The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Theological Forum > Ecclesiology

Ecclesiology Discussion of Church Government, Polity and the like
that you may know how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth (1 Tim 3:15)

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009, 01:39 PM
Puritan Sailor's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lisbon, NY
Posts: 5,886
Thanks: 421
Thanked 635 Times in 294 Posts
The Lord's Supper and Ecumenical Services

Should ministers and members of confessionally Reformed Churches partake of the Lord's Supper in ecumencial services with other churches in the area?

** assume for the sake of argument that all participants in the service are professing Trinitarian Protestants** (i.e. no Roman Catholics, EO, or cult participants)

__________________
Patrick
MDiv, RTS Jackson
Pastor, Grace Presbyterian Church (OPC), Lisbon, NY

"He does well, that discourses of Christ; but he does infinitely better, that by experimental knowledge, feeds and lives on Christ." Thomas Brooks.
"Let us not please ourselves that we have deep understandings, but let us shew our understandings by our practice." Richard Sibbes
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009, 01:57 PM
Scott1's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 1,905
Thanked 1,840 Times in 1,091 Posts
While I would not want that done as a means of watering down reformed theology, I think in select instances it would be okay since we do allow persons who are, for examples, members in good standing of a church where the gospel is preached to partake. As long as the minimal biblical requirements (e.g. fence for unbelievers, etc.) are in good faith, observed.
__________________
Scott
PCA
North Carolina



"Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
Hebrews 10:23
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009, 02:18 PM
Puritan Sailor's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lisbon, NY
Posts: 5,886
Thanks: 421
Thanked 635 Times in 294 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott1 View Post
While I would not want that done as a means of watering down reformed theology, I think in select instances it would be okay since we do allow persons who are, for examples, members in good standing of a church where the gospel is preached to partake. As long as the minimal biblical requirements (e.g. fence for unbelievers, etc.) are in good faith, observed.
Yes, I know the PCA BCO specifically allows members of evangelical churches in good standing to participate. I'm having trouble finding something like that in the OPC BCO though. Any OPC experts have any idea where such a principle is spelled out?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009, 03:23 PM
larryjf's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boothwyn, PA
Posts: 1,928
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 133
Thanked 595 Times in 356 Posts
I would suggest that as long as the view on the administration and substance of the sacraments is the same, and that the basic evangelical doctrines are in agreement, it would be ok.

By "evangelical doctrines" i mean the doctrine of the Gospel itself. In other words, we are saved by God's grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone.
__________________
Larry Bray
Elder - Reformed Presbyterian Church of Boothwyn, PCA
Boothwyn, PA - http://www.rpcb.org/
Free Online Reformed Seminary - http://www.tnars.net
-----------------------------------------------------
Christian ritual costs nothing and is worth nothing. True Christian religion costs all that we have and is worth everything.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009, 03:41 PM
Re4mdant's Avatar
Reformed Dane
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Breum, Denmark
Posts: 6,344
Thanks: 2,713
Thanked 1,013 Times in 735 Posts
__________________
Martin - Reformed
Husband to the most godly, honorable and loyal wife Line
Searching for a Church
Webpage www.5solas.dk
Free Online Reformed Seminary - http://www.tnars.net
Soli Deo Gloria
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2009, 10:04 AM
Puritan Sailor's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lisbon, NY
Posts: 5,886
Thanks: 421
Thanked 635 Times in 294 Posts
No other input?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2009, 10:34 AM
whitway's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 913
Thanked 535 Times in 330 Posts
Patrick,

I can't find anything that would answer your question in the BCO of the OPC either so probably left up to the discretion of the Presbytery and Session. With that said as a layman I'd probably follow the Lead of the Session in this regard as I trust their judgment however I don't personally seek to do so. What would this look like in your question? Would you be having a joint worship service with other churches where communion is celebrated? Would this be a separate service outside of the Stated Worship Service on Sunday? I have never experienced such a service except with other churches of the same denomination.
__________________
Wayne Whitmer
Member, Rio Rancho OPC
Albuquerque, NM
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2009, 10:58 AM
Rich Koster's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Browns Mills NJ
Posts: 2,326
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 621
Thanked 703 Times in 405 Posts
In some cases I would not have a problem with it. However if a congregation in town was started by a faction that was under discipline (recently or historically), wouldn't that be problematic? I know of congregations started by splinter groups, not Church plants from denominations. Also, if they were stated Trinitarian but into some new age stuff, I would also avoid it. Bottom line is it would be a case by case thing depending on the known participants.
__________________
Rich Koster
1689'er
Browns Mills NJ USA
Often Goofy Reformed Eccentric
Romans 7:14-25
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69