» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 103 | | 27 members and 76 guests | | Athaleyah, Backwoods Presbyterian, CaseyBessette, ChristianTrader, Christusregnat, ColdSilverMoon, CovenantalBaptist, JDWiseman, kceaster, Marrow Man, Mindaboo, MrMerlin777, mvdm, packabacka, Peter H, sastark, Scott Shahan, Seb, Southern Presbyterian, Superstu, Theoretical | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
11-25-2007, 12:17 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,610
Thanks: 392
Thanked 35 Times in 23 Posts
| | | 1960: The Making of the President Board Game I picked this game up last weekend, and I've had 3 opportunities to play it. It is a 2-player Card-Driven strategy game built around the Nixon and Kennedy campaigns in the 1960 Election. Within the game, the actual events of the campaign, such as the Cook County returns in JFK's favor, Nixon's knee injury, and anti-Catholic sentiment against JFK, drive the campaign. Players compete for support in all 50 states, vie for control of the media, work to dominate the issues of the day, receive regional endorsements, and compete in the debates.
At first, it takes about 2-2.5 hours to play, but after awhile it looks like it becomes a 90 minute game.
Here's the BoardGameGeek entry for this game. Link
It is well-produced and painstakingly researched.
__________________ Scott
Dallas, Texas
PCA "I believe that pluralistic secularism, in the long run, is a more deadly poison than straightforward persecution." - Francis Schaeffer | 
11-25-2007, 12:52 AM
|  | Megster | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 6,569
Thanks: 382
Thanked 229 Times in 207 Posts
| | | I wonder if anyone has heard of the game Mr. President. It had cards that were for the cabinet members. It didn't have the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, being made before that office was created. The cards were red and blue and had donkeys and elephants on the bacs. I don't remember how it was played but there was a "presidential rummy" you could play and the four of us in our family played it. I wonder if my mom still has it, it would be worth some money except that my dad, who was blind, marked the cards in Braille, leaving little punches on them. I'd still like to have it. | 
11-25-2007, 01:13 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,610
Thanks: 392
Thanked 35 Times in 23 Posts
| | | | 
11-25-2007, 08:49 AM
|  | Bubba | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Beloit, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 5,496
Thanks: 481
Thanked 259 Times in 205 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Theoretical I picked this game up last weekend, and I've had 3 opportunities to play it. It is a 2-player Card-Driven strategy game built around the Nixon and Kennedy campaigns in the 1960 Election. Within the game, the actual events of the campaign, such as the Cook County returns in JFK's favor, Nixon's knee injury, and anti-Catholic sentiment against JFK, drive the campaign. Players compete for support in all 50 states, vie for control of the media, work to dominate the issues of the day, receive regional endorsements, and compete in the debates.
At first, it takes about 2-2.5 hours to play, but after awhile it looks like it becomes a 90 minute game.
Here's the BoardGameGeek entry for this game. Link
It is well-produced and painstakingly researched. | Does Nixon win?
__________________ Ivan Schoen, Pastor Maranatha Baptist Church
Poplar Grove, Illinois USA http://maranatha-sbc.org/ "When a denomination begins to consider doctrine divisive, theology troublesome, and convictions inconvenient, consider that denomination on its way to a well-deserved death." Dr. Albert Mohler, President of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
| 
11-25-2007, 02:00 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,610
Thanks: 392
Thanked 35 Times in 23 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan Quote:
Originally Posted by Theoretical I picked this game up last weekend, and I've had 3 opportunities to play it. It is a 2-player Card-Driven strategy game built around the Nixon and Kennedy campaigns in the 1960 Election. Within the game, the actual events of the campaign, such as the Cook County returns in JFK's favor, Nixon's knee injury, and anti-Catholic sentiment against JFK, drive the campaign. Players compete for support in all 50 states, vie for control of the media, work to dominate the issues of the day, receive regional endorsements, and compete in the debates.
At first, it takes about 2-2.5 hours to play, but after awhile it looks like it becomes a 90 minute game.
Here's the BoardGameGeek entry for this game. Link
It is well-produced and painstakingly researched. | Does Nixon win? | Actually, all 3 times I've played, Nixon has won. He is definitely on the offensive, and Kennedy has to be on the defensive from the outset. It seems that Nixon has the easier road to victory, and more ways to get there than Kennedy does. | 
11-25-2007, 03:55 PM
|  | Bubba | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Beloit, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 5,496
Thanks: 481
Thanked 259 Times in 205 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Theoretical Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan Quote:
Originally Posted by Theoretical I picked this game up last weekend, and I've had 3 opportunities to play it. It is a 2-player Card-Driven strategy game built around the Nixon and Kennedy campaigns in the 1960 Election. Within the game, the actual events of the campaign, such as the Cook County returns in JFK's favor, Nixon's knee injury, and anti-Catholic sentiment against JFK, drive the campaign. Players compete for support in all 50 states, vie for control of the media, work to dominate the issues of the day, receive regional endorsements, and compete in the debates.
At first, it takes about 2-2.5 hours to play, but after awhile it looks like it becomes a 90 minute game.
Here's the BoardGameGeek entry for this game. Link
It is well-produced and painstakingly researched. | Does Nixon win? | Actually, all 3 times I've played, Nixon has won. He is definitely on the offensive, and Kennedy has to be on the defensive from the outset. It seems that Nixon has the easier road to victory, and more ways to get there than Kennedy does. | Is mayor Daley part of the game? I would think he would befrom how you describe the game. Sounds like a very interesting game.
I wonder what the history of our country would have been if Nixon had been elected in 1960? Would Nixon gotten involved in Vietnam the same way Kennedy or at all? Would Johnson have ever become President?
What kind of world would we have now? Better? Worse? About the same? | 
11-26-2007, 09:01 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,610
Thanks: 392
Thanked 35 Times in 23 Posts
| | | Yes, Mayor Daley can be a factor if the card representing his electoral shenanigans is played and activated by Kennedy. It's a very interesting game in that the events of history do guide the game, but only if you are able to make them happen (for good ones) and to block them if they are bad. |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |