» Site Navigation | | | |  | | 
11-03-2007, 07:33 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,195
Thanks: 753
Thanked 636 Times in 391 Posts
| | | Knox Seminary Fiasco continues While it was looking like everyone was going to patch things up in a commendable way, sadly, the Knox Seminary Fiasco continues. I'm speechless. The word shameful comes to mind though. Stuff That Matters - Faith & Politics: Resigned Knox Board Told Don’t Bother
__________________
Chris Coldwell
Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member • Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books • The Confessional Presbyterian, A Journal for Discussion of Presbyterian Doctrine & Practice • The Blue Banner Archive When heresy rises in an evangelical body, it is never frank and open. It always begins by skulking, and assuming a disguise. Its advocates, when together, boast of great improvements, and congratulate one another on having gone greatly beyond the ‘old dead orthodoxy,’ and on having left behind many of its antiquated errors: but when taxed with deviations from the received faith, they complain of the unreasonableness of their accusers, as they ‘differ from it only in words.’ This has been the standing course of errorists ever since the apostolic age. Samuel Miller, Introductory essay, The Articles of the Synod of Dort (1841).
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
11-03-2007, 07:40 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,195
Thanks: 753
Thanked 636 Times in 391 Posts
| | I should have added that Reformed Musings blogs goes over what is contrary to the PCA Book of Church order regarding aspects of this. A Sad Session Overreach « Reformed Musings | 
11-03-2007, 07:41 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 11,413
Thanks: 795
Thanked 2,037 Times in 977 Posts
| | | {shakes head in disbelief} | 
11-03-2007, 07:44 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: RADFORD VA.
Posts: 3,924
Thanks: 717
Thanked 766 Times in 387 Posts
| | | What exactly was this man teaching that upset them so?
__________________ 1689 Baptist Confession
Psa 55:16 As for me, I will call upon God; and the LORD shall save me.
Psa 55:17 Evening, and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud: and he shall hear my voice.
James Farley, Wilderness Road Baptist Assembly.
Husband of Melissa and father of Ann. www.wildernessroadbaptist.org | 
11-03-2007, 08:01 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,817
Thanks: 445
Thanked 658 Times in 335 Posts
| | | What's happening...in a nutshell?
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
| 
11-03-2007, 08:34 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,195
Thanks: 753
Thanked 636 Times in 391 Posts
| | | The majority of the Knox board members, suspended or fired a professor for what they thought was an extreme view of typology; I don't know if that was the only reason, and this may be an over simplification. The session reversed that decision, and six board members resigned, including R. C. Sproul Sr. Eventually the Stated Clerk ruled that the Book of Church order governed the matter and that the session didn't have the right to overturn the decision (again, this is over simplifying; read the links). The session invited the board members who resigned to unresign, without any stipulations or qualifications. Two weeks later, evidently because the board members who did not resign were suspicions of the motives of the returning members, required a letter to be signed stating the returned members repented and other binding stipulations. Whatever one may think of the issue at root of the suspension/firing; this is just shameful to ask them to come back without stipulations and then, oops, when they took the offer, decide to impose conditions. Again, this is condensed and you should read the two links for the full story and the first link for the documentation from each side. | 
11-03-2007, 09:29 AM
|  | Megster | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 6,521
Thanks: 369
Thanked 221 Times in 199 Posts
| | | I see that one of the requirements was to recant their charge that this fellow's teaching was unconfessional. That's asking too much, in my opinion. | 
11-03-2007, 11:11 AM
|  | Lanesterator Minimus | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 280
Thanked 640 Times in 297 Posts
| | | Another important issue in the charge against Gage (and I am making NO judgment on whether the charge was accurate or not: I'm still undecided as to which side is correct. Men I deeply respect are on both sides) was whether or not he taught something equivalent to the fourfold interpretation of the Medieval period, which would be contrary to WCF 1.9. | 
11-03-2007, 12:32 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,217
Thanks: 102
Thanked 52 Times in 45 Posts
| | | Ok, I agree that it is wrong to allow the board members back, only to add further stipulations afterwards and I would also like to state that church politics are always shameful and this incident reeks of church politics.
Having said that, I'm curious: Was Knox Seminary originally set up as a "ministry" (for lack of a better word) of Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church? Was the Session of CRPC accurate in saying that the Board of Knox Seminary is a Standing Commission of CRPC? If so, how could the stated clerk of the PCA offer an assessment in favor of the board of Knox Seminary? It seems to me that this is a local church issue.
Another question I would want answered before making up my mind on this topic is: Who has the right to discipline professors at KTS? Does that responsibility fall to the board of directors or does the Session of CRPC alone have that authority?
Also, I would encourage everyone to withhold judgment until we hear both sides of the issue. | 
11-03-2007, 01:09 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: California
Posts: 792
Thanks: 9
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
| | | If the resignations were not accepted, then they never officially left the board. They are still on the board.
__________________
David Cronkhite, Elder Pasadena United Reformed Church "I count myself one of the number of those
who write as they learn, and learn as they write." | 
11-03-2007, 01:18 PM
|  | McFadderator Minimizing | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 3,463
Thanks: 702
Thanked 1,044 Times in 625 Posts
| | | As a Californian, I have NO clue as to the corporate culture of Coral Ridge or Knox. However, my guess is that whenever a larger-than-life leader of the stature of Kennedy disappears from the scene, you should expect some pretty significant missteps by people trying to adjust to the political environment absent the founder. Look at any large church of whatever polity deal with the death or retirement of a founder or long-term pastor. These kinds of foolish actions are sadly all too common. I pray that they don't do anything to besmirch the reputation of a fine school or some very good people. Sheesh!
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
11-03-2007, 01:45 PM
|  | PCA Pastor | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 7,493
Thanks: 73
Thanked 780 Times in 372 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sastark Ok, I agree that it is wrong to allow the board members back, only to add further stipulations afterwards and I would also like to state that church politics are always shameful and this incident reeks of church politics.
Having said that, I'm curious: Was Knox Seminary originally set up as a "ministry" (for lack of a better word) of Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church? Was the Session of CRPC accurate in saying that the Board of Knox Seminary is a Standing Commission of CRPC? If so, how could the stated clerk of the PCA offer an assessment in favor of the board of Knox Seminary? It seems to me that this is a local church issue.
Another question I would want answered before making up my mind on this topic is: Who has the right to discipline professors at KTS? Does that responsibility fall to the board of directors or does the Session of CRPC alone have that authority?
Also, I would encourage everyone to withhold judgment until we hear both sides of the issue. | The board cannot be a commission (standing or otherwise) of the Session. In order to be on a commission (except as an invited ex officio guest, like the preacher at an ordination), you must be a member of the court. In order to be a member of the Session of CRPC, a man must have been a member of CRPC and have been elected an elder from that congregation. It is manifestly not the case with the Teaching Elders (who are members of their respective Presbyteries), and don't think it is the case with the non-TEs either. Furthermore, as Dr. Taylor states, the Session has no authority over Dr. Gage (himself a member of a Presbytery) either to condemn or exonerate. All of this is standard polity - and does not touch on the substantive issue of Dr. Gage's teaching.
__________________ Fredrick T. Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX) Christ Church Blog "The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle) | 
11-03-2007, 02:18 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,195
Thanks: 753
Thanked 636 Times in 391 Posts
| | | How could anyone claim this when a woman was on the board of directors? | 
11-03-2007, 02:31 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,795
Thanks: 1,263
Thanked 1,420 Times in 749 Posts
| | | Can someone write a brief pargraph of all this in terms where someone who is still a novice to Presbyterian polity can understand it? Who did what and what was wrong and...? | 
11-03-2007, 02:42 PM
|  | PCA Pastor | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 7,493
Thanks: 73
Thanked 780 Times in 372 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress How could anyone claim this when a woman was on the board of directors? | I have no idea, Chris. | 
11-03-2007, 05:44 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
| | | Women on Seminary Board of Directors? Q: Why is/was there a female on the board of directors at Knox?
A: Accreditation. The Association of Theological Schools (ATS), the accrediting authority/body for many seminaries and theological schools, to include Knox, mandates the following in its Standards, paragraph 8.3.1.3: “Members of the governing board shall possess the qualifications appropriate to the task they will undertake. In accordance with the school’s purpose and constituencies, the governing board’s membership should reflect diversity of race, ethnicity, and gender.”
You can refer to the actual ATS Standards via this link: Standards
__________________
Jason G.
FPC Margate, PCA (Margate, FL)
Knox Theological Seminary, student, FL Turretin Blog Author | 
11-03-2007, 05:54 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
| | | Essentially, the ATS mandates that the governing board of a theological school must reflect the diversity of the student body. Knox has both male and female and numerous ethnicities comprising the student body. Therefore, the board of Knox must reflect this reality. | 
11-04-2007, 10:07 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 1,261
Thanks: 107
Thanked 153 Times in 98 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Can someone write a brief pargraph of all this in terms where someone who is still a novice to Presbyterian polity can understand it? Who did what and what was wrong and...? | Why worry about it, Josh? Really, this whole matter should be kept within PCA circles. I don't see that it is my business to know about it or make judgements. I am sure that within the PCA the mechanisms exist to sort this matter out properly.
__________________ Jonathan Hunt
Preaching Elder Cheltenham Evangelical Free Church (Confessionally Based)
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.
-- Thomas Elsworth
| 
11-04-2007, 10:32 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,797
Thanks: 73
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JonathanHunt Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Can someone write a brief pargraph of all this in terms where someone who is still a novice to Presbyterian polity can understand it? Who did what and what was wrong and...? | Why worry about it, Josh? Really, this whole matter should be kept within PCA circles. I don't see that it is my business to know about it or make judgements. I am sure that within the PCA the mechanisms exist to sort this matter out properly. |  I wonder if I'm committing the lust of the eyes in even caring. The desire I have to hear scandals in the church is probably a vain curiosity. Some knowledge may be useful for prayer but how much do I need to know?
__________________
*Peter Gray* Elkins Park RPCNA
"Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief. " Mk 9:24
"The greatest thing we can desire, next to the glory of God, is our own salvation; and the sweetest thing we can desire is the assurance of our salvation. In this life we cannot get higher than to be assured of that which in the next life is to be enjoyed. All saints shall enjoy a heaven when they leave this earth; some saints enjoy a heaven while they are here on earth." Joseph Caryl
| 
11-04-2007, 11:07 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,195
Thanks: 753
Thanked 636 Times in 391 Posts
| | | These cautions are certainly generally appropriate; however, let's do Josh the favor of letting him judge his own conscience in asking for a summary of what exactly has transpired. | 
11-04-2007, 06:21 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,195
Thanks: 753
Thanked 636 Times in 391 Posts
| | A significant recension at Reformedmusings is posted. An Error and Repentence « Reformed Musings | 
11-04-2007, 07:24 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,795
Thanks: 1,263
Thanked 1,420 Times in 749 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress These cautions are certainly generally appropriate; however, let's do Josh the favor of letting him judge his own conscience in asking for a summary of what exactly has transpired. | Thanks.
Jonathan, I appreciate the cautionary note. I just read through the post and am not really comprehending. I just wanted to understand the issue. That's all. | 
11-04-2007, 08:40 PM
|  | Megster | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 6,521
Thanks: 369
Thanked 221 Times in 199 Posts
| | | | |