Do the empiricists who say that the mind is a tabula rasa also deny that we have original sin?

__________________
Curt Hayashida
member, Community Bible Church (Non-denominational)
Vallejo, CA

I don't think all of them would. Locke is the man who coined the phrase and he was an avowed (albeit confused) Christian. Berkeley was an Anglican Bishop who was trying to preserve faith and science.

__________________
Rich
Okinawa, Japan

WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

John Locke was an empiricist in large degree, and he used the tabula rasa analogy to describe the human mind, but I think he affirmed orthodox tenets of Christian faith.

Locke also said, "Good and evil, reward and punishment, are the only motives to a rational creature: these are the spur and reins whereby all mankind are set on work, and guided."

Empirical observations can be helpful for us finite humans; the mistake would be letting experience define our approach to epistomology while denying the preeminence of divine revelation.

__________________
Ryan
1689 London Baptist Confession

Hello Gentlemen,

I think a more interesting question than this would be: Is the doctrine of original sin consistent with the idea that the mind is a tabula rasa?

Brian

__________________
Brian Bosse
Faith Community Church
Tucson, Arizona
Scientiam Dei