» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 97 | | 25 members and 72 guests | | A5pointer, Amy, Backwoods Presbyterian, Beoga, BobVigneault, CaseyBessette, ChristianTrader, ColdSilverMoon, CovenantalBaptist, ericfromcowtown, govols, JDWiseman, kceaster, Kenneth_Murphy, Kevin, Mindaboo, mvdm, NaphtaliPress, panta dokimazete, Southern Presbyterian, Theogenes, TimV | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
04-07-2008, 02:37 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,269
Thanks: 1,459
Thanked 337 Times in 201 Posts
| | | Who Is Ethnic Israel? For those who believe in a future 'mass conversion' of ethnic Israel, who constitutes 'ethnic Israel'?
Anyone who is a descendant of Jacob?
Anyone who practices Judaism?
Anyone who happens to be living in what is now called the nation of Israel?
A combination of these or others?
__________________ | 
04-07-2008, 04:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Montgomery, ALabama
Posts: 371
Thanks: 70
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
| | | probably just the top as the refrences commonly used for widespread denote 12,000 from each tribe. there are some folk who have no known Jewish ancestry that convert.. but in what the folk refrence it would be decendants(maybe just the decendants who "still hold true")
__________________
Jeff Rod
Eastwood Presbyterian Church PCA
member.
webpage: myspace.com/reformationforever
To live a simple, peaceable life before God
To owe as little as possible, to few as possible.
| 
04-07-2008, 04:36 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 858
Thanks: 153
Thanked 172 Times in 101 Posts
| | | Decendants of Jacob. | 
04-07-2008, 04:40 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Hopewell Jct., NY
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| | check out this piece that I have compiled Truth and Way Ministries and click on "Who Is Israel" | 
04-07-2008, 04:43 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 1,425
Thanks: 10
Thanked 93 Times in 63 Posts
| | | Why does it matter to us today or in the future?
__________________
Tom Albrecht
Member, Covenant URCNA, New Holland, PA.
"I'm not a famous man. I'm just a simple country doctor with horse sense."
| 
04-07-2008, 05:19 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,269
Thanks: 1,459
Thanked 337 Times in 201 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PastorTim | It appears from this article that you see no future 'mass conversion' of ethnic Israel. The OP was directed at those who do see such a conversion. | 
04-07-2008, 05:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,269
Thanks: 1,459
Thanked 337 Times in 201 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Wannabee Decendants of Jacob. | Would this be true even of descendants of Jacob who practice Buddhism or Hinduism, for example?
And what of those proselytes who are not descended from Jacob?
Also, since the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, can any Jew truly trace their geneology back to Jacob? (I know some claim they can) | 
04-07-2008, 05:23 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,269
Thanks: 1,459
Thanked 337 Times in 201 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by tcalbrecht Why does it matter to us today or in the future? | This is the question I am trying to answer in my own mind.
Are you saying that you believe there will be a future 'mass conversion' of ethnic Israel but that it doesn't matter to us today, nor will it matter in the future? | 
04-07-2008, 05:33 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Montgomery, ALabama
Posts: 371
Thanks: 70
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Quote:
Originally Posted by Wannabee Decendants of Jacob. | Would this be true even of descendants of Jacob who practice Buddhism or Hinduism, for example?
And what of those proselytes who are not descended from Jacob?
Also, since the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, can any Jew truly trace their geneology back to Jacob? (I know some claim they can) | yes I would argue that they can. for instance the Tribes of Levi and Judah are still around. I know some of them indirectly.
how do they know this? all who claimed to be Levi took a DNA test, 98% had a common marker or something//. the records were not only stored in the temple.
but that is how they would say they know | | The Following User Says Thank You to ModernPuritan? For This Useful Post: | | 
04-07-2008, 09:55 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,269
Thanks: 1,459
Thanked 337 Times in 201 Posts
| | | Rom 11:26 "And so all Israel shall be saved..."
This must be the same 'Israel' as mentioned in vs 25 "...that blindness in part is happened to Israel."
This is the same 'Israel' from 9:3,4,5 "...my kinsman according to the flesh: who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenents, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; whose are the fathers..."
From this I would conclude that those who believe in a future 'mass conversion' of ethnic Israel believe that the Israel that shall be converted are the fleshly descendants of Jacob who are still within the covenant. Would Paul consider a fleshly descendent of Jacob who has apostacized from the covenant to be a part of 'Israel'? | 
04-24-2008, 03:59 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Holland MI
Posts: 145
Thanks: 10
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
| | Ethenc Ireal would be defined as as those who have been judically blinded by God who are curentlly jewish either relgious or not and will be either converted or danmed during The 7 year Tribulatioun 
__________________
Aaron
Independent Baptist
Holland MI
Blog: earthdwell22.blogspot.com
| 
04-24-2008, 04:42 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 1,425
Thanks: 10
Thanked 93 Times in 63 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Rom 11:26 "And so all Israel shall be saved..."
This must be the same 'Israel' as mentioned in vs 25 "...that blindness in part is happened to Israel."
This is the same 'Israel' from 9:3,4,5 "...my kinsman according to the flesh: who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenents, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; whose are the fathers..." From this I would conclude that those who believe in a future 'mass conversion' of ethnic Israel believe that the Israel that shall be converted are the fleshly descendants of Jacob who are still within the covenant. Would Paul consider a fleshly descendent of Jacob who has apostacized from the covenant to be a part of 'Israel'? | The only operative covenant today is the new covenant. The old covenant was decaying and ready to pass away when Hebrews was written (8:13). The final collapse happened in AD70.
Biblical (old covenant) Judaism gave way to two religions, Christianity and rabbinic Judaism. Jews operating under the terms of the new covenant are called Christians.
Paul wrote Romans 9-11 during a time with it was still possible to be a Jew per old covenant terms. Those conditions no longer exist today. During that time Israel still existed, at least theoretically. Even though the dead of Christ ended the sacrificial system when the curtain of the Temple was torn from top to bottom, the Jewish powers caused the system to continue to limp along for another 40 years.
So the legitimate question is; does Israel exist today? | | The Following User Says Thank You to tcalbrecht For This Useful Post: | | 
04-24-2008, 05:27 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,269
Thanks: 1,459
Thanked 337 Times in 201 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by tcalbrecht Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Rom 11:26 "And so all Israel shall be saved..."
This must be the same 'Israel' as mentioned in vs 25 "...that blindness in part is happened to Israel."
This is the same 'Israel' from 9:3,4,5 "...my kinsman according to the flesh: who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenents, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; whose are the fathers..." From this I would conclude that those who believe in a future 'mass conversion' of ethnic Israel believe that the Israel that shall be converted are the fleshly descendants of Jacob who are still within the covenant. Would Paul consider a fleshly descendent of Jacob who has apostacized from the covenant to be a part of 'Israel'? | The only operative covenant today is the new covenant. The old covenant was decaying and ready to pass away when Hebrews was written (8:13). The final collapse happened in AD70.
Biblical (old covenant) Judaism gave way to two religions, Christianity and rabbinic Judaism. Jews operating under the terms of the new covenant are called Christians.
Paul wrote Romans 9-11 during a time with it was still possible to be a Jew per old covenant terms. Those conditions no longer exist today. During that time ‘Israel’ still existed, at least theoretically. Even though the dead of Christ ended the sacrificial system when the curtain of the Temple was torn from top to bottom, the Jewish powers caused the system to continue to limp along for another 40 years.
So the legitimate question is; does Israel exist today? | I understand your POV. You would probably agree with those who say that the fulness of the Gentiles has already come.
I had directed my question specifically to those who believe there is a future mass conversion for 'Israel'. (Whatever that means) Personally I lean in your direction. I can't see how and ethnic 'Israel' exists today according to its biblical definition. | 
04-24-2008, 05:38 PM
|  | I pity the fool! (who says in his heart "There is no God") | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Broad Top, Pa.
Posts: 7,201
Thanks: 23
Thanked 101 Times in 76 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Rom 11:26 "And so all Israel shall be saved..."
This must be the same 'Israel' as mentioned in vs 25 "...that blindness in part is happened to Israel."
This is the same 'Israel' from 9:3,4,5 "...my kinsman according to the flesh: who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenents, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; whose are the fathers..."
From this I would conclude that those who believe in a future 'mass conversion' of ethnic Israel believe that the Israel that shall be converted are the fleshly descendants of Jacob who are still within the covenant. Would Paul consider a fleshly descendent of Jacob who has apostacized from the covenant to be a part of 'Israel'? | It happened already-the remnant that had their eyes opened before the attack of the Romans and fled before the destruction. | | The Following User Says Thank You to PuritanBouncer For This Useful Post: | | 
04-24-2008, 05:44 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: NYC
Posts: 3,537
Thanks: 648
Thanked 118 Times in 90 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanBouncer Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Rom 11:26 "And so all Israel shall be saved..."
This must be the same 'Israel' as mentioned in vs 25 "...that blindness in part is happened to Israel."
This is the same 'Israel' from 9:3,4,5 "...my kinsman according to the flesh: who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenents, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; whose are the fathers..."
From this I would conclude that those who believe in a future 'mass conversion' of ethnic Israel believe that the Israel that shall be converted are the fleshly descendants of Jacob who are still within the covenant. Would Paul consider a fleshly descendent of Jacob who has apostacized from the covenant to be a part of 'Israel'? | It happened already-the remnant that had their eyes opened before the attack of the Romans and fled before the destruction. | before and after the attack as per revelation. "They will come and worship at your feet".
__________________
~Keon Garraway~ Brooklyn, NY
Love for God demonstrated by the love for our children in giving them a God centered education is the only hope for our country. by David Morrow
Pslam 71:20 [Thou], which hast shewed me great and sore troubles, shalt quicken me again, and shalt bring me up again from the depths of the earth.
| 
04-24-2008, 05:49 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Montgomery, ALabama
Posts: 371
Thanks: 70
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
| | Start  today Christian is a universal term to beilevers in Jesus.
I know a few orthodox Jews who see no disconnect between the way their people have lived for thousands of years and the Gospels. They do no accept the title of Christian nor do they hold to the writings of paul (some do some dont) Generally their canon would be this
Genesis- Malachi
the 4 gospels, and the writings of the 12 apostles that Jesus chose in Human form while on earth (those in the Gospels)
Rabbi Simcha Pearlmutter is one such Jew.
Eusibies also rails against "Nazarenes" who still have a copy of matthew in Hebrew.
surprisingly enough, I find Messianic Jews, much more easy to get along with in regards to covenant and generally reformed theology. They get the title "legalist" just as much as a puritan like me does
they affirm the Deity of Jesus, accept him as Lord, they do not use "trinity" because the term is not found in Scripture, but they beileve the same as "Trinitarians" End
all that to say, while it was at Antioch where they were called Christians, It doesnt mean they were called that in Jerusalem. So while history has run its course, i find no problem with folk who are cautios of using "Christian" | 
04-24-2008, 05:50 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Montgomery, ALabama
Posts: 371
Thanks: 70
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
| | | I dont follow the "mass conversion". I tend to be more of the beilef that "Israel=church, church = israel" | 
04-24-2008, 06:04 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Cordova, TN
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 81
Thanked 281 Times in 194 Posts
| |
In case of Rapture, this keyboard will be unmanned.
__________________ Andrew DeShazo, Deacon, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN "All of us stumble in many ways, but if anyone is never at fault in what he says, then he is mature, able to control his whole body."(James 3:2) | 
04-24-2008, 06:19 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Montgomery, ALabama
Posts: 371
Thanks: 70
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenas
In case of Rapture, this keyboard will be unmanned. |
thats okay, Im sure the pope will come steal it and then use it to take control as the Antichrist. | 
04-24-2008, 08:58 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 914
Thanks: 77
Thanked 160 Times in 106 Posts
| | Quote: |
And what of those proselytes who are not descended from Jacob?
| That's a good question. Those who have been absorbed into the Jewish community are now Jews, like Rabab and Ruth's descendents became Jews, like Christ Himself. Studies of European Jews suggest about 5% per century inbreeding, which is why you get differences in coloring etc.. between them and Sephardic Jews.
The tricky parts are when there was mass conversion by non-Jewish people. People like the Karait Jews seem to have been of Turkic stock. So what of them? They've got the religion, but not the genes. In fact several hundred were allowed to join the Waffen SS during WW2 and allowed to practice their religion, as the nazi's saw Jews in ethnic terms primarily rather than religious. Quote: |
Also, since the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, can any Jew truly trace their geneology back to Jacob? (I know some claim they can)
| The so-called "Cohen gene" was referred to already in this thread. There are several modern studies, and I can dig some out if you wish, but the answer is pretty clear that for the most part, those who call themselves Jews are descendants of Jacob.
__________________
Tim Vaughan, 48 years old, member PCA church but currently attending EV Free church. San Luis Obispo County, California.
| 
04-24-2008, 09:07 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 914
Thanks: 77
Thanked 160 Times in 106 Posts
| | | | 
04-24-2008, 09:28 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 1,117
Thanks: 187
Thanked 147 Times in 122 Posts
| | | The Ethnic Israel has to do with lineage and their mothers, I believe. When Temple was destroyed, so were the records. But some Jews today can trace their lineage back along way. God knows who they are. It became a problem with the establishment of Israel. Before that, converts were not common ( to Judaism), who would want to be persecuted the way they were? So todays definition has changed a little. The Mother thingy. | 
04-24-2008, 10:11 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Montgomery, ALabama
Posts: 371
Thanks: 70
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Grymir The Ethnic Israel has to do with lineage and their mothers, I believe. When Temple was destroyed, so were the records. But some Jews today can trace their lineage back along way. God knows who they are. It became a problem with the establishment of Israel. Before that, converts were not common ( to Judaism), who would want to be persecuted the way they were? So todays definition has changed a little. The Mother thingy. | (not really debateable- easily seen in scripture)
1) There was the "master copy of the Torah" in the ark
the king, made himself another copy
and every tribe had its own copy.
so there were at;east 14 manuscripts.
(debatable maybe, based off of info a few Orthodox rabbi friends sent me)
2) No, they weren't all destroyed. the tribes more than likely also kept there genealogies with them. this would make more since, than having them kept in Jerusalem- what if AJ and Joey were fighting that they deserved the inheritance- should they have to travel every time down to Jerusalem?? Its very likely that Gen | |