» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 107 | | 27 members and 80 guests | | austinww, Berean, ChristianTrader, Damon Rambo, Dieter Schneider, Fly Caster, gene_mingo, Grillsy, Hamalas, JoelYrick, jpfrench81, kvanlaan, Marrow Man, Michael Turner, redmanca, SolaScriptura, Soonerborn, uberkermit | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
07-11-2008, 09:45 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,794
Thanks: 5,021
Thanked 2,581 Times in 1,572 Posts
| | | Unlimited Atonement implies Universal Salvation | 
07-11-2008, 09:56 AM
|  | Snow Miser | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 3,273
Thanks: 308
Thanked 1,377 Times in 726 Posts
| | |
It has to because of the logical operation of disjunction.
If Christ died for all men, then either all men are then saved or Christ is a failure.
Christ is not a failure.
All men are saved.
Any Arminian I have met will refuse to listen to this logic, and will refuse to give any answer. I only assume they will answer like the above. The alternative is:
If Christ died for all men, then either all men are then saved or Christ is a failure.
All men are not saved.
Christ is a failure.
__________________ Andrew DeShazo
Husband of Kathryn 
Father of Phillip-Giles B. DeShazo 
Deacon Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN
Has the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices,
As in obeying the voice of the LORD?
Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice,
And to heed than the fat of rams.
| 
07-11-2008, 10:23 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 539
Thanked 469 Times in 220 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenas If Christ died for all men, then either all men are then saved or Christ is a failure.
All men are not saved.
Christ is a failure. | The problem is not the logic (or lack thereof) of the Arminian. The problem is the dichotemy presented.
To Arminians, the sentence "If Christ died for all men, then 1)either all men are then saved or 2)Christ is a failure" presents a false dichotomy. Most of them won't interact with you on this logic because it makes no sense to them.
More accurately, they would say, "If Christ died for all men, then all men have the capability of accepting Christ." Once again, it boils down to whether Christ died to save men or render them savable.
__________________
Kim G
Non-denom church (holds to the WCF) Zion Community Church, Greenville, SC Teach me Your way, O LORD;
I will walk in Your truth;
Unite my heart to fear Your name. Psalm 86:11 | | The Following User Says Thank You to Kim G For This Useful Post: | | 
07-11-2008, 12:46 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 4,696
Thanks: 1,824
Thanked 1,794 Times in 1,061 Posts
| | Quote: |
More accurately, they would say, "If Christ died for all men, then all men have the capability of accepting Christ." Once again, it boils down to whether Christ died to save men or render them savable.
| Yes. And add that man (not God) has the moral ability to make the final decision.
__________________ Scott
PCA
North Carolina "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
Hebrews 10:23 | 
07-11-2008, 02:04 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 884
Thanks: 60
Thanked 116 Times in 88 Posts
| | |
Are there any people who believe that the penalty for sin is paid for twice- once when Christ died for our sins and again when some people go to hell? I was just curious because there are those who believe that Christ was actually punished for everyone's sins, but that some people will be punished for their sins in hell. The logical conclusion that is drawn from what they believe is that the punishment for sin is taken place twice.
__________________
Curt Hayashida
member, Community Bible Church (Non-denominational)
Vallejo, CA
| 
07-11-2008, 02:17 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 398
Thanks: 130
Thanked 197 Times in 89 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenas It has to because of the logical operation of disjunction.
If Christ died for all men, then either all men are then saved or Christ is a failure.
Christ is not a failure.
All men are saved.
Any Arminian I have met will refuse to listen to this logic, and will refuse to give any answer. I only assume they will answer like the above. The alternative is:
If Christ died for all men, then either all men are then saved or Christ is a failure.
All men are not saved.
Christ is a failure. | Owen in The Death of Death basically put it this way: If Christ died for the sins of all men, then necessarily he also died for their sin of unbelief. Thus, the universal salvation, as the title for this thread states.
If he did not die for the sin of unbelief, then how can you set the point for what sins he did or did not die for?
__________________
Randy Harris
Heritage PCA Church
Oklahoma City, OK
| | The Following User Says Thank You to R Harris For This Useful Post: | | 
07-11-2008, 06:31 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 539
Thanked 469 Times in 220 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by cih1355 Are there any people who believe that the penalty for sin is paid for twice- once when Christ died for our sins and again when some people go to hell? I was just curious because there are those who believe that Christ was actually punished for everyone's sins, but that some people will be punished for their sins in hell. The logical conclusion that is drawn from what they believe is that the punishment for sin is taken place twice. | Yes, there are many people who believe this where I live, although they probably wouldn't put it that way. They believe that Christ paid for everyone's sins, but if you choose not to accept Christ's payment on your behalf, then you have to pay for them yourself forever in hell. So it wasn't that Christ didn't pay for them, but that you refused His payment.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Kim G For This Useful Post: | | 
07-11-2008, 09:44 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,794
Thanks: 5,021
Thanked 2,581 Times in 1,572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim G Quote:
Originally Posted by cih1355 Are there any people who believe that the penalty for sin is paid for twice- once when Christ died for our sins and again when some people go to hell? I was just curious because there are those who believe that Christ was actually punished for everyone's sins, but that some people will be punished for their sins in hell. The logical conclusion that is drawn from what they believe is that the punishment for sin is taken place twice. | Yes, there are many people who believe this where I live, although they probably wouldn't put it that way. They believe that Christ paid for everyone's sins, but if you choose not to accept Christ's payment on your behalf, then you have to pay for them yourself forever in hell. So it wasn't that Christ didn't pay for them, but that you refused His payment. | Thanks Kim. You summed up the arminian error quite well. Good Job!!!
| 
07-11-2008, 09:58 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,950
Thanks: 468
Thanked 479 Times in 319 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim G Quote:
Originally Posted by cih1355 Are there any people who believe that the penalty for sin is paid for twice- once when Christ died for our sins and again when some people go to hell? I was just curious because there are those who believe that Christ was actually punished for everyone's sins, but that some people will be punished for their sins in hell. The logical conclusion that is drawn from what they believe is that the punishment for sin is taken place twice. | Yes, there are many people who believe this where I live, although they probably wouldn't put it that way. They believe that Christ paid for everyone's sins, but if you choose not to accept Christ's payment on your behalf, then you have to pay for them yourself forever in hell. So it wasn't that Christ didn't pay for them, but that you refused His payment. | Thanks Kim. You summed up the arminian error quite well. Good Job!!! | I think there's a bit more to add, although most Arminians aren't usually conscious of this, as it sounds much more ridiculous when it is clearly articulated.
Since Arminians believe (along with Calvinists) that men are naturally born in a state of total depravity, they posit that prevenient, or preceding, grace counteracts the effects of sin upon all men's abilities to have saving faith, and that Jesus's death was an atonement for this. Thus, Arminians believe that Jesus's death on the cross atoned for everyone's sins to the point that everyone is born in a state of neutrality (which is philosophically impossible in terms of decision-making, but I digress), where man's volition can take over to reap the rest of Christ's atonement's benefits, or reject them and go to hell.
__________________ Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.
-Jonathan Edwards- | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Confessor For This Useful Post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |