Greg Koukl

cih1355 · #1 (**permalink**) 09-22-2008, 02:08 AM

I watched a video where Greg Koukl talks mostly about Christ's atonement. It is clear that he believes that Jesus did not die for everyone, but he sounds like an Arminian because he said that Jesus died for those who would meet the condition of receiving salvation.

Here is the video clip:

Stand to Reason: Video Commentary - The Five Points of Calvinism Are One

**DMcFadden** · #2 (**permalink**) 09-22-2008, 02:34 AM

Koukl is a strong pro-life, high view of scripture, old earth creationist who is often heard with some of his fellow Biola/Talbot friends. But, on this issue, anyway, he seems pretty clear:

Quote:

Here's what bothers me. We've talked a lot here about the issue of salvation, and whether God is the ultimate author of it or man is. This is the Calvinism vs. Arminianism debate. I've noticed a tendency of people who argue against my view-- that God chooses man for salvation-- and they simply keep going to their texts that talk about man choosing God.

Those verses do have to be taken into consideration in any overall assessment. Sometimes, though, it's like they're saying, "Where are Koukl and the rest of these Reformed guys getting this stuff? They're just making it all up, because here are my proof texts that are so clear."

Friends, what I'm trying to do is to make sense out of the whole Bible. It's my job to construct a way of viewing any particular doctrine which does the best justice to the most verses and references. I can't just camp on my pet verses and say, "There it is, plain as day. What's wrong with you?"

What bothers me is that many won't take the time to construct a theological point of view that attempts to integrate all the verses pertaining to an issue. I want to ask them, "If your point of view is correct, then make sense out of this verse, and this verse and this verse... and I'll give you hundreds for my side. I could be wrong about my view, but you're going to have to work a lot harder at making sense of verses for my view in light of your theology."