The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Apologetics Forum > Philosophy

Philosophy Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ. (Col. 2:8)

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2009, 09:40 AM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sarver, PA
Posts: 11,989
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 5,108
Thanked 2,646 Times in 1,605 Posts
Thomas Reid

For the Philosophy wonks out there I highly recommend picking up Thomas Reid's The Intellectual Powers of Man. Doug Kelly has an excellent little appendix in his Systematic Theology on Reid and his interaction with David Hume. Picked up a Reid book and love it. I have always been interested in Philosophy and wish I could spend more time with it.
__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser, M. Div, Licentiate, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church
Member Fairmount ARP Church
Pittsburgh, PA


Deo Vindice
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Backwoods Presbyterian For This Useful Post:
JM (05-14-2009)
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2009, 11:00 AM
yeutter's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 980
Thanks: 136
Thanked 91 Times in 60 Posts
Reid's epistomology undergirds the old Princeton thought of Archibald Alexander, Charles Hodge, Benjamin Warfield and John Gerstner.
__________________
Thomas Yeutter,
Mason, MI
Member St. Patrick's Anglican Church, Comstock, MI

Ezra 7:10 For Ezra had set his heart to study the law of the Lord and to do it and to teach its statues in Isreal.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to yeutter For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (05-07-2009), Reformed Thomist (05-14-2009)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 12:03 PM
Theogenes's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ND
Posts: 1,395
Thanks: 391
Thanked 225 Times in 158 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeutter View Post
Reid's epistomology undergirds the old Princeton thought of Archibald Alexander, Charles Hodge, Benjamin Warfield and John Gerstner.
Yes! And therefore leads towards an empirical/evidential approach to apologetics instead of a presuppositional one.
__________________
Jim
An Elder, Harvest Reformed Church (RCUS),Minot, ND
http://www.harvestreformedchurch.org/
http://tbftgoggi.wordpress.com/

Upon a life I did not live; upon a death I did not die, Another's death, Another's life, I'd rest my soul eternally
Omnia dicta fortiora,si dicta Latina
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Theogenes For This Useful Post:
ChristianTrader (05-14-2009)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 01:49 PM
rbcbob's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: shelbyville, ky
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 424
Thanked 450 Times in 297 Posts
Thomas Reid, with other of the Scottish Common Sense philosophers influenced John Witherspoon away from historical Reformed epistemology, thus laying the seeds which would eventually take down old Princeton.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to rbcbob For This Useful Post:
ChristianTrader (05-14-2009)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 05:34 PM
yeutter's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 980
Thanks: 136
Thanked 91 Times in 60 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbcbob View Post
Thomas Reid, with other of the Scottish Common Sense philosophers influenced John Witherspoon away from historical Reformed epistemology, thus laying the seeds which would eventually take down old Princeton.
Please provide an example of the "historical Reformed epistemology" that Reid and Witherspoon departed from.
Reid is a classical essentialist philosopher who interacts with the philosophy of Locke.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 05:39 PM
py3ak's Avatar
Use Bat Lip Balm
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 6,668
Thanks: 192
Thanked 2,439 Times in 1,350 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbcbob View Post
Thomas Reid, with other of the Scottish Common Sense philosophers influenced John Witherspoon away from historical Reformed epistemology, thus laying the seeds which would eventually take down old Princeton.
Please see the "signature requirements" link in my signature, and update your profile accordingly. Thanks!
__________________
Ruben
Moderator
F.P.C.I.
Indiana

Vanities and disguises have covered us, and thereby we are naked; licenciousness hath inflam'd us, and thereby we are frozen; voluptuousness hath fed us, and thereby we are sterved, the fancies and traditions of men have taught and instructed us, and thereby we are ignorant.
John Donne


Board Rules - Signature Requirements - Suggestions?

Calvinistas Conversando
Teología en Mexico
The Howling Wilderness
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 06:38 PM
rbcbob's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: shelbyville, ky
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 424
Thanked 450 Times in 297 Posts
Briefly, and in this I mean nothing offensive, you are correct to align the epistemology of Reid and Witherspoon with what today we call evidentialism, or foundationalism. These are two expressions of an epistemology which either tries to blend presuppositionalism with evidentialism or outright reject presuppositionalism. Classic Reformed epistemology is essentially that embraced by the Westminster divines and such theologians as John Calvin and John Owen. Warfield, beloved brother that he remains, adopted the evidential system that Witherspoon taught at the College of New Jersey, later Princeton University.

p.s. I am new and not quite sure what is meant by 'Please see the "signature requirements" link in my signature, and update your profile accordingly.'
Bob
elder
Kentucky
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to rbcbob For This Useful Post:
ChristianTrader (05-14-2009)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:17 PM
yeutter's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 980
Thanks: 136
Thanked 91 Times in 60 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbcbob View Post
Briefly, and in this I mean nothing offensive, you are correct to align the epistemology of Reid and Witherspoon with what today we call evidentialism, or foundationalism. These are two expressions of an epistemology which either tries to blend presuppositionalism with evidentialism or outright reject presuppositionalism. Classic Reformed epistemology is essentially that embraced by the Westminster divines and such theologians as John Calvin and John Owen. Warfield, beloved brother that he remains, adopted the evidential system that Witherspoon taught at the College of New Jersey, later Princeton University.
I am not sure how the influence of Reid and President Witherspoon substantively changed the epistemology of Princeton from that held by founding President William Tennent or other President's of Princeton such as President Jonathan Edwards Sr. or President Aaron Burr Sr. All seem to have been evidentialists. Reid was influential in developing the philosophy so that it could be seen how his school of thought differed from Neo Thomists and from Locke.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:19 PM
armourbearer's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,353
Thanks: 916
Thanked 5,344 Times in 1,959 Posts
Realism is the basis of foundationalism, which is essentially presuppositional. Empiricism is the methodology that common sense realism aimed to counteract. Old Princeton's downfall came as a result of being too confident in scientific progress and allowing it to influence the nature and message of the Bible, not because of its epistemic tradition.
__________________
Yours sincerely,


"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to armourbearer For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (05-14-2009), Beth Ellen Nagle (05-14-2009), JM (05-14-2009), PuritanCovenanter (05-14-2009), SolaGratia (05-14-2009)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:41 PM
ChristianTrader's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,664
Thanks: 517
Thanked 533 Times in 279 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer View Post
Realism is the basis of foundationalism, which is essentially presuppositional. Empiricism is the methodology that common sense realism aimed to counteract. Old Princeton's downfall came as a result of being too confident in scientific progress and allowing it to influence the nature and message of the Bible, not because of its epistemic tradition.
Because it seeked to counteract it, does not imply that it did a good job doing so.

Secondly, asserting that it was their over confidence in scientific progress that was the issue, just pushing the question back to why were they so confident? It was because their epistemology told them to be confident in such.

CT
__________________
Hermonta Godwin
Christ The King PCA
Raleigh, NC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:51 PM
armourbearer's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,353
Thanks: 916
Thanked 5,344 Times in 1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristianTrader View Post
Because it seeked to counteract it, does not imply that it did a good job doing so.

Secondly, asserting that it was their over confidence in scientific progress that was the issue, just pushing the question back to why were they so confident? It was because their epistemology told them to be confident in such.
Reformed epistemology today is still basically realist and it is regarded as doing a good job of counteracting empirical claims.

One cannot ignore the influence which the theory of "development" held over all schools of thought in the back end of the 19th century.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 08:27 PM
py3ak's Avatar
Use Bat Lip Balm
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 6,668
Thanks: 192
Thanked 2,439 Times in 1,350 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbcbob View Post

p.s. I am new and not quite sure what is meant by 'Please see the "signature requirements" link in my signature, and update your profile accordingly.'
Bob
elder
Kentucky
Hi Bob,

If you click on the link in my signature that says "Signature Requirements" it should explain itself pretty well. Your signature can be accessed through the "User CP" link which you'll find in the bar of links towards the top of the page.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 08:55 PM
rbcbob's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: shelbyville, ky
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 424
Thanked 450 Times in 297 Posts
Red face

[
Hi Bob,

If you click on the link in my signature that says "Signature Requirements" it should explain itself pretty well. Your signature can be accessed through the "User CP" link which you'll find in the bar of links towards the top of the page.[/QUOTE]

I think/hope that I did that!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2009, 08:59 PM
py3ak's Avatar
Use Bat Lip Balm
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 6,668
Thanks: 192
Thanked 2,439 Times in 1,350 Posts
It still shows as blank. Did you click on "Edit Signature" after you got in to your User CP? And did you hit the save button at the bottom of the screen when you were done?

[By the way, these off-topic posts will be removed from the thread when the changes take effect, so don't let them interfere with discussion -El Tirano]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69