The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Theological Forum > Ecclesiology

Ecclesiology Discussion of Church Government, Polity and the like
that you may know how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth (1 Tim 3:15)

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2009, 05:01 PM
Theoretical's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,276
Thanks: 2,560
Thanked 332 Times in 169 Posts
Are Any Scholarly Catholics Becoming Protestant These Days?

We hear all the time about the movement of Protestants, especially some in scholarly circles (Kreeft and Hahn come to mind), converting to Catholicism and then becoming Catholic apologists.

Has there been any movement in the other direction recently, of Catholic scholars (or even just clergy) becoming Protestant and then writing in defense of their change?
__________________
Scott - Dallas, Texas - Faith OPC

"It is not what a lawyer tells me I may do; but what humanity, reason, and justice tell me I ought to do." - Edmund Burke
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Theoretical For This Useful Post:
dudley (07-10-2009), whitway (03-13-2009)
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2009, 05:53 PM
historyb's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hemet, Ca
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 339
Thanked 132 Times in 89 Posts
That's something I always wondered myself
__________________
Doug
Baptist
Hemet, Ca
Old Time Radio Podcast
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2009, 05:56 PM
py3ak's Avatar
Use Bat Lip Balm
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 6,661
Thanks: 192
Thanked 2,437 Times in 1,348 Posts
It may not exactly fit the criteria, but it is worth listening to:
SermonAudio.com - Testimony of Pastor Tim Williams
__________________
Ruben
Moderator
F.P.C.I.
Indiana

Vanities and disguises have covered us, and thereby we are naked; licenciousness hath inflam'd us, and thereby we are frozen; voluptuousness hath fed us, and thereby we are sterved, the fancies and traditions of men have taught and instructed us, and thereby we are ignorant.
John Donne


Board Rules - Signature Requirements - Suggestions?

Calvinistas Conversando
Teología en Mexico
The Howling Wilderness
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2009, 05:58 PM
Marrow Man's Avatar
Drunk with Powder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,103
Thanks: 2,778
Thanked 2,444 Times in 1,224 Posts
We have a former Roman Catholic, who was preparing at one point to go to school and become a priest, getting ready to join our church.

I know that's not the same, but hopefully it's an encouragement!

Who was the former RC priest who has the series on Calvinism available on the web? How long ago did he leave the RCC?

And wasn't Brian Schwertly a former RC?
__________________
Tim Phillips
Pastor, Midlane Park Presbyterian Church (ARP)
Louisville, KY
Husband of Scottish Lass
My Blog: Gairney Bridge
My Facebook/My Avatar

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

"Wherever the gospel is preached, it is as if God Himself came into the midst of us." ~ John Calvin
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2009, 06:52 PM
historyb's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hemet, Ca
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 339
Thanked 132 Times in 89 Posts
I think it is berean beacon hosted by Richard Bennett, I just went to his site it's looks nice now.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to historyb For This Useful Post:
Marrow Man (03-13-2009)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2009, 06:58 PM
Marrow Man's Avatar
Drunk with Powder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,103
Thanks: 2,778
Thanked 2,444 Times in 1,224 Posts
Yep, Richard Bennett. That's it. Thanks!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2009, 08:41 PM
charliejunfan's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Janesville, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,130
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 1,483
Thanked 211 Times in 134 Posts
Yes, Brian Schwertley was formerly RCC
__________________
~ Charles Stephen Barribeau ~
Christ Presbyterian Church , OPC (They sing alot of Psalms!)
Original Westminster Standards (I need to study more...)
The Puritans were best! Also... I NEED TO READ MORE!!!
Philipians1:29(KJV) For unto you it is given in the behalf of Christ, not only to believe on him, but also to suffer for his sake;

Janesville, Wisconsin (In the fellowship of Bob Vigneault and Matt+Megan Meisberger)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to charliejunfan For This Useful Post:
dbroyles (03-14-2009), Marrow Man (03-13-2009)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 01:08 PM
Theoretical's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,276
Thanks: 2,560
Thanked 332 Times in 169 Posts
Thanks for these - any others that come to mind?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 01:14 PM
greenbaggins's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,063
Thanks: 981
Thanked 2,452 Times in 841 Posts
Hahn is no scholar, by the way. He doesn't know the first thing about Reformed theology. He left something he didn't even understand.
__________________
Rev. Lane Keister
Teaching Elder, PCA, North Dakota (working out of bounds in a CRC and an RCA church)
http://greenbaggins.wordpress.com
http://brahmsgreenglove.blogspot.com
http://accenttranslation.blogspot.com
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to greenbaggins For This Useful Post:
Berean (04-26-2009), Beth Ellen Nagle (03-14-2009), BlackCalvinist (03-15-2009), Glenn Ferrell (03-14-2009)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 03:06 PM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,956
Thanks: 906
Thanked 820 Times in 504 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins View Post
Hahn is no scholar, by the way. He doesn't know the first thing about Reformed theology. He left something he didn't even understand.
This is just a neutral interjection, but isn't this always the charge leveled against people who change? some mixture of ignorance, confusion, or deception? If I'm right that he has a degree from a well-known Reformed seminary, I find it hard to believe that he's completely ignorant. What about Kreeft? He seems to be fairly educated (both "secularly" and religiously, having been brought up Dutch Calvinist and done his undergrad at Calvin) and teaches philosophy at a name-brand university.

I'm asking you this question specifically because you were so involved with the FV controversy, where it seems to be the problem that no one understands anything (you don't understand the Reformed confessions, no you don't understand history or theology, etc. etc.).

It just seems a little too clean-cut to me to explain it all away by asserting the opposition's complete ignorance.
__________________
Davidius
Husband of Emily
Member of All Saints Anglican Church - Chapel Hill (AMiA / Anglican Church of North America)
Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German and Classics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 03:12 PM
greenbaggins's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,063
Thanks: 981
Thanked 2,452 Times in 841 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidius View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins View Post
Hahn is no scholar, by the way. He doesn't know the first thing about Reformed theology. He left something he didn't even understand.
This is just a neutral interjection, but isn't this always the charge leveled against people who change? some mixture of ignorance, confusion, or deception? If I'm right that he has a degree from a well-known Reformed seminary, I find it hard to believe that he's completely ignorant. What about Kreeft? He seems to be fairly educated (both "secularly" and religiously, having been brought up Dutch Calvinist and done his undergrad at Calvin) and teaches philosophy at a name-brand university.

I'm asking you this question specifically because you were so involved with the FV controversy, where it seems to be the problem that no one understands anything (you don't understand the Reformed confessions, no you don't understand history or theology, etc. etc.).

Do you really think that these men would come around if they knew a different set of propositions, or do you also think that they are willfully deceived?
I'm basing these observations off of reading I did in Sproul and Gerstner, who relate their experience in talking extensively to Hahn before he apostatized. That was the conclusion they reached was that even though Hahn was seminary trained, he did not know what the Reformed faith was. Hahn apparently brought up all the old canards that Roman Catholics have been bringing up for centuries now, apparently unaware that all of them have been answered many times by brilliant men.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to greenbaggins For This Useful Post:
BlackCalvinist (03-15-2009)
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 03:22 PM
uberkermit's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 278
Thanks: 102
Thanked 112 Times in 57 Posts
Add to this the fact that Hahn, who is not a believer, could not even grasp the smallest truth of our faith in a meaningful or helpful way (whereas the least Christian would be able to, by the Spirit). The unregenerate heart is too sullied by sin to understand the faith we adhere to. It must be illumined by the Spirit of the Lord.
__________________
Rob S.
New Creation RPC
Kitchener, ON
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 03:24 PM
whitway's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 913
Thanked 535 Times in 330 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidius View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins View Post
Hahn is no scholar, by the way. He doesn't know the first thing about Reformed theology. He left something he didn't even understand.
This is just a neutral interjection, but isn't this always the charge leveled against people who change? some mixture of ignorance, confusion, or deception? If I'm right that he has a degree from a well-known Reformed seminary, I find it hard to believe that he's completely ignorant. What about Kreeft? He seems to be fairly educated (both "secularly" and religiously, having been brought up Dutch Calvinist and done his undergrad at Calvin) and teaches philosophy at a name-brand university.

I'm asking you this question specifically because you were so involved with the FV controversy, where it seems to be the problem that no one understands anything (you don't understand the Reformed confessions, no you don't understand history or theology, etc. etc.).

Do you really think that these men would come around if they knew a different set of propositions, or do you also think that they are willfully deceived?
I'm basing these observations off of reading I did in Sproul and Gerstner, who relate their experience in talking extensively to Hahn before he apostatized. That was the conclusion they reached was that even though Hahn was seminary trained, he did not know what the Reformed faith was. Hahn apparently brought up all the old canards that Roman Catholics have been bringing up for centuries now, apparently unaware that all of them have been answered many times by brilliant men.
I would agree that ignorance plays a part but isn't apostasy primarily a heart issue or is the ignorance part of a heart issue? Maybe the reason Hahn didn't understand the Reformed answers to the Catholic errors is because he didn't want to and his heart had already been given up to embrace the deception. That's why I think it is extremely important that our Reformed Theology avoid a hyper-intellectual tone and that we put some real Passion and Heart behind what we believe.
__________________
Wayne Whitmer
Member, Rio Rancho OPC
Albuquerque, NM
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to whitway For This Useful Post:
Berean (04-26-2009), BlackCalvinist (03-15-2009), SolaGratia (03-14-2009), Theoretical (03-14-2009)
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 03:58 PM
ChristianTrader's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,664
Thanks: 517
Thanked 533 Times in 279 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitway View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidius View Post

This is just a neutral interjection, but isn't this always the charge leveled against people who change? some mixture of ignorance, confusion, or deception? If I'm right that he has a degree from a well-known Reformed seminary, I find it hard to believe that he's completely ignorant. What about Kreeft? He seems to be fairly educated (both "secularly" and religiously, having been brought up Dutch Calvinist and done his undergrad at Calvin) and teaches philosophy at a name-brand university.

I'm asking you this question specifically because you were so involved with the FV controversy, where it seems to be the problem that no one understands anything (you don't understand the Reformed confessions, no you don't understand history or theology, etc. etc.).

Do you really think that these men would come around if they knew a different set of propositions, or do you also think that they are willfully deceived?
I'm basing these observations off of reading I did in Sproul and Gerstner, who relate their experience in talking extensively to Hahn before he apostatized. That was the conclusion they reached was that even though Hahn was seminary trained, he did not know what the Reformed faith was. Hahn apparently brought up all the old canards that Roman Catholics have been bringing up for centuries now, apparently unaware that all of them have been answered many times by brilliant men.
I would agree that ignorance plays a part but isn't apostasy primarily a heart issue or is the ignorance part of a heart issue? Maybe the reason Hahn didn't understand the Reformed answers to the Catholic errors is because he didn't want to and his heart had already been given up to embrace the deception. That's why I think it is extremely important that our Reformed Theology avoid a hyper-intellectual tone and that we put some real Passion and Heart behind what we believe.
Um, are you asserting that somehow the passion/heart changes the heart when the intellectual argument fails?

CT

-----Added 3/14/2009 at 03:58:48 EST-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidius View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins View Post
Hahn is no scholar, by the way. He doesn't know the first thing about Reformed theology. He left something he didn't even understand.
This is just a neutral interjection, but isn't this always the charge leveled against people who change? some mixture of ignorance, confusion, or deception? If I'm right that he has a degree from a well-known Reformed seminary, I find it hard to believe that he's completely ignorant. What about Kreeft? He seems to be fairly educated (both "secularly" and religiously, having been brought up Dutch Calvinist and done his undergrad at Calvin) and teaches philosophy at a name-brand university.

I'm asking you this question specifically because you were so involved with the FV controversy, where it seems to be the problem that no one understands anything (you don't understand the Reformed confessions, no you don't understand history or theology, etc. etc.).

It just seems a little too clean-cut to me to explain it all away by asserting the opposition's complete ignorance.
But are there really that many options available to explain coming to different conclusions on a subject?

1)Someone is ignorant of some fact that the other side knows
2)One side is in willful rebellion against the truth
3)Or there is no truth to come to in the first place

CT
__________________
Hermonta Godwin
Christ The King PCA
Raleigh, NC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 04:13 PM
whitway's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 913
Thanked 535 Times in 330 Posts
No I am asserting that regardless of the intellectual argument when it comes to Faith it is typically the Heart which has already been deceived which in turn causes one to embrace an error. So in this case it would be #2 rebellion.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 06:25 PM
Glenn Ferrell's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 1,059
Thanks: 450
Thanked 799 Times in 284 Posts
In my young adult years, in my flight from the relativism of liberal Protestantism, not finding fundamentalism a viable option, ignorant of true reformed theology and conservative reformed denominations, and finding some fellowship among the Roman Charismatics of the early 70's, I turned to the Roman Church as seeming to hold a definitive theology and morality. I formally became a Roman Catholic for about three years, attended one of their graduate schools, and considered joining one of their religious orders and seeking ordination.

God in his grace providentially removed me from those circumstances and introduced me to Calvin’s Institutes. After a brief sojourn among evangelical Anglicans and moderate Presbyterians, I discovered all Presbyterians were not liberal lesbians denying the Bible. Since then, I’ve been discovering the magnificent biblical truths of God’s sovereign grace and the comprehensive understanding of this revelation to be found in the Puritans and heirs of Westminster.

Because of my former ignorance, I realize there are many among the Romanists, Modernists, Fundamentalists, Arminians, and Neo-Evangelical who have no idea of what precious treasure we have to share. God has granted me opportunity to witness to more than one Roman Catholic the dominant flaws of their system having to do with authority and grace, which are common to most groups promoting a false gospel.
__________________
Glenn Ferrell
Pastor, Sovereign Redeemer Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Boise, Idaho

http://sovereignredeemer.org

http://www.sermonaudio.com/source_de...formationidaho


Nec Tamen Consumebatur


The duty of magistrates...extends to both tables of the law, ... those laws are absurd which disregard the rights of God, and consult only for men. - Calvin, Institutes, IV:20:9
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Glenn Ferrell For This Useful Post:
Ex Nihilo (03-14-2009), Marrow Man (03-14-2009), Theoretical (03-15-2009)
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 06:37 PM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 533
Thanks: 74
Thanked 95 Times in 72 Posts
Several years ago, didn't Eric Svendsen have a former Jesuit working for NTRM?
__________________
Zack Flummerfelt
Evangel Presbyterian (PCA), layman
Wichita, KS


As of September 12, 2009 I am married to dear Jlynn!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 06:42 PM
Marrow Man's Avatar
Drunk with Powder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,103
Thanks: 2,778
Thanked 2,444 Times in 1,224 Posts
For that matter, isn't Eric Svendsen a former RC?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 07:11 PM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 533
Thanks: 74
Thanked 95 Times in 72 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marrow Man View Post
For that matter, isn't Eric Svendsen a former RC?
Yes. I think he is.

This isn't related to Svendsen but when priests leave the priesthood, morally bite the dust, or have their faculties removed they usually are gone from the RC all together. Unless they are saved unto something they are often basket cases completely. I've been acquanted with a couple on the verge, it isn't pretty. For a committed Catholic to leave the RC is an emotionally draining experience, for a priest it is infinitely more so. So going from the RC cloth to reformed scholar is not going to be overnight thing or easy to clock in terms of numbers.

-----Added 3/14/2009 at 07:11:31 EST-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Ferrell View Post
In my young adult years, in my flight from the relativism of liberal Protestantism, not finding fundamentalism a viable option, ignorant of true reformed theology and conservative reformed denominations, and finding some fellowship among the Roman Charismatics of the early 70's, I turned to the Roman Church as seeming to hold a definitive theology and morality. I formally became a Roman Catholic for about three years, attended one of their graduate schools, and considered joining one of their religious orders and seeking ordination.

God in his grace providentially removed me from those circumstances and introduced me to Calvin’s Institutes. After a brief sojourn among evangelical Anglicans and moderate Presbyterians, I discovered all Presbyterians were not liberal lesbians denying the Bible. Since then, I’ve been discovering the magnificent biblical truths of God’s sovereign grace and the comprehensive understanding of this revelation to be found in the Puritans and heirs of Westminster.

Because of my former ignorance, I realize there are many among the Romanists, Modernists, Fundamentalists, Arminians, and Neo-Evangelical who have no idea of what precious treasure we have to share. God has granted me opportunity to witness to more than one Roman Catholic the dominant flaws of their system having to do with authority and grace, which are common to most groups promoting a false gospel.
I thought about becoming a priest or religious as a catholic. Thanks be to God that never happend.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to KS_Presby For This Useful Post:
dudley (08-08-2009), Marrow Man (03-14-2009)
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69