» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 109 | | 33 members and 76 guests | | Andres, APuritansMind, austinww, Bad Organist, Chippy, christabella_warren, Curt, dannyhyde, David, DD2009, dudley, dyarashus, Grillsy, Jake, jogri17, MarieP, matthew11v25, Montanablue, Nathan Riese, nicnap, Piano Hero, Re4mdant, Reformed Thomist, Romans922, Scottish Lass, SolaScriptura, TKarrer, tlharvey7, toddpedlar, VictorBravo | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
08-17-2009, 07:02 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 77
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
| | | Whose the offspring? SB or RB?
How common is it for a southern Baptist, especially, ~some~ SB ordained minister to go through all their lives not hearing anything about Arminians or have any clue what it means. From what I'm seeing is that Reformed Baptist is more than totally separated from the new modernized Southern Baptist or perhaps the SBC, a creedless (?) church. Seems to me that the SB could at least peek into historic Baptist. I've been told that the Reformed Baptist was an offspring of the Baptist group. Seems to me that the SB would the offspring of the reformed historical Baptist. Perhaps we have multiple Baptist groups that have nothing to do with each other. I'll have to aggree that many churches rather be an Bible-only church but it would be better to learn from our historical errors and not repeat them. Why shoot off a nuclear warhead without learning it's side effects?
__________________
Dao
PCA
Atlanta, GA
"Free will," says Charles Spurgeon, "has carried many souls to hell but never a soul to heaven."
| 
08-17-2009, 07:18 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: shelbyville, ky
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 424
Thanked 448 Times in 295 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Dao How common is it for a southern Baptist, especially, ~some~ SB ordained minister to go through all their lives not hearing anything about Arminians or have any clue what it means. From what I'm seeing is that Reformed Baptist is more than totally separated from the new modernized Southern Baptist or perhaps the SBC, a creedless (?) church. Seems to me that the SB could at least peek into historic Baptist. I've been told that the Reformed Baptist was an offspring of the Baptist group. Seems to me that the SB would the offspring of the reformed historical Baptist. Perhaps we have multiple Baptist groups that have nothing to do with each other. I'll have to aggree that many churches rather be an Bible-only church but it would be better to learn from our historical errors and not repeat them. Why shoot off a nuclear warhead without learning it's side effects? | Dao,
It is very common, sad to say. I was for over four years in a Calvinistic (but not Reformed) SB church. That was in the beginnings of the "Founders Movement" when SBers were being called back to their Calvinistic roots.
There are at least as many Baptist branches as there are Presbyterian branches in Christ's kingdom!
__________________
Bob, elder, RBC Louisville. 1689 LBCF "... Of such also, or of those who make a credible profession of being such, all those particular churches consist, which constitute our Lord's visible kingdom. ... Consequently, all the subjects of His government must have spiritual dispositions, , and yield spiritual obedience- obedience proceeding from an enlightened understanding, an awakened conscience, and a renewed heart."- Abraham Booth 1788 | | The Following User Says Thank You to rbcbob For This Useful Post: | | 
08-17-2009, 07:30 PM
|  | Uncommon Denominator | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 11,936
Thanks: 2,001
Thanked 3,292 Times in 1,652 Posts
| | |
I wouldn't say that Reformed Baptists are an offshoot of Southern Baptists. Reformed Baptists follow in the distinct heritage of the Particular Baptists. To be sure, there have been many Southern Baptists who have left for Reformed Baptist churches; but there are plenty of Southern Baptists who are in thriving Calvinistic congregations.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Herald For This Useful Post: | | 
08-17-2009, 07:40 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 583
Thanks: 227
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
| | |
I'd be happy just to see more SBC congregations take the BF&M seriously.
__________________
Nathan Tyler
Reformed Baptist
University of Toronto (Student: Hons. B.A. in Philosophy)
Ontario, Canada 1689'er http://nathantyler.wordpress.com | | The Following User Says Thank You to Reformed Thomist For This Useful Post: | | 
08-17-2009, 07:50 PM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,100
Thanks: 2,777
Thanked 2,442 Times in 1,223 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by rbcbob There are at least as many Baptist branches as there are Presbyterian branches in Christ's kingdom! | And here I thought it was only Presbyterians who owned all the letters in the alphabet soup... | | The Following User Says Thank You to Marrow Man For This Useful Post: | | 
08-17-2009, 09:00 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 77
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
| |
[quote=rbcbob;673500] Quote:
Originally Posted by Dao clipped . . . Calvinistic (but not Reformed) SB church. . . . | Two of them! An "I chose God" Southern Baptist and a "God chose me" Southern Baptist. Well, a newcomer wouldn't know which until a year later.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |