The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Theological Forum > The Law of God

The Law of God Discussions relating to the 10 Commandments, uses of the Law, etc.
Oh how I love your law! It is my meditation all the day. (Ps. 119:97)

» Online Users: 48
7 members and 41 guests
Eoghan, Grymir, historyb, JoelYrick, PuritanBouncer, satz
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 08:34 PM
Anton Bruckner's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 998
Thanked 213 Times in 143 Posts
Judicial systems which is superior

The Roman model, or the Old Testament model. I constantly hear a lot of praise for the Roman justice system, and many Christians like to import old testament principles into the Roman system. I would like to know why is the Roman system advocated to the detriment of the Old Testament model.
__________________
~Keon Garraway~ Brooklyn, NY Member of Franklin Square OPC

Love for God demonstrated by the love for our children in giving them a God centered education is the only hope for our country. by David Morrow
Pslam 71:20 [Thou], which hast shewed me great and sore troubles, shalt quicken me again, and shalt bring me up again from the depths of the earth.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 09:03 PM
victorbravo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3,618
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 114
Thanked 698 Times in 425 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slippery View Post
The Roman model, or the Old Testament model. I constantly hear a lot of praise for the Roman justice system, and many Christians like to import old testament principles into the Roman system. I would like to know why is the Roman system advocated to the detriment of the Old Testament model.

You know that the Roman system is different from the Common Law system, right? The reason I ask is I have rarely heard anyone even discuss the Roman system except in legal circles. I'd go further and say that the Common Law system fairly self-consciously adopted many elements of Old Testament jurisprudence into it. For example, the common law definition of burglary tracked the OT law, as did the requirement of more than one witness in the case of murder.

Maybe you are using Roman system differently from what I understand it to be. Basically, as I understand it (in a criminal law context), in Roman law the finder of fact is a panel of judges who are given the task of investigation as well. In the CL system, the judge is neutral, the case is presented by a prosecutor who directs the investigation, and the fact finder is a jury.

An argument can be made that both the CL and the Roman systems have elements also found in the OT system, but I tend to think the CL consciously adopted those elements while the Roman system developed those elements from the light of nature. Blackstone goes into this fairly heavily, but few read him any more.
__________________
R.Vic Bottomly
Providence Reformed Baptist Church, Tacoma, WA

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to victorbravo For This Useful Post:
Ivanhoe (12-19-2007)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 09:26 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,871
Thanks: 860
Thanked 769 Times in 476 Posts
I am leaning more to common law these days. Vic, I picked up volume 3 of Blackstone for about $5 the other day. Looking at acquiring the other ones on the cheap.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 09:27 PM
Zenas's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cordova, TN
Posts: 1,439
Thanks: 90
Thanked 341 Times in 229 Posts
Bah. My point is moot. I misread you. Think before you post.
__________________
Andrew DeShazo, Deacon, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN
"All of us stumble in many ways, but if anyone is never at fault in what he says, then he is mature, able to control his whole body."(James 3:2)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Zenas For This Useful Post:
Ivanhoe (12-19-2007)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 09:28 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,871
Thanks: 860
Thanked 769 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by victorbravo View Post
Blackstone goes into this fairly heavily, but few read him any more.
Check this out!
The Avalon Project : Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64