The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Calvinism & The Doctrines of Grace

Calvinism & The Doctrines of Grace Discuss TULIP, God's Sovereignty and Reformed Soteriology
Salvation belongs to the LORD (Ps. 3:8; Jonah 2:9)

» Site Navigation
   • Forum Rules
    • Infraction System
   • Blog Rules
   • Admins & Mods
° PBay
   • F.A.Q.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 02:56 PM
ColdSilverMoon's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 219
Thanks: 28
Thanked 48 Times in 30 Posts
Most difficult of the 5 points?

When talking with non-Calvinists (Arminians, or whatever you prefer to call them), what do you find is the most difficult of the 5 points for them to accept? I find most solid Baptists and Methodists agree with total depravity and to a certain extent perseverance of the saints. But the other 3 points tend to be much harder. The one that seems to turn off most non-Calvinists is limited atonement. Most people like to believe God died for "everyone" rather than the elect.

I'm interested to hear what others of you have found to be the biggest stumbling block to other people accepting the 5 points...
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY

"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 02:57 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,056
Thanks: 338
Thanked 177 Times in 110 Posts
No question in my mind the most difficult is Limited Atonement, then Irresistable Grace .

On the other hand the easiest would be Total Depravity I would think.
__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser
Pittsburgh, PA
Fairmount ARP Church

Student of Theology

Pittsburgh Theological Seminary
Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary
My Blog
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 03:02 PM
joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 13,000
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 887
Thanked 889 Times in 466 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon View Post
I'm interested to hear what others of you have found to be the biggest stumbling block to other people accepting the 5 points...
Their wills.
__________________
Josh Hicks, Chloë's Daddy
Member of TRBC. My Blog
Board Rules-Signature Requirements-Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to joshua For This Useful Post:
BlackCalvinist (03-27-2008), ColdSilverMoon (03-27-2008)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 03:04 PM
jaybird0827's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Indian Trail, NC
Posts: 2,833
Blog Entries: 9
Thanks: 525
Thanked 187 Times in 129 Posts


Particular atonement was the one I had most difficulty with. G .I . Williamson in the Confession of Faith Study Guide helped me the most at the time I needed work through it.

Surprisingly I had no problem with any of the other four.
__________________
~Jay~
Husband of ENS, father of J II. | Indian Trail, NC
Teacher Aide, Union County Public Schools, NC
Communicant Member, Precentor | Presbyterian Reformed Church of Charlotte, NC | Presbyterian Reformed Church
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 03:21 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: St.James ,NY
Posts: 451
Thanks: 110
Thanked 71 Times in 50 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon View Post
When talking with non-Calvinists (Arminians, or whatever you prefer to call them), what do you find is the most difficult of the 5 points for them to accept? I find most solid Baptists and Methodists agree with total depravity and to a certain extent perseverance of the saints. But the other 3 points tend to be much harder. The one that seems to turn off most non-Calvinists is limited atonement. Most people like to believe God died for "everyone" rather than the elect.

I'm interested to hear what others of you have found to be the biggest stumbling block to other people accepting the 5 points...
Hi CSM,
L - is the point least accepted. The main reason it is not understood is that in reality the person who resists does not really understand the T- total depravity.
If you question them you find that they do not believe Adam died in the fall.They think he was slightly wounded, believing the lie of Satan, thou shall not die. God said dying thou shall surely die.
Natural men cannot understand divine truth savingly 1Cor2.
Proud spirited religious men, or immature believer's who will not come humbly to the word of God will not see the necessity of a definate atonement as they will trumpet the full ability of Adam to save himself by his own ability.
__________________
Anthony D'Arienzo
Sunday School Teacher
Hope Reformed Baptist Church:
Medford, N.Y.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Iconoclast For This Useful Post:
Barnpreacher (03-28-2008), ColdSilverMoon (03-27-2008), Sonoftheday (03-27-2008)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 03:31 PM
A5pointer's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marmora NJ
Posts: 463
Thanks: 29
Thanked 29 Times in 27 Posts
They seem to and should reject the first four equally as they are neccessarily logically wound together. I find those who mostly agree to the doctrines struggle with atonement in favor of an Amyraldian slant. And of course almost no one has a problem with having the will that was free not being free anymore and bound to Christ in perseverence.
__________________
Bruce
PCUSA
Ocean City NJ
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 03:38 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,056
Thanks: 338
Thanked 177 Times in 110 Posts
How many words are their for Limited Atonement?

C'mon Tupip and Tudip do not make any sense!!!
__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser
Pittsburgh, PA
Fairmount ARP Church

Student of Theology

Pittsburgh Theological Seminary
Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary
My Blog
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 03:39 PM
Seb's Avatar
Seb Seb is offline
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 317
Thanks: 101
Thanked 38 Times in 35 Posts
Limited Atonement was the hardest one for me too.

I come from a Baptist background and I'd agree; T. and P. were the easiest, since I already believed them.
__________________
Steve Butts - Former SBC-er
Three Forms of Unity - Bradenton CRC - Bradenton, Florida
(A conservative member in a conservative congregation)

"It is a good thing God chose me before I was born, because he surely would not have afterwards." — C.H. Spurgeon
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 03:57 PM
Grymir's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 847
Thanks: 122
Thanked 108 Times in 87 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon View Post
I'm interested to hear what others of you have found to be the biggest stumbling block to other people accepting the 5 points...
Their wills.
__________________
Timothy Johnson
First United Presbyterian of Moline
PCUSA (Yea, I know)
Theology/Philosophy Sunday School Teacher
Davenport, IA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 04:06 PM
North Jersey Baptist's Avatar
Clinging to grace
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 5,403
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 486
Thanked 411 Times in 268 Posts
I have a different take on this. Limited atonement is supposedly the most difficult of the five points to accept. Actually it is the entire five points itself! None of the five points exists independently. They are symbiotic. Reject one and by default you are rejecting the others.
__________________
B.B.
Elder
GBC

Deo volente
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to North Jersey Baptist For This Useful Post:
A5pointer (03-27-2008), BertMulder (03-27-2008), BlackCalvinist (03-27-2008), ColdSilverMoon (03-27-2008), Presbyterian Deacon (03-27-2008), Semper Fidelis (03-27-2008), Sonoftheday (03-27-2008)
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 04:22 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 339
Thanks: 14
Thanked 19 Times in 15 Posts
I accepted the last 3 points (having previously accepted the first two, and part of the fourth) about 5 years ago. Actually it was Perseverance of the Saints that I had real difficulty with. I had previously been a strong denier of Once Saved Always Saved, yet I had had problems with agreeing to Universal Atonement, and while I didn't derive Limited Atonement for myself, as soon as I heard the concept I accepted it fairly quickly.
__________________
T W Hopper
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church
Currently between churches since PRC closed here - attending Crossroads Christian Church.
Canberra, Australia.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 04:36 PM
Justified!'s Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian View Post
No question in my mind the most difficult is Limited Atonement, then Irresistable Grace .

On the other hand the easiest would be Total Depravity I would think.
Agreed, at least that is what I have found.
__________________
“I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End,” says the Lord, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.”
Revelation 1:8

Marc
Saskatoon Evangelical Free Church
Saskatoon, SK
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 05:38 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 3,437
Thanks: 1,001
Thanked 229 Times in 131 Posts
Interesting...

I have found the most difficult is Irresistable Grace. It seems to be so ingrained in the mind of the modern church that Jesus is some wimp in the distance, calling people with a still small voice. They believe that Jesus is a disappointed God because the wills of His created people are to strong for Him to overcome.

"Softly and tenderly Jesus is calling..." but most believe that their is only one call, the gospel call. They could never conceive of a call with power!
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 05:50 PM
danmpem's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 716
Thanks: 150
Thanked 42 Times in 40 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist View Post
I have a different take on this. Limited atonement is supposedly the most difficult of the five points to accept. Actually it is the entire five points itself! None of the five points exists independently. They are symbiotic. Reject one and by default you are rejecting the others.
While I agree with you for the most part, I also think about people like Bunyan and Ryle who did not affirm L.M., but were highly God-centered in their theology. The question of L.M. is a fairly new one, compared to the other four points anyway. From what I understand of it, there is evidence that Calvin would have defended L.M. if asked about it, but he never explicitly wrote on the topic.
__________________
Dan Pemberton
Member, First Baptist Church
San Luis Obispo, CA

In college studying to be an astronaut.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to danmpem For This Useful Post:
North Jersey Baptist (03-27-2008)
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 05:55 PM
ColdSilverMoon's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 219
Thanks: 28
Thanked 48 Times in 30 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist View Post
I have a different take on this. Limited atonement is supposedly the most difficult of the five points to accept. Actually it is the entire five points itself! None of the five points exists independently. They are symbiotic. Reject one and by default you are rejecting the others.
You make a really good point. And I agree with Iconoclast as well: if you really believe the doctrine of total depravity, the rest naturally follow philosophically. If we are truly DEAD in our sins, then only irresistable grace will save us, and He only gives that grace to the elect, etc.
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY

"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ColdSilverMoon For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (03-27-2008), North Jersey Baptist (03-27-2008)
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 06:30 PM
toddpedlar's Avatar
PB Evil Scientist...Boo!
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 1,914
Thanks: 35
Thanked 265 Times in 135 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist View Post
I have a different take on this. Limited atonement is supposedly the most difficult of the five points to accept. Actually it is the entire five points itself! None of the five points exists independently. They are symbiotic. Reject one and by default you are rejecting the others.
I agree with you 100%, Bill. Generally speaking the claim is that L is the hardest, but then when you look at it carefully, if L is rejected, it's usually because they don't really believe T, and if they don't really believe T, then they don't really believe U or I, and we all know they really don't believe P either (in part because of their rejection of I).
__________________
Todd K. Pedlar
member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA
http://semperubi.rtrc.net

"Many men, after a long conversion, see more of the workings of sin in their hearts than ever they did before or at their first conversion. Now, such men have not an increase of sin, but an increase of illumination and light" (Christopher Love)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to toddpedlar For This Useful Post:
North Jersey Baptist (03-27-2008)
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 06:47 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Luttrell, TN
Posts: 94
Thanks: 17
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist View Post
I have a different take on this. Limited atonement is supposedly the most difficult of the five points to accept. Actually it is the entire five points itself! None of the five points exists independently. They are symbiotic. Reject one and by default you are rejecting the others.
I agree if you want have one of them really you want have none of them.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dwayne For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (03-27-2008), North Jersey Baptist (03-27-2008)
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 07:18 PM
Sonoftheday's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Foyil, Oklahoma
Posts: 381
Thanks: 70
Thanked 64 Times in 45 Posts
(EDIT: Actually My post isnt really worth reading I just said the same thing as Todd only in alot more words.)

Quote:
I have a different take on this. Limited atonement is supposedly the most difficult of the five points to accept. Actually it is the entire five points itself! None of the five points exists independently. They are symbiotic. Reject one and by default you are rejecting the others.
There is no such thing as someone who believes in 4 of the doctrines of Grace, because without all five it is no longer grace alone. To deny L is to change the very nature of the atonement. The sacrifice is most often then made into a potential sacrifice that is "only accepted by the elect" and that acceptance makes it actual. If this were the case then we are (in some way) the cause of our own salvation, because as I was pridefully raised my whole life, we accepted. "God gives us a gift, but you must open it." Ohh the pride of the one who opens the gift, they say thier is no pride in opening a gift "after all who is prideful on xmas day whenever they open thier gifts?" I'll tell you who's prideful on xmas when they open thier gifts, the one who looks around the room and sees many many people who have not opened thier gifts and thier burning in hell for it.

Everyone I have ever talked to that denies L does so because they believe Christ is somehow obligated by his character to give every sinner an equal chance at salvation. This is a denial of T (as Iconoclast pointed out) and also a denial of UIP. (T)If they understood the depth of our depravity then they would see there is no good in us that makes us deserve a chance. (U)They do not truly believe then that God chose a group based on his choice alone. (I)They do not believe that it is only the by regeneration that we recieve faith. (P) Thier perseverance is not based on the atonement in that Christ literally accepted the wrath for thier sins on the cross, because this would mean christ did not accept the sins of others on the cross, thus meaning Christ did not give everyone "an equal chance".

Sorry to rant a bit but Calvinism is something I have been forced to defend among family and friends of recent days. It started as showing the ignorance of the age old "calvinist dont witness" argument, but turned into a point by point teaching of how it is the only biblical and Logical doctrine of sotierology, and how if "God gives everyone an equal chance" is true then we are, at least in part, responsible for our own salvation, and should be the most prideful of all beings.
__________________
Bryan Riddle
1689 London Baptist Confession
Bethel Baptist Church Owasso, Oklahoma
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sonoftheday For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (03-27-2008), BertMulder (03-27-2008)
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 07:19 PM
BertMulder's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 489
Thanks: 148
Thanked 53 Times in 38 Posts
Just like a table with a leg missing, missing any one of the 5 points makes for wobbly theology at best.

From what I hear out there though, the one they least like is election and reprobation. The one they believe least is limited atonement, coupled with irrisistable grace.
__________________
Bert Mulder
Elder of the First Protestant Reformed Church of Edmonton
Edmonton Alberta Canada
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BertMulder For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (03-27-2008), North Jersey Baptist (03-27-2008)
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 07:27 PM
DMcFadden's Avatar
McFadderator Maximus
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 2,476
Thanks: 487
Thanked 664 Times in 408 Posts
Given the logical interrelatedness of the five, you might as well separate a cake into flour, milk, eggs, sugar, and butter as try to claim one without the other. However, L is the one most people fixate on as the toughest. After all, Moïse Amyraut didn't make it into the history books for believing in ULIP, TLIP, TULI, or TULP. The L has gone down in the annals of historical theology as the staw the breakes the Arminian camel's back.

Or, if you are Ergun Caner, believing such a doctrine will do nothing except "kill your churches with sermons expounding the Westminster Confession . . . "justify your laziness" . . . as you adopt "semi-Presbyterianism" . . . and run the church like an "oligarchy." As Caner says, "You do the math. And just because you cannot answer the questions concerning your views of predetermined fatalism does not make his arguments 'straw men.'"
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)

Last edited by DMcFadden; 03-27-2008 at 10:40 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DMcFadden For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (03-27-2008)
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 07:30 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,433
Thanks: 770
Thanked 625 Times in 380 Posts
Perseverance (Preservation) of the saints is hardest for me.

When talking with others it is the system itself. Most very quickly see that Calvinism is a system--but systems have this stigma, whether rightly or wrongly, of being cold and austere. Men do not commit to systems. I can very quickly get people to see that Calvinism is utterly logical. But that is often the stumbling block. Cold logic turns into existential despair.

That is what I noticed in college.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!