The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Covenant Theology > Dispensationalism

Dispensationalism Differences between Covenant Theology and Dispensationalism

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 06:09 PM
D. Paul's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 559
Thanks: 25
Thanked 23 Times in 14 Posts
Hyper-Dispy

There's "Hyper" everything, I'm sure but it seems I have run across a hyper-dispensationalist. The comments were unlike anything I've heard.

Is it consistent with typical Dispensationalism to make the writings of Paul totally distinct from the rest of Scripture? (Paul uses "my Gospel" at times so they take this to be different from the Apostle's Gospel) Have you ever heard that we no longer need to repent? How strong is the correlation between Dispy theology and Antinomianism?

I may go into detail if the thread warrants, but for now, I could hardly believe what I was hearing.
__________________
Donald P. Grubb
theol46@embarqmail.com

Berean Baptist Church, Mansfield, OH
Mansfield, OH

John 6:63 It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing.
The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 06:12 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,780
Thanks: 1,753
Thanked 405 Times in 241 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by D. Paul View Post
There's "Hyper" everything, I'm sure but it seems I have run across a hyper-dispensationalist. The comments were unlike anything I've heard.

Is it consistent with typical Dispensationalism to make the writings of Paul totally distinct from the rest of Scripture? (Paul uses "my Gospel" at times so they take this to be different from the Apostle's Gospel) Have you ever heard that we no longer need to repent? How strong is the correlation between Dispy theology and Antinomianism?

I may go into detail if the thread warrants, but for now, I could hardly believe what I was hearing.
I can hardly believe what you are hearing as well!

I have heard it argued by dispys that Paul's words do not carry the same authority as the words of Jesus, but I have not heard them argue that Paul preached a different gospel altogether.

I think that sounds 'hyper'. I can't imaging someone like J. D. Pentecost ever making that claim.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 06:25 PM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ethiopia
Posts: 537
Thanks: 143
Thanked 87 Times in 62 Posts
A long time ago I encountered one kind of hyper-dispie group that considered the only scriptural applicable to this era to be Paul's prison epistles--they did not even accept the gospels. I don't recall what they did with the general epistles and Revelation.

How can people call God "Lord" when they feel free to pick and choose which books they like and which they will discard? It seems evident who is lord in this case.
__________________
Mary Vanderkooi
Kale Heywott Church (KHC)
Soddo, Ethiopia
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 06:32 PM
DMcFadden's Avatar
McFadderator Minimizing
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 4,383
Thanks: 916
Thanked 1,469 Times in 856 Posts
Yes, there is a version of dispensationalism that denies that the Gospels have much to say to the church age at all. Jesus offered the Jews the Kingdom, they rejected it, God went to his mystery parenthesis of the Church Age (= Age of the Gentiles). In that sense, the Sermon on the Mount would be pure millennial lawcode and the epistles would be the only really applicable part of the Bible.

Such dispensationalists are no more typical of rank and file dispensationalists (and no more "the logical conclusion of the philosophy") than hyper-preterism or hyper-Calvinism typifies or represents the "logical conclusion" of Reformed thought. The Reformed have their Harold Camping and the dispensationalists have their Acts 28 Dispensationalists and Mid-Acts Dispensationalists.
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DMcFadden For This Useful Post:
MrMerlin777 (07-15-2008)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 06:53 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pleasanton, California
Posts: 1,534
Thanks: 717
Thanked 341 Times in 211 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by D. Paul View Post
Is it consistent with typical Dispensationalism to make the writings of Paul totally distinct from the rest of Scripture? (Paul uses "my Gospel" at times so they take this to be different from the Apostle's Gospel) Have you ever heard that we no longer need to repent? How strong is the correlation between Dispy theology and Antinomianism?
I think this is a repetition of some of the early church errors. In particular, certain groups divided God into the manifestation as the Father, then as the Son, and then as the Spirit, each mode of God's existence implying a different kind of salvation. In theology proper, this is called modalism (vs. Trinitarianism). In ethics, it is called anti-nomianism. In soteriology, it is called dispensationalism.

To be sure, one may be a dispensationalist and still a Trinitarian. But, IMO, only by "blessed inconsistency".

Another error was to divide up the Scriptures along these categories, and only go for the writings of Paul, and probably not all of them (heretics such as Marcion did this). Nothing new under the sun...

Cheers,
__________________
Adam Brink, Livermore Wine Country, California
Grace Church of Pleasanton, PCA

Attorney: Chicolini, when were you born?
Chicolini: I don't remember. I was just a little baby.
~Chico Marx in Duck Soup
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 07:32 PM
D. Paul's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 559
Thanks: 25
Thanked 23 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
Yes, there is a version of dispensationalism that denies that the Gospels have much to say to the church age at all. Jesus offered the Jews the Kingdom, they rejected it, God went to his mystery parenthesis of the Church Age (= Age of the Gentiles). In that sense, the Sermon on the Mount would be pure millennial lawcode and the epistles would be the only really applicable part of the Bible.

Such dispensationalists are no more typical of rank and file dispensationalists (and no more "the logical conclusion of the philosophy") than hyper-preterism or hyper-Calvinism typifies or represents the "logical conclusion" of Reformed thought. The Reformed have their Harold Camping and the dispensationalists have their Acts 28 Dispensationalists and Mid-Acts Dispensationalists.
BINGO! You've nailed it. Want to come with me to their house next time?
__________________
Donald P. Grubb
theol46@embarqmail.com

Berean Baptist Church, Mansfield, OH
Mansfield, OH

John 6:63 It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing.
The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 07:36 PM
D. Paul's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 559
Thanks: 25
Thanked 23 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie View Post
A long time ago I encountered one kind of hyper-dispie group that considered the only scriptural applicable to this era to be Paul's prison epistles--they did not even accept the gospels. I don't recall what they did with the general epistles and Revelation.

How can people call God "Lord" when they feel free to pick and choose which books they like and which they will discard? It seems evident who is lord in this case.
Very similar here. I quote them, "Take out the 13 epistles of Paul and you basically have the OT." I know my response was and then
__________________
Donald P. Grubb
theol46@embarqmail.com

Berean Baptist Church, Mansfield, OH
Mansfield, OH

John 6:63 It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing.
The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 07:39 PM
JM's Avatar
JM JM is offline.
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,303
Thanks: 308
Thanked 305 Times in 195 Posts
I posted a chart here: Baptism not valid during this Dispensation
__________________
J. M. - Baptist - Ontario, Canada -

Feileadh Mor
The Orthodox Catechism
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JM For This Useful Post:
D. Paul (07-15-2008)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 07:42 PM
CaseyBessette's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: La Grange Park, IL
Posts: 1,227
Thanks: 134
Thanked 170 Times in 107 Posts
Here is a related article:

Modern Dispensationalism and the Doctrine of the Unity of Scripture - Oswald T. Allis - Reformed Literature
__________________
Casey Bessette
Westminster OPC • West Suburbs of Chicago • My Blog: Paradise Regained

"It is part of the calling of the ekklesia to learn to know the love of Christ that surpasses all knowledge and also to make known within the world of science 'the manifold wisdom of God' in order that the final end of theology, as of all things, may be that the name of the Lord is glorified. Theology and dogmatics, too, exist for the Lord's sake." — Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, vol. 1, p. 46
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CaseyBessette For This Useful Post:
D. Paul (07-15-2008)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 07:56 PM
D. Paul's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 559
Thanks: 25
Thanked 23 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JM View Post
Great chart. I think this is it to a T.
__________________
Donald P. Grubb
theol46@embarqmail.com

Berean Baptist Church, Mansfield, OH
Mansfield, OH

John 6:63 It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing.
The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 07:57 PM
D. Paul's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 559
Thanks: 25
Thanked 23 Times in 14 Posts
Thanks! Looks useful.
__________________
Donald P. Grubb
theol46@embarqmail.com

Berean Baptist Church, Mansfield, OH
Mansfield, OH

John 6:63 It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing.
The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 08:08 PM
CaseyBessette's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: La Grange Park, IL
Posts: 1,227
Thanks: 134
Thanked 170 Times in 107 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by D. Paul View Post
Thanks! Looks useful.
You're welcome. It was a real eye-opener when I first read it. I had never quite made the connection between dispensationalism and the spirit of higher criticism. Definitely an unexpected connection between fundamentalism and liberalism!
__________________
Casey Bessette
Westminster OPC • West Suburbs of Chicago • My Blog: Paradise Regained

"It is part of the calling of the ekklesia to learn to know the love of Christ that surpasses all knowledge and also to make known within the world of science 'the manifold wisdom of God' in order that the final end of theology, as of all things, may be that the name of the Lord is glorified. Theology and dogmatics, too, exist for the Lord's sake." — Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, vol. 1, p. 46
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2008, 09:38 AM
Gomarus's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 627
Thanks: 131
Thanked 198 Times in 117 Posts
Hyper-dispensationalism is often associated with E. W. Bullinger (1837-1913):

Hyper-dispensationalism
E. W. Bullinger
__________________
Jim
1689 LBCF
Independent Bible Church
North Texas, USA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64