» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 107 | | 28 members and 79 guests | | alb1, Andres, austinww, baron, Bookmeister, CalvinandHodges, Casey, cpomann, David, dudley, Edward, historyb, jfschultz, Michael Doyle, nicnap, Piano Hero, puritanpilgrim, Re4mdant, Rev. Todd Ruddell, Scottish Lass, The Calvin Knight, toddpedlar, ubermadchen, VictorBravo, westminken, Zenas | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
04-18-2007, 08:43 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
| | | John Owens
Does anybody know if John Owens was or somwhat dispensational?
I read a quote from him that said that the "Lord's Prayer" was Old Testament Theology and not fit for Christians or for Christian Worship.
Any Thoughts?
Michael
__________________
Michael Daniels
Reformed, RPCNA
Denton, Maryland
[i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]
[SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
| 
04-18-2007, 08:52 AM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Lisbon, NY
Posts: 5,886
Thanks: 421
Thanked 635 Times in 294 Posts
| |
You are referring to John Owen the Puritan right? He rejected the Lord's Prayer for use in worship on the grounds of the Regulative Principle of Worship. God did not command its use for worship. He did advocate its use as a model for personal prayer though. I think his RPW argument is wrong, but there was some diversity among the Puritans and Reformers as to how they applied the RPW.
__________________
Patrick
MDiv, RTS Jackson
Pastor, Grace Presbyterian Church (OPC), Lisbon, NY "He does well, that discourses of Christ; but he does infinitely better, that by experimental knowledge, feeds and lives on Christ." Thomas Brooks. "Let us not please ourselves that we have deep understandings, but let us shew our understandings by our practice." Richard Sibbes | 
04-18-2007, 08:53 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
| |
Yes the Puritan John Owens.. But then why would he call it Old Testament Theology and not fit for Christians?
Michael Quote:
Originally Posted by Puritan Sailor You are referring to John Owen the Puritan right? He rejected the Lord's Prayer for use in worship on the grounds of the Regulative Principle of Worship. God did not command its use for worship. He did advocate its use as a model for personal prayer though. I think his RPW argument is wrong, but there was some diversity among the Puritans and Reformers as to how they applied the RPW.  | | 
04-18-2007, 09:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 3,237
Thanks: 5
Thanked 579 Times in 328 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by thunaer Yes the Puritan John Owens.. But then why would he call it Old Testament Theology and not fit for Christians?
Michael | Not trying to be too nit-picky, but there is no final "s" in John Owen's name. | 
04-18-2007, 10:27 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,187
Thanks: 700
Thanked 818 Times in 448 Posts
| |
Thanks Richard. That (s) was kinda buggin' me too.
To the original question. I would suggest that Owen's comment should be looked at in context, so a reference would be handy. Also, referring to a particular passage in the gospels as containing "OT theology" does not make him a dispensationalist -- although it sounds like something a classic dispy might have said.
__________________
Jim
1689 LBCF
Independent Bible Church
North Texas, USA
| 
04-18-2007, 10:29 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
| |
Ok, Just shoot me....  I have never been that good at English and Spelling... LOL
Michael Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover Not trying to be too nit-picky, but there is no final "s" in John Owen's name.  | | 
04-18-2007, 10:30 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
| |
Ok, I will find the quote from the book I was reading and Post it soon...
Michael Quote:
Originally Posted by Gomarus Thanks Richard. That (s) was kinda buggin' me too.
To the original question. I would suggest that Owen's comment should be looked at in context, so a reference would be handy. Also, referring to a particular passage in the gospels as containing "OT theology" does not make him a dispensationalist -- although it sounds like something a classic dispy might have said.  | | 
04-18-2007, 10:49 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
| | |
Here is the quote about John Owen and the Lord's Prayer...
It comes from Nick R. Needham in Chapter "Worship through the Ages" out of A Vision for Reforming Worship.
"Owen disapproved so vigorously of set prayer, which he feared would quench the Spirit, that he even argued stoutly against the use of the Lord's Prayer (it was an essentially Old Testament Prayer, he insisted, unsuitable for Christians living in the light of the postresurrection era).
Sounds like Dispensationalism to me, even along the lines of Isaac Watts and what he said about the Book of Psalms.
| 
04-18-2007, 10:56 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Thankful...
Posts: 3,238
Thanks: 640
Thanked 1,057 Times in 606 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by thunaer Here is the quote about John Owen and the Lord's Prayer...
It comes from Nick R. Needham in Chapter "Worship through the Ages" out of A Vision for Reforming Worship.
"Owen disapproved so vigorously of set prayer, which he feared would quench the Spirit, that he even argued stoutly against the use of the Lord's Prayer (it was an essentially Old Testament Prayer, he insisted, unsuitable for Christians living in the light of the postresurrection era).
Sounds like Dispensationalism to me, even along the lines of Isaac Watts and what he said about the Book of Psalms. | Does the author of the book site a reference for this statement? Or is he just basing this on opinion? Just curious where the author received this information.
__________________
John
Member
Christ Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Salt Lake City, Utah www.christpres.net | 
04-18-2007, 10:57 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: SC
Posts: 3,221
Thanks: 1,093
Thanked 576 Times in 430 Posts
| | |
Brother, you still are not quoting Owen. You have simply taken someone's interpretation of Owen's work. Maybe you should try looking it up in Owen's work instead.
__________________ soli Deo gloria!
~Nicholas~ Ordained Pastor
Member, Fulton PCA; GPTS Student
Christians are like snow covered dung; it is the purity of the covering which the Father sees. -Luther-
There is nothing more ugly than a Christian orthodoxy without understanding or without compassion.
-Francis Schaeffer-
Last edited by nicnap; 04-18-2007 at 10:58 AM.
Reason: Oops...didn't know Blue Tick had already responded in this way...too quick with the quick reply button.
| 
04-18-2007, 11:10 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
| |
I cannot find any reference for this statement of his.
I also do not know enough of John Owen, or access to his works to find out where he might have said this...
Michael Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick Does the author of the book site a reference for this statement? Or is he just basing this on opinion? Just curious where the author received this information. | | 
04-18-2007, 01:51 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Sandy, Oregon
Posts: 2,063
Thanks: 453
Thanked 870 Times in 398 Posts
| | |
I've read Owen's arguments against the use of set prayers for public worship, and I agree with them in the main, but I have never read a statement from him that would support what Needham asserts regarding the Lord's Prayer.
__________________
Adam J. Myer
Slated for the Jan. 10th Chaplains Basic Officer Leadership Course
Estacada Christian Church
Sandy, Oregon Soli Deo Gloria | 
04-18-2007, 02:00 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 1,963
Thanks: 441
Thanked 415 Times in 212 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Archlute I've read Owen's arguments against the use of set prayers for public worship, and I agree with them in the main, but I have never read a statement from him that would support what Needham asserts regarding the Lord's Prayer. | | 
04-18-2007, 02:01 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 3,237
Thanks: 5
Thanked 579 Times in 328 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Gomarus Thanks Richard. That (s) was kinda buggin' me too.
To the original question. I would suggest that Owen's comment should be looked at in context, so a reference would be handy. Also, referring to a particular passage in the gospels as containing "OT theology" does not make him a dispensationalist -- although it sounds like something a classic dispy might have said.  | By the way, there's a nice three-part biography of Owen at the Banner of Truth website. Go to www.banneroftruth.org and click on "articles".
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |