The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Calvinism & The Doctrines of Grace

Calvinism & The Doctrines of Grace Discuss TULIP, God's Sovereignty and Reformed Soteriology
Salvation belongs to the LORD (Ps. 3:8; Jonah 2:9)

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

» Online Users: 73
9 members and 64 guests
CovenantalBaptist, danmpem, DMcFadden, ReformedTarheel, RTaron, turmeric
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 01:56 PM
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,213
Thanks: 0
Thanked 32 Times in 26 Posts
Reasons: why God has given us the doctrine of election ???

A person told me, that "mean" reason why God has revealed us the doctrine of election, is because it is for the comfort for true believers.

Iam agree with that, but can someone give me more good reasons why God has given us the doctrine of election ?

Two reasons i was thinking of was :
- Comfort for the believers
- Take away the pride of sinfull men

So more ?
__________________
* Ralph Wilms (7-10-1974)
* Church : Christengemeente Roermond (The Netherlands)
* Credobaptist who hold towards Covenant Theology
* Husband of Reena & father of Naomie and Gideon
* 1729 Goat Yard Declaration of Faith
* 1646 & 1689 Baptist Confession of faith
* 1595 The Lambeth Articles
* 1618-1619 The Canons of Dordt
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 02:03 PM
Wannabee's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 782
Thanks: 120
Thanked 148 Times in 88 Posts
Interesting question. I guess I would come at it from a different angle. Rather than thinking of the doctrine of election as something God gave us, I would view it as a good and necessary reflection of His character. Either God is sovereign, omniscient and omnipotent, or He is not God. Any division would necessitate an unacceptable inconsistency. Perhaps the question would be more fitly stated, "What does the doctrine of election tell us about God?" The first question focuses on man. This question brings our focus Godward. The manward thoughts are results. The Godward focuses are causes.
__________________
For the Glory of our King,
Joe Johnson
Married up in 1988 and blessed with two wonderful sons
TMS graduate
Preacherboy at Cornerstone Community Church, Escanaba, MI
http://www.SoundLife.org
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wannabee For This Useful Post:
Ivan (03-23-2008)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 02:04 PM
Simply_Nikki's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 793
Thanks: 255
Thanked 67 Times in 55 Posts


I was gonna say for His own good pleasure
__________________
Nikki Edmond
New Beginnings Believers Bible Fellowship (Family's Church), Non-Denom
Los Angeles, CA
www.haveatulip.com - Chat Room for Reformed Believers
Proverbs 1:7 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Simply_Nikki For This Useful Post:
danmpem (03-23-2008)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 03:53 PM
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,213
Thanks: 0
Thanked 32 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wannabee View Post
Interesting question. I guess I would come at it from a different angle. Rather than thinking of the doctrine of election as something God gave us, I would view it as a good and necessary reflection of His character. Either God is sovereign, omniscient and omnipotent, or He is not God. Any division would necessitate an unacceptable inconsistency. Perhaps the question would be more fitly stated, "What does the doctrine of election tell us about God?" The first question focuses on man. This question brings our focus Godward. The manward thoughts are results. The Godward focuses are causes.
I think Joe, you are absolut right with that. Before we speak about the comfert of man, we first need to focused what it means for the Being of God!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 03:54 PM
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,213
Thanks: 0
Thanked 32 Times in 26 Posts
More thoughts ???
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 03:59 PM
danmpem's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 1,211
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 279
Thanked 71 Times in 63 Posts
Just to name a few reasons:
Matt. 28:19-20
Romans 12-15
Ephesians 4-6
Basically the entire letters of 1 & 2 Peter
Jude 3
__________________
Dan Pemberton
Vacaville, CA

Member, First Baptist Church San Luis Obispo
Formerly ABUSA (We left, so I guess that makes us American Baptists Unleashed!)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 05:26 PM
panta dokimazete's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,284
Thanks: 305
Thanked 154 Times in 111 Posts
The doctrine of election is to the glory of Christ.

Quote:
John 17

24"Father, I desire that they also, whom You have given Me, be with Me where I am, so that they may see My glory which You have given Me, for You loved Me before the foundation of the world.
__________________
-JD
1Thess5:21
Ordained Deacon, PCA
Serving in the SBC
MS

Team blog: ChristianSkepticism.org | Personal:...a Longmire rambles | facebook
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 06:29 PM
Hippo's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 513
Thanks: 59
Thanked 167 Times in 104 Posts
Because it is true.
__________________
Mike
London City Presbyterian Church
London
England

"Surely, we wish to be orthodox, but we must first learn what real orthodoxy is. Surely, we wish to be progressive, but we must first have a basis to progress from."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 07:15 PM
DTK's Avatar
DTK DTK is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 925
Thanks: 25
Thanked 116 Times in 48 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayflower View Post
A person told me, that "mean" reason why God has revealed us the doctrine of election, is because it is for the comfort for true believers.

Iam agree with that, but can someone give me more good reasons why God has given us the doctrine of election ?

Two reasons i was thinking of was :
- Comfort for the believers
- Take away the pride of sinfull men

So more ?
I'm not always comfortable with questions that inquire as to why God has been pleased to do this or that. I think that two of your reasons mentioned above are certainly true. Paul tells us specifically in 1 Corinthians 1 (and this may be another way of "Taking away the pride of sinful men") that...

Quote:
God has chosen the foolish things of the world to put to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to put to shame the things which are mighty; 28 and the base things of the world and the things which are despised God has chosen, and the things which are not, to bring to nothing the things that are, 29 that no flesh should glory in His presence. 30 But of Him you are in Christ Jesus, who became for us wisdom from God -- and righteousness and sanctification and redemption -- 31 that, as it is written, "He who glories, let him glory in the LORD." 1 Corinthians 1:27-31
So, this passage from 1 Corinthians supports, at least, the second of your two reasons referenced above. The Greek word translated "put to shame," kataischuno, also means "to humiliate or disgrace or disappoint."

DTK
__________________
Sola Scriptura est norma normans non normata
David T. King, pastor
Christ Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Elkton, Maryland
Augustine (354-430): Therefore what He [i.e., Christ] has deigned to speak to us, we ought to believe that He meant us to understand. But if we do not understand He, being asked, gives understanding, who gave His Word unasked. NPNF1: Vol. VII, Tractates on John, Tractate XXII, ยง1.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ฉ 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey ฉ Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64