» Site Navigation | | | |  | 
12-30-2005, 10:33 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 2,489
Thanks: 245
Thanked 166 Times in 101 Posts
| | | Methods of Studying a Book
How do you approach learning from a theological book?
Do you outline it, take notes, read it multiple times, underline, highlight, etc.?
What are some recommended techniques to retaining what is conveyed in a book?
__________________
--chRis
Psalm 115:1
Christopher Reeder
Husband to Kara, Father to Abigail (7), Caleb (6), Grace (4 1/2), Zoë (3), Elijah (1 1/2) and Hannah (born 8/8/2008)
Member: Pilgrim Presbyterian Church (OPC), Raleigh, NC
| 
12-30-2005, 11:36 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,797
Thanks: 73
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
| | |
Thanks for posting this, I was about to ask the PB a similiar question. I recommend the book "How to read a book" by Adler and Van Doren. Their precise dialectical method reminds me of a puritan book. My question was specifically going to be how people engage the scripture references in a theological book? Do you look them up, circle them, write them down?
__________________
*Peter Gray* Elkins Park RPCNA
"Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief. " Mk 9:24
"The greatest thing we can desire, next to the glory of God, is our own salvation; and the sweetest thing we can desire is the assurance of our salvation. In this life we cannot get higher than to be assured of that which in the next life is to be enjoyed. All saints shall enjoy a heaven when they leave this earth; some saints enjoy a heaven while they are here on earth." Joseph Caryl
| 
12-30-2005, 12:46 PM
|  | Owner and Card Conjurer | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Coconut Creek, FL (or wherever I am)
Posts: 4,901
Thanks: 0
Thanked 105 Times in 43 Posts
| | |
Never "study" a book the first time through - you'll never get through it.
ALWAYS read a book straight through the first time, and the second time.
The third time, then start studying it. Yes, circle Scripture references, or mark things in the margins you want clarification or further studying on.
That is why it is so important not to waste your time reading drivel. You want to read good books with every book you pick up. Life is far too short to read through all the junk out there. Scholars and theologians will take time to do that. The church at large should take time to read things that will 1) edify themselves, 2) edify their families, 3) edify the church.
| 
12-30-2005, 02:08 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3,895
Thanks: 123
Thanked 832 Times in 506 Posts
| | |
I follow Matthew's approach with a little addition. I read straight through for about an hour and a half (if I'm lucky enough to have that span of time), and then, before getting up to stretch, I write a short note to myself about the pages read, the subject, the points made, and anything else that comes to mind. I do it from memory without going back. The note is rarely longer than a paragraph.
Then, when I read the book a second time, I review the note I made before reading. It helps me to practice identifying key points and to keep the general context in mind.
Vic
| 
12-30-2005, 03:31 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 582
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| | |
I'm sure this is not new for those on the PB, but we want to be active readers. I don't think it is possible for me to read anything without a pen in my hand. Interact with the text. Write in the margins any thoughts and questions you have for the author, for yourself, for God, etc.
That way, if the phone rings, or you are interruptyed, you can go back and pick up the train of thought. I have a minister colleague who does not read with a pen. He wants his pages to remain as pristine as when he got them. He recently got the Calvin commentaries on sale from CBD, but will not mark them up. His Bible is the same way.
Active reader. Active reader. Active reader.
__________________
Bobby Gawthrop, V.D.M.
licensed, ordained SBC, licensed PCA
Ph.D. student (Whitefield Theological Seminary)
"Every minister in those days had a V.D.M. degree: Verbum Dei Minister. When, therefore, I became a teacher of apologetics it was natural for me to think, not only of my Th.M. and my Ph.D., but above all of my V.D.M. The former degrees were but means whereby I might be true to the latter degree." Cornelius Van Til
| 
12-30-2005, 07:43 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 988
Thanks: 318
Thanked 144 Times in 91 Posts
| | Quote: Originally posted by Preach
I'm sure this is not new for those on the PB, but we want to be active readers. I don't think it is possible for me to read anything without a pen in my hand. Interact with the text. Write in the margins any thoughts and questions you have for the author, for yourself, for God, etc.
That way, if the phone rings, or you are interruptyed, you can go back and pick up the train of thought. I have a minister colleague who does not read with a pen. He wants his pages to remain as pristine as when he got them. He recently got the Calvin commentaries on sale from CBD, but will not mark them up. His Bible is the same way.
Active reader. Active reader. Active reader.
| Oh, no! Marking in the books? (Cringe!) It's a personal preference, but if I'm reading actively, I much prefer to take notes on another piece of paper. Once you mark the text, you have actually altered it, from my perspective. But it's purely a matter of individual taste.
I like reading some books multiple times, but I find that if I read with the intention of reading it again, I sometimes don't pay as much attention as I ought. My favorite method of studying a book is to outline it, sometimes in substantial detail. I can and have done this the first time through, but the outlines certainly are better when I have a better grasp of the overall development, which I gain if I have already read it.
__________________
Evie B.
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Attending Park Street Church, Boston "Remember not the former things, nor consider the things of old. Behold, I am doing a new thing; now it springs forth, do you not perceive it? I will make a way in the wilderness and rivers in the desert." --Isaiah 43:18-19 (ESV) | 
12-30-2005, 10:32 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Dunnville, ONT., Canada
Posts: 4,421
Thanks: 4
Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts
| | |
I too shudder at the thought of marking a book, especially a Bible. What I do, like Matt, is read first, and only sometimes take notes the first time through.
The method is a little scatter-brained to some, I suppose, but it works for me. And it depends on the book. Some books yield sources for the intellect in different ways than others. I read as much between the lines as I do the lines themselves. That is the historian tendency in me, I guess. Some books are great sources of interest even from seeming inoccuous lines or phrases, while others can be pregnant with a lot of flat air.
What I like to do is use a small binder-type notebook, one in which the pages can be removed and reinserted elsewhere. That is my favourite method. I'll take one page and make a couple of cardboard copies of it from an empty Cheerios box, with little tabs on it. Each one will be a divider for the different things that will come up: namely, the thrust and points of the book, particular main premises of the book which require more looking into, and issues arising out of the book. At least these three, for example, but perhaps more.
The idea is that I keep a category running at all times. I had a reason to read that book, and I address that reason in the third section. It will be present in some form in the next book I read, no matter the topical relationship.
I have at least three notebooks going at one time, with full notebooks ( they are full when they have about a dozen empty pages left ) going onto the ready shelf on my desk or night table. Right now I have six of them, writing in three, and referencing three more, while I am reading ( now studying ) Jus Divinum.
I take care what I read too. Right now, as I'm reading Jus Divinum, I am reading a history on the Canadian West, the ranchers and cowboys of Canada. This is a deliberate offset.
[Edited on 12-31-2005 by JohnV]
__________________
JohnV :detective:
John Vandervliet
Ontario, Canada
member of: Canadian Reformed Church
"In coming to understand anything we are rejecting the facts as they are for us in favour of the facts as they are" C.S Lewis, An Experiment in Criticism
| 
12-30-2005, 11:49 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,797
Thanks: 73
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
| | |
The great analogy for active reading is the image of a pitcher and a catcher. The author attempts to communicate his ideas to the reader who attempts receives them. The only thing passive in the transaction is the ball, ie, the book.
| 
12-31-2005, 08:44 PM
|  | Owner and Card Conjurer | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Coconut Creek, FL (or wherever I am)
Posts: 4,901
Thanks: 0
Thanked 105 Times in 43 Posts
| | |
I have found the best way to get to "know a book" is to outline the book, or write a summary of the book. In seminary they made us write 3 sentecnes for every paragraph of Berkoff's Systematic. That took a LONG time, but it was well worth it in the end. You'll always come to intimately know a book through creating its outline.
| 
12-31-2005, 11:13 PM
|  | PB Evil Scientist...Boo! | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 3,293
Thanks: 98
Thanked 766 Times in 451 Posts
| |
Ditto to Matt's suggestion - outlining, for me, has proven particularly useful for studying John Owen.
And to Evie, and others... it's YOUR book! Write in it!
__________________
Todd K. Pedlar
member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA http://semperubi.rtrc.net
"Many men, after a long conversion, see more of the workings of sin in their hearts than ever they did before or at their first conversion. Now, such men have not an increase of sin, but an increase of illumination and light" (Christopher Love)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
12-31-2005, 11:15 PM
|  | PB Evil Scientist...Boo! | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 3,293
Thanks: 98
Thanked 766 Times in 451 Posts
| | Quote: Originally posted by Peter
The great analogy for active reading is the image of a pitcher and a catcher. The author attempts to communicate his ideas to the reader who attempts receives them. The only thing passive in the transaction is the ball, ie, the book.
| This is great... though in postmodern theory, the catcher can turn 90 degrees away from the pitcher, or even 180 degrees away, and still catch the pitch - and what he catches dictates what the pitcher "wrote"!
T
| 
12-31-2005, 11:28 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,951
Thanks: 1,393
Thanked 764 Times in 548 Posts
| | Quote: Originally posted by Ex Nihilo
Oh, no! Marking in the books? (Cringe!) It's a personal preference, but if I'm reading actively, I much prefer to take notes on another piece of paper. Once you mark the text, you have actually altered it, from my perspective. But it's purely a matter of individual taste.
|  to marking books.
__________________
Chris
Member at Grace Community Baptist Church, Mandeville, LA
Beware of a religion without holdfasts. But if I get a grip upon a doctrine they call me a bigot. Let them do so. Bigotry is a hateful thing, and yet that which is now abused as bigotry is a great virtue, and greatly needed in these frivolous times. I have been inclined lately to start a new denomination, and call it "the Church of the Bigoted." Spurgeon
| 
01-05-2006, 01:25 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 2,489
Thanks: 245
Thanked 166 Times in 101 Posts
| | |
I usually read a book straight through without marking it, and then read it again with more scrutiny.
I never outlined a book. That sounds very time consuming, but effective.
I do refrain from marking up scripture. IMO it tends to distract from the text. Same goes for study bibles. They serve their purpose as secondary resources, but as a primary bible to read and meditate with, the notes tend to distract from thinking.
Thanks for the tips!
| 
01-31-2006, 10:30 AM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 320
Thanks: 39
Thanked 37 Times in 26 Posts
| | Quote: Originally posted by ChristopherPaul
How do you approach learning from a theological book?
Do you outline it, take notes, read it multiple times, underline, highlight, etc.?
What are some recommended techniques to retaining what is conveyed in a book?
|
Try "How to Read a Book" by Mortimer Adler (I have made through the first 5 chapters). It is very good - don't let the title fool you. It was originally published in 1940 and discusses elementary, inspectional, analytical, and syntopical reading. It's pretty cheap on used. Also has good reviews from most.
__________________
Don Jones
Member, First Presbyterian,
Jackson, MS
Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious~ Oscar Wilde
| 
01-31-2006, 11:52 AM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: USA, Az, tucson, barrio luna azul
Posts: 429
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| | |
Something likewise really useful is to write a review of the book when you finish it.
I write two, one short one to post to amazon in the customer reviews and one long one to blog.
it is amazing how reading in order to share, plus the emails i get over the reviews really helps me concentrate and review the book in my mind as i read. an excellent exercise.
there are several people here on the board that i would dearly love to see posting reviews to amazon, they have quite a following, i get emails every week about them.
to weigh in on the marking.
i studied with the best reader i ever knew, a older Pastor, who marked up his books so badly that they were almost unreadable to anyone else. His explanation was that the books were a tool to get inside his head and therefore his notes were a conversation with the author.
__________________
motto:God does not subtract from man's allotted time on earth, the hours spent reading. Quote: |
Originally Posted by paul manata| Anyway, since you think I'm usually about 6 months behind you, why waste the time typing back and forth when you can just wait 6 months and I'll agree with you?
| richard williams|member Rincon Mountain PCA|Tucson Arizona| http://rinconpres.com/ | 
06-08-2006, 03:46 PM
|  | Puritanboard Librarian | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 23,525
Thanks: 2,444
Thanked 3,204 Times in 1,886 Posts
| | Quote: Originally posted by Don Quote: Originally posted by ChristopherPaul
How do you approach learning from a theological book?
Do you outline it, take notes, read it multiple times, underline, highlight, etc.?
What are some recommended techniques to retaining what is conveyed in a book?
|
Try "How to Read a Book" by Mortimer Adler (I have made through the first 5 chapters). It is very good - don't let the title fool you. It was originally published in 1940 and discusses elementary, inspectional, analytical, and syntopical reading. It's pretty cheap on used. Also has good reviews from most.
|  Excellent book, highly recommended!
__________________
Andrew Myers
Husband of Jessica, Father of Jackson, Katie and Samuel
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church of Northern Virginia
Warrenton, VA USA
Editor, The Matthew Poole Project
"Let your Morning Thoughts, and your last Evening Thoughts, be what shall become of you to all Eternity." -- Matthew Poole
| 
06-09-2006, 08:19 AM
|  | Puritanboard Librarian | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 23,525
Thanks: 2,444
Thanked 3,204 Times in 1,886 Posts
| |
Richard Baxter's Advice on Reading |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |