The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Calvinism & The Doctrines of Grace

Calvinism & The Doctrines of Grace Discuss TULIP, God's Sovereignty and Reformed Soteriology
Salvation belongs to the LORD (Ps. 3:8; Jonah 2:9)

» Online Users: 84
21 members and 63 guests
Athaleyah, austinww, Confessor, Covenant Joel, dyarashus, ewenlin, Grillsy, Jack K, Joe Keysor, LeeJUk, Megan Mozart, Michael Turner, Pergamum, Soonerborn, Theoretical, WaywardNowHome
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2008, 08:53 PM
caddy's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ringgold, Georgia
Posts: 2,403
Thanks: 357
Thanked 144 Times in 94 Posts
Post Chesterton & Calvinism

Listening to Chesterton's Book "Orthodoxy" on IPOD, it was interesting to hear some of his remarks on Calvinism.



Antithesis at Reformed.org

Between Two Worlds: How A Roman Catholic Anti-Calvinist Can Serve Today’s Poet-Calvinists

Light and Heat: PIPER ON G.K. CHESTERTON AND CALVINISM

Welcome to the Fallout » Blog Archive » Chesterton and Calvinism

http://www.faithalone.org/journal/2002ii/townsend.pdf

My Lack of a Problem with G.K. Chesterton — Lawrence Salberg

Chesterton’s Un-charitable Presentation of Calvin at Per Caritatem

Quotable G.K. Chesterton Weekend « Miscellanies



Which is why I find "Protestants" who toss out Chesterton quotes so amazingly inconsistent, like this one:
"The Catholic Church is like a thick steak, a glass of red wine, and a good cigar."


Really? Well, if so, then the steak will give you Mad Cow, the glass of wine contains just a few drops of cyanide, and the cigar is laced with radioactive materials.
When we have brilliant, godly, Scripturally sound men like Edwards, or Spurgeon, or Warfield to read, who never once profaned the cross of the Lord Jesus Christ with words and beliefs like those expressed above by O'Brien, and whose insights to this day are compelling and convicting, why do we play games with quotes like Chesterton's? Play with a loaded gun long enough, and it may well go off.

__________________
~ Steven Bradford ~
Member Covenant Presbyterian, Chattanooga, TN

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to caddy For This Useful Post:
Peter H (08-20-2008)
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2008, 09:36 PM
bookslover's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 3,228
Thanks: 4
Thanked 575 Times in 325 Posts
Chesterton didn't become a Roman Catholic until 1922, when he was 48. So, he was bound to be somewhat overzealous in his remarks, I suppose.

He was a brilliant writer with an engaging mind. I read him quite frequently. Part of his brilliance has to do with his use of paradox in his writings, using it to set up the points he wants to make.

As for his Catholicism, as an ex-Catholic myself, I just ignore it and pay attention to the good stuff.
__________________
Richard T. Zuelch, M.Div
Ruling Elder, OPC (not currently serving)
Westminster Presbyterian Church, CA (OPC)
www.alexandermaclaren.wordpress.com
www.reiterations.wordpress.com
www.spurgeonswords.wordpress.com

There is no resting place for conscience but at the cross - Charles Spurgeon (1834-1892), on June 7, 1863
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to bookslover For This Useful Post:
Peter H (08-20-2008)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2008, 09:38 PM
caddy's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ringgold, Georgia
Posts: 2,403
Thanks: 357
Thanked 144 Times in 94 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover View Post
Chesterton didn't become a Roman Catholic until 1922, when he was 48. So, he was bound to be somewhat overzealous in his remarks, I suppose.

He was a brilliant writer with an engaging mind. I read him quite frequently. Part of his brilliance has to do with his use of paradox in his writings, using it to set up the points he wants to make.

As for his Catholicism, as an ex-Catholic myself, I just ignore it and pay attention to the good stuff.
Absolutely Richard. I have quite a large library of Chesterton I built up over 20 years ago. I wrote a few papers on him in College. Fascinating man.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2008, 09:46 PM
bookslover's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 3,228
Thanks: 4
Thanked 575 Times in 325 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by caddy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover View Post
Chesterton didn't become a Roman Catholic until 1922, when he was 48. So, he was bound to be somewhat overzealous in his remarks, I suppose.

He was a brilliant writer with an engaging mind. I read him quite frequently. Part of his brilliance has to do with his use of paradox in his writings, using it to set up the points he wants to make.

As for his Catholicism, as an ex-Catholic myself, I just ignore it and pay attention to the good stuff.
Absolutely Richard. I have quite a large library of Chesterton I built up over 20 years ago. I wrote a few papers on him in College. Fascinating man.
You don't seem quite that sanquine about him in your OP...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2008, 09:57 PM
caddy's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ringgold, Georgia
Posts: 2,403
Thanks: 357
Thanked 144 Times in 94 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by caddy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover View Post
Chesterton didn't become a Roman Catholic until 1922, when he was 48. So, he was bound to be somewhat overzealous in his remarks, I suppose.

He was a brilliant writer with an engaging mind. I read him quite frequently. Part of his brilliance has to do with his use of paradox in his writings, using it to set up the points he wants to make.

As for his Catholicism, as an ex-Catholic myself, I just ignore it and pay attention to the good stuff.
Absolutely Richard. I have quite a large library of Chesterton I built up over 20 years ago. I wrote a few papers on him in College. Fascinating man.
You don't seem quite that sanquine about him in your OP...
I ended on a quote from Aomin ( James White's site ). I find I need to temper or sift him through new lens these days. I actually need to thoroughly read all the links I posted. Still working on that. I am intrigued by the brilliance and sheer depth of knowledge he possessed yet, it seems, he missed the boat on Reformed thinking--or did he?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2008, 10:02 PM
bookslover's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 3,228
Thanks: 4
Thanked 575 Times in 325 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by caddy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by caddy View Post

Absolutely Richard. I have quite a large library of Chesterton I built up over 20 years ago. I wrote a few papers on him in College. Fascinating man.
You don't seem quite that sanquine about him in your OP...
I ended on a quote from Aomin ( James White's site ). I find I need to temper or sift him through new lens these days. I actually need to thoroughly read all the links I posted. Still working on that. I am intrigued by the brilliance and sheer depth of knowledge he possessed yet, it seems, he missed the boat on Reformed thinking--or did he?
In Chesterton's case, I think he denigrated Calvinistic Reformed thought because he didn't take the time to understand it. Besides, when he was in his prime during the early decades of the last century, Calvinism wasn't exactly a hot topic in Britain, as in the States - the old theological liberalism being all the rage.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to bookslover For This Useful Post:
caddy (08-19-2008)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2008, 10:07 PM
caddy's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ringgold, Georgia
Posts: 2,403
Thanks: 357
Thanked 144 Times in 94 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by caddy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover View Post

You don't seem quite that sanquine about him in your OP...
I ended on a quote from Aomin ( James White's site ). I find I need to temper or sift him through new lens these days. I actually need to thoroughly read all the links I posted. Still working on that. I am intrigued by the brilliance and sheer depth of knowledge he possessed yet, it seems, he missed the boat on Reformed thinking--or did he?
In Chesterton's case, I think he denigrated Calvinistic Reformed thought because he didn't take the time to understand it. Besides, when he was in his prime during the early decades of the last century, Calvinism wasn't exactly a hot topic in Britain, as in the States - the old theological liberalism being all the rage.
Sometimes we are simply a product of our age and the current thinking huh?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2008, 07:36 AM
py3ak's Avatar
Use Bat Lip Balm
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 6,600
Thanks: 186
Thanked 2,394 Times in 1,329 Posts
I think there may be quite a simple explanation. Chesterton didn't have a spirit of fair play when it came to argument. And since he is so talented at stylish abuse, he can heap it upon any position. But if anything, it should give us pause. No doubt he said many true and vigorous things in opposition to error; but given how he misreprents the thing we happen to know most about, he should not be taken as a reliable guide to the facts of the matter on any thing. What he loves, he seems to love rather blindly; what he hates, equally. Maybe he was blinded by the brilliance of his own language.
__________________
Ruben
Moderator
F.P.C.I.
Indiana

Vanities and disguises have covered us, and thereby we are naked; licenciousness hath inflam'd us, and thereby we are frozen; voluptuousness hath fed us, and thereby we are sterved, the fancies and traditions of men have taught and instructed us, and thereby we are ignorant.
John Donne


Board Rules - Signature Requirements - Suggestions?

Calvinistas Conversando
Teología en Mexico
The Howling Wilderness
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to py3ak For This Useful Post:
caddy (08-20-2008), Peter H (08-20-2008)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2008, 08:12 AM
sotzo's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 777
Thanks: 69
Thanked 111 Times in 68 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by py3ak View Post
No doubt he said many true and vigorous things in opposition to error; but given how he misreprents the thing we happen to know most about, he should not be taken as a reliable guide to the facts of the matter on any thing.

How can we know that he said true things while at the same time we can't take him as a reliable guide to the facts of the matter on any thing?
__________________
Joel Batts
Christ Presbyterian Church (PCA) - Memphis, TN

I believe that many would find that the heart sings unbidden while they are working their way through a tough bit of theology with a pipe in their teeth and a pencil in their hand. - CS Lewis
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2008, 07:51 PM
py3ak's Avatar
Use Bat Lip Balm
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 6,600
Thanks: 186
Thanked 2,394 Times in 1,329 Posts
Because it is fortunately possible to check many of his facts and test many of his conclusions. Think about Luther: we might question whether his glorious exaggerations are always quite fair; but we're not about to deny that he has any value as a polemicist.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69