» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 77 | | 27 members and 50 guests | | asc, ChristianTrader, CovenantalBaptist, Ex Nihilo, FenderPriest, Hamalas, Hilasmos, Hippo, Jon Peters, kvanlaan, LawrenceU, Manuel, Mayflower, NateLanning, Nebrexan, peetred, Pergamum, Romans922, smhbbag, SolaScriptura, SRoper, tdowns007, timmopussycat, victorbravo | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
05-27-2008, 11:49 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 1,557
Thanks: 31
Thanked 83 Times in 51 Posts
| | | Continental View of the Sabbath
I have searched other posts on the PB on this subject and found nothing clearly defining the Continental View of the Sabbath.
Could you define the Continental View of the Sabbath?
| 
05-28-2008, 12:26 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Colorado Springs, CO - a little piece of heaven on earth!
Posts: 926
Thanks: 183
Thanked 187 Times in 90 Posts
| | |
Hay:
The Continental view of the Sabbath is the same as the Puritan View found in the Westminster Confession of Faith. However, they argue in a different fashion.
The Ceremonial nature of the Sabbath has been done away with. But the law to observe one day in seven as a rest from work and play to devote oneself to the Lord has not been rescinded.
Hope it helps,
CalvinandHodge
__________________
In Essentials Unity, in non-Essentials Liberty, in all things Charity.
Robert Paul Wieland
Springs Reformed Presbyterian Church
Colorado Springs, CO RPCNA
Student at Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary, Pittsburgh PA
B.B. Warfield's definition of Theological Students: "Angels preparing to sound the Trumpets."
| | The Following User Says Thank You to CalvinandHodges For This Useful Post: | | 
05-28-2008, 01:18 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 1,557
Thanks: 31
Thanked 83 Times in 51 Posts
| | |
Not really, sorry.
Could you or someone be very very specific and clear. You confused me by mixing views.
| 
05-28-2008, 04:19 AM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Clinton, MS
Posts: 5,278
Thanks: 166
Thanked 265 Times in 140 Posts
| |
The "Continental view" is often alledged by some to be more lenient than the Puritan view of the Sabbath, often perpetuated by the myth of Calvin bowling on the Sabbath.
But in reality, the Continentals were for all practical purposes identical in practice to the Puritans. They both held to a strict resting from worldly labors and a great focus upon public and private worship.
__________________
Patrick
OPC
MDiv, RTS Jackson. "He does well, that discourses of Christ; but he does infinitely better, that by experimental knowledge, feeds and lives on Christ." Thomas Brooks. | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Puritan Sailor For This Useful Post: | | 
05-28-2008, 09:09 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Oceanside, California
Posts: 360
Thanks: 4
Thanked 218 Times in 82 Posts
| | |
After the international delegates returned home, the Synod The Synod of Dort (161819) dealt with many practical issues facing the Dutch Reformed churches. In its 164th session on May 17, 1619, the Synod issued the following doctrinal deliverance concerning the fourth Commandment:
1. There is in the fourth commandment of the divine law a ceremonial and a moral element.
2. The ceremonial element is the rest of the seventh day after creation, and the strict observance of that day imposed especially on the Jewish people.
3. The moral element consists in the fact that a certain definite day is set aside for worship and so much rest as is needful for worship and hallowed meditation.
4. The Sabbath of the Jews having been abolished, the day of the Lord must be solemnly hallowed by Christians.
5. Since the times of the apostles this day has always been observed by the old catholic church.
6. This day must be so consecrated to worship that on that day we rest from all servile works, except those which charity and present necessity require; and also from all such recreations as interfere with worship. [Cited in Howard B. Spaan, Christian Reformed Church Government (Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 1968), 208.] | | The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to dannyhyde For This Useful Post: | APuritansMind (11-03-2008), Backwoods Presbyterian (05-28-2008), Blueridge Believer (05-28-2008), CalvinandHodges (05-28-2008), CarlosOliveira (10-13-2008), Christusregnat (10-12-2008), JohnOwen007 (05-28-2008), Marrow Man (10-12-2008), Puritan Sailor (05-28-2008), Rev. Todd Ruddell (10-13-2008), Scott1 (10-13-2008), Seb (10-12-2008), SRoper (05-28-2008) | 
05-28-2008, 11:05 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Perth, Australia.
Posts: 676
Thanks: 92
Thanked 232 Times in 110 Posts
| | |
Dear Danny,
Thanks for the citation brother. I noticed that no mention was made of Sunday having to be the day of rest. My understanding was that this was the Continental view of the Sabbath. Then there were those of the Nadere Reformatie (the Voetians) who believed the Sabbath had to be Sunday. And, of course, there were the Cocceians who believed that the Sabbath had been completely abrogated by the coming of Christ.
Every blessing.
__________________
Marty
Minister / Theological Educator
Anglican Church of Australia
(On Sabbatical) Cambridge, UK.
"There is nothing so necessary to draw us to repentance as good thoughts of God." (Thomas Manton)
| 
05-28-2008, 11:17 AM
|  | Puritanboard Librarian | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 23,572
Thanks: 2,464
Thanked 3,209 Times in 1,891 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyhyde 6. This day must be so consecrated to worship that on that day we rest from all servile works, except those which charity and present necessity require; and also from all such recreations as interfere with worship. [Cited in Howard B. Spaan, Christian Reformed Church Government (Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 1968), 208.] | That is a little different than the WCF, Chap. 21, wrt recreation: Quote:
VIII. This Sabbath is then kept holy unto the Lord, when men, after a due preparing of their hearts, and ordering of their common affairs beforehand, do not only observe an holy rest, all the day, from their own works, words, and thoughts about their worldly employments and recreations,(o) but also are taken up the whole time in the public and private exercises of His worship, and in the duties of necessity and mercy.(p)
(o) Exod. 20:8; Exod. 16:23, 25, 26, 29, 30; Exod. 31:15, 16, 17; Isa. 58:13; Neh. 13:15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22.
(p) Isa. 58:13; Matt. 12:1 to 13.
| The difference between the Nadere Reformatie/Voetians and Cocceians on the Fourth Commandment was significant.
It should also be noted that the Continental Reformed, except for the Nadere Reformatie, also allowed for man-made holy days, contra the Westminster understanding of the Fourth Commandment, which teaches that the only holy day to be kept is the Christian Sabbath.
__________________
Andrew Myers
Husband of Jessica, Father of Jackson, Katie and Samuel
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church of Northern Virginia
Warrenton, VA USA
Editor, The Matthew Poole Project
"Let your Morning Thoughts, and your last Evening Thoughts, be what shall become of you to all Eternity." -- Matthew Poole
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to VirginiaHuguenot For This Useful Post: | | 
05-28-2008, 01:15 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 1,614
Thanks: 317
Thanked 67 Times in 43 Posts
| | |
What of Sunday being the Christian sabbath? I thought the Continental reformers were more diverse on this with some saying that the church picked Sunday to be the sabbath, but they could have picked any day. The Wesminster Standards seem to be more specific on this point.
| 
06-01-2008, 01:05 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Fort Drum, NY
Posts: 462
Thanks: 5
Thanked 28 Times in 10 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by SRoper What of Sunday being the Christian sabbath? I thought the Continental reformers were more diverse on this with some saying that the church picked Sunday to be the sabbath, but they could have picked any day. The Wesminster Standards seem to be more specific on this point. | Quote:
4. The Sabbath of the Jews having been abolished, the day of the Lord MUST BE solemnly hallowed by Christians.
5. Since the times of the apostles this day has always been observed by the old catholic church.
6. This day must be so consecrated to worship that on that day we rest from all servile works, except those which charity and present necessity require; and also from all such recreations as interfere with worship.
| "The day of the Lord;" that is to say, the Lord's Day, or the first day of the week.
__________________
Sean P.M. McDonald
Communicant Member of Springs Reformed Church (RPCNA), Colorado Springs, CO
Attending Lisbon Reformed Presbyterian Church, Lisbon, NY
Infantryman, 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum, NY
Engaged to Laura A. Doman of Grand Rapids, MI
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Lex praescribit, evangelium inscribit." (The law prescribes, the gospel inscribes.)
| 
10-12-2008, 09:00 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Sarasota, Florida
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | | Lord's Day Recreation
I confess to an honest ambivalence toward this issue. I can see strengths of both views: the Puritan, which forbids recreation on the Sabbath, and the Continental, which permits it.
And, Dort's clause is, like many, ambiguous. Does recreation "that interferes with worship" mean that which would keep us from attending church services? Or, does it mean any that pre-empts any act of public or private worship at any time of the day?
It would seem that it would not be the latter, because any recreation at all will interfere with Sunday worship if that worship is to be done throughout the entire day. I wish I could know exactly what the Synod meant.
It does seem that it is not a bad idea to try to worship God throughout the day, because we can never worship God enough. On the other hand, it does seem that recreation(though, perhaps, not any and all kinds) might be permissible on Sunday, because it does seem from the first reference to the Sabbath in Genesis that a purpose for it is to enjoy creation.
Please - if you have any response, for or against these statements, I would like to read them.
| 
10-12-2008, 09:12 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,613
Thanks: 994
Thanked 924 Times in 592 Posts
| | |
Welcome to the board Endymion. Please see the link below my signature on how to fix your signature to be in accord with board rules. Thanks very much.
| 
10-12-2008, 09:33 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 870
Thanks: 365
Thanked 145 Times in 98 Posts
| |
I've always enjoyed this comment relayed by Terry Johnson: Quote: |
Years ago Hughes Old said of those who were claiming the “continental” view of the Sabbath over against that of the Confession, that they must mean the “continental Catholic” view, allowing no disjunction between the Reformed in Britain and those in Europe proper.
| | 
10-12-2008, 10:26 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Far East
Posts: 3,032
Thanks: 527
Thanked 420 Times in 274 Posts
| |
I seem to recall reading somewhere (maybe even here on the PB) about the "Continental" reformed taking it too easy on the Sabbath. I believe they were referred to as the "licentious Dutch".
__________________
Kevin
Far East
Deacon, Int'l Church
| 
10-12-2008, 10:39 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 5,287
Thanks: 646
Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,021 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyhyde [Cited in Howard B. Spaan, Christian Reformed Church Government (Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 1968), 208.] | Is this book possibly still available?
__________________
Yours sincerely,
"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
| 
10-12-2008, 10:42 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 870
Thanks: 365
Thanked 145 Times in 98 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyhyde [Cited in Howard B. Spaan, Christian Reformed Church Government (Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 1968), 208.] | Is this book possibly still available? | It looks like you can find used copies here.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Marrow Man For This Useful Post: | | 
10-12-2008, 10:45 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 5,287
Thanks: 646
Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,021 Posts
| |
Excellent! Thankyou. Quote:
Originally Posted by Marrow Man Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyhyde [Cited in Howard B. Spaan, Christian Reformed Church Government (Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 1968), 208.] | Is this book possibly still available? | It looks like you can find used copies here. | | 
10-12-2008, 10:47 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 870
Thanks: 365
Thanked 145 Times in 98 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer Excellent! Thankyou. | You are welcome, brother.
| 
10-13-2008, 10:08 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Oceanside, California
Posts: 360
Thanks: 4
Thanked 218 Times in 82 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyhyde [Cited in Howard B. Spaan, Christian Reformed Church Government (Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 1968), 208.] | Is this book possibly still available? | Hello Matthew,
There is a little more historical info in the Church Order Commentary of Monsma and VanDellen, although it is a bit more expensive. Heritage Books sells new copies of this book here: Reformation Heritage Books | | The Following User Says Thank You to dannyhyde For This Useful Post: | | 
10-13-2008, 10:49 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 5,287
Thanks: 646
Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,021 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyhyde There is a little more historical info in the Church Order Commentary of Monsma and VanDellen, although it is a bit more expensive. Heritage Books sells new copies of this book here: Reformation Heritage Books | Thankyou Danny. I am enjoying a deeper exploration into the Dutch Reformed tradition. Is there a Dutch equivalent to the Dictionary of Scottish Church History and Theology?
| 
10-13-2008, 11:32 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Oceanside, California
Posts: 360
Thanks: 4
Thanked 218 Times in 82 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyhyde There is a little more historical info in the Church Order Commentary of Monsma and VanDellen, although it is a bit more expensive. Heritage Books sells new copies of this book here: Reformation Heritage Books | Thankyou Danny. I am enjoying a deeper exploration into the Dutch Reformed tradition. Is there a Dutch equivalent to the Dictionary of Scottish Church History and Theology? | Not that I know of in English. There is a large series of books by Eerdmans on the Reformed Church in America (the mainline denom that arrived in the New World in the early 1600's). Here is a link: eerdmans.com - Book Display | | The Following User Says Thank You to dannyhyde For This Useful Post: | | 
10-13-2008, 11:40 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 5,287
Thanks: 646
Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,021 Posts
| |
Thanks for that link. Perhaps you have contacts over there who might be interested in promoting a Dictionary-like project. [hint; hint] Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyhyde | | |