» Site Navigation | | | |  | 
08-30-2009, 08:25 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: East Boston MA
Posts: 59
Thanks: 17
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | | Why Calvin/Luther:Why no commentary on Revelation?
Also, did anyone from the Reformation write a good commentary on
Revelation that is still available? Would be interesting to compare to
today's views.
__________________
Joe
4C's
Boston, MA
| 
08-30-2009, 08:51 PM
|  | Arbitrary Moderation | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,911
Thanks: 825
Thanked 1,702 Times in 745 Posts
| | |
There was a large output of commentaries and sermons published on the Apocalypse throughout both the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. If you're looking for actual Reformation-era Reformed commentary, the earliest (and probably most widely accessible today [from that early period]) I know of are the sermons of Bullinger on the book.
__________________
Paul Korte
OPC
Flint, MI They who perceive in themselves discoveries of the divine goodness, so full and absolutely perfect, and who make them the subject of earnest meditation, will never embrace new doctrines, by which the very grace they feel so powerfully in themselves is thrown into the shade. --John Calvin
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
08-30-2009, 09:26 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 775
Thanks: 88
Thanked 482 Times in 256 Posts
| | |
I went to search on possibilities ["reformation era commentaries on revelation"], and Joe's post is already up on Google as a return, less than an hour after posting!
That search did turn up the following work, which looks interesting: Reformation Readings of the Apocalypse: Geneva, Zurich, and Wittenberg. By Irena Backus. Oxford Studies in Historical Theology. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. pp. xx, 182. $45.00.)
| 
08-30-2009, 09:34 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,504
Thanks: 1,590
Thanked 2,013 Times in 1,112 Posts
| | |
I think Google's spiders hang out here because I've seen hits on threads not at all long after posting.
| 
08-30-2009, 09:36 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 775
Thanks: 88
Thanked 482 Times in 256 Posts
| | |
This must be a happenin' place!
| 
08-30-2009, 10:07 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Sandy, Oregon
Posts: 2,063
Thanks: 453
Thanked 871 Times in 398 Posts
| | |
I remember having read years back through some good sermons/lectures on Revelation in the collected works of one of the Thomases - take your pick: Boston, Goodwin, Manton. You'll find them in one those collections.
__________________
Adam J. Myer
Slated for the Jan. 10th Chaplains Basic Officer Leadership Course
Estacada Christian Church
Sandy, Oregon Soli Deo Gloria | 
08-30-2009, 10:39 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
| | |
He's not from the Reformation times but have you read Triumph of the Lamb by Dennis E. Johnson?
| 
08-30-2009, 11:46 PM
|  | Meum cerebrum nocet | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,512
Thanks: 1,769
Thanked 3,538 Times in 1,717 Posts
| |
You mean there is something out there besides Tim LaHay's Revelation: Illustrated and Made Plain revised (Zondervan, 1975 {first printing 1973})???
If you want to look at the contemporary era . . .
G K Beale, The Book of Revelation: A Commentary on the Greek Text (New international Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, Mich.) 1999.) 1408 pp. Synopsis This is a massive and detailed work suitable for the scholar and student already familiar with Revelation. The interpretative approach is eclecticism or a Redemptive-Historical form of modified idealism that fits most within the overall interpretative framework of such past commentators as Caird, Johnson, Sweet, and above all Hendriksen and Wilcock, he found Mounce and Bauckham useful.
William Hendriksen, More than Conquerors, Baker Book House, 1962. Evangelical and scholarly, a classic of the idealist school (216 pp). He writes on a passage rather than a verse and therefore he is more useful to the layman than the student.Amazon Still popular after 60 years, and rightly so.
Dennis E. Johnson Triumph of the Lamb: A Commentary on Revelation P & R Press; (August 2001) 384 pages, very good, Amill approach (326pp)
Or put another way,
Scholarly: Beale, Osborne, Smalley, Mounce, Thomas, Chilton
Students and teachers: Osborne, Mounce, Johnson, Bauckham
Preachers: Krodel, Keener, Michaels, Brighton
Student starter: Ladd, Morris, Newport
Layman: Hendiksen, Koester, Newport, Barton Revelation commentary reviews
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
08-31-2009, 10:07 AM
|  | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 10,583
Thanks: 1,671
Thanked 1,901 Times in 1,045 Posts
| | |
I just read A Theological Guide to the Institutes. In it one of the authors said Calvin probably ran out of time in life to do the Apocolypse of John. He did do the book of Daniel which had much to do with Apocolyptic Revelation.
| 
08-31-2009, 10:24 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Thankful...
Posts: 3,238
Thanks: 640
Thanked 1,057 Times in 606 Posts
| | Quote: |
You mean there is something out there besides Tim LaHay's Revelation: Illustrated and Made Plain revised (Zondervan, 1975 {first printing 1973})???
|
__________________
John
Member
Christ Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Salt Lake City, Utah www.christpres.net | 
08-31-2009, 03:31 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Leeds, W Yorks, UK
Posts: 68
Thanks: 10
Thanked 41 Times in 18 Posts
| | |
For Calvin I would suggest it was because he died before he got there.
__________________
Jonathan
Deacon (full time)
Independent Reformed Baptist (BCF 1689)
Tinshill Free Church, Leeds, UK.
| 
08-31-2009, 10:21 PM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,103
Thanks: 2,778
Thanked 2,444 Times in 1,224 Posts
| | |
I've heard more than once some say that Calvin didn't write a commentary on Revelation because "he didn't understand it" (or something along those lines). That seems far-fetched, and considering he also didn't write commentaries on a couple of NT epistles and some of the OT historical books, singling out Revelation would seem even more unlikely.
Does anyone know about this or have a source? If it's an accurate quote, please let me know.
| 
09-01-2009, 01:21 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,366
Thanks: 384
Thanked 410 Times in 180 Posts
| | |
Greetings:
Luther did not believe that Revelation belonged in the inspired canon. Calvin did not have the time to write a commentary.
Blessings,
Rob
__________________
In Essentials Unity, in non-Essentials Liberty, in all things Charity.
Robert Paul Wieland
Springs Reformed Presbyterian Church
Colorado Springs, CO RPCNA
Student at Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary, Pittsburgh PA
Never be afraid to do something new. Remember, amateurs built the Ark, but professionals built the Titanic.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |