The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Covenant Theology > Dispensationalism

Dispensationalism Differences between Covenant Theology and Dispensationalism

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

» Online Users: 74
10 members and 64 guests
buggy, christabella_warren, DMcFadden, Jon Peters, ReadBavinck, Reformed Thomist, T.A.G.
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 02:41 PM
Kim G's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,338
Thanks: 544
Thanked 471 Times in 221 Posts
"The doctrine of Election in a proverbial nutshell"

I recently came across a dispensationalist's view (disciplemakerministries.org) of election. He calls this "The doctrine of Election in a proverbial Nutshell." I have removed the multiple parathetical statements and verses so as to better understand the flow.

Without furthur ado *drumroll*, "The Doctrine of Election in a Nutshell":

Quote:
The Promised One of Genesis 3:25 is God’s Son, chosen (elected) from the “foundation of the world” to be both the Redeemer of the lost and both a new and “last Adam” to restore the dominion relinquished to Satan by Adam’s sinful choice. The Promised One would be successful where the first Adam failed. The Promised One would be the “firstborn” of a New Genesis and would become the “door” into this New Genesis to “whosoever” of fallen humanity willing to believe in His death, burial, and resurrection, repent of sin, confess Him as LORD, call on Him to save them, and be supernaturally “born again” “by grace through faith” into the New Genesis “in Christ.” Therefore, this whole group that would become the descendants of the Seed of the Promised One “through faith” would become the elect “in Christ”. Although election does not always translate into the salvation of the individual or group elected, the primary and “eternal purpose” of God in election is a continuing and ongoing faithful remnant for the stewardship and preservation of Truth to His glory to the end of time.
Later he says:
Quote:
All those saved "by grace through faith" down through the Ages are God’s ultimate elect remnant. They were not individuals chosen by God to be saved. These are individuals who chose to believe God and were saved.
I grew up in a dispensational church, but I had never heard such . Was I just asleep? Is this actually the "normal" dispensational view of election?
__________________
Kim G
Non-denom church (holds to the WCF)
Zion Community Church, Greenville, SC

Teach me Your way, O LORD;
I will walk in Your truth;
Unite my heart to fear Your name.

Psalm 86:11
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 02:48 PM
Wannabee's Avatar
Obi Wan Kenobi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
This is a "typical" view of many churches. It's a man centered gospel that denies God's sovereignty without realizing it. Pray for those who haven't been given the good teaching and understanding that we, only by the unimaginable and unfathomable grace of God, have been blessed with.

Your resident dispy,
__________________
For the Glory of our King,
Joe Johnson
Slave of Christ, husband, father, Preacherboy at Cornerstone Community Church, Escanaba, MI. and TMS graduate. Personal website - SoundLife.org
I do not know, and I do not say, that a person cannot believe in Revelation and in evolution, too, for a man may believe that which is infinitely wise and also that which is only asinine. ~ CHS
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 02:56 PM
Kim G's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,338
Thanks: 544
Thanked 471 Times in 221 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wannabee View Post
Your resident dispy,
Are you really dispy? Just curious, since I really have no idea what I believe (though I know what I don't believe!).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 03:00 PM
Wannabee's Avatar
Obi Wan Kenobi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
Oy, that ought to open a .

For the moment, I think I'll let others answer that for me since I'm probably a bit biased...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 03:34 PM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 4,814
Thanks: 889
Thanked 1,063 Times in 704 Posts
Not really a comment on the article, but more something my 13 yr old son said yesterday when we were talking about this topic..

He asked.."How can someone believe they make the decision on whether they go to heaven or not?" Then he add's his thoughts "if it were left up to everyone, then everyone would be going to heaven, and that's not what the bible says...the Bible clearly says there IS a Hell and people will go there, and since there is a Hell and nobody would choose to go there, or there would be no need for the bible to mention hell, that must mean God declares it, or that would make God a liar, and well, God is not a liar."

Then he got quite, and I asked what he was thinking..and he said.."the thought of an eternity in hell, that's forever and ever with no end to suffering, that's really scary."

His 13 yr old friend who was with us, looked at him and said.."I've never thought about it that way, WOW, I'm going to have to think about that some more."
__________________
Bobbi Clark
Covenant Member
Pinewood Pres. (PCA) Middleburg

When I kept Silent, My bones wasted away through my groaning all day long. Psalm 32:3
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 03:44 PM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,956
Thanks: 906
Thanked 820 Times in 504 Posts
It may be both/and. Christ is called the "elect" in 1 Peter 2, that is, the "chosen" corner stone. The Greek word is the same (ἐκλεκτός - eklektos, which becomes "elect" in English when the prefix, the preposition ἐκ, loses its kappa). When used of Christ in Peter, it is normally translated as "chosen" instead of elect, at least in the newer versions. Either way, the Greek word, and both English translations, are applied to Christ and his people. In Peter, the imagery is of Christ the chosen/elect cornerstone upon whom His people are added as stones to build God's house.

I can also think of at least one Old Testament messianic prophecy which uses this language with regard to the Savior:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaiah 42
Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles. He shall not cry, nor lift up, nor cause his voice to be heard in the street. A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth judgment unto truth. He shall not fail nor be discouraged, till he have set judgment in the earth: and the isles shall wait for his law.
It's translated "chosen" in the newer translations.

(note: "chosen" is basically the same as "elect" but has a Germanic rather than Latin/Greek origin)
__________________
Davidius
Husband of Emily
Member of All Saints Anglican Church - Chapel Hill (AMiA / Anglican Church of North America)
Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German and Classics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 03:52 PM
Kim G's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,338
Thanks: 544
Thanked 471 Times in 221 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidius View Post
It may be both/and. Christ is called the "elect" in 1 Peter 2, that is, the "chosen" corner stone. The Greek word is the same (ἐκλεκτός - eklektos, which becomes "elect" in English when the prefix, the preposition ἐκ, loses its kappa). When used of Christ in Peter, it seems to normally be translated "chosen" instead of elect. Either way, the Greek word, and both English translations, are applied to Christ and his people. In Peter, the imagery is of Christ the chosen/elect cornerstone upon whom His people are added as stones to build God's house.
I don't dispute the fact that Christ is the "elect" in one sense. But I don't agree that the "elect" in another sense is a group of believers who chose to trust Christ, rather than those who are chosen by Christ.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 03:54 PM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,956
Thanks: 906
Thanked 820 Times in 504 Posts
I know. I wasn't really commenting on that question in my post, rather pointing out some variation in the usage of the term in Scripture to show that that guy isn't wrong when he says that Christ is also "elect" in some sense.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Davidius For This Useful Post:
Kim G (05-30-2008)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 05:16 PM
danmpem's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 1,404
Blog Entries: 4
Thanks: 347
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
Kim,
While I don't know everything about dispinsationalism, that quote definitely has the perspective of an individual who has an Israel-centered hermeneutic to the Bible. Israel was God's "chosen nation", but not everyone was chosen to be saved within the nation. This is used by some to find a middle-ground in the doctrine of election (a person may be chosen by God, but that does not guarantee salvation for the individual).

(I'm not trying to bash dispinsationalism or any dispies out there, I'm just giving my on the quote.)
__________________
Dan Pemberton
Vacaville, CA

Member, First Baptist Church San Luis Obispo
Formerly ABUSA (We left, so I guess that makes us American Baptists Unleashed!)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 08:19 AM
Jimmy the Greek's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,187
Thanks: 700
Thanked 818 Times in 448 Posts
I think you will find both Arminian-leaning dispies and Calvinistic-leaning dispies, John MacArthur being of the latter type. I don't think Dispensationalism itself is necessarily preferential for or against Calvinism or Arminianism -- although by definition it is anti-Covenant Theology. Earlier proponents (a la Scofield, Chafer, Ryrie, Walvoord) would have identified themselves as soteriological Calvinists (although moderate) and dispensationalists. With its widespread popularity (especially among independent and non-confessional churches) you find some with basically an Arminian theological framework who are dispensationalists.

Regarding the OP, although Christ may certainly be regarded as "the Elect One," the nutshell summary is a typical Arminian conclusion.
__________________
Jim
1689 LBCF
Independent Bible Church
North Texas, USA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 09:36 AM
danmpem's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 1,404
Blog Entries: 4
Thanks: 347
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gomarus View Post
I think you will find both Arminian-leaning dispies and Calvinistic-leaning dispies, John MacArthur being of the latter type. I don't think Dispensationalism itself is necessarily preferential for or against Calvinism or Arminianism -- although by definition it is anti-Covenant Theology.
Although, MacArthur is more covenantal than most would like to admit. Yeah, he has his dispy roots, but between Lordship salvation, 5-point Calvinism, and then some, his teachings transcend those of even progressive dispinsationalism. I first heard of Watson's A Body of Divinity while listening to one of his sermons, when he recommended it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 09:46 AM
Jimmy the Greek's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,187
Thanks: 700
Thanked 818 Times in 448 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by danmpem View Post
Although, MacArthur is more covenantal than most would like to admit. Yeah, he has his dispy roots, but between Lordship salvation, 5-point Calvinism, and then some, his teachings transcend those of even progressive dispinsationalism. I first heard of Watson's A Body of Divinity while listening to one of his sermons, when he recommended it.
Yeah. I'd like to see him leave the remnants of his dispensationalism behind.

S. Lewis Johnson was a lot like MacArthur in his theology. The eccentricties of dispensationalism never seemed to be prominent in his teaching.

Last edited by Jimmy the Greek; 06-13-2008 at 11:49 AM. Reason: add comment on S.L.J.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69