The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Covenant Theology > Dispensationalism

Dispensationalism Differences between Covenant Theology and Dispensationalism

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 08:43 AM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
John Owens

Does anybody know if John Owens was or somwhat dispensational?

I read a quote from him that said that the "Lord's Prayer" was Old Testament Theology and not fit for Christians or for Christian Worship.

Any Thoughts?

Michael
__________________
Michael Daniels
Reformed, RPCNA
Denton, Maryland

[i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

[SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 08:52 AM
Puritan Sailor's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lisbon, NY
Posts: 5,886
Thanks: 421
Thanked 635 Times in 294 Posts
You are referring to John Owen the Puritan right? He rejected the Lord's Prayer for use in worship on the grounds of the Regulative Principle of Worship. God did not command its use for worship. He did advocate its use as a model for personal prayer though. I think his RPW argument is wrong, but there was some diversity among the Puritans and Reformers as to how they applied the RPW.
__________________
Patrick
MDiv, RTS Jackson
Pastor, Grace Presbyterian Church (OPC), Lisbon, NY

"He does well, that discourses of Christ; but he does infinitely better, that by experimental knowledge, feeds and lives on Christ." Thomas Brooks.
"Let us not please ourselves that we have deep understandings, but let us shew our understandings by our practice." Richard Sibbes
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 08:53 AM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Yes the Puritan John Owens.. But then why would he call it Old Testament Theology and not fit for Christians?


Michael


Quote:
Originally Posted by Puritan Sailor View Post
You are referring to John Owen the Puritan right? He rejected the Lord's Prayer for use in worship on the grounds of the Regulative Principle of Worship. God did not command its use for worship. He did advocate its use as a model for personal prayer though. I think his RPW argument is wrong, but there was some diversity among the Puritans and Reformers as to how they applied the RPW.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 09:51 AM
bookslover's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 3,237
Thanks: 5
Thanked 579 Times in 328 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by thunaer View Post
Yes the Puritan John Owens.. But then why would he call it Old Testament Theology and not fit for Christians?


Michael
Not trying to be too nit-picky, but there is no final "s" in John Owen's name.
__________________
Richard T. Zuelch, M.Div
Ruling Elder, OPC (not currently serving)
Westminster Presbyterian Church, CA (OPC)
www.alexandermaclaren.wordpress.com
www.reiterations.wordpress.com
www.spurgeonswords.wordpress.com

Devout souls do not take offence at the depths and difficulties of God's Word, but are, thereby, drawn to intenser contemplation of them. - Alexander Maclaren (1826-1910)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 10:27 AM
Jimmy the Greek's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,187
Thanks: 700
Thanked 818 Times in 448 Posts
Thanks Richard. That (s) was kinda buggin' me too.

To the original question. I would suggest that Owen's comment should be looked at in context, so a reference would be handy. Also, referring to a particular passage in the gospels as containing "OT theology" does not make him a dispensationalist -- although it sounds like something a classic dispy might have said.
__________________
Jim
1689 LBCF
Independent Bible Church
North Texas, USA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 10:29 AM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Ok, Just shoot me.... I have never been that good at English and Spelling... LOL

Michael

Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover View Post
Not trying to be too nit-picky, but there is no final "s" in John Owen's name.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 10:30 AM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Ok, I will find the quote from the book I was reading and Post it soon...


Michael

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gomarus View Post
Thanks Richard. That (s) was kinda buggin' me too.

To the original question. I would suggest that Owen's comment should be looked at in context, so a reference would be handy. Also, referring to a particular passage in the gospels as containing "OT theology" does not make him a dispensationalist -- although it sounds like something a classic dispy might have said.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 10:49 AM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Here is the quote about John Owen and the Lord's Prayer...

It comes from Nick R. Needham in Chapter "Worship through the Ages" out of A Vision for Reforming Worship.

"Owen disapproved so vigorously of set prayer, which he feared would quench the Spirit, that he even argued stoutly against the use of the Lord's Prayer (it was an essentially Old Testament Prayer, he insisted, unsuitable for Christians living in the light of the postresurrection era).


Sounds like Dispensationalism to me, even along the lines of Isaac Watts and what he said about the Book of Psalms.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 10:56 AM
Blue Tick's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Thankful...
Posts: 3,238
Thanks: 640
Thanked 1,057 Times in 606 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by thunaer View Post
Here is the quote about John Owen and the Lord's Prayer...

It comes from Nick R. Needham in Chapter "Worship through the Ages" out of A Vision for Reforming Worship.

"Owen disapproved so vigorously of set prayer, which he feared would quench the Spirit, that he even argued stoutly against the use of the Lord's Prayer (it was an essentially Old Testament Prayer, he insisted, unsuitable for Christians living in the light of the postresurrection era).


Sounds like Dispensationalism to me, even along the lines of Isaac Watts and what he said about the Book of Psalms.
Does the author of the book site a reference for this statement? Or is he just basing this on opinion? Just curious where the author received this information.
__________________
John
Member
Christ Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Salt Lake City, Utah
www.christpres.net
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 10:57 AM
nicnap's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SC
Posts: 3,221
Thanks: 1,093
Thanked 576 Times in 430 Posts
Brother, you still are not quoting Owen. You have simply taken someone's interpretation of Owen's work. Maybe you should try looking it up in Owen's work instead.
__________________
soli Deo gloria!
~Nicholas~ Ordained Pastor
Member, Fulton PCA; GPTS Student
Christians are like snow covered dung; it is the purity of the covering which the Father sees. -Luther-
There is nothing more ugly than a Christian orthodoxy without understanding or without compassion.
-Francis Schaeffer-

Last edited by nicnap; 04-18-2007 at 10:58 AM. Reason: Oops...didn't know Blue Tick had already responded in this way...too quick with the quick reply button.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 11:10 AM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
I cannot find any reference for this statement of his.

I also do not know enough of John Owen, or access to his works to find out where he might have said this...

Michael



Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick View Post
Does the author of the book site a reference for this statement? Or is he just basing this on opinion? Just curious where the author received this information.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 01:51 PM
Archlute's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandy, Oregon
Posts: 2,063
Thanks: 453
Thanked 870 Times in 398 Posts
I've read Owen's arguments against the use of set prayers for public worship, and I agree with them in the main, but I have never read a statement from him that would support what Needham asserts regarding the Lord's Prayer.
__________________
Adam J. Myer
Slated for the Jan. 10th Chaplains Basic Officer Leadership Course
Estacada Christian Church
Sandy, Oregon

Soli Deo Gloria
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 02:00 PM
CDM's Avatar
CDM CDM is offline.
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 1,963
Thanks: 441
Thanked 415 Times in 212 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archlute View Post
I've read Owen's arguments against the use of set prayers for public worship, and I agree with them in the main, but I have never read a statement from him that would support what Needham asserts regarding the Lord's Prayer.
__________________
Chris
Presbyterian Reformed Church of Charlotte (PRC)
Student, Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary
SC

...hope is nothing but the nourishment and strength of faith.
~ Calvin's Institutes III.ii.43
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 02:01 PM
bookslover's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 3,237
Thanks: 5
Thanked 579 Times in 328 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gomarus View Post
Thanks Richard. That (s) was kinda buggin' me too.

To the original question. I would suggest that Owen's comment should be looked at in context, so a reference would be handy. Also, referring to a particular passage in the gospels as containing "OT theology" does not make him a dispensationalist -- although it sounds like something a classic dispy might have said.
By the way, there's a nice three-part biography of Owen at the Banner of Truth website. Go to www.banneroftruth.org and click on "articles".
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69