton (archbishop of Canterbury in the early 13th century). The division of the OT into verses was done by a Jewish Rabbi, Isaac Nathan ben Kalonymus during the 16th century whilst Robert Stephanus, a Frenchman, completed the NT whilst travelling back and forward from Paris to Lyon on horseback. The fact that Beza used Stephanus' divisions in the Textus Receptus enshrined his divisions as the standard work.
Chapter and verse divisions are very handy but create artificial breaks in passages that were never intended. I have often thought how helpful it would be not to have them as then we would have to become muchmore familier with the bible in order to find things. here were no such divisions, you would need to memorise scripture more so you would know where to find things.
__________________
Stuart
Elder, Lambeg Baptist, Northern Ireland, UK
In Him the fulness of the Godhead dwells in bodily form and in Him you are complete (Col 2.9-10)
The sacrifice of a broken heart doth please Him but the sacrifice of a broken Christ alone doth satisfy Him (Richard Steele)
| | The Following User Says Thank You to jambo For This Useful Post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |