» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 119 | | 28 members and 91 guests | | amishrockstar, austinww, Backwoods Presbyterian, Brad, christabella_warren, Heidelberg1, JM, johnbugay, JonathanHunt, LeeJUk, Micah Everett, Montanablue, Pergamum, Presbyterian Deacon, rrfranks, sailorswife, satz, StainlessThroughGrace, Theogenes, TimV | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | | |
View Poll Results: Is "Classical" education "Christian" education? | |
YES
|    | 3 | 7.69% | |
NO
|    | 21 | 53.85% | |
Not sure
|    | 1 | 2.56% | |
Some of it is (only what lines up with scripture)
|    | 14 | 35.90% |  | 
07-21-2009, 07:34 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Spokane, WA, USA
Posts: 184
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
| | | Christians & Classical Education
Do you consider "Classical" education to be "Christian" education?
Why or why not?
Thanks
| 
07-21-2009, 07:43 PM
|  | Hench Wench | | Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,910
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,480 Times in 743 Posts
| | |
No more than I consider Aeschylus to be a 'Christian' author, or macaroni and cheese to be a 'Christian' meal, or the tree outside my window to be a 'Christian' tree; but all of these things in various ways display His glory, and I think a classical education has an advantage over much of what passes currently in that regard. I think just reading classical literature forces one to seriously consider God more than many 'Christian' literature programs do.
__________________
Heidi
Indianapolis, Indiana
Patience must dwell with Love, for Love and Sorrow
Have pitched their tent together here:
Love all alone will build a house tomorrow,
And sorrow not be near. -Christina Rossetti
| | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to a mere housewife For This Useful Post: | | 
07-21-2009, 07:56 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: N MS
Posts: 541
Thanks: 293
Thanked 174 Times in 85 Posts
| | |
I'm not sure how to vote. I think that Classical Education *can* be Christian, if you make it that way.
I homeschool and we use a curriculum called Tapestry of Grace. We are studying classical literature and such, but on the framework of scripture and God's Sovereign hand in ALL things in history. Each author, philosopher, theologian that we come up against is viewed through the lense of scripture and how they lined up.....or didn't. -----Added 7/21/2009 at 07:56:24 EST-----
I went back and voted *NO* because, as it stands, without adding the framework of scripture, it is not.
__________________
Polly
wife and mom
participating in an OPC church plant effort in Collierville, TN
living in N MS
| | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to JoyFullMom For This Useful Post: | | 
07-21-2009, 08:21 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 628
Thanks: 69
Thanked 287 Times in 164 Posts
| | |
To answer "Yes" would be to assume that the Scriptures give specific detail on what method we must use, or how we must educate our children. That we must educate them in the Scriptures is true of course, but after that I think the Bible allows for a fair amount of liberty in this regard. Although we generally prefer a classical model in educateing our children, I've seen an almost blind devotion to it from others. I'm sorry, but as cool as it is to tell my Reformed friends that my kids speak Latin, I'd rather they learn Spanish, French and Chinese. And many of the classical works are only marginally beneficial to most people.
Bottom line, the Scriptures give us a broad outline, we have to fill it in and we need to be careful not to bind the consciences of other believers with how we've decided to fill in those blanks.
__________________ Jon Peters
Member, Reformation Fellowship (OPC) (Roseville, CA)
Folsom, CA
| | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jon Peters For This Useful Post: | | 
07-21-2009, 08:44 PM
|  | Hench Wench | | Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,910
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,480 Times in 743 Posts
| | Quote: |
we need to be careful not to bind the consciences of other believers with how we've decided to fill in those blanks.
| I agree -- I think it has always been recognized that classical education was not suitable for everyone? (and I have met some people who haven't learned critical thinking etc. that it is promoted as being guaranteed to instill, so well as others who had a much more haphazard education.)
| 
07-21-2009, 10:25 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,256
Thanks: 155
Thanked 556 Times in 340 Posts
| | |
We live in an ordered universe -- certain laws and processes can be observed and discovered that are useful for understanding the realm of reason and the natural world. I think the "ancients" did an incredible job in discovering principles of math, science, and critical thinking -- but only because their work reflects the order that God Himself created.
As a homeschooling Mom, I try to draw on the best resources and constantly remind my kids that what we learn must be consistent with what God has revealed in His word to be true. Aristotelian logic is certainly a worthy subject. A Greek play that wraps a story line around women refusing their husbands, well I don't see that as a worthy part of my child's education just because it's Classical Literature. Familiarity with Latin because of its contribution to modern, western languages? that's great. Spending hours translating ancient works? I'd rather see it spent studying scripture. Pick what's useful for you and your family.
| 
07-22-2009, 02:48 PM
|  | Hench Wench | | Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,910
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,480 Times in 743 Posts
| | |
Even the Bible tells stories of adultery; there's a difference between the glorification and the tragedy of sin -- one of the reasons the classics are classics is because those ancient pagans understood so well not only the fleeting attractiveness but also the terrible tragic cycles of sin.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to a mere housewife For This Useful Post: | | 
07-22-2009, 03:25 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Pleasanton, California
Posts: 1,107
Thanks: 724
Thanked 188 Times in 108 Posts
| | |
Strictly speaking the answer is no. Classical refers to pagan Greek and Roman authors and can not properly be considered Christian.
If you are referring to a method (Grammar, Logic, Rhetoric), then yes, it can be Christian.
__________________
Brian Eschen
Ruling Elder, PCA
Pleasanton, California
| 
07-22-2009, 07:38 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: La Grange Park, IL
Posts: 1,756
Thanks: 281
Thanked 379 Times in 217 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by brianeschen If you are referring to a method (Grammar, Logic, Rhetoric), then yes, it can be Christian. | Grammar, logic, and rhetoric are subjects.
__________________
Casey, Chicagoland, OPC
| 
07-22-2009, 11:52 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Pleasanton, California
Posts: 1,107
Thanks: 724
Thanked 188 Times in 108 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by CaseyBessette Quote:
Originally Posted by brianeschen If you are referring to a method (Grammar, Logic, Rhetoric), then yes, it can be Christian. | Grammar, logic, and rhetoric are subjects.  | Not necessarily. These terms also describe stages of learning.
| 
07-23-2009, 10:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,302
Thanks: 685
Thanked 363 Times in 207 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by jon peters although we generally prefer a classical model in educateing our children, i've seen an almost blind devotion to it from others. I'm sorry, but as cool as it is to tell my reformed friends that my kids speak latin, i'd rather they learn spanish, french and chinese. | Amen! | | The Following User Says Thank You to sastark For This Useful Post: | | 
07-23-2009, 10:58 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,813
Thanks: 248
Thanked 453 Times in 308 Posts
| | |
No, it's not. That doesn't mean it's wrong.
I would argue that the vast majority of world history isn't Christian, but that doesn't mean it's not worth studying.
__________________
Jonathan
Audio Engineer
Reformed Anabaptist
Ohio
Moroni's magical glasses of proper interpretation: | | The Following User Says Thank You to Skyler For This Useful Post: | | 
07-23-2009, 10:58 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Acton, Maine
Posts: 307
Thanks: 81
Thanked 94 Times in 73 Posts
| | |
I would argue that all of world history is worth studying because it's the work of our Sovereign God.
__________________
Sandra, Lady of the Lake
CBA, Acton ME http://www.viewsfromthedeck.blogspot.com Let us then approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need. Hebrews 4:16
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Lady of the Lake For This Useful Post: | | 
07-24-2009, 12:40 AM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: N MS
Posts: 541
Thanks: 293
Thanked 174 Times in 85 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady of the Lake I would argue that all of world history is worth studying because it's the work of our Sovereign God. | I agree! I cannot say how much it has increased our faith as we have studied history and seen God's hand moving in EVERYTHING!
If nothing else, it has given us our motto "It ain't always about US!" | | The Following User Says Thank You to JoyFullMom For This Useful Post: | | 
07-24-2009, 12:47 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Montana
Posts: 3,789
Thanks: 2,624
Thanked 985 Times in 537 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyler No, it's not. That doesn't mean it's wrong.
I would argue that the vast majority of world history isn't Christian, but that doesn't mean it's not worth studying. | Ditto.
__________________
Kathleen M
nondenominational
Montana
| 
07-30-2009, 04:23 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Jackson, TN
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | |
My wife teaches at a classical Christian school, and starting this year two of our three kids will attend there. I love the idea that a classical education reinforces the idea of an intentional, holistic view of reality; however, as the motto of our school says, there is no understanding without the cross (nullus intellectus sine cruce). Therefore, I would have to agree with the notion that classical education creates a framework within which we can approach God through knowledge and learning.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |