» Site Navigation | | | |  | 
03-03-2009, 09:43 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 259
Thanks: 48
Thanked 95 Times in 57 Posts
| | | Analysis of Roman Catholic "spiral"
Here is a good analysis over at the Alpha Omega blog, responding to the claim that Protestants cannot have certainty about the Scriptures without having an infallible Magisterium. I think it does a pretty good job of taking apart the alternative (namely, that we can have confidence in an infallible church without thinking in circles). I've encountered exactly this argument from Catholics before, and I usually find they haven't thought through their own positions.
I hope it's helpful. Alpha and Omega Ministries, The Christian Apologetics Ministry of James R. White
__________________
Bill in Dayton, OH
Member of Redeemer OPC
"Show me Your ways, O LORD;
Teach me Your paths.
Lead me in Your truth and teach me,
For You are the God of my salvation;
On You I wait all the day." (Psalm 25:4-5)
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wturri78 For This Useful Post: | | 
03-04-2009, 08:49 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,999
Thanks: 493
Thanked 492 Times in 326 Posts
| | |
Good read. What I've noticed in Romanist arguments is that they try to construct some magical barrier between the text and whatever a person can learn from it, so that an infallible interpreter is needed. But all this does is push back the problem, for every single individual Romanist must still interpret the Catholic Catechism to understand it means.
In other words, they arbitrarily assert that the Bible is a useless hodgepodge of words -- unless you're an infallible interpreter, of course -- while the Catholic Catechism is crystal-clear language (in fact, consistent Romanists like those in the Middle Ages would forbid Bible-reading to the laymen). While I would admit that the Catechism can be easier to understand than the Bible, that doesn't mean the Catechism accurately represents biblical teaching, and more relevantly, that doesn't allow Romanists to declare a magical barrier between the Bible and its readers while failing to do so between the Catechism and its readers. In fact, nearly all Romanist arguments are arbitrary and self-refuting in this respect.
Therefore, all we need to do is tell Romanists that they do in fact know how to read, and point to any of the perspicuous passages teaching Reformed theology.
__________________ Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.
-Jonathan Edwards- | 
03-04-2009, 09:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 1,083
Thanks: 349
Thanked 191 Times in 133 Posts
| |
I liked reading that article because it made me feel very smart indeed.
__________________
Rangerus
Southern Baptist
Austin, TX
Teacher and Volunteer
1689 LBCF & BF&M 2000
| 
03-20-2009, 07:57 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 259
Thanks: 48
Thanked 95 Times in 57 Posts
| | |
You all really need to get better with the word mystery. It's the all-encompassing trump card that allows you to escape contradiction while sounding pious.
For example: The Catholic tells you of a need for infallible intepretation because of this barrier between what the text says, and our ability to understand it. You respond by pointing out that they just move it up a few levels, and individual Catholics still need someone to infallibly interpret the Church's infallible interpretations. The Catholic can then reply, "The Spirit's work in the Church is indeed a mystery..."
Problem solved! Now we can get down to chanting and gazing at our navels.
| 
03-20-2009, 09:37 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 913
Thanks: 160
Thanked 169 Times in 117 Posts
| | |
I like how Martin Luther responds to the allegation that the Bible is not entirely clear at points; he responds citing scripture that exclaims that the word is clear, it is easy to understand and to apply, etc.
Of course his reply seems to beg the question; he assumes it is clear and can be understood by citing scripture anyway.
__________________
Steven Nemes
Phoenix, AZ
Good philosophy must exist, if for no other reason, because bad philosophy must be answered - C.S. Lewis | 
03-22-2009, 06:46 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 533
Thanks: 74
Thanked 95 Times in 72 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by wturri78 Here is a good analysis over at the Alpha Omega blog, responding to the claim that Protestants cannot have certainty about the Scriptures without having an infallible Magisterium. I think it does a pretty good job of taking apart the alternative (namely, that we can have confidence in an infallible church without thinking in circles). I've encountered exactly this argument from Catholics before, and I usually find they haven't thought through their own positions.
I hope it's helpful. Alpha and Omega Ministries, The Christian Apologetics Ministry of James R. White | Thanks!!! More vintage White, always appreciated!! -----Added 3/22/2009 at 06:46:45 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by KS_Presby Quote:
Originally Posted by wturri78 Here is a good analysis over at the Alpha Omega blog, responding to the claim that Protestants cannot have certainty about the Scriptures without having an infallible Magisterium. I think it does a pretty good job of taking apart the alternative (namely, that we can have confidence in an infallible church without thinking in circles). I've encountered exactly this argument from Catholics before, and I usually find they haven't thought through their own positions.
I hope it's helpful. Alpha and Omega Ministries, The Christian Apologetics Ministry of James R. White | Thanks!!! More vintage White, always appreciated!! | Actually another blogger..but thanks.
__________________
Zack Flummerfelt
Evangel Presbyterian (PCA), layman
Wichita, KS
As of September 12, 2009 I am married to dear Jlynn!! |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |