» Site Navigation | | | |  | 
08-10-2008, 06:39 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 1,434
Thanks: 493
Thanked 379 Times in 240 Posts
| | | The NEW Presuppositional Champion
This may have been discussed on another thread and if so I apologize.
Who is currently using the Van Tillian apologetic method as forcefully and as effectively as Dr. Greg Bahnsen did? Which atheists have they debated recently?
I have heard of Michael Butler, but haven't heard of him doing anything recently.
Thanks
__________________
Chris Thomas | SBC-Founders | Fairbanks, AK "Whatever the cause, the Calvinists were the only fighting Protestants. It was they whose faith gave them courage to stand up for the Reformation. In England, Scotland, France, Holland, they,... did the work, and but for them the Reformation would have been crushed... If it had not been for Calvinists,... and whatever you like to call them, the Pope and Philip would have won, and we should either be Papists or Socialists." ~ Sir John Skelton | 
08-10-2008, 07:27 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,664
Thanks: 517
Thanked 533 Times in 279 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnGill This may have been discussed on another thread and if so I apologize.
Who is currently using the Van Tillian apologetic method as forcefully and as effectively as Dr. Greg Bahnsen did? Which atheists have they debated recently?
I have heard of Michael Butler, but haven't heard of him doing anything recently.
Thanks | I would say the best Van Tillian alive today would be K. Scott Oliphint of Westminster East. At this moment, I think he "gets" Van Til better than even Bahnsen. I do not think he has participated in many/any debates against atheists, but then I also do not find atheism very interesting. The most interesting opposition to Christianity are alternative Theist/Deist systems.
CT
__________________
Hermonta Godwin
Christ The King PCA
Raleigh, NC
| | The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ChristianTrader For This Useful Post: | | 
08-10-2008, 07:34 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 1,434
Thanks: 493
Thanked 379 Times in 240 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristianTrader Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnGill This may have been discussed on another thread and if so I apologize.
Who is currently using the Van Tillian apologetic method as forcefully and as effectively as Dr. Greg Bahnsen did? Which atheists have they debated recently?
I have heard of Michael Butler, but haven't heard of him doing anything recently.
Thanks | I would say the best Van Tillian alive today would be K. Scott Oliphint of Westminster East. At this moment, I think he "gets" Van Til better than even Bahnsen. I do not think he has participated in many/any debates against atheists, but then I also do not find atheism very interesting. The most interesting opposition to Christianity are alternative Theist/Deist systems.
CT | I agree with your assessment of atheism. If an atheist was consistent he'd play Russian Roulette with all six chambers loaded. All the while he would have to believe that the bullet may or may not fire.
But atheism is prevalent up here in Fairbanks more than competing pseudo-christian worldviews. This is due to the local college, which can legitimately be called a place of higher learning due to its location atop an hill.
Throw a cat and hit 7 atheists and only one pseudo-christian.
Thanks for the name. Does he debate muslims and such?
| 
08-11-2008, 01:41 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Hudsonville, MI
Posts: 37
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
| |
Gene Cook Jr. used to argue presuppositionally with atheists quite often on his podcast, The Narrow Mind. Although he hasn't done it recently.
Paul Manata, occasional guest of Gene's, has also done debates with atheists, like Dan Barker. If you Google you can probably locate some MP3 files.
They probably are not as scholarly as Oliphint, but they are interacting with the enemy and doing a good job exposing his folly.
__________________
Gary V.
Cornerstone, URC
Hudsonville, MI | | The Following User Says Thank You to Heldveld For This Useful Post: | | 
08-11-2008, 03:10 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 703
Thanks: 106
Thanked 141 Times in 87 Posts
| | |
Here is my assessment;
Van Til, from what I’ve heard, he preferred to casually chat with people over coffee than embarrass unbelieving thought in front of an audience. I personally think there is a time and place for both methods and Van Til may have felt that he wasn’t the type of person to engage in the latter method. IMHO, he was too soft-spoken.
Bahnsen is still the best. He is still refuting atheism from the other side of the grave by the simple fact that no one has refuted him yet. I’m convinced that most of his abilities came from his very strong work ethic. He was always studying and reading up on the subjects that he debated. He’s a great example for how a Christian should think and act.
Oliphint, I’ve heard a lot of good things about him but like Hermonta said, I haven’t heard him in action. Even if he was to only debate a theists/deists I’m sure his presuppositionalism should be evident in a debate. Waiting to see him in action.
Michael Butler, supposedly Bahnsen’s successor. I have heard some of his lectures, I haven’t heard him debate, based on his lectures, he doesn’t sound as knowledgeable, quick on his feet or as aggressive as Bahnsen.
John Frame, I’ve heard that he does not like to participate in public debates. I’ve read an online debate he had with Michael Martin, I liked bahnsen’s analysis of Martin better. I’ve listened to his Apologetics course and I don’t like his dry teaching style, Bahnsen’s lectures on Apologetics were much more interesting and memorable.
Our own Paul Manata, pretty good considering that he has a ways to go in catching up with Bahnsen’s depth of knowledge.
Gene Cook, not bad, again he needs more study to be able to run circles around his opponent like Bahnsen was able to.
Anyone else I left out?
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Answerman For This Useful Post: | | 
08-11-2008, 05:40 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 201
Thanks: 64
Thanked 58 Times in 37 Posts
| | |
Anyone else think Tim Keller is a gifted evangelist/apologist/preacher?
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Robbie Schmidtberger For This Useful Post: | | 
11-17-2008, 09:12 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Vivian, Louisiana, USA
Posts: 691
Thanks: 77
Thanked 92 Times in 57 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Answerman Michael Butler, supposedly Bahnsen’s successor. I have heard some of his lectures, I haven’t heard him debate, based on his lectures, he doesn’t sound as knowledgeable, quick on his feet or as aggressive as Bahnsen. | You'll be hard pressed to find anyone as quick on his feet as Bahnsen. The gears of his mind always seem well greased.
__________________
Devin Brian
1689er
Attending Trinity Baptist Church in Shreveport, LA.
Vivian, Louisiana, USA "...If you are not firm in faith,you will not be firm at all." - Isaiah 7:9
"The fall of man is written in too legible characters not to be understood: Those that deny it, by their denying, prove it." - George Whitefield | 
11-17-2008, 09:16 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 777
Thanks: 69
Thanked 111 Times in 68 Posts
| | |
Other issues notwithstanding, my vote would go to Doug Wilson as the most erudite presupper around. Check out his stuff vs Farrell Till and Christopher Hitchens.
__________________
Joel Batts
Christ Presbyterian Church (PCA) - Memphis, TN
I believe that many would find that the heart sings unbidden while they are working their way through a tough bit of theology with a pipe in their teeth and a pencil in their hand. - CS Lewis
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sotzo For This Useful Post: | | 
11-17-2008, 10:26 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,230
Thanks: 256
Thanked 223 Times in 108 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sotzo Other issues notwithstanding, my vote would go to Doug Wilson as the most erudite presupper around. Check out his stuff vs Farrell Till and Christopher Hitchens. |
__________________ Mark Maney
Edmonton Chinese Baptist Church
Master of Theological Studies
Master of Arts (Cross Cultural)
Trinity Western University, ACTS Seminaries
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada | 
11-17-2008, 11:01 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Schmidtberger Anyone else think Tim Keller is a gifted evangelist/apologist/preacher? | Yes, but that might get you into trouble here.
__________________
Michael Jewell
Member, Cherry Creek Presbyterian Church (EPC)
Aurora, CO
| 
11-17-2008, 11:02 PM
|  | Snow Miser | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 3,313
Thanks: 313
Thanked 1,413 Times in 741 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Schmidtberger Anyone else think Tim Keller is a gifted evangelist/apologist/preacher? | Prepare the gallows.
__________________ Andrew DeShazo
Husband of Kathryn 
Father of Phillip-Giles B. DeShazo 
Deacon Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN
"From out of the depth of unbroken Infinfity arose the Question, "Who am I?" And to that Question there is the answer, "I am God!" -Meher Baba, died 1969.
"I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." Christ, died 33 AD, ressurected three days later.
| 
11-17-2008, 11:02 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sotzo Other issues notwithstanding, my vote would go to Doug Wilson as the most erudite presupper around. Check out his stuff vs Farrell Till and Christopher Hitchens. | +1, but I think FV is off limits here...but from what I've read, DW's presupp approach is not tainted by FV (or not as much?). | 
11-17-2008, 11:03 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenas Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Schmidtberger Anyone else think Tim Keller is a gifted evangelist/apologist/preacher? | Prepare the gallows. | Told ya'!!! | 
11-18-2008, 01:01 AM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Lisbon, NY
Posts: 5,887
Thanks: 421
Thanked 635 Times in 294 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Schmidtberger Anyone else think Tim Keller is a gifted evangelist/apologist/preacher? | I don't agree with him on some issues, but he does a good job at working through post-modern arguments. In his book Reason for God, he basically follows the presuppositional method by spending the first half of the book tearing down the unbelieving postmodern worldview and then the second half setting forth the Christian worldview and how it better makes the good things post-moderns love more intelligible and plausible. I think he makes a valiant attempt to reach out to secular thinkers.
Bahnsen and Oliphant are outstanding, but they are not very accessible to the average unbeliever who might be interested in learning more about Christianity
__________________
Patrick
MDiv, RTS Jackson
Pastor, Grace Presbyterian Church (OPC), Lisbon, NY "He does well, that discourses of Christ; but he does infinitely better, that by experimental knowledge, feeds and lives on Christ." Thomas Brooks. "Let us not please ourselves that we have deep understandings, but let us shew our understandings by our practice." Richard Sibbes | | The Following User Says Thank You to Puritan Sailor For This Useful Post: | | 
11-18-2008, 07:27 AM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,210
Thanks: 1,764
Thanked 138 Times in 83 Posts
| | |
IMO, I want to see a presuppositionalist who actually engages atheist and puts his arguments to work. It's easy to make arguments work in a class room environment, but when actually using presuppositional apologetics in the atheist vs theist debate the strength of the argument will be tested. Bahsen had arguments that were able to stand up under scrutiny, and he applied the presuppositional position to hard philosophical objections toward Christianity. I haven't seen any presupper do that since.
To the OP, Douglas Wilson is the only one I know who is a presupper and who is actually in the atheist vs theist debate.
__________________
Andrew C.
IFB
LBCF 1689
| | The Following User Says Thank You to christianyouth For This Useful Post: | | 
11-18-2008, 09:06 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 1,285
Thanks: 416
Thanked 413 Times in 237 Posts
| | |
You know what I would like to see...presupp apologetics taken all the way down to the layman, such as in the simple methods used by "Way of the Master" to present the Gospel. That would be good.
__________________
Tim Lindsay
member, Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church, Halifax, NS, Canada
Living in Cape Town, South Africa
"under the Southern Cross, at the foot of Table Mountain, not far from the Cape of Good Hope"
| 
11-18-2008, 09:38 AM
|  | Snow Miser | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 3,313
Thanks: 313
Thanked 1,413 Times in 741 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnGill Who is currently using the Van Tillian apologetic method as forcefully and as effectively as Dr. Greg Bahnsen did? | I don't know if its a healthy exercise to constantly compare all those following after to one hero. Each teacher and shepherd we are given is different than the last and there won't be another Greg Bahnsen again, niether a Van Til, nor a John Calvin, nor a Martin Luther, etc. etc. We don't need another one. We already had them. Now we'll have someone else.
That being said, Dr. James White has debated against just about every worldview. He's into debating against Islam right now however. I'm guessing he finds atheism as uninteresting and silly as everyone else does.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |