» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 99 | | 28 members and 71 guests | | Anton Bruckner, Athaleyah, Backwoods Presbyterian, BobVigneault, CaseyBessette, christianyouth, CovenantalBaptist, etexas, InevitablyReformed, Marrow Man, Mindaboo, MrMerlin777, packabacka, panta dokimazete, Peter H, sastark, Scott Shahan, Seb, Southern Presbyterian, Superstu, Theogenes, Theoretical | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
02-15-2008, 12:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,939
Thanks: 240
Thanked 229 Times in 142 Posts
| | | Is NCT Antinomian? Is New Covenant Theology antinomian for denying the fourth commandment?
__________________
J. M. - Baptist - Ontario, Canada - Feileadh Mor "Nothing is more seductive for man than his freedom of conscience. But nothing is a greater cause of suffering."
The Brothers Karamazov
| 
02-15-2008, 12:27 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Marmora NJ
Posts: 495
Thanks: 31
Thanked 40 Times in 32 Posts
| | | Antinomian would be agianst "law" or "lawless", NCT is not antinomian just says that the Law of Christ has succeeded the Law given by Moses.
__________________
Bruce
PCUSA
Ocean City NJ
| | The Following User Says Thank You to A5pointer For This Useful Post: | | 
02-15-2008, 12:49 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,926
Thanks: 1,297
Thanked 1,470 Times in 776 Posts
| | Just as there are different shades of Covenant Theology, so are there with NCT. For example, I would say that my Church (while myself being Covenantal) is more along the lines of Continental Reformed in that they say the 4th Commandment was mostly spiritual (with which I disagree); however, my church would still reconize the decalogue as being binding. However, there are other shades of NCT, such as espoused by Fred Zaspel and Tom Wells in their New Covenant Theology, which some would say tend towards antinomianism (i.e. a cross betwen CT and Dispensationalism). Here are some good thoughts from Covenantal Reformed Baptist Sam Waldron: http://www.samwaldron.us/pdfs/NCTIntro1.pdf http://www.samwaldron.us/pdfs/NCTIntro2.pdf http://www.samwaldron.us/pdfs/NCTIntro3.pdf http://www.samwaldron.us/pdfs/NCTIntro4.pdf | | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to joshua For This Useful Post: | | 
02-15-2008, 01:06 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,383
Thanks: 1,253
Thanked 635 Times in 455 Posts
| | | This is really an old debate between 1689 subscribing Reformed Baptists and what used to be called "Sovereign Grace" Baptists, the latter of which denied that we are obligated to observe the sabbath. Many of the Sovereign Grace people have now adopted some form of NCT.
What I find curious is the number of those Baptists who say they hold to CT but are non Sabbatarian.
__________________
Chris Poe--Attending Grace Community Baptist Church, Mandeville, LA "There never was a man in the world without a creed. What is a creed? A creed is what you believe. What is a confession? It is a declaration of what you believe. That declaration may be oral or it may be committed to writing, but the creed is there either expressed or implied."—B.H. Carroll | 
02-15-2008, 01:07 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,926
Thanks: 1,297
Thanked 1,470 Times in 776 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim What I find curious is the number of those Baptists who say they hold to CT but are non Sabbatarian. | Yeah. To quote O Brother, Where Art Thou?
THAT DON'T MAKE NO SENSE! | 
02-15-2008, 01:08 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,939
Thanks: 240
Thanked 229 Times in 142 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim What I find curious is the number of those Baptists who say they hold to CT but are non Sabbatarian. | Isn't Baptist CT and Presbyterian CT different with Baptism being one demonstration of that difference? I'll have to go back to my Peter Masters sermons on this subject but I always thought they were different. | 
02-15-2008, 01:08 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,383
Thanks: 1,253
Thanked 635 Times in 455 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Just as there are different shades of Covenant Theology, so are there with NCT. For example, I would say that my Church (while myself being Covenantal) is more along the lines of Continental Reformed in that they say the 4th Commandment was mostly spiritual (with which I disagree); however, my church would still reconize the decalogue as being binding. | Are you simply disagreeing with your church or do you also disagree that there is as much disagreement with the Continental and British views as many suppose? If I'm not mistaken, I think there are a good many on this board and elsewhere who will argue that there is no essential difference between the Continental and British (WCF) views, although the Continental confessions do not spell things out quite as clearly as do the Westminster Standards. | 
02-15-2008, 01:11 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,383
Thanks: 1,253
Thanked 635 Times in 455 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim What I find curious is the number of those Baptists who say they hold to CT but are non Sabbatarian. | Isn't Baptist CT and Presbyterian CT different with Baptism being one demonstration of that difference? I'll have to go back to my Peter Masters sermons on this subject but I always thought they were different. | They are, but they are agreed on one covenant of grace, two administrations and the continuance of the Moral Law. The London Confession is just as Sabbatarian as the WCF is. Reformed Baptists routinely denounce NCT and similar views as antinomian, and typically it comes down to an argument over the 4th Commandment since there is generally no argument about the others unless it is argued that there is a New Covenant legal code, as some NCTers have claimed. | | The Following User Says Thank You to Pilgrim For This Useful Post: | | 
02-15-2008, 01:11 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,926
Thanks: 1,297
Thanked 1,470 Times in 776 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Just as there are different shades of Covenant Theology, so are there with NCT. For example, I would say that my Church (while myself being Covenantal) is more along the lines of Continental Reformed in that they say the 4th Commandment was mostly spiritual (with which I disagree); however, my church would still reconize the decalogue as being binding. | Are you simply disagreeing with your church or do you also disagree that there is as much disagreement with the Continental and British views as many suppose? If I'm not mistaken, I think there are a good many on this board and elsewhere who will argue that there is no essential difference between the Continental and British (WCF) views, although the Continental confessions do not spell things out quite as clearly as do the Westminster Standards. | I'm saying I disagree with the position my church takes on the Sabbath. Of course, I don't make this a bone of contention, so as to avoid making a stink in the church. | 
02-15-2008, 01:13 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,383
Thanks: 1,253
Thanked 635 Times in 455 Posts
| | | | 
02-15-2008, 01:14 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,383
Thanks: 1,253
Thanked 635 Times in 455 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Just as there are different shades of Covenant Theology, so are there with NCT. For example, I would say that my Church (while myself being Covenantal) is more along the lines of Continental Reformed in that they say the 4th Commandment was mostly spiritual (with which I disagree); however, my church would still reconize the decalogue as being binding. | Are you simply disagreeing with your church or do you also disagree that there is as much disagreement with the Continental and British views as many suppose? If I'm not mistaken, I think there are a good many on this board and elsewhere who will argue that there is no essential difference between the Continental and British (WCF) views, although the Continental confessions do not spell things out quite as clearly as do the Westminster Standards. | I'm saying I disagree with the position my church takes on the Sabbath. Of course, I don't make this a bone of contention, so as to avoid making a stink in the church. |  | 
02-15-2008, 01:14 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,926
Thanks: 1,297
Thanked 1,470 Times in 776 Posts
| | | What I have a problem with, and what NCT (by implication) purports is that somehow Jesus brought a law that was new or better? The problem with that, though, is that God's Law can't get any better than perfect (Ps. 19, et al). | | The Following User Says Thank You to joshua For This Useful Post: | | 
02-15-2008, 01:15 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,939
Thanks: 240
Thanked 229 Times in 142 Posts
| | | Do most Continental Reformed Churches hold to the spiritual view or have they imported the mostly imported the idea from Presbyterianism? Is the Continental view closer to Calvin's view then the Presbyterian view?
Thanks. | 
02-15-2008, 01:16 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,939
Thanks: 240
Thanked 229 Times in 142 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua What I have a problem with, and what NCT (by implication) purports is that somehow Jesus brought a law that was new or better? The problem with that, though, is that God's Law can't get any better than perfect (Ps. 19, et al). | Would that be Baxter's view as well? | 
02-15-2008, 01:18 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,926
Thanks: 1,297
Thanked 1,470 Times in 776 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua What I have a problem with, and what NCT (by implication) purports is that somehow Jesus brought a law that was new or better? The problem with that, though, is that God's Law can't get any better than perfect (Ps. 19, et al). | Would that be Baxter's view as well? | I have no idea. I have read little (if any) of Baxter. | 
02-15-2008, 01:29 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,383
Thanks: 1,253
Thanked 635 Times in 455 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Do most Continental Reformed Churches hold to the spiritual view or have they imported the mostly imported the idea from Presbyterianism? Is the Continental view closer to Calvin's view then the Presbyterian view?
Thanks. | See the link I posted above.
I don't think there is as much of a difference between the Continental view and the WCF, especially on a practical and historical level, as some want to think. I have known of people who claimed to take the Continental view but were practically as anti-sabbatarian as the average dispensationalist. | | The Following User Says Thank You to Pilgrim For This Useful Post: | | 
02-15-2008, 01:34 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: RADFORD VA.
Posts: 3,925
Thanks: 718
Thanked 767 Times in 388 Posts
| | Waldron has a good message explaining where he would depart with NCT. SermonAudio.com - New Covenant Theology
__________________ 1689 Baptist Confession
Psa 55:16 As for me, I will call upon God; and the LORD shall save me.
Psa 55:17 Evening, and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud: and he shall hear my voice.
James Farley, Wilderness Road Baptist Assembly.
Husband of Melissa and father of Ann. www.wildernessroadbaptist.org | | The Following User Says Thank You to Blueridge Baptist For This Useful Post: | | 
02-15-2008, 01:37 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Auburn, MA
Posts: 76
Thanks: 17
Thanked 31 Times in 18 Posts
| | | Neonomianism is the technical term for advocates of a 'New Law.' Baxter was neo-nomian. If he is in heaven, he knows better, now.
There are implications for the Christian life, as well. The third use of the Law is thrown out. They believe (generalization alert) that the Spirit guides believers to know intuitively what they ought to or ought not to do. As regards relationships, love is to govern.
However, the standard of love is the Law--towards God and towards neighbor. Anything in its place is 'anti' nomian. Anti means in the place of as well as against a thing.
Mike
__________________
Mike Renihan
~Pastor, Heritage Baptist Church, Worcester, MA, ARBCA
~Executive Director, Mission::Ireland, "Bringing the Reformation to the Emerald Isle one book at a time." 
~Professor, Worcester State College, Dept. of History & Political Science 
~Publisher, B & R Press, Auburn, MA "Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend; inside of a dog, its too dark to read." --Groucho | | The Following User Says Thank You to JohnTombes For This Useful Post: | | 
02-15-2008, 01:40 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,383
Thanks: 1,253
Thanked 635 Times in 455 Posts
| | | | 
02-15-2008, 01:44 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,939
Thanks: 240
Thanked 229 Times in 142 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim What I find curious is the number of those Baptists who say they hold to CT but are non Sabbatarian. | Yeah. To quote O Brother, Where Art Thou?
THAT DON'T MAKE NO SENSE! | Would it follow that Sabbatarian Baptists should give up their credo position and Baptist children of believers?
Just thinking... | 
02-15-2008, 01:48 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,383
Thanks: 1,253
Thanked 635 Times in 455 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim What I find curious is the number of those Baptists who say they hold to CT but are non Sabbatarian. | Yeah. To quote O Brother, Where Art Thou?
THAT DON'T MAKE NO SENSE! | Would it follow that Sabbatarian Baptists should give up their credo position and Baptist children of believers?
Just thinking... | That's probably a thought for another thread.
What I was referring to is those who say they hold to the Covenant Theology found in the 2nd London Baptist Confession and other similar statements yet are not sabbatarian. But you have those like some Klineans in Confessional Presbyterian churches that have similar views on the sabbath and who disagree with the WCF. | | The Following User Says Thank You to Pilgrim For This Useful Post: | | 
02-15-2008, 01:48 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,926
Thanks: 1,297
Thanked 1,470 Times in 776 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim What I find curious is the number of those Baptists who say they hold to CT but are non Sabbatarian. | Yeah. To quote O Brother, Where Art Thou?
THAT DON'T MAKE NO SENSE! | Would it follow that Sabbatarian Baptists should give up their credo position and Baptist children of believers?
Just thinking... |  My lips are sealed AND that's for another forum!  | | The Following User Says Thank You to joshua For This Useful Post: | | 
02-15-2008, 01:49 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,939
Thanks: 240
Thanked 229 Times in 142 Posts
| | | Ok, I better step out and take a day or two to view the links/sermons posted.
Thanks folks.
j | |