Closed Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: My Heart is Breaking

  1. #1
    CharlieJ's Avatar
    CharlieJ is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Posts
    951
    Thanks
    102
    Thanked 583 Times in 308 Posts

    My Heart is Breaking

    Friends, I am struck by the hollowness of Dispensational theology, at least as taught by some. I should know by now that it is faulty, but it truly hurts me when something this erroneous is believed by Christians. I was in a conversation with Scott Aniol, a graduate of Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary and an influential Fundamentalist conference speaker, and we were discussing the faith of Old Testament saints. After some miscommunications, we clarified the issue. Here's how the conversation ended (with slight editing for clarity).

    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie
    1. Is there any definite unchanging content of saving faith, other than its being directed toward Yahweh?

    2. Is saving faith necessarily Messianic, that is, believing that personal sin will be/was dealt with by a Messiah?

    I answer yes to both. Really, #2 is my answer to #1. If you cannot affirm #2, then to my perspective, that is "multiple ways of salvation" even if professed otherwise. One cannot establish a consistent Biblical basis for why man should be justified by any sort of faith. If there is no Christ in the faith, it makes the OT religion an essentially different religion from ours.
    Quote Originally Posted by Scott
    1. No.
    2. No.

    I would suggest, my brother, that you are naively ignoring the nature of progressive revelation and reading NT revelation back into the OT.
    Now that's just...sad. Most Dispensational laypeople are Bible-conscious enough not to go to the lengths that their scholarship goes to.
    Charlie Johnson
    Downtown Presbyterian Church (PCA)
    M.A. Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary
    My Blog: Sacra Pagina
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  2. #2
    toddpedlar's Avatar
    toddpedlar is offline. Iron Dramatist
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Decorah, IA
    Posts
    6,699
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 2,655 Times in 1,364 Posts
    He apparently ignored Genesis 3.
    Todd K. Pedlar
    member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA
    My Blog: In Principio Deus
    Podcast I co-host: Covenant Radio

    "As God did not at first choose you because you were high, He will not now forsake you because you are low."
    John Flavel in Keeping the Heart

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  3. #3
    rpavich's Avatar
    rpavich is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    284
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
    Ok...
    I'm not Seminary trained and don't understand this issue very well.

    Can I ask a few questions?

    1.) What's the problem with "progressive revelation?" Isn't that what actually happened?

    2.) Can you give me the overall primer on what dispensational theology teaches?

    3.) Can you give me the nutshell version of why it's wrong?

    thanks,
    bob
    Robert
    Lay Person
    PCA
    West Virginia
    Go share your faith
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  4. #4
    Marrow Man's Avatar
    Marrow Man is offline. Drunk with Powder
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    8,105
    Thanks
    3,188
    Thanked 2,885 Times in 1,430 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by toddpedlar View Post
    He apparently ignored Genesis 3.
    As well as Galatians 3.
    Tim Phillips
    Pastor, Midlane Park Presbyterian Church (ARP)
    Louisville, KY
    Husband of Scottish Lass
    Father of Grace Cameron Phillips
    My Blog: Gairney Bridge
    My Facebook/My Avatar

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

    "Wherever the gospel is preached, it is as if God Himself came into the midst of us." ~ John Calvin
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  5. #5
    Scott1's Avatar
    Scott1 is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    6,007
    Thanks
    2,377
    Thanked 2,292 Times in 1,371 Posts
    After several years, a couple things jumped out about dispensationalism. They became clear.

    One is that dispensationalism sees an eternal separation of people with some Jewish ethnicity from the Body of Christ (though many, recently, now say they do eventually get together in the state of glory). Think about how incongruous that is with Scripture, particularly as you read through the Book of Acts!

    Another is that dispensationalism tends to interpret the New Testament in light of the Old Testament. Reformed Theology, interprets the Old Testament in light of the "last word," the New Testament. So while a natural reading of the Bible for us shows things being clarified and becoming more explicit as Gods' Word goes forward in time, Dispensationalists are limiting the newer to the lesser clarity of the Old. And then, they only do that with "prophecy"- everything else works the way we (reformed) view it.
    Scott
    PCA
    North Carolina



    "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
    Hebrews 10:23
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  6. #6
    Spinningplates2's Avatar
    Spinningplates2 is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Lake Zurich, Illinois
    Posts
    458
    Thanks
    97
    Thanked 136 Times in 85 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rpavich View Post
    Ok...
    I'm not Seminary trained and don't understand this issue very well.

    Can I ask a few questions?

    1.) What's the problem with "progressive revelation?" Isn't that what actually happened?

    2.) Can you give me the overall primer on what dispensational theology teaches?

    3.) Can you give me the nutshell version of why it's wrong?

    thanks,
    bob
    The biggest problem is that God was surprised that the Jews did not accept our Lord Jesus as the Massiah so He (God the Father) had to insert a 'quick fix' by establishing a "Church Age." This is a fact and the athers of the dispensational movement all taught this as fact.
    Alan Hughes
    PCA
    Lake Zurich, Illinois

    If you think I'm a Hyper-Calvinist, God planned that thought before the foundation of the Earth. If you try to tell me that God only planned some things and not all things, then your problem is with God not me.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  7. #7
    toddpedlar's Avatar
    toddpedlar is offline. Iron Dramatist
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Decorah, IA
    Posts
    6,699
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 2,655 Times in 1,364 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Marrow Man View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by toddpedlar View Post
    He apparently ignored Genesis 3.
    As well as Galatians 3.
    and a host of others... I just always go to Genesis 3 when someone suggests some amorphous "faith in God" that was practiced by the Old Testament faithful. It seems ludicrous to me that any could claim any other (but then we are in a dispensationalism-infested age and nation).
    Todd K. Pedlar
    member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA
    My Blog: In Principio Deus
    Podcast I co-host: Covenant Radio

    "As God did not at first choose you because you were high, He will not now forsake you because you are low."
    John Flavel in Keeping the Heart

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  8. #8
    toddpedlar's Avatar
    toddpedlar is offline. Iron Dramatist
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Decorah, IA
    Posts
    6,699
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 2,655 Times in 1,364 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rpavich View Post
    Ok...
    I'm not Seminary trained and don't understand this issue very well.

    Can I ask a few questions?

    1.) What's the problem with "progressive revelation?" Isn't that what actually happened?
    Nothing at all is wrong with progressive revelation. However, the Messiah was promised on the day of the Fall. Everything progresses from that promise - so to argue that there was no such thing as "faith in the one to come" strikes at the heart of redemptive history.

    The other questions I'll let others tackle as I should really get back to work
    Todd K. Pedlar
    member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA
    My Blog: In Principio Deus
    Podcast I co-host: Covenant Radio

    "As God did not at first choose you because you were high, He will not now forsake you because you are low."
    John Flavel in Keeping the Heart

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to toddpedlar For This Useful Post:

    Jimmy the Greek (06-29-2009)

  10. #9
    a mere housewife's Avatar
    a mere housewife is offline. Hench Wench
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    5,126
    Thanks
    1,996
    Thanked 2,033 Times in 1,015 Posts
    I have some acquaintance with Scott Aniol: do you think something by B. B. Warfield would be helpful to him re: progressive revelation and faith in Christ? I think Warfield is highly esteemed by most graduates of Detroit Theological Seminary and Warfield is great on that topic.
    Heidi Zartman
    Indianapolis, IN

    Whom have I in heaven but thee? and there is none upon earth that I desire beside thee.
    My flesh and my heart faileth: but God is the strength of my heart, and my portion for ever.

    An anni babtist is a thing I am not a member of; I am a Pisplikan just now & a Prisbeteren at Kercaldy my native town which though dirty is clein in the country . . . (Marjorie Fleming)
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  11. #10
    Wannabee's Avatar
    Wannabee is offline. Obi Wan Kenobi
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Escanaba, MI
    Posts
    3,590
    Thanks
    1,414
    Thanked 1,355 Times in 666 Posts
    Hebrews 11 comes to mind as well.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spinningplates2 View Post
    The biggest problem is that God was surprised that the Jews did not accept our Lord Jesus as the Massiah so He (God the Father) had to insert a 'quick fix' by establishing a "Church Age." This is a fact and the athers of the dispensational movement all taught this as fact.
    This is not dispensationalism. It is Arminianism. Dispensationalism can be Arminian, but is not necessarily. I don't even know if I'd lump this in with Arminianism necessarily, but maybe more along the lines of Open Theism.

    Much of the problem in these discussions is the polarization fostered by either side, if they have any understanding of the other. Must understanding is incomplete, even for those who once "were" of the other persuasion. Just because someone was taught something in a dispensational church does not make it necessarily dispensationalism any more than a Presby church teaching baptismal regeneration represents this perspective for all Presbies. Neither side has a monopoly on abominations and heresies.

    Rather than focusing on the different aspects that you perceive in the theological grid, concentrate on the soteriology involved and the implications involved when the very character and attributes of God are in view. If you come at it from this perspective without either forcing a grid nor imposing one then you can start on common ground with a common desire to understand truth together. You can more readily steer the conversation along biblical lines, without bringing in much that can easily cause antagonism. Just be a brother in Christ helping another brother grow their his theological understanding. Each step brings you both closer to the truth as you grow in your understanding through teaching and perhaps through seeing another man's mind in a way you hadn't considered before. Be a blessing through love, gentleness, patience and a true desire to love and understand.
    For the Glory of our King,
    Joe Johnson
    Slave of Christ, husband, father, Preacherboy at Cornerstone Community Church, Escanaba, MI. and TMS graduate. Personal website - SoundLife.org
    I do not know, and I do not say, that a person cannot believe in Revelation and in evolution, too, for a man may believe that which is infinitely wise and also that which is only asinine. ~ CHS
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  12. #11
    blhowes's Avatar
    blhowes is offline. Puritanboard Professor
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Framingham, MA
    Posts
    5,871
    Thanks
    507
    Thanked 381 Times in 194 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Wannabee View Post
    Hebrews 11 comes to mind as well.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spinningplates2 View Post
    The biggest problem is that God was surprised that the Jews did not accept our Lord Jesus as the Massiah so He (God the Father) had to insert a 'quick fix' by establishing a "Church Age." This is a fact and the athers of the dispensational movement all taught this as fact.
    This is not dispensationalism. It is Arminianism. Dispensationalism can be Arminian, but is not necessarily. I don't even know if I'd lump this in with Arminianism necessarily, but maybe more along the lines of Open Theism.
    To what extent, though, is that statement true (ignoring the bolded parts). The dispensationalism I was taught taught:

    1. God offered the kingdom to the Jews.
    2. The Jews rejected the Kingdom/Messiah, so the kingdom was postponed.
    3. The church was established as a parenthesis in God's plan.

    God wasn't surprised by any of this, but (according to what I was taught, based on Eph 3:2-6) the OT Jews would have been very surprised.
    B.Howes
    Framingham, MA
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  13. #12
    Semper Fidelis's Avatar
    Semper Fidelis is offline. 2 Timothy 2:24-25
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Northern Virgnia
    Posts
    18,626
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    2,644
    Thanked 6,662 Times in 2,682 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Scott
    1. No.
    2. No.

    I would suggest, my brother, that you are naively ignoring the nature of progressive revelation and reading NT revelation back into the OT.
    I guess Christ's death was in vain and righteousness came by the Law after all.

    Well, either Paul is right or Scott is right. If Paul is right then I hope Scott also heeds the warning of Gal 1:8.
    Rich
    PCA, Northern VA
    Student, New Geneva Theological Seminary

    WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
    SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  14. #13
    chbrooking's Avatar
    chbrooking is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ellicott City, MD
    Posts
    779
    Thanks
    243
    Thanked 400 Times in 180 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rpavich View Post
    Ok...
    I'm not Seminary trained and don't understand this issue very well.

    Can I ask a few questions?

    1.) What's the problem with "progressive revelation?" Isn't that what actually happened?

    2.) Can you give me the overall primer on what dispensational theology teaches?

    3.) Can you give me the nutshell version of why it's wrong?

    thanks,
    bob
    If you are interested, I address #'s 2 and 3 here
    Clark Brooking
    Pastor
    Living Hope Presbyterian Church (OPC)
    Clarksville, MD
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  15. #14
    fredtgreco's Avatar
    fredtgreco is offline. Vanilla Westminsterian
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Katy, Texas
    Posts
    10,948
    Thanks
    344
    Thanked 3,928 Times in 1,588 Posts
    I would ask him (humbly, sincerely) how he squares his answer to #2 with:

    Fred Greco
    Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX)
    Christ Church Blog

    "The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle)
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69