» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 85 | | 26 members and 59 guests | | Abd_Yesua_alMasih, Backwoods Presbyterian, blhowes, Brad, CaseyBessette, christianyouth, Covenant Joel, CPI1943, dkicklig, Ex Nihilo, gene_mingo, Pilgrim72, PuritanCovenanter, py3ak, Reformingstudent, rescuedbyLove, satz | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
02-15-2008, 10:29 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 129
Thanks: 7
Thanked 177 Times in 42 Posts
| | | “Thoughts on Ministerial Education and Preparation” by Dr. C.N. Willborn Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,
I first met Dr. Nick Willborn when he was still a PhD candidate at WTS in Philadelphia and I was a student there. Nick was a good friend of my pastor, Mark Herzer, and I found him to be not only a humble and godly Christian man, but a wonderful individual to sit down with and discuss issues. He's also one of the foremost living authorities on Southern Presbyterianism and in particular, John L. Girardeau. In the years since I first met Nick, I can't count the times I've called on him to discuss a pastoral issue I've been working through, or just to ask a question about something I've been studying.
Recently, I asked him if he wouldn't mind addressing the subject of the theological education of ministers on the planting Old School Churches Blog, given that he is a seminary professor at GPTS and comes from the same Old School Presbyterian school of thought that the blog is seeking to advance. Anyway, he recently sent the following essay for publication: “Thoughts on Ministerial Education and Preparation” by Dr. C.N. Willborn « Building Old School Churches
I hope you find it useful or at the very least thought provoking especially where he suggests some of the weaknesses of current methods of seminary education and proposes a slightly modified approach.
__________________
Pastor Andy Webb Providence PCA, Fayetteville, NC BUILDING OLD SCHOOL CHURCHES "Providence is a Christian's diary, but not his Bible. Sometimes a bad cause prevails and gets ground; but it is not to be liked because it prevails. We must not think the better of what is sinful, because it is successful. This is no rule for our actions to be directed by." - Thomas Watson | | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to SEAGOON For This Useful Post: | | 
02-15-2008, 10:58 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 935
Thanks: 26
Thanked 124 Times in 52 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by SEAGOON Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,
I first met Dr. Nick Willborn when he was still a PhD candidate at WTS in Philadelphia... | I first met Nick at the PCA GA some years back in Colorado Springs. He still makes fun of my discomfort during our trek up Pike's Peak. I still think Pike's Peak does more for me standing at its foot and looking up than standing from its summit and looking down.
DTK
__________________ Sola Scriptura est norma normans non normata
David T. King, pastor
Christ Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Elkton, Maryland Augustine (354-430): Therefore what He [i.e., Christ] has deigned to speak to us, we ought to believe that He meant us to understand. But if we do not understand He, being asked, gives understanding, who gave His Word unasked. NPNF1: Vol. VII, Tractates on John, Tractate XXII, §1.
| 
02-15-2008, 11:02 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,383
Thanks: 1,253
Thanked 635 Times in 455 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by DTK Quote:
Originally Posted by SEAGOON Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,
I first met Dr. Nick Willborn when he was still a PhD candidate at WTS in Philadelphia... | I first met Nick at the PCA GA some years back in Colorado Springs. He still makes fun of my discomfort during our trek up Pike's Peak. I still think Pike's Peak does more for me standing at its foot and looking up than standing from its summit and looking down.
DTK | 
__________________
Chris Poe--Attending Grace Community Baptist Church, Mandeville, LA "There never was a man in the world without a creed. What is a creed? A creed is what you believe. What is a confession? It is a declaration of what you believe. That declaration may be oral or it may be committed to writing, but the creed is there either expressed or implied."—B.H. Carroll | 
02-16-2008, 06:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,966
Thanks: 473
Thanked 697 Times in 359 Posts
| | | What is an "Old school" church? How is it different from a new school church?
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
| 
02-16-2008, 09:52 AM
|  | "da wabbit" | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 3,816
Thanks: 11
Thanked 1,004 Times in 389 Posts
| | Old-New School refers to an historical division within US Presbyterianism, occurring in 1837.
Read New Horizons article, and here's a quote: Quote: |
Today the term Old School Presbyterian has a variety of meanings, but at the time of the division of 1837 it reflected the effort of American Presbyterians to resist being absorbed into the general mainstream of generic American Protestantism. Contemporary Presbyterians may think that being Old School involves certain views on creation, Scripture, sabbatarianism, or worship, but during the middle decades of the nineteenth century, as the Western Memorial indicated, it stood for Presbyterianism that was self-conscious about Calvinism and Presbyterian church polity. In fact, Old School Presbyterianism was opposed to New School Presbyterian views and impulses as much as it was committed to definite views of soteriology and ecclesiology.
| Actually, while frequently in modern arguments certain "issues" do come up (as mentioned above), the basic concerns of modern "Old Schoolers" remains the same: Confessional identity and theology. The modern "issues" are nothing really but an urgent concern that the Confessional stance is being struck at by those who want the identity, but do not wish to be bound to explicit Confessional theology on those issues. Trust me, when the argument leaves the "lesser" issues of Creation and Sabbath and Worship, the next items on the revisionist agenda will be Justification, Election, and Covenant.
Or are we there already?
Frankly, I prefer endless wrangling over "in the space of six days" Creation language.
__________________ Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12 When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:
Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us. --Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? -- | | The Following User Says Thank You to Contra_Mundum For This Useful Post: | | 
02-16-2008, 11:46 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 129
Thanks: 7
Thanked 177 Times in 42 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum What is an "Old school" church? How is it different from a new school church? | Hi Pergamum,
Bruce has given you the historic context for the origin of the term "Old School Presbyterian" here's an answer that attempts to set the Old School Presbyterian philosophy in the context of the modern church:
First, the term “Old School” in the title is not specifically a reference to the pop culture phrase “old school” which, according to Wikipedia: Quote: |
“is a slang term referring to an older school of thinking or acting and to old objects in general, within the context of newer, more modern times. Rather than carrying the negative connotation of obsolete, it may be used to refer to a time of perceived higher standards or level of craft. The term “old school” may be effectively equivalent to “They just don’t make ‘em like this anymore”
| Having said that, there are elements in the definition above that would be applicable to the term “Old School” as we are using it. Old School Presbyterianism is indeed an older school of thought which reached its zenith in the 19th century, Old School Presbyterian churches do indeed stand out in the modern context, and we would argue that they are the product of a commitment to the highest possible standard. However, where we would diverge with the above definition is in that this blog is committed to the idea that when it comes to Old School churches, “they just don’t make ‘em like this anymore” doesn’t need to be the case. Since we believe that God is the builder of these churches, and his unchanging Word is the blueprint, there is no reason we shouldn’t be able to build new Old School churches either by building them from scratch via Old School church planting or by reforming existing churches along Old School lines.
While there are many ways we might define the term Old School, and a lot of the posts on this blog will inevitably be discussions of what Old School Presbyterianism is and isn’t here are a few principles that might be considered foundational to an understanding of Old School Presbyterianism:
1) Old School Presbyterians are committed to the idea that the Bible, which is the Word of God, is entirely sufficient for everything in our faith, life, and practice and we do not need to add anything of our own, nor should we. Therefore our worship is to be ordered according to God’s instructions, and not according to our imaginations or traditions or in any way God has not prescribed for us. This formulation is sometimes referred to as the Regulative Principle of Worship, which refers to the idea that our worship is entirely regulated and ruled by the teaching of scripture. This means that Old School Worship is neither “contemporary” nor “traditional” but simple and biblical.
2) In Church Polity Old School Presbyterians are committed to the idea that Presbyterianism is the form of church polity the bible teaches.
3) In Theology, Old School Presbyterians are committed to the Calvinism of the Westminster Standards, and believe this is the system of doctrine that the Bible teaches. They further believe that when men are ordained in Presbyterian churches, their subscription to the standards should be full and complete, and that any exceptions that a man has to the standards should be minimal.
4) Old School Presbyterians are also committed to the doctrine of the Spirituality of the Church and believe that the Church is not to embroil itself in party politics, nationalism, or anything that Christ has not commissioned his church to do. Dr. Morton Smith explains further what the spirituality of the church entails:
“There is a twofold work for the Church to accomplish. It is the gathering of the elect through the preaching of the Word, and then the instruction of those thus gathered in the full teaching of the Word. In other words the mission of the Church is to evangelize the lost, and then to teach the whole counsel of God to those who have been evangelized. We see the Church in Acts also ministering to her poor, but ultimately this was to the end that they could be taught the faith. This and this alone is the mission of the Church. R. B. Kuiper says, “The church’s task is to teach and preach the Word of God. Whatever else it may properly do is subordinate and subsidiary to that task. This is its supreme task.” He concludes his chapter on this subject by saying:
Just because the preaching of the Word is so great a task the church must devote itself to it alone. For the Church to undertake other activities, not indissolubly bound up with this one, is a colossal blunder, because it inevitably results in neglect of its proper ask. Let not the church degenerate into a social club. Let not the church go into the entertainment business. Let not the church take sides on such aspects of economics, politics, or natural science as are not dealt with in the Word of God. And let the church be content to teach special, not general revelation. Let the church be the church.
We may add further that since this was the only task given to the Church by her King, the Church should confine herself to carrying out this task and this task alone.”
5) Old School Presbyterians also believe in preaching that is warm and aimed not merely at the intellect, but at mens hearts and convictions. They are interested in and pray for genuine biblical revival within God’s churches.
Examples of Old School Presbyterian Theologians might include men like Dabney, Thornwell, Palmer, Peck, Girardeau, Cunningham, Bannerman, Brown, Alexander, Miller and a host of others from Scotland and the United States would fit into this category.
Your Servant in Christ,
Andy Webb | | The Following User Says Thank You to SEAGOON For This Useful Post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |