The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Theological Forum > The Law of God

The Law of God Discussions relating to the 10 Commandments, uses of the Law, etc.
Oh how I love your law! It is my meditation all the day. (Ps. 119:97)

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

» Online Users: 56
11 members and 45 guests
CalvinandHodges, CovenantalBaptist, JoelYrick, rjlynam, satz, Southern Presbyterian, ~~Susita~~
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2007, 05:44 PM
Barnpreacher's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,396
Thanks: 307
Thanked 232 Times in 149 Posts
Theonomy and Marriage

How would theonomy teach us to view marriage today in America? Obviously there are cultural details that were present in the OT that aren't present in the Western culture today. Would the standing law be that "Marriage is honorable" and then it would be dependant on your culture?

Does there need to be a ceremony for that marriage covenant to be a true covenant simply because it is the way of our culture? Would it be sinful without the ceremony if the two believers never joined to anyone else?
__________________
Ryan Barnhart - Pastor of OGBC
Husband to a beautiful wife, Father to two beautiful girls
"But by the grace of God I am what I am." I Corinthians 15:10

"I confess to you, that if I can but live and die serving the Lord Jesus, it will make no difference to me whether I am eaten by Cannibals or by worms. And in the Great Day my Resurrection body will rise as fair as yours in the likeness of our risen Redeemer." - John Paton
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2007, 06:09 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,818
Thanks: 827
Thanked 754 Times in 464 Posts
Marriage in a church before the covenant community is better than a marriage by the Justice of the Peace (assuming all parties are Christian).

Marriage by a Justice of the Peace is better than living in sin.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2007, 10:02 PM
Barnpreacher's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,396
Thanks: 307
Thanked 232 Times in 149 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Marriage in a church before the covenant community is better than a marriage by the Justice of the Peace (assuming all parties are Christian).

Marriage by a Justice of the Peace is better than living in sin.
In the Old Testament times it wasn't living in sin to not participate in a marriage ceremony. The man left his father and mother and was joined to his wife. Genesis 24:67, "And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah's tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother's death." That seemed to be a covenantal marriage in the sight of God without a wedding ceremony.

Did that begin to change when there were marriage feasts? Does anybody know the custom of when that began to change and ceremonies became a part of marriage?

Last edited by Barnpreacher; 10-28-2007 at 10:20 PM. Reason: spelling
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2007, 10:07 PM
clstamper's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 150
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
Marriage teaches you to live in the real world instead of building abstractions in the air. Then you stop being a theonomist!
__________________
Chris Stamper
Park Cities PCA
(Dallas, TX)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2007, 10:09 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,818
Thanks: 827
Thanked 754 Times in 464 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnpreacher View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Marriage in a church before the covenant community is better than a marriage by the Justice of the Peace (assuming all parties are Christian).

Marriage by a Justice of the Peace is better than living in sin.
In the Old Testament times it wasn't living in sin to not participate in a marriage ceremony. The man left his father and mother and was joined to his wife. Genesis 24:67, "And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah's tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother's death." That seemed to be a covenental marriage in the sight of God without a wedding ceremony.

Did that begin to change when there were marriage feasts? Does anybody know the custom of when that began to change and ceremonies became a part of marriage?
You could have a point there. There was a (rather heated) thread on PB about 3 years ago concerning when and what validated a marriage (was it the oath, the church, or consummation?)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2007, 11:47 PM
Southern Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 2,605
Thanks: 657
Thanked 254 Times in 202 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
There was a (rather heated) thread on PB about 3 years ago concerning when and what validated a marriage (was it the oath, the church, or consummation?)
So, were any conclusions drawn? Do you have a link to the thread, or a hint as to what keywords will turn it up in a search?
__________________
~James Helbert~, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS

TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn
"Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” - Zechariah 3:2
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 07:43 AM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,818
Thanks: 827
Thanked 754 Times in 464 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
There was a (rather heated) thread on PB about 3 years ago concerning when and what validated a marriage (was it the oath, the church, or consummation?)
So, were any conclusions drawn? Do you have a link to the thread, or a hint as to what keywords will turn it up in a search?
I haven't had any luck...er, providence, with the search functions. I think a guy named tolle et lege was the one doing it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 08:24 AM
JohnOwen007's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth, Australia.
Posts: 614
Thanks: 74
Thanked 204 Times in 94 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnpreacher View Post
Genesis 24:67, "And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah's tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother's death." That seemed to be a covenantal marriage in the sight of God without a wedding ceremony.
Not necessarily. The text may well assume that there was a wedding ceremony at some stage; it doesn't have to be explicitly reported for there to have been one.

If marriage is a covenant one must assume some sort of a formal (covenant) ceremony somwehere at sometime.
__________________
Marty

From Creation to New Creation via Redemption
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 08:38 AM
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,713
Thanks: 91
Thanked 70 Times in 42 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnOwen007 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnpreacher View Post
Genesis 24:67, "And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah's tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother's death." That seemed to be a covenantal marriage in the sight of God without a wedding ceremony.
Not necessarily. The text may well assume that there was a wedding ceremony at some stage; it doesn't have to be explicitly reported for there to have been one.

If marriage is a covenant one must assume some sort of a formal (covenant) ceremony somwehere at sometime.
I am not sure why we would necessarily assume this, since the bible never says that there must be a ceremony before a marriage is legitimate.
__________________
Mark Li
International University Church
New South Wales, Australia
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 09:41 AM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,818
Thanks: 827
Thanked 754 Times in 464 Posts
I think it is what is in our hearts that really counts. As long as it is done for love (not law), it's okay. Love covers all sins.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:12 AM
victorbravo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3,354
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 98
Thanked 589 Times in 349 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
I think it is what is in our hearts that really counts. As long as it is done for love (not law), it's okay. Love covers all sins.
I wish there were a rolling-on-the-floor-laughing-with-tears-in-my-eyes-and-sackcloth-on-my-head-banging-against-a-wall smiley.
__________________
R.Vic Bottomly
Providence Reformed Baptist Church, Tacoma, WA

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:08 PM
Barnpreacher's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,396
Thanks: 307
Thanked 232 Times in 149 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnOwen007 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnpreacher View Post
Genesis 24:67, "And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah's tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother's death." That seemed to be a covenantal marriage in the sight of God without a wedding ceremony.
Not necessarily. The text may well assume that there was a wedding ceremony at some stage; it doesn't have to be explicitly reported for there to have been one.

If marriage is a covenant one must assume some sort of a formal (covenant) ceremony somwehere at sometime.
That's a good point, Marty. What we can't assume though is that the covenant ceremony was the same throughout the course of history.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:20 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,818
Thanks: 827
Thanked 754 Times in 464 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by victorbravo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
I think it is what is in our hearts that really counts. As long as it is done for love (not law), it's okay. Love covers all sins.
I wish there were a rolling-on-the-floor-laughing-with-tears-in-my-eyes-and-sackcloth-on-my-head-banging-against-a-wall smiley.
Doesn't the bible say that love is the end of the law? Quit imposing your rules, mon. Just go with it..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:39 PM
Barnpreacher's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,396
Thanks: 307
Thanked 232 Times in 149 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by victorbravo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
I think it is what is in our hearts that really counts. As long as it is done for love (not law), it's okay. Love covers all sins.
I wish there were a rolling-on-the-floor-laughing-with-tears-in-my-eyes-and-sackcloth-on-my-head-banging-against-a-wall smiley.
Doesn't the bible say that love is the end of the law? Quit imposing your rules, mon. Just go with it..
That's real funny until you have to deal with "Christians" (non-members) that act like that in your church.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 01:43 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,818
Thanks: 827
Thanked 754 Times in 464 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnpreacher View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by victorbravo View Post


I wish there were a rolling-on-the-floor-laughing-with-tears-in-my-eyes-and-sackcloth-on-my-head-banging-against-a-wall smiley.
Doesn't the bible say that love is the end of the law? Quit imposing your rules, mon. Just go with it..
That's real funny until you have to deal with "Christians" (non-members) that act like that in your church.
Oh, I was just summarising Reformed ethics essays.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 04:45 PM
Barnpreacher's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,396
Thanks: 307
Thanked 232 Times in 149 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnpreacher View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post

Doesn't the bible say that love is the end of the law? Quit imposing your rules, mon. Just go with it..
That's real funny until you have to deal with "Christians" (non-members) that act like that in your church.
Oh, I was just summarising Reformed ethics essays.
I know, Jacob. I wasn't lashing out at you, rather at the mindset of some professing believers. If they wanted to argue against the culture of marriage ceremonies that's one thing. But they just want to avoid marriage altogether by living together, and that flies in the face of "Marriage is honorable."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64