CLARIFICATION: Where there any Reformers who were credo-baptist?

If so, who?

(Even though this is in the "Credo" only forum "Paedos" can answer too)

__________________
jason d.
deacon @ Sovereign Joy Community Church
reformed baptist (LBC.1689)
fort worth (haltom city), texas

Jason, Zwingli seems to have been very temporarily lured by credo-only baptism, but that's about all you'll find. The Protestant Reformation was combating the Anabaptists just as much as it was fighting Rome, so the idea of being aligning yourself with Anabaptist practice would have been unthinkable. Protestant (not Anabaptist) Baptists as we know them descend from English Separatist Congregational churches in the early 1600s, about 100 years after the start of the Reformation.

__________________
Paul Korte
OPC
Flint, MI

They who perceive in themselves discoveries of the divine goodness, so full and absolutely perfect, and who make them the subject of earnest meditation, will never embrace new doctrines, by which the very grace they feel so powerfully in themselves is thrown into the shade. --John Calvin

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

If you look amongst the radical reformers you would find a few, like Thomas Muntzer 1490-1525.

__________________
Jonathan
Deacon (full time)
Independent Reformed Baptist (BCF 1689)
Tinshill Free Church, Leeds, UK.

Well, a little late and more deeply in the English Reformation, Bunyan was a Baptist.

__________________
Ray Nearhood
Layman
Rockdale Community Church (a Reformed Baptist Fellowship)
Conyers, GA
LBC 1689
Husband of Evelyn , Father of Oren and Elijah
"To suppose that whatever God requireth of us that we have power of ourselves to do, is to make the cross and grace of Jesus Christ of none effect." -

Honestly, haven't you people heard about the trail of blood?

KIDDING! KIDDING!

rat brains!

__________________
Jonathan Hunt

Elder holding forth the word of life at:
Cheltenham Evangelical Free Church (Confessionally Based)
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom

Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.
-- Thomas Elsworth

Jason, there were many Reformers who were what are now called credo-baptists.

Conrad Grebel 1498-1526 one-time associate of Zwingli

George Blaurock executed at the stake 1529

Mennno Simons 1496-1561

Felix Manz 1490-1527 executed by drowning

The Zurich Council, recently reformed by Zwingli ordered the execution of the "heretics" who opposed infant baptism. It is not a coincidence that so many of them attained a better resurrection after the Council's ban in 1526.

__________________
Bob, elder, RBC Louisville. 1689 LBCF

"... Of such also, or of those who make a credible profession of being such, all those particular churches consist, which constitute our Lord's visible kingdom. ... Consequently, all the subjects of His government must have spiritual dispositions, , and yield spiritual obedience- obedience proceeding from an enlightened understanding, an awakened conscience, and a renewed heart."- Abraham Booth 1788

John Tombe

__________________

Norseman Moderator

R. Martin Snyder
1689er
http://www.puritanboard.com/blogs/puritancovenanter/

"Our object should not be to have scripture on our side but to be on the side of scripture; and however dear any sentiment may have become by being long entertained, so soon as it is seen to be contrary to the Bible, we must be prepared to abandon it without hesitation."
William Symington

Click to get:Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

To all those who are listing Anabaptist men such as Grebel, Muntzer, etc., -- Yes, there were thousands of Anabaptists during the time of the Reformation. These men, however, were not Protestant reformers. They stand outside Protestant Christianity. Credo-baptists who were within the realms of Christian orthodoxy did not arise until later.

Randy,

I didn't mention men such as Tombes, Smyth, etc., as they all belonged to a later period than the Reformation.

I have to disagree. The historical record shows that such men as Manz, Grebel, Blaurock, Simons and many others initially made common cause with Luther and Zwingli. Such men corresponded with paedobaptist reformers and were initially well received.

To be pedantic, the OP asked;

Not 'where there any ProtestantReformers who were credo-baptist?'

The very fact that they were credobaptist excluded these men from unity with the likes of Zwingli, Luther and Calvin, in the end, however I would suggest that they were still part of the reformation, and indeed the radical reformers were one major tractectory of the reformation.

Jonathan, yes, I realize the OP asked that. I imagined, however, (and perhaps wrongly) that information concerning Anabaptist radicals or the Romanist folks of the Counter-Reformation were not what was being sought, but rather information concerning Credo-baptists who stand in the Protestant tradition.

Also, it was much more than their credobaptist beliefs which excluded them from the Protestants.

Sure, they initially tried. That's not in question. The simple fact is, however, the two movements were going in very different directions, and this was a result of a whole lot more than baptism.

True, what caused their pulling out of the reformation was primarily Luther and Zwingli viewing The Church (similarly to Roman Catholics at the time) as being coextensive with The State.

Indeed it was, I agree, they were seperated by many things, as indeed were Luther, Zwingli, Calvin et al, as well

Don't get me wrong, I understand where you are coming from. However the history of the reformation is not as simple as making clear divisions between the Lutheran reformers, Calvinistic reformers, radical reformers, (counter reformers) and the humanist reformers like (d'Etaples and Erasmus). Often the lines are blurred between these groupings in various ways. In my opinion these are all trajectories of the reformation, at times there was more unity between many of these men, and at times less. I simply wish to point out that the reformation was more then just Calvinistic theologians

Jonathan, there is a vast dissimilitude between differences within a movement, and difference between movements. Whatever individual differences Zwingli may have had with Bucer, or Bullinger with Calvin -- they all consciously understood themselves as standing within the same faith. There was no such awareness between the Reformed and the Anabaptists, or the Lutherans and the Anabaptists. In fact, they were self-consciously set against one another. I might suggest reading some of Bullinger's letters to various city councils on how to deal with the Anabaptists, or the treatises which he wrote against them. It was a different sort of struggle than what the Swiss churches had with the Lutherans.

The Strasbourg church may have been a bit overly lenient at times, especially due to the a-bit-overly irenic character of men such as Capito, but this should not be taken as normative. There also were, indeed, men of great Christian character and virtue among some of the early Anabaptists; but this should not be taken as a token of orthodoxy or acceptance of the movement.

I don't want folk to make more of my case then I am doing all I am saying is that these were all, by definition, reformers, and to limit the term 'reformer' only to those within our own trajectory of the reformation is in my opinion incorrect. Nothing more, nothing less

Moderator Warning:

The OP wants to know if any of the Reformers were credo-baptists. This thread is not intended to degenerate into a discussion of credo v. paedo positions, but the historical question raised in the OP.

__________________
Tim Phillips
Pastor, Midlane Park Presbyterian Church (ARP)
Louisville, KY
Husband of Scottish Lass
My Blog: Gairney Bridge
My Facebook/My Avatar

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

"Wherever the gospel is preached, it is as if God Himself came into the midst of us." ~ John Calvin

That is an interesting statement. Much like we categorize theonomy, big T or little t, perhaps the same can be said of the Reformation. It strains credulity to suggest that the immediate generation of Luther's Reformation was overwhelmingly populated with anything but paedobaptists. Afterall, the disagreements with Rome were not predominatly over the sacraments. The non-anaptist credobaptists, as has been pointed out earlier in this thread, came on the scene at a later date. This is where the small "r" of the Reformation comes into play. It can be argued that the pond ripples of Wittenberg came to incorporate Baptists in due time. From a credo perspective it should have little impact as to whether our Baptist forefathers can trace themselves to 1517. Reformed thought did not end with the passing of the early Reformers. If it did what does that say about the Reformation credo of Semper Reformanda? If we expand the impact of the historical context, can't we say that we continue in the same spirit of the Reformation; always reforming?

__________________
Bill Brown
Elder
Reformed Baptist
Maryland

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Visit my BLOG Theology for the Rest of Us

I would say though it is perhaps anachronistic, to suggests that we should define a reformer by how closely they align with a confession written after they them . For a start it would exclude all the Lutheran reformers

Paul, what is the 'official' beginning and ending of the Reformation and is it the same for Germany, England and Holland etc?

__________________


http://www.villagecommunitychurch.org/


"Preparing a sermon is like cooking a meal. You need pots and pans and utensils, but you don't bring them out to the table where people are eating." Derek Thomas


Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

Ken, I'm not sure there is literally "an official beginning" or end of the Reformation, especially considering that it was not a uniform event, but was spread widely across Europe. In general, we could say that in Germany it had its beginnings in Wittenburg circa 1517/1518, and that it began in Switzerland with the Zurich reforms in the early 1520s. As far as the termination of the period, one could theoretically put forth any number of times, e.g., The Council of Trent, or perhaps the deaths of the generation of the first codifiers of the Protestant system and the transition to the period of early orthodoxy.

When it comes to the English church, there is obviously going to a different set of answers, since (realistically speaking) they weren't reforming the Roman church, but the English church.

Paul, this precisely my point. The Reformation may very well have had eddys and under-currents that make a definitive end date difficult to ascertain. See my previous post.

So just to summarize then, the Anabaptists(and a few random heretics here and there) were about the only ones in the earlier stages of the Reformation who practiced credobaptism, correct?

__________________
Jonathan
Audio Engineer
Reformed Anabaptist
Ohio

Moroni's magical glasses of proper interpretation:

Bill, I believe that I am basically in full agreement with that previous post of yours. Just so long as, in our acknowledgment (on a theological level) that we are always reforming we do not forget that, on an historical level, there was a period called the Reformation, which has passed. Even as we not say that, though we find ourselves continually drawn back to the sources of Classical learning, we are still in The Renaissance, so from an historic perspective we need to acknowledge that the Reformation period did, in fact, end. Otherwise we open ourselves up to anyone's reinterpretation of what constitutes Reformation-era theology and practice.

Correct.

Paul, so one question is when did the Reformation era end? Is it possible that the Reformation era can be divided into stages? As with any major religious or philosophical camp there are the founders, proponents, and apologists. It sometimes takes generations for these to have impact.

It seems to me this is a question best answered in a history book of a few hundred pages, not a forum post.

Bill, this would be the point when I would have to exit, as I would not have anything worth saying. In the course of the discussion which would follow, I don't think I'm intelligent enough to discern when I would be saying something with actual substance, or when I would just be playing word games. For instance, one could argue that what we're really talking about is not "The Reformation," but rather something broader: "The Restoration and Establishment of the True Church." The Reformation, then, could be that first step (the founders) you mentioned, the period of orthodoxy would be the proponents, and we'd be the apologists. I can say that, but I don't really believe it to mean anything; and I fear that's what any input I have would amount to -- Sorry!

In general, a traditional pattern sees the period of Reform, followed by a period of initial codification of Reformation thought (e.g., Calvin, Musculus, Vermigli, etc), followed by early, high and late orthodoxy, etc. This is the pattern in which I think. I'm open to someone showing a better paradigm.

Excellent thread! Thank you all!

__________________
Eric Paulsen
Preaching Deacon, GFCC - Non-Denominational/Independent
Grizzly Flats, California

He must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to rebuke those who contradict it. - Titus 1:9

Just in case this might come up again... I made a blog about whether Credo Baptist were truly reformed or not. If we are speaking in those terms there were no Credo's that were Reformed.

Are Covenantal Baptists Reformed in the Historical Understanding of Reformed Theology - The PuritanBoard

@Jason

I think Martin's blog post is a good read on this topic.

I think we have to answer "Who are The Reformers?" first. What is a requirement to being a "Reformer"? Calvinistic? Covenantal? Church-State Religion? Paedobaptist? What makes one a Reformer?

Also, Reformed Baptist Erroll Hulse claims the Anabaptists as forefathers, thinks the name is derogatory and should be changed to just "Baptists". While Reformed Baptist Tom Nettles does not claim the Anabaptists as forefathers, but starts with Smyth. So there is some disagreement there.



-----Added 9/7/2009 at 09:31:41 EST-----

What's up with everyone's lack of compliance to the PB's signature requirements?

__________________
junior
Deacon
First Baptist Church of Richland Hills, Texas
Owning the 1677 Baptist Confession of Faith, 1680 Orthodox Catechism, & 1693 Baptist Catechism

They tweeked it today. Your full signature will appear only in your first post to each thread.

Thought that might be the case ... it was looking like this all over. Only pain it causes is when your first post is on a different page than the page of the first unread.

__________________
Brian Withnell
Deacon, OPC
Leesburg, Virginia

You cannot train for war in the midst of a battle. Prepare before the battle starts; if the battle is long and hard, you will wish you had.

There is very strong evidence to believe that John Wycliffe was credo. The Martyrs Mirror, first published in Dutch in 1660, states that in 1370 Wycliffe issued an article “declared to militate against infant baptism” (p. 322). Another famous reformer, William Tyndale, might have been credo as well.

History of the Baptists

__________________
Spencer Snow
Crosspoint Fellowship
Joplin, MO

Wretched man that I am! Who will set me free from the body of this death? Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord

Romans 7:24-25

Thanks all, this is very helpful.

Munzer, beyond doubt, was a Lutheran. There is positive proof, though he sometimes "played tricks with the sacraments," that he was never a Baptist (Erbkam, Geschichte der protestantischen Sekten, 494). Possibly he denied at one time the necessity of infant baptism, but he practiced that rite to the end of his life. There is no proof that he was ever rebaptized or in any way was ever connected with the Baptist movement. "He was not baptized," says Frank, "as I am trustworthily informed" (Frank, Chronik, 493b).

In the year 1523 he put forth a book for the direction of God's service (Munzer, Ordnung und berechnung des Teutschen, 6), and in this book he prescribes infant baptism. In 1525, in a letter to Oecolampadius he defends infant baptism and held to its practice (Herzog, Das Leben Job. Oekolampads, I. 302. Basel, 1843). That he was never a Baptist is quite plain (Sekendorf, Historia Lutheranismi, I. 192; II 13). Frank says: "He himself never baptized, as I am credibly informed" (Frank, Chronik, clxxiiib), and adds he was never a Baptist. With this statement modern scholars agree (Marshall, The Baptists. The Encyclopedia Britannica, III.370, Cambridge, 1910).

It may be concluded that Munzer was a follower and friend of Luther; he practiced infant baptism to the close of his life; he was never in the practice of Anabaptism; he was opposed by the Baptist leaders; held doctrinal views radically different from the Baptists on the use of the sword; and he was never intimately associated with the Baptists.

A History of the Baptists, John T. Christian | The Reformed Reader

__________________
* Ralph Wilms (7-10-1974)
* Church : Christengemeente Roermond (The Netherlands)
* 1729 Goat Yard Declaration of Faith & 1646 Baptist Confession of faith

"To our mind, either everything or nothing must be held in subjection to the will and providence of God. Even the wickedness of ungodly men is restricted by predestination, so that the wrath of man shall praise God, and the remainder of wrath He will restrain." - GILBERT BEEBE (1800-1881)

Mayflower,

Thanks for your correction, I will look into it as best I can. I am no expert on Muntzer. I believe Bullinger claimed that Muntzer was the first anabpatist about 35 years after his death. Didn't the Hutterian Anabptists claim him as one of their forefathers as well? This is where my statements came from

From what I have read I am fairly sure that Muntzer alienated himself from lutheranism though, his polemical works against the Wittenburg reformers, and Luther would suggest that see for example in Chapter 23 of Reformation Theologians by Gottfried Seebas