The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Theological Forum > The Law of God

The Law of God Discussions relating to the 10 Commandments, uses of the Law, etc.
Oh how I love your law! It is my meditation all the day. (Ps. 119:97)

» Online Users: 42
7 members and 35 guests
Abd_Yesua_alMasih, JonathanHunt, Raj, ReformedTarheel, satz, Witsius
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 06:47 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,489
Thanks: 602
Thanked 856 Times in 448 Posts
Art, erotic art, naked natives and pornography

What's the difference and why?

Here's some scenarios:
  • ---A man has a picture of his wife in a bikini from a recent vacation on his wall,
  • ---A man has a picture of a stranger in a bikini hanging on his wall,
  • ---A man has a painted picture of a naked women on his wall..but she is Eve and the painting is a Biblical scene,
  • ---A man has a picture of naked tribal women on his wall related to his anthropological work.
  • ---A man has a picture of a naked female form on his wall (he is a obgyn and the picture of a graphic description of certain parts).
  • ---A boy draws grafiti on the wall of a crude, almost stick figure form of a naked female woman.


It appears that the difference is the purpose of the picture. Therefore, National Geographic is a great EDUCATIONAL magazine and graphic prints of OBGYN prints are very useful. What about art showing the beauty of the human form. Can this beauty be shown without sin, since the beauty is the goal and not the eroticism? Can Chrsitians own old works of art like Botticelli?


I need a logical framework to fit this together.
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 07:41 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,870
Thanks: 860
Thanked 765 Times in 474 Posts
I actually like Botticelli
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 07:44 PM
clstamper's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 150
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
I actually like Botticelli
I have been searching for answers on this issue all my life and have found nothing. Nada. Zilch.
__________________
Chris Stamper
Park Cities PCA
(Dallas, TX)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 08:26 PM
victorbravo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3,487
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 106
Thanked 624 Times in 377 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by clstamper View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
I actually like Botticelli
I have been searching for answers on this issue all my life and have found nothing. Nada. Zilch.
Similarly, the US Supreme Court has been trying for more than 50 years. The best anybody's come up with, regarding obscenity, is "I know it when I see it."

That and "community standards" which was supposed to be an objective test.
__________________
R.Vic Bottomly
Providence Reformed Baptist Church, Tacoma, WA

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 08:43 PM
Sydnorphyn's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Langhorne, PA
Posts: 247
Thanks: 8
Thanked 20 Times in 14 Posts
similar questions

I listened to a sermon in chapel today on pornography and was struck by the lack of attention to Song of Songs and its graphic presentation of female and male sexuality - when do we draw the line in presenting this to our children...our students?

__________________
John
Evangelical Free Church, no offices held
Langhorne, PA

[B]δός δοξαν τῳ θεῳ.[/B]
[B]ιδου ποιω τα εσχατα ως τα πρωτα.
הבל הבלים[/B]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 10:10 PM
panta dokimazete's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,957
Thanks: 479
Thanked 277 Times in 202 Posts
Pornography is any image that arouses lust.

bikini, nude, etc...
__________________
-JD
1Thess5:21
Ordained Deacon, PCA
Serving in the SBC
MS

Team blog: ChristianSkepticism.org | Personal:...a Longmire rambles | facebook
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 10:31 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 143
Thanks: 5
Thanked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sydnorphyn View Post
I listened to a sermon in chapel today on pornography and was struck by the lack of attention to Song of Songs and its graphic presentation of female and male sexuality - when do we draw the line in presenting this to our children...our students?

What!?!? I thought Song of Songs was all about trees and fruit and pairs of deer and battlements and boards of cedar.
__________________
C. Gorsuch
Glencullen Baptist
Portland, Oregon
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 10:33 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,870
Thanks: 860
Thanked 765 Times in 474 Posts
No, the two breasts = the two testaments.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:24 PM
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Moncton NB Canada
Posts: 2,246
Thanks: 288
Thanked 217 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
No, the two breasts = the two testaments.


(you are on a roll tonight!)
__________________
Kevin Rogers
Sovereign Community Church, PCA
Moncton NB
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:27 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,489
Thanks: 602
Thanked 856 Times in 448 Posts
What if Song of Solomon arouses lust? Or a few verses in Ezekial?



Arouses lust in whom? WHen? I guess that is where community standards or a "common sense" comes in. THe purpose of a thing it seems determines its quality. Thus Botticelli would not be seen the same as a bikini model.

What is the difference in all these items, the Botticeli, the Nat Geo pics of natives, the obgyn textbooks and etc....
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post:
py3ak (10-31-2007)
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:29 PM
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Moncton NB Canada
Posts: 2,246
Thanks: 288
Thanked 217 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlongmire View Post
Pornography is any image that arouses lust.

bikini, nude, etc...
Ahh..., Have you read the Song of Songs? Some pretty strong desire going on there. I may be reading between the lines, but are you suggesting that lust is "strong desire"?

Not disagreeing with you totally, but I would add the caveat that *sinfull* lust is a desire for that which is not *rightfully* yours.
__________________
Kevin Rogers
Sovereign Community Church, PCA
Moncton NB
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:40 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,870
Thanks: 860
Thanked 765 Times in 474 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
No, the two breasts = the two testaments.


(you are on a roll tonight!)
I have an even better one, but it probably crosses the line (I found it in a commentary, so that makes it okay). I don't fee like getting my study bible out of my car tonight...maybe tomorrow.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2007, 12:36 AM
DMcFadden's Avatar
McFadderator Minimizing
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 4,097
Thanks: 829
Thanked 1,338 Times in 785 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
No, the two breasts = the two testaments.
One old and one new??? Yikes!
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2007, 12:47 AM
DMcFadden's Avatar
McFadderator Minimizing
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 4,097
Thanks: 829
Thanked 1,338 Times in 785 Posts
Pragmatic test of ****: Does it leave you feeling guilty? Does your pulse quicken?
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2007, 12:48 AM
No Longer A Libertine's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,483
Thanks: 1
Thanked 82 Times in 56 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
No, the two breasts = the two testaments.
One old and one new??? Yikes!
A common occurrence in California.
__________________

Travis Speegle
Redeemer Presbyterian, PCA (Waco, Tx)
Pacific Cross Roads, PCA (Los Angeles, CA)


"When it comes to trustworthy theologians one can usually honor the rule of thumb that the deader the better."-Dr. John Hannah, DTS (of all places)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2007, 12:51 AM
Theoretical's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,759
Thanks: 491
Thanked 50 Times in 34 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by No Longer A Libertine View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
No, the two breasts = the two testaments.
One old and one new??? Yikes!
A common occurrence in California.
__________________
Scott - Dallas, Texas - PCA

"It is not what a lawyer tells me I may do; but what humanity, reason, and justice tell me I ought to do." - Edmund Burke
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2007, 01:21 AM
SolaScriptura's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sanford, NC
Posts: 1,589
Thanks: 18
Thanked 113 Times in 54 Posts
Regarding Song of Songs... I think it is a fallacy to assume that because it is God's Word it is therefore suitable reading material for everyone. Remember, both the Jewish community AND the early (pre-allegory) church had "restrictions" on who should read it and when.
__________________
Ben
Sanford, NC
TE Ohio Valley Presbytery, PCA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2007, 01:44 AM
No Longer A Libertine's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,483
Thanks: 1
Thanked 82 Times in 56 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolaScriptura View Post
Regarding Song of Songs... I think it is a fallacy to assume that because it is God's Word it is therefore suitable reading material for everyone. Remember, both the Jewish community AND the early (pre-allegory) church had "restrictions" on who should read it and when.
True, we forget the inspired Word is holy and not be approached flippantly or without prayer.
__________________

Travis Speegle
Redeemer Presbyterian, PCA (Waco, Tx)
Pacific Cross Roads, PCA (Los Angeles, CA)


"When it comes to trustworthy theologians one can usually honor the rule of thumb that the deader the better."-Dr. John Hannah, DTS (of all places)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to No Longer A Libertine For This Useful Post:
Quickened (01-02-2008)
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2007, 03:47 AM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,489
Thanks: 602
Thanked 856 Times in 448 Posts
Who would then restrict the Song of Solomon? Would it come packaged in a black wrapper? Who would do the packaging. Rome? To withold any part of inspired Writ seems unjustifiable.
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post:
Daniel Ritchie (10-30-2007), Ivanhoe (01-02-2008), py3ak (10-31-2007)
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2007, 10:01 AM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
No, the two breasts = the two testaments.


In all seriousness though, why can't people just admit that the Song of Songs is a book about a husband and wife having sex?
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:22 AM
Davidius's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,266
Thanks: 708
Thanked 573 Times in 379 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolaScriptura View Post
Regarding Song of Songs... I think it is a fallacy to assume that because it is God's Word it is therefore suitable reading material for everyone. Remember, both the Jewish community AND the early (pre-allegory) church had "restrictions" on who should read it and when.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Who would then restrict the Song of Solomon? Would it come packaged in a black wrapper? Who would do the packaging. Rome? To withold any part of inspired Writ seems unjustifiable.
I agree with Pergie. Just because the Jewish community and early church placed restrictions on the reading of a book (source?) doesn't mean that they should have. I'd like some elaboration on the point that it's a "fallacy" to claim that God's Word is for everyone. Historical evidence is certainly not the criterion for classifying something as a fallacy.
__________________
Davidius
Husband of Emilia
Member: First Reformed Presbyterian Church of Durham (RPCNA) - Durham, NC
Currently in the process of transferring membership to an as-yet-undecided church in Chapel Hill
Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German Literature and Classics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:31 AM
victorbravo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3,487
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 106
Thanked 624 Times in 377 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
Pragmatic test of ****: Does it leave you feeling guilty? Does your pulse quicken?
Would it be OK if it didn't? I suspect there are a lot of jaded guiltless consumers out there. One of the more dramatic changes I've seen in my lifetime is the acceptance of **** in the mainstream. It used to be confined to the squalid little theater at the edge of town, or maybe at the sleazy magazine vendor in the big city. Now it is on TV, marketed by big respectable companies. It is remarkable how numb our culture has become to it.

BTW, for me, coffee with a little too much sugar meets your test too.
__________________
R.Vic Bottomly
Providence Reformed Baptist Church, Tacoma, WA

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:33 AM
victorbravo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3,487
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 106