Closed Thread
Results 1 to 28 of 28

Thread: Is Arminianism works righteousness?

  1. #1
    Javilo is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    East Boston MA
    Posts
    62
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Is Arminianism works righteousness?

    I am thinking that Arminianism is works righteousness because they believe
    that a person is saved by the action of their own free will. Thus it is
    something they do and not what God has done. So this leads me to
    believe that they are not really saved since it seems to me that by a free will
    "make a decision for Christ" they are really saying "Lord, I am good enough."
    which is works righteousness the way I see it. If this is true, how many
    Arminians are tragically hell bound with a false assurance of their salvation
    depending on their free will works righteousness!
    Joe
    4C's
    Boston, MA
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  2. #2
    christabella_warren's Avatar
    christabella_warren is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Rockville, Maryland
    Posts
    427
    Thanks
    146
    Thanked 112 Times in 54 Posts
    Let me respectfully say that your statement sounds rather extreme and condemnatory, to say the least. I don't think even in the days of the old Reformers, anyone believed that a belief in double predestination was a prerequisite to salvation.
    Christabella Warren
    Fourth Presbyterian Church
    Bethesda, MD

    ========================
    He that has light within his own clear breast May sit i' the centre, and enjoy bright day: But he that hides a dark soul and foul thoughts Benighted walks under the mid-day sun; Himself his own dungeon. -- John Milton's Comus
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  3. #3
    steven-nemes is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    906
    Thanks
    153
    Thanked 169 Times in 117 Posts
    He didn't say, so far as I can tell, that a belief in double predestination is necessary for salvation.

    He did say that the consequences of Arminian free-will theology makes it works righteousness, and therefore they are not saved. Now if this is true, is another matter.
    Steven Nemes
    Phoenix, AZ

    Good philosophy must exist, if for no other reason, because bad philosophy must be answered - C.S. Lewis
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  4. #4
    jwithnell's Avatar
    jwithnell is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Leesburg, VA
    Posts
    1,442
    Thanks
    167
    Thanked 645 Times in 398 Posts
    I do thing caution is in order here. On some level, anything, even saying, "in and of myself I believe -- I am coming to faith," is a work and a grounds for boasting. That said, I have known ardent free-will Armenians who would disavow that they had done (or required) any work. Inconsistent? You bet. But these are still brothers and sisters in Christ regardless of if they are "of Apollo" or "of Paul."
    JWithnell
    Member Bethel OPC
    Virginia
    http://learningyesican.blogspot.com/
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  5. #5
    Confessor's Avatar
    Confessor is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ada, OH
    Posts
    2,099
    Thanks
    531
    Thanked 505 Times in 335 Posts
    I asked in another thread whether one could have true faith in Christ's work and still believe in free will. I think they can, although a caveat must be added: When they are confronted by the perspicuous Biblical witness and still deny the matter, entrenching themselves in the belief that regeneration is an effect of their own wills, then their situation is much more precarious.
    Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook
    In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
    Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH

    When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH


    “Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.”
    -Jonathan Edwards-
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  6. #6
    Scott Bushey's Avatar
    Scott Bushey is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Margate, Florida
    Posts
    8,526
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 53 Times in 22 Posts
    Salvation is a process of sorts. A new believer may not have all the information onboard that maybe you or I do at the time they are regenerated. This is not like the movie the Matrix where once one is plugged in, one can download every doctrine the Bible possesses. Arminianism is sinful and an error. Someone that understands the difference between justification by faith alone and Arminianism, and yet rejects justification by faith alone for the error is perishing. There's a difference between ignorance and holding to a doctrine. The HS will direct the truly converted to truth.

    ~To answer your question, yes. Arminianism is works based.
    Scott Bushey
    Husband to Tina, father to Nicole, Danielle and Zoe
    Member First Presbyterian Church of Margate PCA
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  7. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Scott Bushey For This Useful Post:

    a mere housewife (07-02-2009), Jeff_Bartel (07-02-2009), Scott1 (07-02-2009)

  8. #7
    Semper Fidelis's Avatar
    Semper Fidelis is offline. 2 Timothy 2:24-25
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Northern Virgnia
    Posts
    18,628
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    2,646
    Thanked 6,662 Times in 2,682 Posts
    The Canons of Dordt:

    Having set forth the orthodox teaching concerning election and reprobation, the Synod rejects the errors of those:

    V. Who teach that the incomplete and nonperemptory election of particular persons to salvation occurred on the basis of a foreseen faith, repentance, holiness, and godliness, which has just begun or continued for some time; but that complete and peremptory election occurred on the basis of a foreseen perseverance to the end in faith, repentance, holiness, and godliness. And that this is the gracious and evangelical worthiness, on account of which the one who is chosen is more worthy than the one who is not chosen. And therefore that faith, the obedience of faith, holiness, godliness, and perseverance are not fruits or effects of an unchangeable election to glory, but indispensable conditions and causes, which are prerequisite in those who are to be chosen in the complete election, and which are foreseen as achieved in them.

    This runs counter to the entire Scripture, which throughout impresses upon our ears and hearts these sayings among others: Election is not by works, but by him who calls (Rom. 9:11-12); All who were appointed for eternal life believed (Acts 13:48); He chose us in himself so that we should be holy (Eph. 1:4); You did not choose me, but I chose you (John 15:16); If by grace, not by works (Rom. 11:6); In this is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son (1 John 4:10).

    IX. Who teach that the cause for God's sending the gospel to one people rather than to another is not merely and solely God's good pleasure, but rather that one people is better and worthier than the other to whom the gospel is not communicated.

    For Moses contradicts this when he addresses the people of Israel as follows: Behold, to Jehovah your God belong the heavens and the highest heavens, the earth and whatever is in it. But Jehovah was inclined in his affection to love your ancestors alone, and chose out their descendants after them, you above all peoples, as at this day (Deut. 10:14-15). And also Christ: Woe to you, Korazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! for if those mighty works done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes (Matt. 11:21).

    III. Who teach that Christ, by the satisfaction which he gave, did not certainly merit for anyone salvation itself and the faith by which this satisfaction of Christ is effectively applied to salvation, but only acquired for the Father the authority or plenary will to relate in a new way with men and to impose such new conditions as he chose, and that the satisfying of these conditions depends on the free choice of man; consequently, that it was possible that either all or none would fulfill them.

    For they have too low an opinion of the death of Christ, do not at all acknowledge the foremost fruit or benefit which it brings forth, and summon back from hell the Pelagian error.

    VI. Who make use of the distinction between obtaining and applying in order to instill in the unwary and inexperienced the opinion that God, as far as he is concerned, wished to bestow equally upon all people the benefits which are gained by Christ's death; but that the distinction by which some rather than others come to share in the forgiveness of sins and eternal life depends on their own free choice (which applies itself to the grace offered indiscriminately) but does not depend on the unique gift of mercy which effectively works in them, so that they, rather than others, apply that grace to themselves.

    For, while pretending to set forth this distinction in an acceptable sense, they attempt to give the people the deadly poison of Pelagianism.
    Rich
    PCA, Northern VA
    Student, New Geneva Theological Seminary

    WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
    SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post:

    Scott1 (07-02-2009)

  10. #8
    historyb is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Hemet, Ca
    Posts
    1,094
    Thanks
    338
    Thanked 136 Times in 91 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Javilo View Post
    I am thinking that Arminianism is works righteousness because they believe
    that a person is saved by the action of their own free will. Thus it is
    something they do and not what God has done. So this leads me to
    believe that they are not really saved since it seems to me that by a free will
    "make a decision for Christ" they are really saying "Lord, I am good enough."
    which is works righteousness the way I see it. If this is true, how many
    Arminians are tragically hell bound with a false assurance of their salvation
    depending on their free will works righteousness!
    I wouldn't know any who thought that way. There was no belief that a person is not saved by their own free will and nothing else, indeed there is a belief that a person is saved by faith alone in God and they have a choice weather to believe are not.

    I never heard anything like this until coming here, I know many pastors not in Reformed and many Christians non-Reformed who would tell you that we are saved by faith alone and not by anything we do.
    Doug
    Baptist
    Hemet, Ca
    [URL="http://otrclassics.mypodcast.com/"]Old Time Radio Podcast[/URL]
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  11. #9
    Nomad's Avatar
    Nomad is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Oreland, PA.
    Posts
    47
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Javilo View Post
    I am thinking that Arminianism is works righteousness because they believe
    that a person is saved by the action of their own free will. Thus it is
    something they do and not what God has done. So this leads me to
    believe that they are not really saved since it seems to me that by a free will
    "make a decision for Christ" they are really saying "Lord, I am good enough."
    which is works righteousness the way I see it. If this is true, how many
    Arminians are tragically hell bound with a false assurance of their salvation
    depending on their free will works righteousness!
    Arminian soteriology may very well imply the things you list, but putting that aside for a minute, most Arminians would vehemently deny the things you list. Most of all, they would deny that faith is a meritorious work or that they contribute anything to their justification.
    Trevor James
    Ruling Elder, St. Paul's RBC
    Oreland, PA.

    1689 London Baptist Confession
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  12. #10
    Spinningplates2's Avatar
    Spinningplates2 is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Lake Zurich, Illinois
    Posts
    458
    Thanks
    97
    Thanked 136 Times in 85 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by historyb View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Javilo View Post
    I am thinking that Arminianism is works righteousness because they believe
    that a person is saved by the action of their own free will. Thus it is
    something they do and not what God has done. So this leads me to
    believe that they are not really saved since it seems to me that by a free will
    "make a decision for Christ" they are really saying "Lord, I am good enough."
    which is works righteousness the way I see it. If this is true, how many
    Arminians are tragically hell bound with a false assurance of their salvation
    depending on their free will works righteousness!
    I wouldn't know any who thought that way. There was no belief that a person is not saved by their own free will and nothing else, indeed there is a belief that a person is saved by faith alone in God and they have a choice weather to believe are not.

    I never heard anything like this until coming here, I know many pastors not in Reformed and many Christians non-Reformed who would tell you that we are saved by faith alone and not by anything we do.
    I think we all know namy non-Reformed Christians who tell people that they can be saved by Faith alone and that only faith in Christ is needed for salvation. I get the feeling that you are taking a swipe at this board instead of answering the question. I know a man who has taught for years that salvation is a gift of God for all by Grace alone. Dig a little deeper though and you will find that man MUST act first.

    The first question might have been asked a little on the blunt side, but it is not an unusual or necessarily wrong statement.
    Alan Hughes
    PCA
    Lake Zurich, Illinois

    If you think I'm a Hyper-Calvinist, God planned that thought before the foundation of the Earth. If you try to tell me that God only planned some things and not all things, then your problem is with God not me.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  13. #11
    Semper Fidelis's Avatar
    Semper Fidelis is offline. 2 Timothy 2:24-25
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Northern Virgnia
    Posts
    18,628
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    2,646
    Thanked 6,662 Times in 2,682 Posts
    Arminianism is a doctrine.

    A person who has been baptized into Christ is a Christian.

    Though Christians may be deceived by false doctrines we need to use the name Christian to refer to them and labor to teach them correctly according to the proper Way. I believe false teachers who propagate Armianism will be judged harshly for leading the baptized astray who are owed proper instruction.
    Rich
    PCA, Northern VA
    Student, New Geneva Theological Seminary

    WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
    SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post:

    JBaldwin (07-21-2009)

  15. #12
    historyb is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Hemet, Ca
    Posts
    1,094
    Thanks
    338
    Thanked 136 Times in 91 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Spinningplates2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by historyb View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Javilo View Post
    I am thinking that Arminianism is works righteousness because they believe
    that a person is saved by the action of their own free will. Thus it is
    something they do and not what God has done. So this leads me to
    believe that they are not really saved since it seems to me that by a free will
    "make a decision for Christ" they are really saying "Lord, I am good enough."
    which is works righteousness the way I see it. If this is true, how many
    Arminians are tragically hell bound with a false assurance of their salvation
    depending on their free will works righteousness!
    I wouldn't know any who thought that way. There was no belief that a person is not saved by their own free will and nothing else, indeed there is a belief that a person is saved by faith alone in God and they have a choice weather to believe are not.

    I never heard anything like this until coming here, I know many pastors not in Reformed and many Christians non-Reformed who would tell you that we are saved by faith alone and not by anything we do.
    I think we all know namy non-Reformed Christians who tell people that they can be saved by Faith alone and that only faith in Christ is needed for salvation. I get the feeling that you are taking a swipe at this board instead of answering the question. I know a man who has taught for years that salvation is a gift of God for all by Grace alone. Dig a little deeper though and you will find that man MUST act first.

    The first question might have been asked a little on the blunt side, but it is not an unusual or necessarily wrong statement.
    No, I wasn't taking a swipe thank you very much.
    Doug
    Baptist
    Hemet, Ca
    [URL="http://otrclassics.mypodcast.com/"]Old Time Radio Podcast[/URL]
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  16. #13
    chbrooking's Avatar
    chbrooking is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ellicott City, MD
    Posts
    779
    Thanks
    243
    Thanked 400 Times in 180 Posts
    There seems to be of late a sort of a spike in posts which question the salvation of Arminians. I am disturbed by it.

    If a perfect doctrinal stand is a prerequisite for salvation, we are all in deep trouble.

    As Calvinists, surely you recognize that your theological understanding is a gift. As a gift, it may not (yet) have been given to others who know our Lord. Think of a child. What level of misunderstandings they have! And yet, by God's grace, they are accepted on the basis of His choice and Christ's work, not their own understanding of Him or Christ's work. Else, no infant or imbecile could be saved -- and this is one of the great encouragements of monergism.

    Surely your test for your brethren can go no further than scripture. There, we are told that we will know them by their fruits and by their love. We aren't told that we will know them by their flowery thoughts (tulip). I know many Arminians who, I am quite confident -- as confident as I am of my Calvinist brothers -- know the Lord. Often, their love and piety shames me. They are inconsistent, to be sure. But they are brothers, nonetheless. The belief that a reformed perspective is a prerequisite for salvation is a denial of the monergistic principle of that reformed perspective itself.

    My Arminian brothers believe the Bible. They don't understand parts of it. But I could say the same of myself. My Arminian brothers believe that the eternal son of God took on human flesh and wrought our redemption through perfect obedience, even to the death. And they count on that for their salvation. The Arminians that I know would never say, "I'm going to heaven because I had the common sense to take hold of what was offered." Now, surely they are inconsistent. I'm not denying that. But God help us if perfect consistency is a prerequisite for salvation!

    I've had Arminians doubt my salvation because I'm a Calvinist. I didn't just find it naive. I found it offensive. And I'm disturbed to see the same sort of naive offensiveness being presented here. Stick to the text. How will we know those who know the Lord? No passage that answers this question mentions understanding predestination.
    Clark Brooking
    Pastor
    Living Hope Presbyterian Church (OPC)
    Clarksville, MD
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  17. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to chbrooking For This Useful Post:

    christabella_warren (07-02-2009), Classical Presbyterian (07-21-2009), coramdeo (07-21-2009), gkterry (07-21-2009), Nomad (07-02-2009), Reluctantly Reforming (07-21-2009)

  18. #14
    coramdeo's Avatar
    coramdeo is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Texarkana, Texas
    Posts
    513
    Thanks
    149
    Thanked 120 Times in 85 Posts

    Semi-Arminain?

    I'm wondering if we should not have another term to apply to evangelical Christians who hold to "free will". Since they don't believe in a true works salvation but salvation by faith alone thru choosing by free will ( which they don't see as a work as noted in earlier post) should they be Semi-Arminian after the Pelagian, Semi-Pelagian mode?...or am I all wet?
    Gregg
    East Texas
    Member Heritage Baptist Church
    "I eagerly expect and hope that I will in no way
    be ashamed, but will have sufficient courage so
    that now, as always, Christ will be exalted in my
    life." Phil 1:20
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  19. #15
    Whitefield's Avatar
    Whitefield is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Georgetown, IN
    Posts
    1,554
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 652 Times in 384 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by coramdeo View Post
    I'm wondering if we should not have another term to apply to evangelical Christians who hold to "free will". Since they don't believe in a true works salvation but salvation by faith alone thru choosing by free will ( which they don't see as a work as noted in earlier post) should they be Semi-Arminian after the Pelagian, Semi-Pelagian mode?...or am I all wet?
    That sounds like straight Arminianism to me.
    Lance G. Marshall
    Pastor
    Georgetown, Indiana
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  20. #16
    Confessor's Avatar
    Confessor is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ada, OH
    Posts
    2,099
    Thanks
    531
    Thanked 505 Times in 335 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by coramdeo View Post
    I'm wondering if we should not have another term to apply to evangelical Christians who hold to "free will". Since they don't believe in a true works salvation but salvation by faith alone thru choosing by free will ( which they don't see as a work as noted in earlier post) should they be Semi-Arminian after the Pelagian, Semi-Pelagian mode?...or am I all wet?
    That sounds like straight Arminianism to me.
    Yeah, those would be straight Arminians; the reason a distinction appears to be made there is because those Arminians are inconsistent. Most don't realize that free will implies works-righteousness.
    Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook
    In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
    Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH

    When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH


    “Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.”
    -Jonathan Edwards-
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  21. #17
    ADKing is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    1,009
    Thanks
    158
    Thanked 710 Times in 283 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chbrooking View Post
    There seems to be of late a sort of a spike in posts which question the salvation of Arminians. I am disturbed by it.

    If a perfect doctrinal stand is a prerequisite for salvation, we are all in deep trouble.

    As Calvinists, surely you recognize that your theological understanding is a gift. As a gift, it may not (yet) have been given to others who know our Lord. Think of a child. What level of misunderstandings they have! And yet, by God's grace, they are accepted on the basis of His choice and Christ's work, not their own understanding of Him or Christ's work. Else, no infant or imbecile could be saved -- and this is one of the great encouragements of monergism.

    Surely your test for your brethren can go no further than scripture. There, we are told that we will know them by their fruits and by their love. We aren't told that we will know them by their flowery thoughts (tulip). I know many Arminians who, I am quite confident -- as confident as I am of my Calvinist brothers -- know the Lord. Often, their love and piety shames me. They are inconsistent, to be sure. But they are brothers, nonetheless. The belief that a reformed perspective is a prerequisite for salvation is a denial of the monergistic principle of that reformed perspective itself.

    My Arminian brothers believe the Bible. They don't understand parts of it. But I could say the same of myself. My Arminian brothers believe that the eternal son of God took on human flesh and wrought our redemption through perfect obedience, even to the death. And they count on that for their salvation. The Arminians that I know would never say, "I'm going to heaven because I had the common sense to take hold of what was offered." Now, surely they are inconsistent. I'm not denying that. But God help us if perfect consistency is a prerequisite for salvation!

    I've had Arminians doubt my salvation because I'm a Calvinist. I didn't just find it naive. I found it offensive. And I'm disturbed to see the same sort of naive offensiveness being presented here. Stick to the text. How will we know those who know the Lord? No passage that answers this question mentions understanding predestination.
    I don't intend to get sucked into a extended debate on this issue as it has been discussed many times before. However, I cannot let such comments pass without adding my

    Let us please stop constructing and attacking straw men. Who on this board is arguing that "perfect consistency is a prerequisite for salvation"? Who has once said "a perfect doctrinal stand is a prerequisite for salvation"?

    You acknowledge that our test for our brethren ought not to go further than the scripture. Agreed. That is what is being asked. To say that we judge people's professions on "fruits and love" is true. But isn't some doctrinal knowldge a necessary fruit? To confess that "Jesus is Lord" implies that one knows who Jesus is and something of the implications of this statement. To discern the body and the blood of the Lord surely requires some knowledge of why he had a body and the significance of why it was broken. Surely, brother you acknowledge that a profession of faith in Christ includes doctrinal content.

    The heart of the question is this
    1. Is Calvinism synonymous with the gospel
    or
    2. Is Calvinism a true but additional (and unessential) "flowery thought".

    Personally I hold to #1 and am quite disturbed by the implications of those who forcefully promote #2.
    Rev. Adam King
    Pastor,Trinity Reformed Church (RPCNA)
    Wichita, KS
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to ADKing For This Useful Post:

    Jeff_Bartel (07-21-2009)

  23. #18
    Confessor's Avatar
    Confessor is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ada, OH
    Posts
    2,099
    Thanks
    531
    Thanked 505 Times in 335 Posts
    Rev. King,

    I believe there might be a third option in your final dichotomy, namely those who have trust in Christ alone for salvation, but who do not realize that God first had to choose them. In other words, I don't think sola fide by itself necessitates sola gratia (and its logical implications, TULIP).
    Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook
    In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
    Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH

    When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH


    “Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.”
    -Jonathan Edwards-
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  24. #19
    Grillsy's Avatar
    Grillsy is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Grayson, Kentucky
    Posts
    1,348
    Thanks
    748
    Thanked 231 Times in 135 Posts
    The thing that concerns me is that we do view bad theology as we should. Bad theology is a moral problem and we should treat it as such. Arminians will use the vocabulary of one who believes in Sola Fide. But when you carry out the logic of Arminian thought it is pure works righteousness...even though they say they are trusting only in Christ's work. Some Mormons will also say the same thing with the same vocabulary as will the average Campbellite. Do we accept them as orthodox and saved automatically because they sound orthodox? Of course not.

    We have become far too accepting of the Arminian error is these troubling times. Read the Canons of Dordt and see just how open they were to Arminians. Why have we neglected to treat the heresies and errors in our day in the way that those great theologians of old did?
    Willie Grills
    Trinity Presbyterian Church
    OPC
    Huntington, WV
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  25. #20
    Romans 9:16's Avatar
    Romans 9:16 is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 35 Times in 18 Posts

    Is Arminianism works righteousness?

    If we are saved by the action of our will, whether the will is ‘free’ or not is irrelevant with respect to the question of ‘works righteousness.’ The issue is not the freeness of the will, but rather what is the relation of willing to believing. Any time faith is defined as a volition (whether its God’s gift or not) you will end up with ‘works righteousness.’ Only Gordon Clark’s view of faith (“assent to understood propositions” – see What is Saving Faith?) guards against ‘works righteousness.’

    As to the question of whether Arminians (or anybody for that matter) can be saved with a faulty view of faith, will, etc., one must acknowledge a potential disjunction between the actual content of a person’s belief system and the way they formulate and profess it. I think there are many that understand the scriptural teaching of an entirely free salvation sovereignly bestowed, apart from any human willing (Rom 9:16), and yet are unwilling to allow this same clarity to ring out in their systemization of the Biblical materials. Thankfully, most Arminians don’t believe in Arminianism (even if they think and say that they do).
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  26. #21
    ADKing is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    1,009
    Thanks
    158
    Thanked 710 Times in 283 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Confessor View Post
    Rev. King,

    I believe there might be a third option in your final dichotomy, namely those who have trust in Christ alone for salvation, but who do not realize that God first had to choose them. In other words, I don't think sola fide by itself necessitates sola gratia (and its logical implications, TULIP).
    How is this a third option? Either sola gratia is an essential part of the gospel or it is not. I am not talking about the subjective experience of confused individuals but am asking the question about the objective and essential content of the gospel.
    Rev. Adam King
    Pastor,Trinity Reformed Church (RPCNA)
    Wichita, KS
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  27. #22
    Confessor's Avatar
    Confessor is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ada, OH
    Posts
    2,099
    Thanks
    531
    Thanked 505 Times in 335 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ADKing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Confessor View Post
    Rev. King,

    I believe there might be a third option in your final dichotomy, namely those who have trust in Christ alone for salvation, but who do not realize that God first had to choose them. In other words, I don't think sola fide by itself necessitates sola gratia (and its logical implications, TULIP).
    How is this a third option? Either sola gratia is an essential part of the gospel or it is not. I am not talking about the subjective experience of confused individuals but am asking the question about the objective and essential content of the gospel.
    Well, the problem is that some people do not understand sola gratia consistently. They are simply unaware that free will precludes sola gratia.

    For the record, I do believe that Arminians who put forth a large resistance to Reformed theology are in a much more precarious situation.
    Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook
    In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
    Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH

    When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH


    “Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.”
    -Jonathan Edwards-
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  28. #23
    ADKing is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    1,009
    Thanks
    158
    Thanked 710 Times in 283 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Confessor View Post
    Well, the problem is that some people do not understand sola gratia consistently. They are simply unaware that free will precludes sola gratia.

    For the record, I do believe that Arminians who put forth a large resistance to Reformed theology are in a much more precarious situation.
    OK, so this is really my last post on this topic

    I want to probe your statement "the problem is..." Let me ask you, "The problem with what?"

    Is the confusion and ignorace of some people a problem with identifying the objective and essential content of the gospel? Surely you don't believe this. Just because people are unaware of things doesn't mean that the Bible doesn't speak to them (and clearly at that).

    Can the church identify what the gospel is? How much doctrinal content is essential to its message? This seems pretty straightforward to me. If we cannot answer such a question as the church we are in big trouble.
    Rev. Adam King
    Pastor,Trinity Reformed Church (RPCNA)
    Wichita, KS
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  29. #24
    Confessor's Avatar
    Confessor is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ada, OH
    Posts
    2,099
    Thanks
    531
    Thanked 505 Times in 335 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ADKing View Post
    I want to probe your statement "the problem is..." Let me ask you, "The problem with what?"

    Is the confusion and ignorace of some people a problem with identifying the objective and essential content of the gospel? Surely you don't believe this. Just because people are unaware of things doesn't mean that the Bible doesn't speak to them (and clearly at that).

    Can the church identify what the gospel is? How much doctrinal content is essential to its message? This seems pretty straightforward to me. If we cannot answer such a question as the church we are in big trouble.
    The problem with understanding whether people who do not recognize God's absolute sovereignty are saved.

    I know many people who are simply unfamiliar with Calvinism. They haven't heard of it. They know that they must trust in Christ alone for salvation. They know that faith in Him is the means of their sins being forgiven. They know that Christ was punished so they wouldn't need to be. But they haven't yet been confronted with the problems that free will brings up.

    Even when the Bible is plain about how God's grace is sufficient and necessary for salvation, it's very easy to read those passages quickly and not see its anti-free will implications. Certainly this implies some moral problem on the part of the reader, but that does not imply they don't truly trust in Christ for salvation.
    Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook
    In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
    Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH

    When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH


    “Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.”
    -Jonathan Edwards-
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  30. #25
    Grillsy's Avatar
    Grillsy is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Grayson, Kentucky
    Posts
    1,348
    Thanks
    748
    Thanked 231 Times in 135 Posts
    The thing that concerns me is that we do view bad theology as we should. Bad theology is a moral problem and we should treat it as such. Arminians will use the vocabulary of one who believes in Sola Fide. But when you carry out the logic of Arminian thought it is pure works righteousness...even though they say they are trusting only in Christ's work. Some Mormons will also say the same thing with the same vocabulary as will the average Campbellite. Do we accept them as orthodox and saved automatically because they sound orthodox? Of course not.

    We have become far too accepting of the Arminian error is these troubling times. Read the Canons of Dordt and see just how open they were to Arminians. Why have we neglected to treat the heresies and errors in our day in the way that those great theologians of old did?
    Willie Grills
    Trinity Presbyterian Church
    OPC
    Huntington, WV
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  31. #26
    Confessor's Avatar
    Confessor is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ada, OH
    Posts
    2,099
    Thanks
    531
    Thanked 505 Times in 335 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Grillsy View Post
    The thing that concerns me is that we do view bad theology as we should. Bad theology is a moral problem and we should treat it as such. Arminians will use the vocabulary of one who believes in Sola Fide. But when you carry out the logic of Arminian thought it is pure works righteousness...even though they say they are trusting only in Christ's work. Some Mormons will also say the same thing with the same vocabulary as will the average Campbellite. Do we accept them as orthodox and saved automatically because they sound orthodox? Of course not.

    We have become far too accepting of the Arminian error is these troubling times. Read the Canons of Dordt and see just how open they were to Arminians. Why have we neglected to treat the heresies and errors in our day in the way that those great theologians of old did?
    Sorry to look over your post earlier.

    Bad theology certainly is a moral problem, but it obviously does not follow that bad theology is an unforgivable sin. Certainly, some bad theology can be evidence of unregeneracy, but we must know where to draw the line.

    And again, I would contend that it is possible to actually trust in Christ while being unaware of the implications of free will. There must be some moral problem in reading over the texts speaking of God's sovereignty in salvation,, but I don't think this moral problem is damning.

    Lastly, I do not think a belief that some Arminians are saved is tantamount to an acceptance or tolerance of Arminian theology. I hate Arminianism.
    Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook
    In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
    Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH

    When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH


    “Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.”
    -Jonathan Edwards-
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  32. #27
    Grillsy's Avatar
    Grillsy is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Grayson, Kentucky
    Posts
    1,348
    Thanks
    748
    Thanked 231 Times in 135 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Confessor View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Grillsy View Post
    The thing that concerns me is that we do view bad theology as we should. Bad theology is a moral problem and we should treat it as such. Arminians will use the vocabulary of one who believes in Sola Fide. But when you carry out the logic of Arminian thought it is pure works righteousness...even though they say they are trusting only in Christ's work. Some Mormons will also say the same thing with the same vocabulary as will the average Campbellite. Do we accept them as orthodox and saved automatically because they sound orthodox? Of course not.

    We have become far too accepting of the Arminian error is these troubling times. Read the Canons of Dordt and see just how open they were to Arminians. Why have we neglected to treat the heresies and errors in our day in the way that those great theologians of old did?
    Sorry to look over your post earlier.

    Bad theology certainly is a moral problem, but it obviously does not follow that bad theology is an unforgivable sin. Certainly, some bad theology can be evidence of unregeneracy, but we must know where to draw the line.

    And again, I would contend that it is possible to actually trust in Christ while being unaware of the implications of free will. There must be some moral problem in reading over the texts speaking of God's sovereignty in salvation,, but I don't think this moral problem is damning.

    Lastly, I do not think a belief that some Arminians are saved is tantamount to an acceptance or tolerance of Arminian theology. I hate Arminianism.
    I agree with you Confessor. Really my worry is that too often we let the Arminian error off easy. Most on the PB, rightly so, condemn Roman Catholicism, but they would back off of Arminianism even though soteriologically speaking the error is the same. I do believe that there are some Arminians who will be saved in spite of their theology. I just feel that is some instances we could take a stronger stand against, in more public or vocal way.
    I am by no means implying that we burn them at the stake or personally and viciously attack proponents of Arminianism. Rather I would like to see us soberly and Biblically combat this vicious and pervasive error. Not that to some degree this isn't already done. The problem is that we are all to often ready to engage Arminianism is a safe zone like our local Presbyterian church, or on the PB, but when it comes to the public condemnation of the doctrine sometimes we shrink back.
    I worry that we are forgetting an obligation that we may have. Again I am using the general "WE" as Reformed Christians and am not accusing anyone on the PB specifically.
    Willie Grills
    Trinity Presbyterian Church
    OPC
    Huntington, WV
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  33. #28
    Confessor's Avatar
    Confessor is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ada, OH
    Posts
    2,099
    Thanks
    531
    Thanked 505 Times in 335 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Grillsy View Post
    I agree with you Confessor. Really my worry is that too often we let the Arminian error off easy. Most on the PB, rightly so, condemn Roman Catholicism, but they would back off of Arminianism even though soteriologically speaking the error is the same. I do believe that there are some Arminians who will be saved in spite of their theology. I just feel that is some instances we could take a stronger stand against, in more public or vocal way.
    I am by no means implying that we burn them at the stake or personally and viciously attack proponents of Arminianism. Rather I would like to see us soberly and Biblically combat this vicious and pervasive error. Not that to some degree this isn't already done. The problem is that we are all to often ready to engage Arminianism is a safe zone like our local Presbyterian church, or on the PB, but when it comes to the public condemnation of the doctrine sometimes we shrink back.
    I worry that we are forgetting an obligation that we may have. Again I am using the general "WE" as Reformed Christians and am not accusing anyone on the PB specifically.
    I can certainly agree with that.

    I know a problem I have personally is that I know some people are Christians and I don't want to "start arguments" or something -- simply because I don't like it when people don't like me. But in all honesty, I should be more vocal about the sovereignty of God when I'm on campus. "Blessed are you when people persecute you."

    Thanks for the reminder.
    Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook
    In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
    Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH

    When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH


    “Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.”
    -Jonathan Edwards-
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69