» Site Navigation | | | |  | | 
09-08-2009, 10:46 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyler Semper Fidelis--could you make the signature disappearance optional? Or would that not help with performance issues? As in, a profile setting, I mean. | Jonathan, allow me to answer on Rich's behalf:
Probably not. It's a practical thing, not a personal one. The reason being is that when a signature shows up for each member's each and every post in a thread it takes up more space and makes the page loads slower, etc. for everybody. | It seems like doing away with the avatars would save more bandwidth than doing away with a few lines of text in the sigs. At least that's my recollection from my dial-up days. Although I do recall at least one sig that had an image in it. |       and take away my entertainment???? tie your lips!  I'm not sure what the big deal is guys!!! Just think of it this way: more ppl will be clicking onto your site to get your name which will give you more visits and then you can start a thread/poll to see who gets the most visits! How fun is that!?!?! | 
09-08-2009, 10:56 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,813
Thanks: 248
Thanked 453 Times in 308 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyler Semper Fidelis--could you make the signature disappearance optional? Or would that not help with performance issues? As in, a profile setting, I mean. | Thanks for the response Josh. It cannot be customized in the User CP. You can turn all signatures and images off from your UserCP but the mod I made was to the postbit template that affects all users. | So the postbit template can't check for individual settings then?
__________________
Jonathan
Audio Engineer
Reformed Anabaptist
Ohio
Moroni's magical glasses of proper interpretation: | 
09-08-2009, 11:17 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,301
Thanks: 373
Thanked 708 Times in 346 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PointingToChrist I can't emphasize enough how convenient and useful it is to have the signature in every post, especially for multi-page threads. Most members don't end their posts with their names, so it's nice to be able to put a real name to a username (as well as congregation) quickly while I'm scrolling through posts.
Moreover, I was writing a reply in another thread, and I had to hit back and scroll up to remember the posters' names that I wished to address.
If I'm in the minority, I'll shut up, but I wanted to express my opinion on it while the subject was hot. Could we have a poll on it?
Thank you,
Mitch |
__________________
Brian Withnell
Deacon, OPC
Leesburg, Virginia
You cannot train for war in the midst of a battle. Prepare before the battle starts; if the battle is long and hard, you will wish you had.
| 
09-08-2009, 11:33 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,036
Thanks: 626
Thanked 675 Times in 440 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by OPC'n | It's their site, they can do what they want with the sigs. Speaking of that, what happened to the image that used to be in yours prior to the most recent name change?
And I don't keep track of visits - just my thank you ratio (given thanks to received thanks).
__________________
Edward
Deacon
PCA
Texas
| 
09-08-2009, 11:54 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward Quote:
Originally Posted by OPC'n | It's their site, they can do what they want with the sigs. Speaking of that, what happened to the image that used to be in yours prior to the most recent name change?
And I don't keep track of visits - just my thank you ratio (given thanks to received thanks). | It's illegal to have an image in your sig so I got rid of it. | 
09-09-2009, 12:27 AM
|  | Vanilla Westminsterian | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,519
Thanks: 334
Thanked 3,501 Times in 1,412 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Withnell Quote:
Originally Posted by PointingToChrist I can't emphasize enough how convenient and useful it is to have the signature in every post, especially for multi-page threads. Most members don't end their posts with their names, so it's nice to be able to put a real name to a username (as well as congregation) quickly while I'm scrolling through posts.
Moreover, I was writing a reply in another thread, and I had to hit back and scroll up to remember the posters' names that I wished to address.
If I'm in the minority, I'll shut up, but I wanted to express my opinion on it while the subject was hot. Could we have a poll on it?
Thank you,
Mitch |  | There is no need for a poll. And there is no need for multiple signatures. You can find all the information you need by clicking on the user's name and opening up his profile. You can do that either in a new window, or a new tab.
This saves bandwidth, and therefore costs, and stops the need to scroll past signature after signature when browsing a thread.
__________________ Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX) Christ Church Blog "The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle) | 
09-09-2009, 11:02 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,036
Thanks: 626
Thanked 675 Times in 440 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco
There is no need for a poll. And there is no need for multiple signatures. You can find all the information you need by clicking on the user's name and opening up his profile. You can do that either in a new window, or a new tab.
This saves bandwidth, and therefore costs, and stops the need to scroll past signature after signature when browsing a thread. | I was going to question the 'saving bandwidth' argument, but it appears that there are well over 1000 characters in your signature block (mostly in the various clickable links including the 4 that are automatically put at the bottom of each post). I can see how that would add up.
| 
09-09-2009, 11:05 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 773
Thanks: 88
Thanked 480 Times in 255 Posts
| | |
I don't know about bandwidth (probably), but it sure shortens the overall length of a thread and shortens the time it takes to scroll down through it all. I'm for it.
[I'm also trying to post recklessly towards 500. Say anything, just get those posts up there.]
| 
09-09-2009, 11:12 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Texas
Posts: 277
Thanks: 100
Thanked 41 Times in 33 Posts
| |
Quote:
[I'm also trying to post recklessly towards 500. Say anything, just get those posts up there.][/QUOTE]
And I thought I was the only one employing this methodology! | 
09-09-2009, 11:14 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 3,031
Thanks: 1,708
Thanked 534 Times in 402 Posts
| | |
Just for the record, I do like the new popup system with pm's. I just received a time-sensitive one I would have missed for at least several minutes, if not entirely, since I was well into a thread and beyond the point of the traditional notification.
| 
09-09-2009, 11:18 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 773
Thanks: 88
Thanked 480 Times in 255 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Baptist-1689er And I thought I was the only one employing this methodology! | Well, since you give me the opportunity to reply, and since I've replied to about everything else that I can reply to, and since this will put me at my goal, I will reply and say "Yes, you're not the only one."
500. How sophomoric of me.
| 
09-09-2009, 11:21 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Texas
Posts: 277
Thanks: 100
Thanked 41 Times in 33 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne Quote:
Originally Posted by Baptist-1689er And I thought I was the only one employing this methodology! | Well, since you give me the opportunity to reply, and since I've replied to about everything else that I can reply to, and since this will put me at my goal, I will reply and say "Yes, you're not the only one."
500. How sophomoric of me. | Congratulations!
| 
09-09-2009, 11:28 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 773
Thanks: 88
Thanked 480 Times in 255 Posts
| | |
That and $5.00 will get you (or me) a cup of coffee!!!
| 
09-09-2009, 11:56 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne I don't know about bandwidth (probably), but it sure shortens the overall length of a thread and shortens the time it takes to scroll down through it all. I'm for it.
[I'm also trying to post recklessly towards 500. Say anything, just get those posts up there.] | Quote:
Originally Posted by Baptist-1689er And I thought I was the only one employing this methodology!  | I knew it! You were giving me too many "thank you's" thought I! | | The Following User Says Thank You to OPC'n For This Useful Post: | |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |