» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 110 | | 33 members and 77 guests | | Andres, austinww, Bad Organist, christabella_warren, Curt, dannyhyde, David, DD2009, dudley, dyarashus, Grillsy, Jake, jogri17, JTB, MarieP, matthew11v25, Montanablue, Nathan Riese, nicnap, Piano Hero, Re4mdant, Reformed Thomist, Romans922, Scottish Lass, SolaScriptura, TKarrer, tlharvey7, toddpedlar, TrueConvert, VictorBravo | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
07-05-2008, 01:11 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: LaFollette, TN
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
| | | Holy Laughter.
Somehow I got started talking about holy laughter on one of my previous threads. As you may know, holy laughter was one of the phenomena which characterized the Toronto revival.
Many churches in the UK embraced the Toronto blessing. In fact there is a Calvinistic Charismatic association of churches known as New Frontiers that is based in Brighton, England that embraced the blessing.
Adrian Warnock, a popular "reformed" charismatic blogger is part of New Frontiers. A couple of years ago, he posted a blog entry concerning the Toronto blessing and Charles Haddon Spurgeon of all people.
The following quote is taken from Spurgeon, which in turn was taken from the pyromaniacs blog via Adrian Warnock's blog.
"My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness."
"I have often read in Scripture of the holy laughter of Abraham, when he fell upon his face and laughed; but I do not know that I ever experienced that laughter till a few evenings ago, when this text came home to me with such sacred power as literally to cause me to laugh . . ."
You can read the rest of Adrian's article here: adrianwarnock.com: Sufficient and Efficient Grace - Spurgeon, Tongues, and the Toronto Blessing
__________________
Jared Hanley
AG
LaFollette, TN
Unless the LORD builds the house,
those who build it labor in vain.
Psalm 127:1 ESV
| 
07-05-2008, 01:19 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,425
Thanks: 2,918
Thanked 6,137 Times in 2,590 Posts
| | | Admin's Cautionary Note Admin's Note:
This can be discussed here, but it will not be advocated or argued for in the affirmative, due to its obvious contra Confessional nature.
__________________ Josh Hicks, Chloë's Dad Christ Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCGA Facebook - The Calvinist Vent Board Rules - Signature Rules - Suggestion Box It is God that multiplies our sorrows.... God, as a righteous Judge, does it, which ought to silence us under all our sorrows; as many as they are, we have deserved them all, and more: nay, God, as a tender Father, does it for our necessary correction, that we may be humbled for sin, and weaned from the world by all our sorrows; and the good we get by them, with the comfort we have under them, will abundantly balance our sorrows, how greatly soever they are multiplied. - Matthew Henry | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Joshua For This Useful Post: | | 
07-05-2008, 01:50 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: LaFollette, TN
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Admin's Note:
This can be discussed here, but it will not be advocated or argued for in the affirmative, due to its obvious contra Confessional nature. | I don't mean to be rude by asking this. I was simply wondering. Was Spurgeon contra confessional by mentioning his experience with what he calls "holy laughter". (Spurgeon's words, not mine.) Is this experience that Spurgeon claims to have had contra confessional?
| 
07-05-2008, 01:52 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,425
Thanks: 2,918
Thanked 6,137 Times in 2,590 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared104 Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Admin's Note:
This can be discussed here, but it will not be advocated or argued for in the affirmative, due to its obvious contra Confessional nature. | I don't mean to be rude by asking this. I was simply wondering. Was Spurgeon contra confessional by mentioning his experience with what he calls "holy laughter". (Spurgeon's words, not mine.) Is this experience that Spurgeon claims to have had contra confessional? | There were no accusations of rudeness, Brother. I just wanted to nip it in the bud just in case or before it became an issue. | 
07-05-2008, 02:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Lisbon, NY
Posts: 5,886
Thanks: 421
Thanked 635 Times in 294 Posts
| |
I would like to see more of the context of Spurgeon's quote but from what is quoted, it is apparent that Spurgeon is moved to laughter by meditation upon Scripture and the illumination of it's truth. This is not what the "holy laughter" of the charismatic movement is, which is completely driven my mindless emotion and manipulated euphoria, not meditation. I gladly welcome Spurgeon's version, but not the charismatic version.
__________________
Patrick
MDiv, RTS Jackson
Pastor, Grace Presbyterian Church (OPC), Lisbon, NY "He does well, that discourses of Christ; but he does infinitely better, that by experimental knowledge, feeds and lives on Christ." Thomas Brooks. "Let us not please ourselves that we have deep understandings, but let us shew our understandings by our practice." Richard Sibbes | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Puritan Sailor For This Useful Post: | | 
07-05-2008, 03:12 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,334
Thanks: 916
Thanked 5,328 Times in 1,952 Posts
| |
Here is the quotation in context. Clearly Mr. Spurgeon references it as something derogatory to himself, not spiritually edifying. Quote: |
In the last reading which I will give, I shall lay the emphasis upon the first and the last words—“My Grace is sufficient for you.” I have often read in Scripture of the holy laughter of Abraham, when he fell upon his face and laughed. But I do not know that I ever experienced that laughter till a few evenings ago, when this text came home to me with such sacred power as literally to cause me to laugh! I had been looking it through—looking at its original meaning and trying to fathom it, till at last I got hold of it this way—“My Grace,” says Jesus, “is sufficient for you,” and it looked almost as if it were meant to ridicule my unbelief! For surely the Grace of such a One as my Lord Jesus is, indeed, sufficient for so insignificant a being as I am.
|
__________________
Yours sincerely,
"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
| | The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to armourbearer For This Useful Post: | | 
07-05-2008, 07:47 AM
|  | Use Bat Lip Balm | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 6,658
Thanks: 191
Thanked 2,436 Times in 1,347 Posts
| |
I laughed when I got the joke of Psalm 2. There is a time when God fills our mouths with laughter,
Psalm 126:2
. But there is a massive difference between sudden joy in the goodness or greatness of God (which I think is what produces laughter: it's surprised joy), and what I have seen of the "holy laughter" phenomenon, which ought more accurately to be called "infernal laughter". It happened one time to John and Charles Wesley, that first Charles and then John began to laugh uncontrollably while speaking of Scriptural things out on a walk: they concluded that it was a diabolical attack upon them, not a blessing to be embraced.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to py3ak For This Useful Post: | | 
07-05-2008, 08:05 AM
|  | Iron Dramatist | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 6,251
Thanks: 247
Thanked 2,369 Times in 1,238 Posts
| | |
In no way can the shenanigans that went on in Toronto (or Brownsville, or other places) popularly known as "holy laughter" be a) called a "blessing", b) referred to as "holy" or c) considered anything but demonic in nature. One cannot equate Spurgeon's laughter, or that of Abraham's - look at the context of his quotation, and the way in which the laughter itself arose, and you'll see that this isn't some kind of Spirit-filled giggling that the shysters of the "Toronto blessing" were selling people.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to toddpedlar For This Useful Post: | | 
07-05-2008, 05:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: LaFollette, TN
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
| | |
I will try to be careful about how I reply since I have been told not to argue in favor of the phenomenon known as the Toronto blessing.
Perhaps, some Charismatics do experience a deeper sort of laughter that arises from the study of scripture.
A few people have already said that they don't have a problem with Spurgeon's experience since it is brought on because of something that is read in the scripture. This has happened to me a couple of times. Not as a normal thing, but it has happened two or three times, maybe.
For instance, I was reading the following scripture and had this experience:
Now the LORD was gracious to Sarah as he had said, and the LORD did for Sarah what he had promised. Sarah became pregnant and bore a son to Abraham in his old age, at the very time God had promised him. Abraham gave the name Isaac to the son Sarah bore him. When his son Isaac was eight days old, Abraham circumcised him, as God commanded him. Abraham was a hundred years old when his son Isaac was born to him.
Sarah said, "God has brought me laughter, and everyone who hears about this will laugh with me."
Genesis 21:1-6
| 
07-05-2008, 05:47 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: LaFollette, TN
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
| | |
"and it looked almost as if it were meant to ridicule my unbelief!"
What do you think Spurgeon meant by that?
| 
07-05-2008, 05:58 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,061
Thanks: 981
Thanked 2,448 Times in 839 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared104 I will try to be careful about how I reply since I have been told not to argue in favor of the phenomenon known as the Toronto blessing.
Perhaps, some Charismatics do experience a deeper sort of laughter that arises from the study of scripture.
A few people have already said that they don't have a problem with Spurgeon's experience since it is brought on because of something that is read in the scripture. This has happened to me a couple of times. Not as a normal thing, but it has happened two or three times, maybe.
For instance, I was reading the following scripture and had this experience:
Now the LORD was gracious to Sarah as he had said, and the LORD did for Sarah what he had promised. Sarah became pregnant and bore a son to Abraham in his old age, at the very time God had promised him. Abraham gave the name Isaac to the son Sarah bore him. When his son Isaac was eight days old, Abraham circumcised him, as God commanded him. Abraham was a hundred years old when his son Isaac was born to him.
Sarah said, "God has brought me laughter, and everyone who hears about this will laugh with me."
Genesis 21:1-6 | Moderator Voice on:
It is not entirely clear that you are trying to be careful with this post. Could you please clarify that you are not positing a supernatural "laughter" experience? Do you mean this, or do you merely mean that there are funny things in Scripture?
| 
07-05-2008, 06:10 PM
|  | Vanilla Westminsterian | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,519
Thanks: 334
Thanked 3,501 Times in 1,412 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared104 "and it looked almost as if it were meant to ridicule my unbelief!"
What do you think Spurgeon meant by that? | He meant that he began to laugh at himself for his inability to understand the substantive point of the text. He was previously trying to delve, pry and prove the text for some hidden meaning, and the Holy Spirit (through illumination) caued him to understand the text's import on himself.
This obviously had nothing to do with "holy laughter" nor was it a "spiritual experience" in and of itself. The citing blog posts are guilty of being disingenuous, that is, lying, to promote their false theology.
__________________ Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX) Christ Church Blog "The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle) | | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post: | | 
07-05-2008, 06:21 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: LaFollette, TN
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared104 I will try to be careful about how I reply since I have been told not to argue in favor of the phenomenon known as the Toronto blessing.
Perhaps, some Charismatics do experience a deeper sort of laughter that arises from the study of scripture.
A few people have already said that they don't have a problem with Spurgeon's experience since it is brought on because of something that is read in the scripture. This has happened to me a couple of times. Not as a normal thing, but it has happened two or three times, maybe.
For instance, I was reading the following scripture and had this experience:
Now the LORD was gracious to Sarah as he had said, and the LORD did for Sarah what he had promised. Sarah became pregnant and bore a son to Abraham in his old age, at the very time God had promised him. Abraham gave the name Isaac to the son Sarah bore him. When his son Isaac was eight days old, Abraham circumcised him, as God commanded him. Abraham was a hundred years old when his son Isaac was born to him.
Sarah said, "God has brought me laughter, and everyone who hears about this will laugh with me."
Genesis 21:1-6 | Moderator Voice on:
It is not entirely clear that you are trying to be careful with this post. Could you please clarify that you are not positing a supernatural "laughter" experience? Do you mean this, or do you merely mean that there are funny things in Scripture? | I'm not entirely sure that I understand the question, but I will try to answer anyway.
I would understand my experience to be a partial fulfillment of the text. (Of course not the only fulfillment because that would be absurd.)
What I mean is this:
When Sarah says:
"God has brought me laughter, and everyone who hears about this will laugh with me."
I felt like what I was experiencing was exactly what was foretold in the afore-mentioned passage. It did not say that only those who were contemporaneously connected to Sarah would laugh, but simply anyone who hears about it.
Perhaps my understanding of the passage is incorrect. I would be perfectly willing for someone to disprove my experience. After all, experience is subjective.
| 
07-05-2008, 06:37 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,425
Thanks: 2,918
Thanked 6,137 Times in 2,590 Posts
| | |
Jared, experiences aren't disproven. They're either validated or invalidated by the Truth of Scripture. Given the text, the context, etc., I don't think this could be compared to the utter foolishness that is today called "holy laughter."
Whether one has an experience or not is completely irrelevant. Experience doesn't = Truth/Right. We must allow Scripture to be a means of reforming us (via the work of the Spirit in sanctification)? experiences and all.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Joshua For This Useful Post: | | 
07-05-2008, 06:54 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: La Grange Park, IL
Posts: 1,756
Thanks: 281
Thanked 379 Times in 217 Posts
| | |
You don't generally expect a woman who is past age to have children. Sarah laughed because it was "funny" and unexpected. The passage isn't foreshadowing or foretelling that there will be a future "holy laughing" experience in the church. It seems to be a way of her admitting (excusing?) her own unbelief when she laughed at the announcement of her and her 100-year-old husband having a son. You can almost sympathize with her chuckle at the whole situation. So you could say that, whereas Sarah laughed in unbelief, Mary, when announced that she would have a child, simply believed. The text is about the fulfillment of God's promise of providing a seed and, along with that, one woman's struggle to believe it -- and that struggle involved laughing at God's promise and then, finally, laughing when it is actually fulfilled. This puts her laughter into context.
__________________
Casey, Chicagoland, OPC
| 
07-05-2008, 07:27 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared104 Somehow I got started talking about holy laughter on one of my previous threads. As you may know, holy laughter was one of the phenomena which characterized the Toronto revival.
Many churches in the UK embraced the Toronto blessing. In fact there is a Calvinistic Charismatic association of churches known as New Frontiers that is based in Brighton, England that embraced the blessing.
Adrian Warnock, a popular "reformed" charismatic blogger is part of New Frontiers. A couple of years ago, he posted a blog entry concerning the Toronto blessing and Charles Haddon Spurgeon of all people.
The following quote is taken from Spurgeon, which in turn was taken from the pyromaniacs blog via Adrian Warnock's blog.
"My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness."
"I have often read in Scripture of the holy laughter of Abraham, when he fell upon his face and laughed; but I do not know that I ever experienced that laughter till a few evenings ago, when this text came home to me with such sacred power as literally to cause me to laugh . . ."
You can read the rest of Adrian's article here: adrianwarnock.com: Sufficient and Efficient Grace - Spurgeon, Tongues, and the Toronto Blessing |   Sorry I got caught up in the spirit.
__________________
Stephen Welch
PCA Teaching Elder
Nova Scotia :cheers:
| 
07-05-2008, 07:29 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared104 Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Admin's Note:
This can be discussed here, but it will not be advocated or argued for in the affirmative, due to its obvious contra Confessional nature. | I don't mean to be rude by asking this. I was simply wondering. Was Spurgeon contra confessional by mentioning his experience with what he calls "holy laughter". (Spurgeon's words, not mine.) Is this experience that Spurgeon claims to have had contra confessional? |
This guy has obviously been laughing so much he has not taken the time to read Spurgeon, because he did not advocate this revivalist nonsense of the Toronto movement.
| 
07-05-2008, 07:30 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Puritan Sailor I would like to see more of the context of Spurgeon's quote but from what is quoted, it is apparent that Spurgeon is moved to laughter by meditation upon Scripture and the illumination of it's truth. This is not what the "holy laughter" of the charismatic movement is, which is completely driven my mindless emotion and manipulated euphoria, not meditation. I gladly welcome Spurgeon's version, but not the charismatic version.  | Right on, brother.
| 
07-09-2008, 07:54 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Cape Town
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 5 Posts
| | |
It's sad when people misquote others to support their views. That quote by Spurgeon in context is definetly NOT talking about a "holy laughter" for there was nothing really "holy" about Sarah laughing, and God even rebuked her for it, which she denied. It was a sign of unbelief, for it was in a sense saying that the thing God promised was to hard for Him to accomplish because she was past the age of child-bearing. But this giving of Spurgeon's words another meaning is prohibited by the 9th commadment too, bearing false testimony.
__________________
Benjamin
Worship leader
CESA
South Africa, Cape Town
"What is the chief end of man?
Answer: Man's chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy Him forever." | 
07-09-2008, 09:49 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Benjamin It's sad when people misquote others to support their views. That quote by Spurgeon in context is definetly NOT talking about a "holy laughter" for there was nothing really "holy" about Sarah laughing, and God even rebuked her for it, which she denied. It was a sign of unbelief, for it was in a sense saying that the thing God promised was to hard for Him to accomplish because she was past the age of child-bearing. But this giving of Spurgeon's words another meaning is prohibited by the 9th commadment too, bearing false testimony. |
Welcome to the internet age. People often go to the internet to research and get information that is often taken out of context or not always carefully researched. Gary North on Vision Forum's website this week had a great commentary on how not to use the internet for searching for information, especially quotes taken out of context.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |