The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Apologetics Forum > Apologetical Methods

Apologetical Methods Discussion of Various Apolgetics, including Presuppositionalism and Evidentialism.
This forum is for those who desire to DEBATE and DISCUSS. All others please refrain from this Forum.

» Online Users: 47
9 members and 38 guests
Athaleyah, beej6, cih1355, Davidius, No Longer A Libertine, satz
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2007, 08:34 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,863
Thanks: 856
Thanked 762 Times in 471 Posts
Can Evidentialism Jump Lessing's Ditch?

Lessing’s Ditch: Historical truths and metaphysical/moral truths are in two entirely different categories. “That, then, is the ugly great ditch which I cannot cross, however often and however earnestly I have tried to make this leap.”

Can one infer the necessary truths of reason from the contigent truths of history?

Is this true?
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2007, 08:54 PM
victorbravo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3,481
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 106
Thanked 624 Times in 377 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Lessing’s Ditch: Historical truths and metaphysical/moral truths are in two entirely different categories. “That, then, is the ugly great ditch which I cannot cross, however often and however earnestly I have tried to make this leap.”

Can one infer the necessary truths of reason from the contigent truths of history?

Is this true?

I think the problem Lessing had was trying to work from the finite to the infinite. In that case, there always will be the great ditch.

I remembe Frame talking about this in one of his philosophy lectures. I don't remember the details, but I think he was presupposing empiricism being able to explain the metaphysical. Not a good place to start.
__________________
R.Vic Bottomly
Providence Reformed Baptist Church, Tacoma, WA

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64