» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 82 | | 22 members and 60 guests | | APuritansMind, Athaleyah, Backwoods Presbyterian, Blueridge Baptist, Brad, CarlosOliveira, CharlieJ, ColdSilverMoon, Davidius, Devin, Grace Alone, Guido's Brother, Javilo, LAYMAN JOE, smhbbag, Southern Presbyterian, Timothy William, turmeric | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | | 
11-01-2007, 05:23 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,869
Thanks: 860
Thanked 764 Times in 473 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by satz Something a little more on topic:
I am happy to affirm that it is unjust and a sin for the government when criminals who deserve it under Moses' law are not put to death. On the other hand I also believe, as I have posted before, that it is God's (revealed) will that his people will live under unrighteous governments until the time Christ returns. So there is a sense whereby God's people can be happy about certain aspects of the fact that biblical law is not enforced. | No one denies that. We are only exercising our prophetic abilities. Quote: |
If I were to someday, God forbid, commit adultery, I would be very grateful that would not be put to death
| obviously. Quote: |
but have the chance to not only repent, but live a life fitting with repentance from then on. In 1 Cor 5 Paul told the church to throw the fornicator out not so that the state could deal with him, but in the hope of securing repentance and his eventual re-admission into the body.
| Remember, Paul was writing to the Church, not to the Civil government. Quote: |
Would it have been unjust for the state to have executed him for his immorality? No. But God's NT people can still be thankful for the fact that such a person had the chance to repent and atone by living a godly life.
| So? Of course we are thankful. But let's apply your maxim on a different level. What about a serial killer? We would rejoice in his conversion, but does that clear him with the civil law?
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
| 
11-01-2007, 05:37 PM
| | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 117
Thanked 80 Times in 48 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Remember, Paul was writing to the Church, not to the Civil government. | Agreed. Off course, I believe Paul never wrote to the Civil government because practically speaking, regulation of government is not the church's concern in the NT. Quote: |
So? Of course we are thankful. But let's apply your maxim on a different level. What about a serial killer? We would rejoice in his conversion, but does that clear him with the civil law?
| No, it does not clear him with the civil law and the state is completely just to put him to death. If he was genuinely repentent and showed the fruit of conversion, I would still rejoice if for some reason the state dropped the ball and didn't execute him.
__________________
Mark Li
International University Church
New South Wales, Australia
| 
11-01-2007, 05:37 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,554
Thanks: 1,603
Thanked 378 Times in 228 Posts
| | |
In addition, wasn't there a place for atonement and forgiveness under the Mosaic Law, especially in cases of sins of ignorance?
People who oppose theonomy sometimes seem to paint a cruel picture of God's Law in order to bolster their argument.
After all, Aaron was not put to death for his idolotry. Moses was not put to death for misrepresenting God.
__________________ | 
11-01-2007, 05:39 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,869
Thanks: 860
Thanked 764 Times in 473 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK In addition, wasn't there a place for atonement and forgiveness under the Mosaic Law, especially in cases of sins of ignorance?
People who oppose theonomy sometimes seem to paint a cruel picture of God's Law in order to bolster their argument.
After all, Aaron was not put to death for his idolotry. Moses was not put to death for misrepresenting God. | Yes. And even if the State wanted to prosecute, logistically it would be very difficult because of its reduced size.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Ivanhoe For This Useful Post: | | 
11-01-2007, 05:53 PM
|  | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 7,372
Thanks: 775
Thanked 703 Times in 440 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Lev 19:27: Quote: |
Ye shall not round the corners of your heads, neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy beard.
| |
I was being biblical....
| 
11-01-2007, 05:59 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 1,468
Thanks: 237
Thanked 181 Times in 150 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK In addition, wasn't there a place for atonement and forgiveness under the Mosaic Law, especially in cases of sins of ignorance?
People who oppose theonomy sometimes seem to paint a cruel picture of God's Law in order to bolster their argument.
After all, Aaron was not put to death for his idolotry. Moses was not put to death for misrepresenting God. | Yes. And even if the State wanted to prosecute, logistically it would be very difficult because of its reduced size. | Neither was he put to death for killing the Egyptian.
Hey Jacob, serious question, who was supposed to carry out the penal sanctions? And are there any examples of this even happening in the OT?
And dont pull the "Arguement from silence" bologna. I am asking seriously. Not trying to Pigeon hole you. Hey is pigeon whole a sophist word like the rest you use?
__________________
N. Robert; Trinity Reformed Church RCA, Holland MI
Once in a while you can get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right."
| 
11-01-2007, 06:01 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3,482
Thanks: 106
Thanked 624 Times in 377 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter I was being biblical.... |  But your head looked kinda round in that picture. | 
11-01-2007, 06:04 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,554
Thanks: 1,603
Thanked 378 Times in 228 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace Hey is pigeon whole a sophist word like the rest you use?  | Can you elaborate on this? Why are you accusing Jacob of 'sophism'?
__________________ | 
11-01-2007, 06:08 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,869
Thanks: 860
Thanked 764 Times in 473 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK In addition, wasn't there a place for atonement and forgiveness under the Mosaic Law, especially in cases of sins of ignorance?
People who oppose theonomy sometimes seem to paint a cruel picture of God's Law in order to bolster their argument.
After all, Aaron was not put to death for his idolotry. Moses was not put to death for misrepresenting God. | Yes. And even if the State wanted to prosecute, logistically it would be very difficult because of its reduced size. | Neither was he put to death for killing the Egyptian. | That wasn't a crime, but an act of war. Either way, beside the point. Quote: |
Hey Jacob, serious question, who was supposed to carry out the penal sanctions? And are there any examples of this even happening in the OT?
| Elders of the gate. # Deuteronomy 19:12
the elders of his town shall send for him, bring him back from the city, and hand him over to the avenger of blood to die.
# Joshua 20:4
"When he flees to one of these cities, he is to stand in the entrance of the city gate and state his case before the elders of that city. Then they are to admit him into their city and give him a place to live with them. Quote:
And dont pull the "Arguement from silence" bologna. I am asking seriously. Not trying to Pigeon hole you. Hey is pigeon whole a sophist word like the rest you use? | Hopefully my answer shall suffice. But I don't really understand why you asked the question. Your question sort of assumed that God never really intended his law to be carried out. Even the Reformed Relativist believes that the Israelites should have carried it out.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
| 
11-01-2007, 06:08 PM
|  | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 7,372
Thanks: 775
Thanked 703 Times in 440 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by victorbravo Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter I was being biblical.... |  But your head looked kinda round in that picture.  |
Well, maybe you are right. Maybe it got a little to rounded.
| 
11-01-2007, 06:10 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 1,468
Thanks: 237
Thanked 181 Times in 150 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace Hey is pigeon whole a sophist word like the rest you use?  | Can you elaborate on this? Why are you accusing Jacob of 'sophism'? | Just teasing a tad, hence the wink. I honestly enjoy Jacobs rhetoric much.
I spelled pigeon hole wrong though.
I accuse all philosophers and logicians of being sophists..... That sais, my questions were serious though.
Who carried out teh penal sanctions and are there examples of it happening besides directly from the hands of God..
__________________
N. Robert; Trinity Reformed Church RCA, Holland MI
Once in a while you can get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right."
| 
11-01-2007, 06:12 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,869
Thanks: 860
Thanked 764 Times in 473 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace Hey is pigeon whole a sophist word like the rest you use?  | Can you elaborate on this? Why are you accusing Jacob of 'sophism'? | Just teasing a tad, hence the wink. I honestly enjoy Jacobs rhetoric much.
I spelled pigeon hole wrong though.
I accuse all philosophers and logicians of being sophists..... That sais, my questions were serious though.
Who carried out teh penal sanctions and are there examples of it happening besides directly from the hands of God.. | There is some truth to his teasing. Sadly, there have been times when I used my meager skills at logic to dance an argument. Hopefully, that is past me.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
| 
11-01-2007, 06:14 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 1,468
Thanks: 237
Thanked 181 Times in 150 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane
Yes. And even if the State wanted to prosecute, logistically it would be very difficult because of its reduced size. | Neither was he put to death for killing the Egyptian. | That wasn't a crime, but an act of war. Either way, beside the point. Quote: |
Hey Jacob, serious question, who was supposed to carry out the penal sanctions? And are there any examples of this even happening in the OT?
| Elders of the gate. # Deuteronomy 19:12
the elders of his town shall send for him, bring him back from the city, and hand him over to the avenger of blood to die.
# Joshua 20:4
"When he flees to one of these cities, he is to stand in the entrance of the city gate and state his case before the elders of that city. Then they are to admit him into their city and give him a place to live with them. Quote:
And dont pull the "Arguement from silence" bologna. I am asking seriously. Not trying to Pigeon hole you. Hey is pigeon whole a sophist word like the rest you use? | Hopefully my answer shall suffice. But I don't really understand why you asked the question. Your question sort of assumed that God never really intended his law to be carried out. Even the Reformed Relativist believes that the Israelites should have carried it out. | How was moses killing the egyptian when he fled an act of war?
I asked becasue I did not know. And I do not know of any recorded incident..
__________________
N. Robert; Trinity Reformed Church RCA, Holland MI
Once in a while you can get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right."
| 
11-01-2007, 06:35 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,869
Thanks: 860
Thanked 764 Times in 473 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace
Neither was he put to death for killing the Egyptian. | That wasn't a crime, but an act of war. Either way, beside the point.
Elders of the gate. # Deuteronomy 19:12
the elders of his town shall send for him, bring him back from the city, and hand him over to the avenger of blood to die.
# Joshua 20:4
"When he flees to one of these cities, he is to stand in the entrance of the city gate and state his case before the elders of that city. Then they are to admit him into their city and give him a place to live with them. Quote:
And dont pull the "Arguement from silence" bologna. I am asking seriously. Not trying to Pigeon hole you. Hey is pigeon whole a sophist word like the rest you use? | Hopefully my answer shall suffice. But I don't really understand why you asked the question. Your question sort of assumed that God never really intended his law to be carried out. Even the Reformed Relativist believes that the Israelites should have carried it out. | How was moses killing the egyptian when he fled an act of war?
I asked becasue I did not know. And I do not know of any recorded incident.. | That was tongue-in-cheek. My point was Moses was not guilty of a capital crime since he acted in self-defense of his neighbor. Most civilized societies recognize that (or did before this generation).
As to the recorded incident, my references say who was usually in charge of jurisdiction.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
| 
11-01-2007, 06:42 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,554
Thanks: 1,603
Thanked 378 Times in 228 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Lev 19:27: Quote: |
Ye shall not round the corners of your heads, neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy beard.
| |
I was being biblical.... | You are a beautiful man, brother!
Pro 20:29 Quote: |
The glory of young men [is] their strength: and the beauty of old men [is] the gray head.
|
__________________ | 
11-01-2007, 07:27 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: California
Posts: 792
Thanks: 9
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Quote:
Originally Posted by non dignus Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane In that case, let's just ditch the 10 commandments. | No. Let's just excommunicate, not execute. | Would you apply that same reasoning to kidnappers, serial rapists, incorribigly criminal violence? | I'm in favor of captial punishment, but not for pagans, perverts, and problem children.
The Bishop is no good for civilian affairs, and the magistrate is no good for ecclesiastical affairs.
__________________
David Cronkhite, Elder Pasadena United Reformed Church "I count myself one of the number of those
who write as they learn, and learn as they write." | 
11-01-2007, 07:38 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,869
Thanks: 860
Thanked 764 Times in 473 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by non dignus Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Quote:
Originally Posted by non dignus
No. Let's just excommunicate, not execute. | Would you apply that same reasoning to kidnappers, serial rapists, incorribigly criminal violence? |
The Bishop is no good for civilian affairs, and the magistrate is no good for ecclesiastical affairs. | And who said we should mix the two? Bahnsen had a whole chapter in TiCE defending the Separation of Church and State. Rushdoony's lectures on American History extol in the highest of praises the voluntary church. Rather, it is usually the critics of theonomy who have a hard time consistently maintaining the separation.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
| 
11-01-2007, 08:11 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: California
Posts: 792
Thanks: 9
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Quote:
Originally Posted by non dignus Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane
Would you apply that same reasoning to kidnappers, serial rapists, incorribigly criminal violence? |
The Bishop is no good for civilian affairs, and the magistrate is no good for ecclesiastical affairs. | And who said we should mix the two? Bahnsen had a whole chapter in TiCE defending the Separation of Church and State. Rushdoony's lectures on American History extol in the highest of praises the voluntary church. Rather, it is usually the critics of theonomy who have a hard time consistently maintaining the separation. | OK, but if the church and state are mirror images of one another what is the net effect?
__________________
David Cronkhite, Elder Pasadena United Reformed Church "I count myself one of the number of those
who write as they learn, and learn as they write." | |