» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 85 | | 20 members and 65 guests | | calgal, calvinich, Jack K, K. R. Alyea, Kilted_Rob, MarieP, Nebrexan, Quickened, Raj, refbaptdude, satz, tabrooks, WAWICRUZ, Webservant, William Price | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
08-20-2009, 02:38 AM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,210
Thanks: 1,764
Thanked 138 Times in 83 Posts
| | | One Book to prepare Christians for skeptic attacks
I have a friend who is at college and comes back every day with a new story about how the professor attacked his faith, yet I know that he isn't going to be down for reading a lot, so I'm looking for one book that can prepare him to deal with the different objections raised against Christianity.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!
__________________
Andrew C.
IFB
LBCF 1689
| | The Following User Says Thank You to christianyouth For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 06:47 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 297
Thanks: 214
Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts
| |
He has to read a lot... no, even more than that, if he wants to be able to deal with the different objections. I have a whole bookshelf of books on Apologetics and yet keep on ordering more and more. (Just this morning I placed an order for by Craig L. Blomberg.) And if you want to debate with a University Professor, you've got to be prepared accordingly.
__________________ Igor
Deacon - Novotushino Baptist Church
Moscow, Russia | 
08-20-2009, 07:26 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Vaasa, Finland
Posts: 381
Thanks: 223
Thanked 50 Times in 35 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by christianyouth I have a friend who is at college and comes back every day with a new story about how the professor attacked his faith, yet I know that he isn't going to be down for reading a lot, so I'm looking for one book that can prepare him to deal with the different objections raised against Christianity.
Any suggestions?
Thanks! | From my experience, reading books give you the right theoretical knowledge but the ability to spot faulty arguments and unjustified assertions quickly only comes through experience.
Presuppositional apologetics is the way to go.
If he won't be able to read a lot, CARM has some quite quick&easy examples of how to respond to atheists CARM - Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry
__________________
Christoffer S.
Layman
Finnish Evangelical-Lutheran church
Vaasa, Finland
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Christoffer For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 08:22 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Cedartown
Posts: 357
Thanks: 19
Thanked 103 Times in 67 Posts
| |
Presuppositional apologetics are only going to work for your friend if he is willing to attack back, and that is typically not a good idea in a university setting for someone untrained in rhetoric and philosophy. It requires you know the position of your opponent quite well as well as your own so that you can show that your position is consistent while theirs is not.
Classical apologetics can be used to show sufficient warrant for belief without needing to know the other persons argument, its forms are relatively easily memorized and have been well developed over the ages. He should grab Sproul/Gerstners and leave presuppositionalism to real apologists or he can move into it once he has gotten his feet wet with classical.
__________________
Robert K. "Kelly" Brumbelow
In Inquirer's class at Grace Presbyterian (PCA) Cedartown, GA
Cedartown, Georgia
Dear Lord and Father of mankind, Forgive our foolish ways;
Reclothe us in our rightful mind, In purer lives Thy service find,
In deeper reverence, praise. - John Greenleaf Whittier 1807-1892
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Hungus For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 09:07 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 574
Thanks: 223
Thanked 209 Times in 118 Posts
| |
Actually, the best book that I can suggest is this...
__________________
Nathan Tyler
Reformed Baptist
University of Toronto (Student: Hons. B.A. in Philosophy)
Ontario, Canada 1689'er http://nathantyler.wordpress.com | | The Following User Says Thank You to Reformed Thomist For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 09:12 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 368
Thanks: 17
Thanked 120 Times in 76 Posts
| | |
I would suggest (in addition to a working knowledge of classical argumentation) that he read up on his church history, particularly the first five centuries of Christianity. The point on which I am most often attacked is the historical reliability of the scriptures.
| 
08-20-2009, 09:25 AM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,210
Thanks: 1,764
Thanked 138 Times in 83 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Christoffer Quote:
Originally Posted by christianyouth I have a friend who is at college and comes back every day with a new story about how the professor attacked his faith, yet I know that he isn't going to be down for reading a lot, so I'm looking for one book that can prepare him to deal with the different objections raised against Christianity.
Any suggestions?
Thanks! | From my experience, reading books give you the right theoretical knowledge but the ability to spot faulty arguments and unjustified assertions quickly only comes through experience.
Presuppositional apologetics is the way to go.
If he won't be able to read a lot, CARM has some quite quick&easy examples of how to respond to atheists CARM - Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry |
Hey Christoffer, thanks for the tips.
I'm kinda worried about the presuppositional apologetic method, not because it doesn't make great points but because it takes a lot of intelligence to use effectively(especially to use it against specific objections toward Christianity). But I love the CARM idea! Nothing too extensive, nice and easy to read articles; this is exactly what I was looking for. | 
08-20-2009, 09:32 AM
|  | Semper ubi sub ubi | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 7,401
Thanks: 403
Thanked 2,943 Times in 1,076 Posts
| |
I've enjoyed this book a lot. It may not be technical enough for higher learning but I think it gives a pretty good base to work from. | | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to BobVigneault For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 09:35 AM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,100
Thanks: 2,777
Thanked 2,441 Times in 1,223 Posts
| | | | 
08-20-2009, 09:41 AM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 662
Thanks: 17
Thanked 32 Times in 26 Posts
| | |
I've heard Ken Samples teach and also support Bob's recommendation.
| 
08-20-2009, 11:28 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,302
Thanks: 685
Thanked 363 Times in 207 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by beej6 I've heard Ken Samples teach and also support Bob's recommendation. | I took a class from Prof. Samples last semesters (on World Religions). The man knows his stuff and is Reformed (he's a member at Kim Riddlebarger's church). The book Bob recommended was one of our textbooks. I suggest checking it out.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to sastark For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 12:06 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 574
Thanks: 223
Thanked 209 Times in 118 Posts
| |
Also, I highly, highly recommend an essay by the late German neo-Thomist philosopher Josef Pieper, titled "On Faith: A Philosophical Treatise." By way of wiping the floor with David Hume's "On Miracles" -- an ever-popular canonical atheistic text -- Pieper outlines the nature of faith and the supreme reasonableness of, and humanity in, the act of religious faith.
It is the first essay in the book Faith, Hope, Love, published by Ignatius Press. | 
08-20-2009, 12:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Ringgold, Georgia
Posts: 2,420
Thanks: 364
Thanked 145 Times in 95 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor He has to read a lot... no, even more than that, if he wants to be able to deal with the different objections. I have a whole bookshelf of books on Apologetics and yet keep on ordering more and more. (Just this morning I placed an order for The Historical Reliability of the Gospels by Craig L. Blomberg.) And if you want to debate with a University Professor, you've got to be prepared accordingly. | I agree. One book isn't going to do it, but Doug Wilson, Greg Bahansen are good starts. Thomas Morris: Making Sense of it all: Pascal and the Meaning of Life & Kreeft's, Christianity for Moden Pagans, are two good books that explore Pascal's helpful insights from his Pensees. I have Ravi Zacarihas books, Van Til books, John Frame. The List could go on and on. No one book will answer all the arrows shot your way... -----Added 8/20/2009 at 12:20:46 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by P. F. Pugh I would suggest (in addition to a working knowledge of classical argumentation) that he read up on his church history, particularly the first five centuries of Christianity. The point on which I am most often attacked is the historical reliability of the scriptures. | Good Point! Philip Schaff is VERY readable and his 8 volume history on the church can be had very cheaply these days. I learn a lot anytime I sit down with those books.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to caddy For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 12:58 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,302
Thanks: 685
Thanked 363 Times in 207 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by caddy No one book will answer all the arrows shot your way... | Besides Scripture itself, of course.
| 
08-20-2009, 01:00 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 297
Thanks: 214
Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts
| |
Well, perhaps this would help (but only for the beginning!) since it does try to cover a lot of issues: I mysel liked it very much.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Igor For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 01:05 PM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,210
Thanks: 1,764
Thanked 138 Times in 83 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor | Great! This is the kind of book I had in mind. Thanks Igor. | 
08-20-2009, 01:40 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 297
Thanks: 214
Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by christianyouth Great! This is the kind of book I had in mind. Thanks Igor.  | You're very welcome! Just in case, look inside, the table of Contents and an excerpt: here.
| 
08-20-2009, 02:46 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Hudsonville, MI
Posts: 37
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
| | is a helpful book, although like others have said I don't think there is one book that does it all.
It deals with Jesus seminar, Bart Ehrman, DaVinci code type skeptical arguments. It is a good introduction to evidential apologetics which answers lots of questions. Although I now believe presuppositional is the better method.
__________________
Gary V.
Cornerstone, URC
Hudsonville, MI | | The Following User Says Thank You to Heldveld For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 02:52 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 131
Thanks: 12
Thanked 26 Times in 17 Posts
| | |
I found Tim Keller's The Reason for God to be very helpful. His approach isn't to end the conversation with a winner/loser but rather points out the reasonableness of Christianity and the faith claims that many skeptics make.
__________________
David
PCA
Bartlett, TN
Who am I, O Lord God, and what is my house,
that you have brought me thus far?
2 Samuel 7:18
| 
08-21-2009, 03:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 297
Thanks: 214
Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts
| |
I have just fetched from my local post office a new book - It's just excellent. I guess this is exactly what you friend needs, perhaps along with "The Christian Combat Manual".
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Igor For This Useful Post: | | 
08-21-2009, 04:06 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 1,285
Thanks: 416
Thanked 413 Times in 237 Posts
| | |
Do skeptics attack?
__________________
Tim Lindsay
member, Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church, Halifax, NS, Canada
Living in Cape Town, South Africa
"under the Southern Cross, at the foot of Table Mountain, not far from the Cape of Good Hope"
| 
08-21-2009, 04:20 AM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,210
Thanks: 1,764
Thanked 138 Times in 83 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Do skeptics attack? | Haha, Tim. As a grad student and someone who inhabits the modern world with the rest of us, I KNOW you know the answer to this.
Igor, these are some great suggestions you made, but here in the US, my generation doesn't read, So I just think the Christian Combat Manual and the book Bob suggested will have to do, and Lord willing I can continue to help my friend out with some of the skeptic's attacks(with the help of people on the PB, of course, who always answer my questions, thanks guys).
| 
08-21-2009, 04:29 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 1,285
Thanks: 416
Thanked 413 Times in 237 Posts
| | |
Actually, I wasn't being sarcastic!
But isn't skepticism by nature a defensive position rather than offensive? The reason why I made that comment is to explore whether Christians might rather go on the offensive in their approach.
I haven't spent a lot of time thinking about this, but it just occurred to me that perhaps we might view our position differently - by forcing the skeptics themselves to be on the defensive.
They are the ones who say that they can't be sure - the burden of proof is upon them.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Tim For This Useful Post: | | 
08-21-2009, 04:47 AM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,210
Thanks: 1,764
Thanked 138 Times in 83 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim But isn't skepticism by nature a defensive position rather than offensive? | Ahhh, this makes sense. Good point.
| 
08-21-2009, 05:30 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Cedartown
Posts: 357
Thanks: 19
Thanked 103 Times in 67 Posts
| |
No, skeptics do attack things, and quite commonly. While a person who is being skeptical about something in the common vernacular may or not be aggressive in their own position, Skepticism is a viable scholastic general position and will normally attack any position it does not favour. And so I present to you the latest Discovery channel movie! | | The Following User Says Thank You to Hungus For This Useful Post: | | 
08-21-2009, 02:27 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Melbourne Beach, FL
Posts: 580
Thanks: 217
Thanked 134 Times in 97 Posts
| | |
I've found the presuppositional approach easier to apply even when dealing with the pseudo-intellectual professors one meets in college. You don't need answers to every objection an unbeliever throws at you, because the premises of the questions are usually poorly thought out.
Remember that the Bible calls the unbeliever a "fool" and his thinking is "futile".
Your friend can turn the tables on the professor and make him account for his beliefs. Most often the unbeliever's belief system will be merely a construction by own intellect. Therefore, if everyone is free to construct their own belief system, then your friend may point out that it is the epitome of intolerance the professor ridicule Christianity.
Check out some of Greg Bahnsen's videos on YouTube. -----Added 8/21/2009 at 02:27:28 EST-----
[QUOTE=Hungus;676005]No, skeptics do attack things, and quite commonly. While a person who is being skeptical about something in the common vernacular may or not be aggressive in their own position, Skepticism is a viable scholastic general position and will normally attack any position it does not favour. And so I present to you the latest Discovery channel movie! /QUOTE]
Hmmm. You can ask the skeptic if he is skeptical of his Skepticism and how does that comport with an ability to argue anything.
__________________
Michael Masztal
Ruling Elder, Chapel By The Sea, ARP
Melbourne Beach, FL
| 
08-21-2009, 03:02 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Browns Mills NJ
Posts: 2,316
Thanks: 617
Thanked 702 Times in 404 Posts
| | |
I'm lazy, I just fall back on Romans
__________________
Rich Koster
1689'er
Browns Mills NJ USA Often Goofy Reformed Eccentric
Romans 7:14-25
| 
08-24-2009, 09:22 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Ringgold, Georgia
Posts: 2,420
Thanks: 364
Thanked 145 Times in 95 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sastark Quote:
Originally Posted by caddy No one book will answer all the arrows shot your way... | Besides Scripture itself, of course. | Of Course! Good Catch sastark!
| 
08-24-2009, 12:40 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 191
Thanks: 8
Thanked 34 Times in 22 Posts
| | |
I'm not sure how much can be accomplished if your friend doesn't like to read, or won't force him- or herself to do so. Perhaps his/her time would be better spent talking to someone like you (who is well read) rather than reading a single book?
Otherwise, it may help to know what he/she thinks is the most powerful objection to Christianity, and then give him a book based on that (e.g., the reliability of the Bible, the problem of evil?). Maybe seeing one objection answered in detail will prompt your friend to study more?
__________________
Patrick
Covenant (OPC), Brighton, MI
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |