» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 103 | | 24 members and 79 guests | | Backwoods Presbyterian, Bern, buggy, DD2009, dgordonwood, Jack K, jogri17, jollymommy4, Lady of the Lake, Marrow Man, Michael Turner, R. Scott Clark, raekwon, sastark, TaylorOtwell, Titus35, Tripel, ubermadchen, westminken | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
03-08-2009, 02:52 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 913
Thanked 535 Times in 330 Posts
| | | Presbyterian attending Baptist Churches?
I know of plenty of credobaptists who attend PCA, OPC churches etc. Actually I'll go a step further I've met several credobaptists who are very influential and in many instances are the backbone of PCA churches in spite of the fact that they cannot hold Church Office.
But are there any Presbyterian/paedobaptist folks attending Baptistic or non-denominational (baptistic) Calvinistic Churches on PB? If so what do you do when you have children who need to be baptized?
__________________
Wayne Whitmer
Member, Rio Rancho OPC
Albuquerque, NM
| | The Following User Says Thank You to whitway For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 05:19 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Bordentown, NJ, 08505
Posts: 941
Thanks: 226
Thanked 609 Times in 295 Posts
| | |
My pastor used to work (CCEF counselor type stuff) at a Reformed and Baptist church that had a good reputation all around and attracted many people including paedos. He said the church just sent them over to the closest PCA if they had a baby they wanted baptized. The PCA church was fine with it since they knew the pastor would only send over believing parents. (The quality of the teaching and doctrine at that time was actually far better at the Baptist church; the local PCA sermons were rumored to consist of watered over World Magazine articles).
I would guess John Piper must draw some paedos, I wonder what they do out there......
__________________
Lynnie
PCA
Central NJ
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lynnie For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 05:28 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Boothwyn, PA
Posts: 1,928
Thanks: 133
Thanked 595 Times in 356 Posts
| | |
Wouldn't the fact that they don't properly administer the sacraments mean that they aren't a true church?
__________________
Larry Bray
Elder - Reformed Presbyterian Church of Boothwyn, PCA
Boothwyn, PA - http://www.rpcb.org/ Free Online Reformed Seminary - http://www.tnars.net
-----------------------------------------------------
Christian ritual costs nothing and is worth nothing. True Christian religion costs all that we have and is worth everything.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to larryjf For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 05:31 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: wandering around
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 155
Thanked 315 Times in 228 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by whitway But are there any Presbyterian/paedobaptist folks attending Baptistic or non-denominational (baptistic) Calvinistic Churches on PB? If so what do you do when you have children who need to be baptized? | Wait until they are able to join themselves to a local presbyterian church.
__________________
Matt
Reformed Baptist
Christ Community Church
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sans nom For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 05:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 1,434
Thanks: 493
Thanked 379 Times in 240 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by whitway I know of plenty of credobaptists who attend PCA, OPC churches etc. Actually I'll go a step further I've met several credobaptists who are very influential and in many instances are the backbone of PCA churches in spite of the fact that they cannot hold Church Office.
But are there any Presbyterian/paedobaptist folks attending Baptistic or non-denominational (baptistic) Calvinistic Churches on PB? If so what do you do when you have children who need to be baptized? | I don't know if there any on the PB, but there are some at my church. (SBC) We don't baptize children until a profession of faith is made. Sometimes the families take their children to a local PCUSA church just for that. Other times they wait until they go on vacation and do it at their home church. (Military families.) There is a local Episcopal church pastored by a pastor from the OPC. Most presbyterians attending Baptistic churches in town are unaware of this. Any I meet I let them know that they have that option as well. Hope this helps.
__________________
Chris Thomas | SBC-Founders | Fairbanks, AK "Whatever the cause, the Calvinists were the only fighting Protestants. It was they whose faith gave them courage to stand up for the Reformation. In England, Scotland, France, Holland, they,... did the work, and but for them the Reformation would have been crushed... If it had not been for Calvinists,... and whatever you like to call them, the Pope and Philip would have won, and we should either be Papists or Socialists." ~ Sir John Skelton | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JohnGill For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 06:24 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 913
Thanked 535 Times in 330 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnie My pastor used to work (CCEF counselor type stuff) at a Reformed and Baptist church that had a good reputation all around and attracted many people including paedos. He said the church just sent them over to the closest PCA if they had a baby they wanted baptized. The PCA church was fine with it since they knew the pastor would only send over believing parents. (The quality of the teaching and doctrine at that time was actually far better at the Baptist church; the local PCA sermons were rumored to consist of watered over World Magazine articles).
I would guess John Piper must draw some paedos, I wonder what they do out there...... | Excellent Points and hitting home as to why I asked the question in the first place. -----Added 3/8/2009 at 06:24:57 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by larryjf Wouldn't the fact that they don't properly administer the sacraments mean that they aren't a true church? | I guess that's matter of debate however I guess I'm asking those who do believe that a Calvinistic Baptist Church is a True Church.
| 
03-08-2009, 06:41 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Janesville, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,130
Thanks: 1,483
Thanked 211 Times in 134 Posts
| | |
I attend a Reformed Baptist church but will switch once I have children if not before....
__________________ ~ Charles Stephen Barribeau ~ Christ Presbyterian Church , OPC (They sing alot of Psalms!) Original Westminster Standards (I need to study more...) The Puritans were best! Also... I NEED TO READ MORE!!! Philipians1:29(KJV) For unto you it is given in the behalf of Christ, not only to believe on him, but also to suffer for his sake; Janesville, Wisconsin (In the fellowship of Bob Vigneault and Matt+Megan Meisberger) | 
03-08-2009, 06:51 PM
|  | Meum cerebrum nocet | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,512
Thanks: 1,769
Thanked 3,538 Times in 1,717 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by larryjf Wouldn't the fact that they don't properly administer the sacraments mean that they aren't a true church? | Sorry, Larry, those of us in Baptist churches, aka synagogues of Satan usually just sit around engaging in occult blood ceremonies, practicing cannibalism, chanting vain repetitious mantras, etc.  So much for the line that Presbyterians accept Baptists but that Baptists don't accept Presbyterians. Quote: |
I guess that's matter of debate however I guess I'm asking those who do believe that a Calvinistic Baptist Church is a True Church.
| Indeed, Wayne, indeed.
Since one of the mods recently suggested that I might be a crypto-Presbyterian who hasn't come out of the closet yet, you cannot imagine how confusing this is to one's identity! It is sort of like being a Texas rancher at a PETA convention, Jesse Jackson at a KKK rally, Hugh Heffner at a NOW gathering, or an Arminian Pentecostal on the PB.
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Last edited by DMcFadden; 03-08-2009 at 09:06 PM.
| | The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to DMcFadden For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 06:54 PM
|  | Uncommon Denominator | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 11,944
Thanks: 2,001
Thanked 3,299 Times in 1,656 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by larryjf Wouldn't the fact that they don't properly administer the sacraments mean that they aren't a true church? | Larry, I still consider a Presbyterian church a true church even though they don't properly administer the sacraments.
Actually, most Presbyterians I know consider Baptists to be in error regarding baptism, but they don't deny we're a true church. That arguments cuts both ways.
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Herald For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 07:14 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,667
Thanks: 2,140
Thanked 971 Times in 581 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Herald Quote:
Originally Posted by larryjf Wouldn't the fact that they don't properly administer the sacraments mean that they aren't a true church? | Larry, I still consider a Presbyterian church a true church even though they don't properly administer the sacraments.
Actually, most Presbyterians I know consider Baptists to be in error regarding baptism, but they don't deny we're a true church. That arguments cuts both ways. | I know that in our denomination (URCNA) there are some people and leaders who don't believe that baptists are saved - perhaps because of the counter-reformation - who knows. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who doesn't believe that Spurgeon, Gill and Pink were saved needs a lot more than his head examined.  These people need to be reminded that it was paedos who murdered baptists, not the other way around.
I would rather sit under strong meaty preaching from a reformed baptist than sermonettes for Christianettes preached by many presbys any day. I'm not saying all presbyterian preachers preach that way, but I do tend to favor more baptist preachers than presbys.
As far as baptism goes, A baptist brother of ours said he'd rather see an infant be baptized and grow up to accept the promises of the covenant and live a godly life than see a young man get baptized and live like the Devil. Likewise, I'd rather see a young person get baptized upon making a profession of faith and live in a godly manner than see a young child who's been baptized in infancy take his baptism for granted. | | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Knoxienne For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 07:19 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 1,434
Thanks: 493
Thanked 379 Times in 240 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxienne Quote:
Originally Posted by Herald Quote:
Originally Posted by larryjf Wouldn't the fact that they don't properly administer the sacraments mean that they aren't a true church? | Larry, I still consider a Presbyterian church a true church even though they don't properly administer the sacraments.
Actually, most Presbyterians I know consider Baptists to be in error regarding baptism, but they don't deny we're a true church. That arguments cuts both ways. | I know that in our denomination (URCNA) there are some people and leaders who don't believe that baptists are saved - perhaps because of the counter-reformation - who knows. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who doesn't believe that Spurgeon, Gill and Pink were saved needs a lot more than his head examined.  These people need to be reminded that it was paedos who murdered baptists, not the other way around.
I would rather sit under strong meaty preaching from a reformed baptist than sermonettes for Christianettes preached by many presbys any day. I'm not saying all presbyterian preachers preach that way, but I do tend to favor more baptist preachers than presbys.
As far as baptism goes, A baptist brother of ours said he'd rather see an infant be baptized and grow up to accept the promises of the covenant and live a godly life than see a young man get baptized and live like the Devil. Likewise, I'd rather see a young person get baptized upon making a profession of faith and live in a godly manner than see a young child who's been baptized in infancy take his baptism for granted.  | I'd expect such a wise post from you being married to Theognome.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JohnGill For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 07:38 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Boothwyn, PA
Posts: 1,928
Thanks: 133
Thanked 595 Times in 356 Posts
| |
There's a big difference between saying that a baptist church is not a true church and saying that baptists aren't saved (which i never said). The marks of a true church are not the same as the marks of a true christian.
The marks of a true church are: - Rightly preaching the Word of God
- Rightly administering the sacraments
- Rightly practicing discipline
The Belgic Confession states it this way (article 29): Quote: |
The true church can be recognized if it has the following marks: The church engages in the pure preaching of the gospel; it makes use of the pure administration of the sacraments as Christ instituted them; it practices church discipline for correcting faults. In short, it governs itself according to the pure Word of God, rejecting all things contrary to it and holding Jesus Christ as the only Head. By these marks one can be assured of recognizing the true church-- and no one ought to be separated from it.
| | | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to larryjf For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 07:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,667
Thanks: 2,140
Thanked 971 Times in 581 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by larryjf There's a big difference between saying that a baptist church is not a true church and saying that baptists aren't saved (which i never said). The marks of a true church are not the same as the marks of a true christian.
The marks of a true church are: - Rightly preaching the Word of God
- Rightly administering the sacraments
- Rightly practicing discipline
The Belgic Confession states it this way (article 29): Quote: |
The true church can be recognized if it has the following marks: The church engages in the pure preaching of the gospel; it makes use of the pure administration of the sacraments as Christ instituted them; it practices church discipline for correcting faults. In short, it governs itself according to the pure Word of God, rejecting all things contrary to it and holding Jesus Christ as the only Head. By these marks one can be assured of recognizing the true church-- and no one ought to be separated from it.
| | Larry - Please forgive me if you thought I was accusing you of saying something you did not - I was not reacting to your words at all - just to the ideas believed by many in my denomination - people who would also say the baptist church is not a true church. I should have been clearer.  | 
03-08-2009, 08:03 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Boothwyn, PA
Posts: 1,928
Thanks: 133
Thanked 595 Times in 356 Posts
| | |
Toni,
I appreciate that. I may have taken it the wrong way as i did think it was directed towards me. -----Added 3/8/2009 at 08:03:28 EST-----
Since no church practices the 3 marks perfectly the question that should actually be asked is how "rightly" these marks must be carried out.
If only the understanding of what the Baptism represents is what's needed to rightly administer the sacrament then both Baptists and Presbys meet the requirement.
But if those to whom the sacrament is withheld from is important, then one of us does not meet the requirement.
Just consider for a moment that it is wrong to keep infants from being baptized, then we could draw an analogy by excluding a different group of people to see if we would have the same spirit of brotherhood considering the sacrament.
So what if African-Americans were withheld from the sacrament...would it be a true church? If not, then it does matter who's withheld from the sacrament in defining a true church.
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to larryjf For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 09:01 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | |
wow
| 
03-08-2009, 09:07 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Browns Mills NJ
Posts: 2,326
Thanks: 621
Thanked 703 Times in 405 Posts
| |
As much as we argue the point, we are going to find out that we BOTH baptized un-elect on the Day.
__________________
Rich Koster
1689'er
Browns Mills NJ USA Often Goofy Reformed Eccentric
Romans 7:14-25
| 
03-08-2009, 09:18 PM
|  | Use Bat Lip Balm | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 6,665
Thanks: 192
Thanked 2,439 Times in 1,350 Posts
| | |
[Moderator]The question is about Presbyterians attending Baptist churches, not about the status of Baptist churches. Keep your posts on topic or watch them go up in smoke.[/Moderator]
| | The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to py3ak For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 09:25 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 1,434
Thanks: 493
Thanked 379 Times in 240 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by py3ak [Moderator]The question is about Presbyterians attending Baptist churches, not about the status of Baptist churches. Keep your posts on topic or watch them go up in smoke.[/Moderator] | Elijah?
I remember a Joel Beeke sermon that mentioned credos going to paedos churches and vice versa. He might be able to answer the question if you email him. Or Pastor VanderZwaag.
| 
03-08-2009, 09:31 PM
|  | Meum cerebrum nocet | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,512
Thanks: 1,769
Thanked 3,538 Times in 1,717 Posts
| | |
During my pastoral years, I had several Presbyterians who attended our church. In my limited experience, congregations in some areas do not offer a plethora of good options. The call to be part of the visible Body of Christ trumps the specific details of some of our intra-mural disputes. A solidly Calvinistic Baptist would probably be an improvement over the tepid teaching of some mainline Presbyterians. And, I would MUCH rather be part of a confessional Presbyterian church (even if they wouldn't let me teach) than attend a liberal American Baptist congregation.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DMcFadden For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 09:35 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 913
Thanked 535 Times in 330 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden During my pastoral years, I had several Presbyterians who attended our church. In my limited experience, congregations in some areas do not offer a plethora of good options. The call to be part of the visible Body of Christ trumps the specific details of some of our intra-mural disputes. A solidly Calvinistic Baptist would probably be an improvement over the tepid teaching of some mainline Presbyterians. And, I would MUCH rather be part of a confessional Presbyterian church (even if they wouldn't let me teach) than attend a liberal American Baptist congregation. | | 
03-08-2009, 09:43 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Boothwyn, PA
Posts: 1,928
Thanks: 133
Thanked 595 Times in 356 Posts
| | |
Out of deference to the moderator i will not be posting "off topic" on this thread. If the mod deems it to be "on topic" then i will be more than happy to continue.
| 
03-08-2009, 09:43 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Browns Mills NJ
Posts: 2,326
Thanks: 621
Thanked 703 Times in 405 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden During my pastoral years, I had several Presbyterians who attended our church. In my limited experience, congregations in some areas do not offer a plethora of good options. The call to be part of the visible Body of Christ trumps the specific details of some of our intra-mural disputes. A solidly Calvinistic Baptist would probably be an improvement over the tepid teaching of some mainline Presbyterians. And, I would MUCH rather be part of a confessional Presbyterian church (even if they wouldn't let me teach) than attend a liberal American Baptist congregation. | I believe that I am a solid Calvinistic Baptist. I attend a liberal AB Church. They let me teach and I don't hold back. I ran some "accept and affirm" people off already. However, I do have a small audience and agreement with part of them. Should I stop or continue sharing the doctrines of grace? Should I start this on a new thread?
Last edited by Rich Koster; 03-08-2009 at 09:46 PM.
Reason: add a question
| 
03-08-2009, 09:46 PM
|  | Pastor | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Beloit, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,167
Thanks: 1,467
Thanked 1,422 Times in 1,062 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnGill Quote:
Originally Posted by py3ak [Moderator]The question is about Presbyterians attending Baptist churches, not about the status of Baptist churches. Keep your posts on topic or watch them go up in smoke.[/Moderator] | Elijah? | It took me a while but I got it!
__________________ Ivan R. Schoen, B.A., M.A., M.L.I.S.
Pastor of Maranatha Baptist Church (SBC)
Poplar Grove, IL, USA http://maranatha-sbc.org | | The Following User Says Thank You to Ivan For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 09:48 PM
|  | Meum cerebrum nocet | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,512
Thanks: 1,769
Thanked 3,538 Times in 1,717 Posts
| | |
Rich,
My pilgrimage is quite different from yours. I was a pastoral leader in ABC circles and served on a number of boards at the local, regional, and national levels. When my region withdrew, I naturally went with them. That is not to say that you are not having an impact on your neck of the woods. NJ is a funny area: it has both liberal AND conservative ABC congregations and a conservative Executive Minister of the region. Go figure! I'm not judging the validity of your staying in your church. At this point in life, it would not be possible for me, however.
| 
03-08-2009, 10:17 PM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,835
Thanks: 2,454
Thanked 6,035 Times in 2,448 Posts
| |
I attended a Baptist Church for 3 years in Okinawa primarily because there was no choice but, in the end, felt very privileged to have attended there in the Providence of God. It helped me to stop labeling people and to start thinking of people as Christians who are in need of patience and bearing with them. I never taught against credo-Baptism though, by the providence of God, one of the former couples that attended there now attends the same PCA Church here in VA. I taught about baptism about 3 weeks ago on the baptism of their infant daughter: Baptism - A teaching on its meaning and significance
In my case, we had our two children born in Okinawa baptized when we were on vacation for Sophia or when we returned to the States with Calvin.
| 
03-08-2009, 10:37 PM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,111
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 2,444 Times in 1,224 Posts
| | |
My NT/Greek prof at Seminary (he teaches at Covenant now) received his Ph.D. from the University of Aberdeen. One day before class, someone asked him if he belonged to the Church of Scotland while he was over there. He responded that no, he worshiped at the Baptist church.
This prof was straight from Scottish stock. I would suspect his blood ran blue. So it puzzled everyone when he said this. Then he told us why. He asked, in a congregation of about 150, how many elders should a church have. A few numbers were called out (5? 8? 10?). Then he told us the answer -- 30. This church of 150 had 30 elders, 10 of which (he said) might have been Christian. Every lawyer or accountant in the congregation was made an elder, it seems. Very pragmatic and ungodly. So the Baptist church is where he went for those 2 or 3 years.
I'm not sure if any of his children were born there or, if so, what he did with regard to their baptisms.
| 
03-08-2009, 10:37 PM
|  | Uncommon Denominator | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 11,944
Thanks: 2,001
Thanked 3,299 Times in 1,656 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by larryjf There's a big difference between saying that a baptist church is not a true church and saying that baptists aren't saved (which i never said). The marks of a true church are not the same as the marks of a true christian.
The marks of a true church are: - Rightly preaching the Word of God
- Rightly administering the sacraments
- Rightly practicing discipline
The Belgic Confession states it this way (article 29): Quote: |
The true church can be recognized if it has the following marks: The church engages in the pure preaching of the gospel; it makes use of the pure administration of the sacraments as Christ instituted them; it practices church discipline for correcting faults. In short, it governs itself according to the pure Word of God, rejecting all things contrary to it and holding Jesus Christ as the only Head. By these marks one can be assured of recognizing the true church-- and no one ought to be separated from it.
| | This line of reasoning is not helpful at all. It only serves to pit Presbyterians and Baptists against each other. Presbyterians can say that Baptist churches aren't true churches and vice versa. Both groups will stand on their respective confessions waving their true church flag and fail to see they've missed the big picture. "I'm so glad that I don't go to THAT church. After all, they're not a true church." It smacks of theological hubris cloaked in confessional conviction.
The PB recognizes a plurality of denominations that fit the criteria of a true church. We are bound together on this board by agreement with accepted confessions. It would be helpful to keep in mind that some paedo-communionists would question whether those paedo churches that refuse paedo communion are true churches. Interesting how the worm turns.
Debating the administration of the sacraments is fair game. We do that all the time on the PB.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Herald For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 10:43 PM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,111
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 2,444 Times in 1,224 Posts
| | |
It might be helpful to acknowledge, with regard to the administration of the sacraments, that Rome has a view of baptism that is regenerative (as in the washing away of original sin) and a view of communion that is rank idolatry. The Reformers were primarily railing against these views. Neither Baptists nor Presbyteries, for their disagreements, come anywhere near these destructive teachings.
| | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Marrow Man For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2009, 11:00 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Boothwyn, PA
Posts: 1,928
Thanks: 133
Thanked 595 Times in 356 Posts
| |
Bill,
I'm sorry that i can't comment on your post due to the moderator's post. If you are interested in my thoughts on your post please PM me.
I hope you understand. -----Added 3/8/2009 at 11:00:16 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by Marrow Man It might be helpful to acknowledge, with regard to the administration of the sacraments, that Rome has a view of baptism that is regenerative (as in the washing away of original sin) and a view of communion that is rank idolatry. The Reformers were primarily railing against these views. Neither Baptists nor Presbyteries, for their disagreements, come anywhere near these destructive teachings. | I spoke to this here... Presbyterian attending Baptist Churches? |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |