» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 118 | | 38 members and 80 guests | | alb1, austinww, bisonrancher, Brad, BuddyOfDavidClarkson, Casey, cbryant, Chaplainintraining, Chippy, christabella_warren, DD2009, Dearly Bought, grizzlor, Hamalas, Jake, markkoller, Michael Turner, Montanablue, PactumServa72, Rev. Todd Ruddell, satz, smhbbag, SRoper, tellville, timmopussycat, VictorBravo, WAWICRUZ, William Price, Zenas | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
05-13-2009, 08:47 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 913
Thanks: 160
Thanked 169 Times in 117 Posts
| | | The problem of evil
What sort of response do you make to the claim that the existence of evil is logically inconsistent with the existence of a good God in control of the universe?
__________________
Steven Nemes
Phoenix, AZ
Good philosophy must exist, if for no other reason, because bad philosophy must be answered - C.S. Lewis | 
05-13-2009, 08:49 PM
|  | Use Bat Lip Balm | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 6,661
Thanks: 192
Thanked 2,436 Times in 1,347 Posts
| | |
1. Not if God has a morally sufficient reason for permitting evil.
2. You wouldn't know what evil was apart from good. Speaking of evil presupposes the existence of good, of moral good: it is no objection at all to God's existence, if anything, it is evidence for it.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to py3ak For This Useful Post: | | 
05-13-2009, 08:50 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
| | |
If the universe is without evil, in what way is God good? Everything would be neither good or evil if there were no evil, because everything would be simply the same.
Besides, I believe we must take into account God's purpose in orchestrating history (including evil) for His greater purpose of glorifying Himself and allowing His children to enjoy Him forever.
| 
05-13-2009, 08:57 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,664
Thanks: 517
Thanked 533 Times in 279 Posts
| | |
I would ask them to flesh out the argument. Their only shot is to leave everything implicit.
CT
__________________
Hermonta Godwin
Christ The King PCA
Raleigh, NC
| 
05-13-2009, 10:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Boothwyn, PA
Posts: 1,928
Thanks: 133
Thanked 595 Times in 356 Posts
| | |
We must start our position with the purpose of creation - to bring glory to God. Since that's the purpose we must consider what would being the most glory to God.
God is most glorified by Himself. The more facets of God that are displayed, the more glory He displays. If there was no evil in the world we would never see some of the facets of God:
His mercy on sinners
His love for the elect in dying for them
His hatred of sin
The seriousness of sin by what it cost to redeem us from it
The power that God has over recreation and not only over creation
etc, etc.
If it were not for sin we would be missing out on many facets of God...and these facets bring more glory to Him, therefore sin serves God's purpose of bringing glory to Himself until the day that He does finally judge it.
__________________
Larry Bray
Elder - Reformed Presbyterian Church of Boothwyn, PCA
Boothwyn, PA - http://www.rpcb.org/ Free Online Reformed Seminary - http://www.tnars.net
-----------------------------------------------------
Christian ritual costs nothing and is worth nothing. True Christian religion costs all that we have and is worth everything.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to larryjf For This Useful Post: | | 
05-13-2009, 10:47 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: shelbyville, ky
Posts: 1,130
Thanks: 424
Thanked 449 Times in 296 Posts
| | |
I say non sequitur, and let them begin again.
| 
05-13-2009, 11:24 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,218
Thanks: 617
Thanked 1,916 Times in 851 Posts
| | |
I would argue that a good God, in this context, has a sense of humour. Obama is proof of this.
Theognome
__________________
Bill Cunningham
Covenant Reformed Church, URC
Kansas City
There are three kinds of people- those who can count, and those who can't.
| 
05-14-2009, 09:30 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 585
Thanks: 228
Thanked 217 Times in 121 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by steven-nemes What sort of response do you make to the claim that the existence of evil is logically inconsistent with the existence of a good God in control of the universe? | I would say that he or she probably has hedonistic presumptions: he or she believes that pain, suffering, dying, etc., are intrinsically evil. This is usually the case with atheists who posit the problem of evil.
The first thing to do is to find out precisely what 'evil' is. One consideration: Augustine taught that evil, technically, does not exist -- what we call evil is just the privation (lack) of good, that which is 'left over' when goodness is rejected by choice-making/moral agents.
I am inclined to reject the presumption that natural disasters (and their natural results: animals dying), for instance -- which atheists tend to view as great evils in the world -- are actually 'evil', for they are not the result of a choice by a moral agent (capable of rejecting good). Natural disasters just are; they do not meet the moral categories of good or evil.
__________________
Nathan Tyler
Reformed Baptist
University of Toronto (Student: Hons. B.A. in Philosophy)
Ontario, Canada 1689'er http://nathantyler.wordpress.com
Last edited by Reformed Thomist; 05-14-2009 at 09:46 AM.
| 
05-14-2009, 09:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 700
Thanked 818 Times in 448 Posts
| |
You may find some helpful info and background here: http://www.theopedia.com/Problem_of_evil
__________________
Jim
1689 LBCF
Independent Bible Church
North Texas, USA
| 
05-14-2009, 05:59 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 913
Thanks: 160
Thanked 169 Times in 117 Posts
| | |
Thanks for the responses everyone, and just to clear up: I'm not struggling answering the question myself, I am only curious as to what kind of responses my PB brethren would give.
| 
05-14-2009, 06:06 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 627
Thanks: 80
Thanked 230 Times in 112 Posts
| | |
The fall.
__________________
Aaron Josh Wright
Deerbrook Baptist Church, Humble Tx
New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary
| 
05-22-2009, 12:31 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 488
Thanked 492 Times in 326 Posts
| | |
If it's the deductive problem of evil, then I would easily point out that there's no inconsistency with an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God and evil, for He can still decree evil for good purposes.
If it's the inductive problem of evil (e.g., that the Holocaust gives evidence against God-belief), then all that stands is an emotional hurdle -- because it's very, very easy for a Christian to defend against this, logically: e.g. "God allowed the holocaust because He desired some good to come out of it." And the best way to conquer the emotional hurdle is to explain that any suffering we experience in this world is not undeserved, and therefore not evil, by virtue of the fact that we deserve hell.
Basically, if one can grapple with the "problem" of hell, then the "problem" of evil is nullified.
__________________ Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH “Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.”
-Jonathan Edwards- | 
05-22-2009, 03:26 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: scotland
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| | |
"According to theologians the first great mystery,which refers to this subject, is the existence of sin in a God-controlled system; the second great mystery is the existence of sin in a perfect moral agent.All the wonderful explanations given to solve these great mysteries leave us just where we were before. The existence of sin is something we know and feel; its origin we cannot understand. That God has permitted sin when he could have prevented it, we cannot deny; and that, therefore, it was right for him to do so , we must not question. But why it was right for God to permit sin, we cannot tell." Evangelical Theology by Nicholson.
__________________
william.m.
Member.F.C.C.
Stornoway Scotland.
| 
06-01-2009, 02:15 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Folsom, Ca
Posts: 246
Thanks: 44
Thanked 72 Times in 45 Posts
| | |
__________________
Claudiu
Reformed Baptist
attending Immanuel Baptist Church
Sacramento, CA
| | The Following User Says Thank You to cecat90 For This Useful Post: | | 
06-01-2009, 02:22 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 488
Thanked 492 Times in 326 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by cecat90 | Would that apologists like Ravi be more consistent in their presuppositionalism!
Honestly, so much of what he just said is gold; what he has to realize is that he is presupposing Biblical authority and striking down unbelieving presuppositions -- the unbeliever cannot intelligibly ask the question of the "problem" of evil without borrowing from the Christian's worldview, which Ravi so wisely pointed out.
| 
06-01-2009, 03:40 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Perth, Australia.
Posts: 718
Thanks: 98
Thanked 251 Times in 122 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Confessor If it's the deductive problem of evil, then I would easily point out that there's no inconsistency with an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God and evil, for He can still decree evil for good purposes. | This needs some clear qualification. Henri Blocher's book Evil and the Cross makes those qualifications elegantly.
__________________
Marty
Ordained Presbyter; Currently Lecturer in Theology
Anglican Church of Australia
(Now finally back! in) Perth, Australia.
"There is nothing so necessary to draw us to repentance as good thoughts of God." (Thomas Manton)
| 
06-01-2009, 10:43 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: ND
Posts: 1,393
Thanks: 391
Thanked 225 Times in 158 Posts
| | |
My response to that is "Have you ever read the bible"?
| 
06-01-2009, 01:27 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 488
Thanked 492 Times in 326 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnOwen007 Quote:
Originally Posted by Confessor If it's the deductive problem of evil, then I would easily point out that there's no inconsistency with an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God and evil, for He can still decree evil for good purposes. | This needs some clear qualification. Henri Blocher's book Evil and the Cross makes those qualifications elegantly. | Honestly, it doesn't. Very, very few unbelievers argue for the logical inconsistency of God and evil -- such that the Christian God and any amount of evil cannot logically co-exist. This is quite easily answered by the fact that God uses evil for good purposes.
Separate questions coming from this would be how God uses some specific evil, e.g. the Holocaust (which would then be inductive), or how evil came to exist in the world in the first place (which is a different question from the deductive PoE).
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |