The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Covenant Theology > Dispensationalism

Dispensationalism Differences between Covenant Theology and Dispensationalism

» Online Users: 37
5 members and 32 guests
Chaplainintraining, Eoghan, Mathetes, Pergamum, uberkermit
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2007, 10:42 PM
Bandguy's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sherwood, Arkansas
Posts: 598
Thanks: 14
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jenney View Post
This is what I thought at first, too, but then I realized what Blue Tick wrote was about God blessing a nation. It would shock and grieve me for any Christian to say, "How can God bless a person when that person curses God's Son?" because such were some of us, and God did bless us by washing, justifying and sanctifying us (1 Cor 6:9-11).

However, he was not writing about God blessing a person, but rather about a nation. I think that makes a huge difference.
You make a good point. However, I would respond by asking, "How is it that God blesses any nation on the Earth. Even America is full of those who curse God, murder the unborn, promote Homosexuality, etc..." Just because we are historically known as the "Christian" nation, let us not become arrogant in thinking that we are not under the same potential judgment as any other nation on earth because of our sin. It is soley by grace that we haven't been destroyed totally yet.
__________________
Joseph Botwinick, Band Director
Second Baptist Church, Jacksonville, Arkansas, Southern Baptist Convention
Sherwood, Arkansas
Romans 7:14-25
http://botwinick.wordpress.com/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 09:53 AM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: California
Posts: 792
Thanks: 9
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
The Plight of Roman Catholic Christians

This unfortunate group of people is caught in the middle of tensions between Eastern Orthodox' and Protestants. While many Catholics sympathize politically and culturally with their fellow Mary/Saint worshippers over the Protestant people, they nonetheless are often targets of scorn from Eastern Orthodox Christians. What is most shocking, however, is that Christians of Roman Catholic descent are non-issues in the minds of most American Christians. Catholic believers are most notably ignored by many Christians in America who believe in unconditional election, amillenialism.......
__________________
David Cronkhite, Elder
Pasadena United Reformed Church

"I count myself one of the number of those
who write as they learn, and learn as they write."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 11:36 AM
Herald's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 7,762
Blog Entries: 16
Thanks: 991
Thanked 1,159 Times in 671 Posts
The Roman church is apostate. It is no different in substance than the JW's or Mormons. It is a works based system. Don't expect Christians to cozy up to Rome in search of the miniscule few believers that may be there. Those believers need to come out of Romanism.

But while we're at it let's lament the fact that we have not reached out to left handed Christians...blind Christians...Slavic Christians....Icelandic Christians...let's make every nationality part of the victim class.
__________________
Bill Brown
Elder
Grace Baptist Church
Anne Arundel County, Maryland

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Visit my BLOG Theology for the Rest of Us
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 01:32 PM
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Moncton NB Canada
Posts: 2,593
Thanks: 455
Thanked 289 Times in 187 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaptistInCrisis View Post
The Roman church is apostate. It is no different in substance than the JW's or Mormons. It is a works based system. Don't expect Christians to cozy up to Rome in search of the miniscule few believers that may be there. Those believers need to come out of Romanism.

But while we're at it let's lament the fact that we have not reached out to left handed Christians...blind Christians...Slavic Christians....Icelandic Christians...let's make every nationality part of the victim class.
Big difference---they baptise in the name of the Holy Trinity and the RC baptism is a valid Christian Baptism. Not true of JW or Mormans. There are some similarities that is true, however both JW and LDS are chiliastic cults and have more in common with the dispys we were talking about above then they do with RCs.
__________________
Kevin Rogers
Sovereign Community Church, PCA
Moncton NB
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 01:53 PM
Contra_Mundum's Avatar
"da wabbit"
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 4,137
Thanks: 22
Thanked 1,550 Times in 576 Posts
Borders in the modern world are important for more than cartographers or geography students. From time immemorial they served as boundary-markers that enclose, not deliniate, areas of control (or influence).

With the establishment of nation-states, and the assertion of control over virtually all the inhabitable world, societies (which often exited with "fuzzy" boundaries previously) came increasingly to be defined by those boundaries. But there are still identities--societies--that cross national and cultural boundaries. Religion is one of those (see 1 Ki. 12:25-27).

Muslims are devoted to a religion which is primarily earthly and sensual. Their version of paradise is simply the rutting of animals (in recruiting the suicide bombers, the young, aimless males are encouraged to "just keep thinking about the virgins..."). Now, because of the this-worldly emphasis of this religion, it is a simple thing to explain Muslim outrage over perceived attacks on their co-religionists in other parts of the world. It is relatively simple to connect tangible violence against them in one place to reprisals perpetrated by them anyplace.

Chrstianity is SUPPOSED to be primarily spiritual and heavenly. But this does not fully explain why in the main there is such widespread ignorance and apathy concerning the temporal sufferings of their co-religionists. Christians whose first social identity was to "King Jesus" would still have no trouble identifying and entering into the sufferings of their brothers and sisters. In fact, they are SUPPOSED to be concerned about even the plight of their enemies, and not only their friends.

The true explanation for the apathy is that for the most part, Christians are not Christians first, but worldly. They are mainly concerned about their earthly identities and nationalities, except for an hour or two on Sundays. They are so earthly-minded that they're no heavenly good. Because they relegate spirituality to another "realm", they make the most of the tangible societies they see and participate in on earth.

Thus, the only church they really know or care much about is the place they drop their money and their backsides. They want the best preacher they can buy, the best building they can buy, and a good write-up in the local newspaper once or twice a year. The other Christians they identify with most are not those who are theologically, denominationally, or even ideologically consistent with them, but culturally homogenous. Hence the appeal of "broad (American) evangelicalism".

Just today I got another monthly "Franklin Graham-gram" plea for $. This is the kind of thing that stands-in place of genuine concern for world "relief" and missionary evangelism. See, as far as I can tell, this $ is to go for promoting American-style mass marketing appeal crusading (as opposed to cross-cultural missions); shoe-boxes of American-style faithjunk including comic-strip Bible stories, coloring books, and a colorful crew neck T-shirt with a western logo on it for Kids; and reconstruction efforts in stricken areas in order to remake them in America's image, to build up social goodwill (for later crusades), and help Americans feel good about themselves.

All so very American. But back to borders. Iraq is, er... used to be a society and a culture. Think of the society like an organism. Its defenses were assailed, like a person getting hit by a truly virulent disease from outside. Then, the head is amputated, just going to attach another one (that's easy!). Have you ever thought about surgey as trauma? Is sure is. That's why you want an experienced, certified doctor doing it. Not just someone "certifiable". Now the experimentation really gets going. Oooops, forgot about managing the immune system while the head is off. Wait! is that Cancer? You keep sewing the head on, I'll try cutting this part out... wow, I think there's some serious gangrene here too, wasn't here when we started... Lucky for this guy we were here to save him!


Imagine waking up today, and not just thinking, "You know, I might have an accident driving to work today." Or, "What if a manic shoots up my work/classroom/McDonalds today--OK, not much chance of that." But rather, "With 6-7 bombs going off every single day, in unpredictable (but crowded) but necessary places to go--like the grocery store or the bakery--I have a 20% chance of being injured or killed this year. Is it worth a try today?" What starts happening to a society, to a city, where this is typical? Where murders fueled simply by revenge grow exponentially? Meanwhile the doctors (who you never asked to operate) just keep telling you to lie still, they are "working on it", not their fault your lousy veins are collapsing and they can't feed you painkillers (assuming they had enough).

The body starts to look like swiss cheese. It starts to look like the bombs and bullets are ripping the fabric of society apart. There's not enough resiliency for the body to close up and repair itself. Its going to try to compartmentalize to survive, but that means that each part is now competing in some sense with the rest for whatever common resources there are.

In this scenario, you had this Christian community. It was small, and separate, disparate, but it functioned in the old society in some way. I dunno, maybe like "salt and light"? Now, you may think that the bombs and killings are doing the most damage to the larger segments of the society. That's where the most visible damage is occuring, certainly. But the less visible segments are not unaffected. How can they not be? Or do we think that the Sovereign Lord typically hands his own people bullet-proof vests in times like these? The society disintegrates, but the church like adamantine thread withstands it all unsinged? Undamaged?

No. The 200 years old Presbyterian church in Iraq is also disintegrating, being blown to smithereens by bombs and cut down by executioner's bullets. We already talked about that one the other day. Llike any smaller organism, just a few cuts kills faster than many cuts may in a larger organism.

The borders that make Iraq look like just another odd puzzle piece on the map are like the walls of Frankenstein's castle. The surrounding states just want the screams to stay confined to that place. They know their authoritarian societies are precarious if this quarantine is ineffective. And they really don't want the "doctors" to pay them a housecall.

Christians all over the Middle East feel the pressure. In many ways, their enemies around them see them not as salt in their society, but as having ties to the west, to the invaders form of faith, and they wall them off as infectious. Just makes them more invisible to outsiders. Makes them vulnerable inside and out. Lumps them into "Islamic" culture.


If I could just do one thing, I wish I could make Christians in the west see themselves as Christians first. As belonging to King Jesus, and to the rest of King Jesus' people. I wish I could make them see that the heritage of this nationality here in this land is a wonderful legacy, but the culture that owns the land today has more in common with the culture, society, and government of the Roman Empire, than it does with their Christian forefathers.

Instead of seeing this place--and everything it stands for--as worth defending at any reach and at any price, including moral cost, I wish we were more willing as a Christian sub-culture to take an adversative stance to the godlessness around us, to let some things go as not worth holding on to, like misers after pennies. "Let goods and kindred go," anyone? "This mortal life also"?

We need to expand our borders and shorten them at the same time. We need to think about the kingdom of God as a world-wide program, containing many commonalities that subsumes a host of distinctions without destroying them. And we need to abandon our foolish alliances with godlessness, identities based on nothing more than place of birth and State claims of sovereignty and ownership of our persons. Be as ruthlessly utilitarian about your "citizenship" as the Apostle Paul was about his.

Focus instead on living as strangers and pilgrims in this world, but no less on directing the affairs of your borders, your family and home, as though it were the sole propriety of King Jesus. Only on a foundation made of many such bricks can a society truly be renovated, if indeed it will be before Jesus comes again.
__________________
Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI

Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer
Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12

When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:

Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us.
--Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? --
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 02:47 PM
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Moncton NB Canada
Posts: 2,593
Thanks: 455
Thanked 289 Times in 187 Posts
Wow. Thanks.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 03:35 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 175
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just got this from my Moody e-mail account:


Theology of Israel and its Political Implications:
A discussion on Christian Zionism
With Dr. Michael Wechsler and Dr. Gary Burge

Time: 7:30pm Thursday, April 19th
Location: Room 328, The Sweeting Center for World Evangelization

Dr. Gary Burge is Professor of New Testament at Wheaton College in Wheaton Illinois. He received his Ph.D. in New Testament from King's College, The University of Aberdeen, Scotland. He authored many books, including "Whose Land? Whose Promise? What Christians are not being told about Israel and the Palestinians". He has spent a significant amount of time in the Middle East and is a supporter of the rights of the Palestinian people.

Dr. Michael G. Wechsler is an Associate Professor of Bible at the Moody Bible Institute. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Chicago. He teaches classes including Biblical Hebrew and another on the Book of Genesis. He has headed numerous tours of Moody students to Israel and has spent much of his life following the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Professor Wechsler personally considers himself to be a Zionist.

Topics of the discussion include:
* What is modern Zionism? Is anti-Zionism a form of anti-Semitism?
* What role should theology play in the political situation in Israel/Palestine?
* Interpretation of the theology pertaining to Israel as a nation state.
* Does Christian theology support the modern State of Israel?
* Discussion of the current political situation between Palestinians and the Israelis.
* And more….

Come listen to a great discussion on one of the most important subjects affecting our world today!

This event is sponsored by the Student Theological Society at the Moody Bible Institute.

_______________________________________________

I just thought that this was somewhat relevant to the discussion... I just know that the vice-presdient @ Moody said in chapel that the people ought to serve the nation of Israel because they are the chosen people of God. They said Israel is not always perfect, but we should support them. Hopefully this is somewhat relevant.
__________________
Brandon Addison

Member- Michiana Covenant Presbyterian Church
Granger, IN (http://www.michianacovenant.org/)

Attending and serving the youth @- Christ Church Pasadena Pasadena, CA (www.christchurch.la)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 03:54 PM
Blueridge Believer's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: RADFORD VA.
Posts: 4,334
Thanks: 930
Thanked 1,043 Times in 498 Posts
"I just thought that this was somewhat relevant to the discussion... I just know that the vice-presdient @ Moody said in chapel that the people ought to serve the nation of Israel because they are the chosen people of God. They said Israel is not always perfect, but we should support them. Hopefully this is somewhat relevant".



And therein is a problem. If national Israel after the flesh is the "chosen people of God", what is the Body of Christ? We sould serve Israel after the flesh? I don't think so. We are to serve our Lord Jesus Christ and his body.
In my opinion, Zionism is racism.
Israel is not always perfect? They are never perfect. Neither is any other nation on earth after the flesh.
__________________
1689 Baptist Confession

Psa 55:16 As for me, I will call upon God; and the LORD shall save me.
Psa 55:17 Evening, and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud: and he shall hear my voice.
James Farley, Wilderness Road Baptist Assembly.
Husband of Melissa and father of Ann.
www.wildernessroadbaptist.org
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 04:38 PM
Herald's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 7,762
Blog Entries: 16
Thanks: 991
Thanked 1,159 Times in 671 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
Big difference---they baptise in the name of the Holy Trinity and the RC baptism is a valid Christian Baptism. Not true of JW or Mormans. There are some similarities that is true, however both JW and LDS are chiliastic cults and have more in common with the dispys we were talking about above then they do with RCs.
In my book the trinity aspect is totally irrelevant. It matters to paedos because of your view of baptism, but to me to it matters little for the Papists deny sola scriptura, sola fide, sola gratia and solus Christus. In fact they deny soli deo gloria.. But I don't want to turn this into a discussion on the validity of Roman baptism. I was part of the darkness which is Romanism for seventeen years. Thank God that He called me to Himself or I would still be enslaved to that demonic infested religion.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 06:05 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 175
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueridge reformer View Post
And therein is a problem. If national Israel after the flesh is the "chosen people of God", what is the Body of Christ? We sould serve Israel after the flesh? I don't think so. We are to serve our Lord Jesus Christ and his body.
In my opinion, Zionism is racism.
Israel is not always perfect? They are never perfect. Neither is any other nation on earth after the flesh.
Ya, when he said those things at chapel I could hardly containt myself. All the guys on my floor (K-9 represent!) knew where I stood on everything and thought it was pretty funny. They were not that hard line. Most of them were either leaning towards CT or Progressive. Still though, after going to a school like Moody (albeit, only for a semester), and growing up a dispensational church, there is this idea that there really are not Arab Christians. Now if there happend to be an Arab Christian, that is great, but they are certainly not thought about.... The Jewish people are thought more about than Arabs (in my experience).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 06:09 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 5,121
Thanks: 1,953
Thanked 458 Times in 271 Posts
For those interested an Iranian-Christian Pastor, formerly with VOM will be speaking at my church:

Village Community Church in Wrightwood, CA.
7:00 pm
Friday, May 25th

visit www.villagecommunitychurch.org for driving directions

This pastor, whose father and brother are also pastors and who just recently escaped from Iran, will be bringing a message entitled: "Prosperity and Persecution". It is a message focusing on Christianity in Iran (persecution) and Christianity in America (prosperity).

Any of you in the SoCal area are more than welcome to come up to the mountains and see us for this event.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 08:15 PM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: California
Posts: 792
Thanks: 9
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
I assume most Palestinian Christians are cultural Christians (Antiochan or some type of Eastern Orthodox) which is why I made the comparison with Roman Catholics. I also assume they despise Presbyterians generally.
The 'Holy' land draws in all kinds of bad religion.
Let's not cozy-up with bad religion just because we hate Israel.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 09:19 PM
Bandguy's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sherwood, Arkansas
Posts: 598
Thanks: 14
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by non dignus View Post
Let's not cozy-up with bad religion just because we hate Israel.
That really is the heart of the matter, isn't it?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 11:02 PM
Contra_Mundum's Avatar
"da wabbit"
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 4,137
Thanks: 22
Thanked 1,550 Times in 576 Posts
If this thread gets any more political, I'm moving it...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 11:34 PM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,951
Thanks: 1,393
Thanked 764 Times in 548 Posts
Good thoughts, Bruce, about being Christians first.
__________________
Chris
Member at Grace Community Baptist Church, Mandeville, LA

Beware of a religion without holdfasts. But if I get a grip upon a doctrine they call me a bigot. Let them do so. Bigotry is a hateful thing, and yet that which is now abused as bigotry is a great virtue, and greatly needed in these frivolous times. I have been inclined lately to start a new denomination, and call it "the Church of the Bigoted." Spurgeon
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2007, 11:44 PM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,951
Thanks: 1,393
Thanked 764 Times in 548 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by non dignus View Post
I assume most Palestinian Christians are cultural Christians (Antiochan or some type of Eastern Orthodox) which is why I made the comparison with Roman Catholics. I also assume they despise Presbyterians generally.
The 'Holy' land draws in all kinds of bad religion.
Let's not cozy-up with bad religion just because we hate Israel.
True, but let's not assume that there are no believers there either. My understanding is that the Presbyterian church in Iraq was relatively orthodox all things considered. Hostilities in that region generally have not served the cause of Christ, and I think that was the point of the OP. Some popular dispensationalists have appeared to have more enthusiasm in advancing the cause of Israel and Zionism than in advancing the cause of Christ and unfortunately they all sometimes get painted with that broad brush. I think that is some of what Bruce was getting at with being no heavenly good, the tendency to think in terms of what appears to be in our nations best interest rather than kingdom thinking.

I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't hate Israel.

For that matter, most "Christians" in the USA are cultural Christians and many of them (including many so called evangelicals) generally despise confessional Presbyterians.

Last edited by Pilgrim; 04-19-2007 at 11:59 PM.. Reason: corrected a misstatement
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2007, 01:04 AM
Bladestunner316's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kirkland,WA U.S.A.
Posts: 6,890
Thanks: 238
Thanked 57 Times in 39 Posts
I ahve nto read the article yet though I will put your thread title intrigued me. Often in my dispy days I always thought of the ME as Mostly Muslim and slightly Jewish never thinking that there were actually Christians there.
__________________
Nathan Olaf Brandal
First Baptist Church of Kirkland

"Man is nothing: he hath a free will to go to hell, but none to go to heaven, till God worketh in him to will and to do his good pleasure"
GEORGE WHITEFIELD TO JOHN WESLEY

My Blog
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2007, 09:03 AM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: California
Posts: 792
Thanks: 9
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
True, but let's not assume that there are no believers there either. My understanding is that the Presbyterian church in Iraq was relatively orthodox all things considered. Hostilities in that region generally have not served the cause of Christ, and I think that was the point of the OP.
Yes, indeed. The Lord certainly calls men out of every tribe, tongue, and nation.

Quote:
Some popular dispensationalists have appeared to have more enthusiasm in advancing the cause of Israel and Zionism than in advancing the cause of Christ and unfortunately they all sometimes get painted with that broad brush.
I guess if they don't want to be broad-brushed they should better articulate their exceptions. Possibly they look at Palestinian Christians and see them not as true Christians which is understandable. Most Palestinian Christians are earthly minded, not knowing they are strangers and pilgrims looking for a heavenly city.

(BTW, I support Israel too, mostly because they have a democratic form of government. I also have special feelings for Jewry because of its heritage.)

Ironically, dispensationalism has subtle anti-semitic overtones: their eschatology involves an eternal state which has 'separate but equal' locations for Jews and Gentiles. It's sort of an eternal Jim Crow state!

Last edited by non dignus; 04-20-2007 at 10:14 AM..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2007, 10:15 AM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Being the daughter of Christian Lebanese, and having been to Lebanon twice, the Middle East is very close to my heart. A Christian brother gave me the following link a year or so ago and I thought you all might be interested.

http://merf.woh.gospelcom.net/

MERF stands for Middle East Reformed Fellowship
__________________
Name: Samantha Elossais
Faithful Contender for Truth
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

For Zion's sake, I will not hold my peace, and for Jerusalem's sake, I will not rest until the righteousness thereof go forth as brightness, and the salvation thereof as a lamp that burneth. Isaiah 62:1
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2007, 11:55 AM
Jerusalem Blade's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,200
Thanks: 188
Thanked 529 Times in 251 Posts
In Bethlehem there is Baraka Bible Presbyterian Church, and the pastors, George and Danny Awad (father and son) are genuine -- and genuinely Reformed -- believers. I have fellowshipped with them both through the conferences & seminars of MERF at the John Calvin Centre in Cyprus.

Before we initiated English-language services the congregation in Limassol was almost entirely Arabic-speaking (I would preach and teach through translators).

A good book to read would be Elias Chacour's Blood Brothers -- this slim volume (with some others) turned me around in my views of the Jewish-Arab situation. A Jew, I had been indoctrinated by the American churches (& Messianic Jews) to a Zionist viewpoint. But no longer. I will post shortly some brief essay-type stuff here on this.

Steve
__________________
Steve Rafalsky
Elder, International Evangelical Church (Reformed)
Limassol, Cyprus

"I am set for the defense of the gospel" (Philippians 1:17)

"Strengthened with all might, according to His glorious
power, unto all patience and longsuffering with joyfulness...
" (Colossians 1:11)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2007, 04:57 PM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: California
Posts: 792
Thanks: 9
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Samantha and Steve,

I am very interested in your experiences. I'm sure I'm not alone here. Please elaborate.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #62 (