"Make sure they understand the gospel" -- what is he talking about?

Strange prayer??? 7:14

__________________
John
Member
Christ Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Salt Lake City, Utah
www.christpres.net

What's he talking about? After listening to him, I don't think he knows what he's talking about it, especially after hearing his prayer.

__________________
Ivan R. Schoen, B.A., M.A., M.L.I.S.
Pastor of Maranatha Baptist Church (SBC)
Poplar Grove, IL, USA
http://maranatha-sbc.org

WOW! I guess we believe that one has to be a Calvinist to be saved, I wasn't aware that I thought this until I watched this video

__________________
~ Charles Stephen Barribeau ~
Christ Presbyterian Church , OPC (They sing alot of Psalms!)
Original Westminster Standards (I need to study more...)
The Puritans were best! Also... I NEED TO READ MORE!!!
Philipians1:29(KJV) For unto you it is given in the behalf of Christ, not only to believe on him, but also to suffer for his sake;

Janesville, Wisconsin (In the fellowship of Bob Vigneault and Matt+Megan Meisberger)

LOL We'll now we know something about ourselves that we didn't know before!

"for those who are unsaved but are Calvinists"? I don't think he knows what he's talking about either. I wonder where he went to seminary.

__________________
Norm
IA PCA

In love he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will. Ephesians 1:4-5

He prays that no one would fall into the ditch of Calvinism nor Arminianism.

Why do so many Arminians deny that they are Arminians while using the same arguments as Arminians? I would dare say that classical Arminians probably had a better hold on the nature of original sin than do many of the contemporary variety.

__________________
Tim Phillips
Pastor, Midlane Park Presbyterian Church (ARP)
Louisville, KY
Husband of Scottish Lass
My Blog: Gairney Bridge
My Facebook/My Avatar

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

"Wherever the gospel is preached, it is as if God Himself came into the midst of us." ~ John Calvin

From the church's website:

Well, many are right about declining the term Arminian. Calvinists have an annoying tendency to describe all conflicting ideas of the will as "Arminian," whether or not the appellation is accurate. Balthasar Hubmaier, an Anabaptist theologian, was anticipating many of the positions of modern evangelical theology before Arminius was born. Personally, I've stopped referring to most non-Calvinists as "Arminians" and instead call them "Semi-Pelagians," which is historically accurate.

__________________
Charlie Johnson
Downtown Presbyterian Church (PCA)
Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary, student

Good point. However, aren't semi-Pelagianism and Arminianism technically different from one another at some point along the spectrum?

I like to use the term free-willists and free-willism when people are not self-pronounced Arminians, because it stresses where the idolatry is located.

__________________
Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook
In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH
When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH

“Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.”
-Jonathan Edwards-

Semi-Pelagianism teaches that man can come to Christ without God taking the initiative to draw him. Arminianism teaches that a person cannot come to Christ unless God takes the initiative to draw him. Arminianism teaches that the drawing of God is a necessary condition for man to come to Christ, but not a sufficient condition. In their view, the drawing of God does not guarantee that anyone will come to Christ. They believe that the drawing of God merely makes the person capable of coming to Christ.

__________________
Curt Hayashida
member, Community Bible Church (Non-denominational)
Vallejo, CA

I like to call them synergists because whether one is an arminian or a pelagian they are still synergistic in their theology

I do not think there is a cogent distinction to be made between semi-Pelagianism and Arminianism.

The Worthless Distinction Between Arminianism and semi-Pelagianism

I thought it funny that this is on their "what we believe" portion of their website:
Followed by salvation is solely by God alone through grace alone...

__________________
Michael P Doyle
Waukesha WI
Member of http://www.cornerstone-pca.com/
Attending http://www.lampseminary.org/

Right. They are different. That's why I say semi-Pelagian instead of Arminian. The suggestions of "synergism" and "free-willers" are also very good, since they strike at the problem. Arminianism is a historically identifiable system of doctrine (not without variation), just like Calvinism. The belief in unconditional election, for example, does not make someone a Calvinist. Unconditional election is a belief shared by Augustine, Aquinas, Bradwardine, Wyclif, Hus, Gregory of Rimini, Staupitz, and (I think) Pascal. That does not make them Calvinists. In the same way, we shouldn't call people Arminians unless they buy the whole system. It's both offensive and inaccurate.

Ben, as a monergist, I agree with the main point of your post. On the other hand, there is usefulness in keeping the ideas distinct. From a Christian perspective, one can say that there are only two religions, God's (Christianity) and the Devil's (everything else). Even though that is true, it doesn't justify us calling Catholics Muslims or atheists Buddhists. There are distinct incarnations of error, and a Semi-Pelagian like Gabriel Biel arrives at and articulates his position quite differently than an Arminian like Wesley.

The throne of man... The "Free Willer" montra... God's precious gift to mankind is giving man free will... Actually God's precious gift to mankind is HIS SON Jesus Christ! Therefore, repent and believe the gospel!

My favorite part, after his puzzling assertion that failing to adopt a Calvinistic theology results in a failure to "persevere in the faith," leaving them unregenerate and damned, is this one: "See, now we have a place in our understanding of the Bible for people to be saved and doctrinally screwed-up. But, I don't know that they really do."

I can say that after three full years of seminary, this is news to me. I've never heard my professors deal anything but humbly and charitably with, ahem, non-Calvinists. I've always thought of them as slightly theologically off-center brothers in Christ, and so do most Calvinists I know.

__________________
David
Member and Arts Team Leader
Christ Community Church (PCA)
Johnson City, TN

“But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong..."
I Corinthians 1:27

I loved the part where he was stating how Calvinism is growing today with the likes of R C Sproul, John MacArthur and John Piper. Isn't it funny how he named (IMO) the three best expositors of scripture we have today. I felt like he was mentioning the likes of Joel Osteen, T D Jakes and Benny Hinn as we would consider false teaching today. I really started laughing, but I guess we should pray for this guy and the people he is corrupting.

__________________
Rick
Teacher/Apologist
Baptist
SE Missouri

God grant that we might converse with our opponents like this:

A 250-yr-old Model: How Calvinist Simeon Related to Wesley :: Desiring God