» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 137 | | 48 members and 89 guests | | 21st Century Calvinist, asc, Ask Mr. Religion, austinww, awretchsavedbygrace, Backwoods Presbyterian, baron, Curt, David, Dearly Bought, DMcFadden, gene_mingo, Gord, HokieAirman, Jake, Kings Bro, KMK, KSon, markkoller, Montanablue, nicnap, PMBrooks, Puritan Sailor, PuritanCovenanter, raekwon, Reformed Musings, Rich Koster, Ruby, satz, SolaSaint, Soonerborn, Southern Presbyterian, SteppingHeavenward, tabrooks, TaylorOtwell, Titus35, toddpedlar, uberkermit, Zenas | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
03-19-2009, 01:23 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,340
Thanks: 545
Thanked 472 Times in 222 Posts
| | Thinking too hard about end times :)
So hubby and I were having our nightly discussion before bed. I mentioned that a dispensational woman had mentioned online that Christians ought not produce any more children because the rapture will take place in 2012 and the children will be left on earth without parents. Josh laughed and said, "What if a woman is pregnant? Will her unborn baby stay on earth when she goes up?"
So I started thinking too hard. When Christ returns to judge the living and the dead, and our mortal bodies are clothed in immortality, what happens to unborn children in pregnant women? (And what kind of body do elect infants get?)
Obviously, the Bible doesn't answer this, and the Lord knows what he will do, but it was definitely one of those "whoa, weird" moments.
__________________
Kim G
Non-denom church (holds to the WCF) Zion Community Church, Greenville, SC Teach me Your way, O LORD;
I will walk in Your truth;
Unite my heart to fear Your name. Psalm 86:11 | 
03-19-2009, 01:29 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 4,126
Thanks: 495
Thanked 2,303 Times in 846 Posts
| | |
I'm guessing that the elect will be translated from their mother's womb and given glorified bodies in which they'll enjoy the presence of God forever. Meanwhile, the reprobate will be ripped from the safety of their mother's body to be given a body of their own in which they shall experience the horrors and torments of hell forever and ever.
Unless all infants are elect, in that case just disregard the second sentence.
__________________
Ben
Chaplain, US Army
Ft. Riley, KS
TE Ohio Valley Presbytery, PCA
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SolaScriptura For This Useful Post: | | 
03-19-2009, 01:29 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
| | |
Good question tho! I think that the baby will get the resurrected body intended for it from the beginning. Either a body for heavenly blessing or for damnation. Our glorified bodies will be different than the ones we have presently...not sure how except no more sin sickness etc. So I don't think it will matter if people are in the womb or tomb or on earth when He comes.
| 
03-19-2009, 01:31 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Deep in the heart of Dixie - Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 6,152
Thanks: 767
Thanked 2,927 Times in 1,455 Posts
| | |
I'd have to agree with Ben on this one.
2012. . . I need to write a book. 12 Reasons that Christ Will Return in 2012. It would be a lot easier and shorter to write than 88. I'll be sure and use the millions that I make to fight dispensationalism and spread the truth.
__________________
We shall not adjust our Bible to the age; but before we have done with it, by God's grace, we shall adjust the age to the Bible. - Charles Haddon Spurgeon
Lawrence Underwood, Jr.
Pastor - Providence Family Fellowship / Mobile, Alabama
1644/46 LBC My Blog - Imprimis
Last edited by LawrenceU; 03-19-2009 at 03:47 PM.
Reason: Correcting spelling so I don't have my diploma revoked. Not that any one from that school would likely ever stumble on it.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LawrenceU For This Useful Post: | | 
03-19-2009, 02:17 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 4,882
Thanks: 1,911
Thanked 1,854 Times in 1,099 Posts
| | |
This recalls the book, "Eighty seven reasons for the rapture in 1988."
I recall someone telling me then they had to have children quickly because of that. Also Reverend Hal Lindsay say, "No one knows the day and the hour, but I wouldn't be surprised if it happened in 1988."
Now, I realize that not only are we told not to speculate but that this comes from a dispensational theology. One that does not really look for Jesus reigning now and returning as Judge. It really affects the way you live your life before God where speculation replaces the here-and-now God calls His people to.
__________________ Scott
PCA
North Carolina "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
Hebrews 10:23 | 
04-14-2009, 11:34 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,450
Thanks: 2,924
Thanked 6,168 Times in 2,600 Posts
| |
__________________ Josh Hicks, Chloë's Dad Christ Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCGA Facebook - The Calvinist Vent Board Rules - Signature Rules - Suggestion Box It is God that multiplies our sorrows.... God, as a righteous Judge, does it, which ought to silence us under all our sorrows; as many as they are, we have deserved them all, and more: nay, God, as a tender Father, does it for our necessary correction, that we may be humbled for sin, and weaned from the world by all our sorrows; and the good we get by them, with the comfort we have under them, will abundantly balance our sorrows, how greatly soever they are multiplied. - Matthew Henry | 
04-14-2009, 11:50 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Browns Mills NJ
Posts: 2,328
Thanks: 621
Thanked 703 Times in 405 Posts
| | |
I like it when questionable teachers set dates. Then you don't have to question any more because they have just proven themselves to be false teachers.
__________________
Rich Koster
1689'er
Browns Mills NJ USA Often Goofy Reformed Eccentric
Romans 7:14-25
| 
04-14-2009, 11:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,340
Thanks: 545
Thanked 472 Times in 222 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Koster I like it when questionable teachers set dates. Then you don't have to question any more because they have just proven themselves to be false teachers. | Jonathan Edwards set a date for Christ's return.
I have tried to cut date-setters some slack ever since I learned that.
| 
04-14-2009, 11:59 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Browns Mills NJ
Posts: 2,328
Thanks: 621
Thanked 703 Times in 405 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim G Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Koster I like it when questionable teachers set dates. Then you don't have to question any more because they have just proven themselves to be false teachers. | Jonathan Edwards set a date for Christ's return.
I have tried to cut date-setters some slack ever since I learned that. | Did he repent or hold to it/modify it to save face?
| 
04-14-2009, 12:03 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by LawrenceU I'd have to agree with Ben on this one.
2012. . . I need to write a book. 12 Reasons that Christ Will Return in 2012. It would be a lot easier and shorter to write than 88. I'll be sure and use the millions that I make to fight dispensationalism and spread the truth. | I'll wait until 2013 to buy that book. I bet I'll be able to get it at a drastically reduced price.
__________________
Lance G. Marshall
Pastor
Georgetown, Indiana
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Whitefield For This Useful Post: | | 
04-14-2009, 12:47 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,340
Thanks: 545
Thanked 472 Times in 222 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Koster Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim G Jonathan Edwards set a date for Christ's return.
I have tried to cut date-setters some slack ever since I learned that. | Did he repent or hold to it/modify it to save face? | I don't know. I only read about it in a brief biography. Maybe someone else here would know.
| 
04-24-2009, 11:21 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Palatka, FL
Posts: 423
Thanks: 138
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield Quote:
Originally Posted by LawrenceU I'd have to agree with Ben on this one.
2012. . . I need to write a book. 12 Reasons that Christ Will Return in 2012. It would be a lot easier and shorter to write than 88. I'll be sure and use the millions that I make to fight dispensationalism and spread the truth. | I'll wait until 2013 to buy that book. I bet I'll be able to get it at a drastically reduced price. |
Kim G, can you provide a citation for Edwards date? I'd like to read it. In the mean time let me google it!
| 
04-25-2009, 12:05 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,340
Thanks: 545
Thanked 472 Times in 222 Posts
| |
I know nothing of these sites; I just googled them. But I read about his date setting in one of Piper's books. Here's what a couple websites say online:
"Jonathan Edwards saw the Antichrist being defeated by 1866. See C. C. Goen, “Jonathan Edwards: A New Departure in Eschatology,” Church History 28, no. 1 (1959): 29; Robert Fuller, Naming the Antichrist (New York: Oxford University, 1995), 66-67; Perry Miller, Errand into the Wilderness (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1964), 233. " Direction: Visions of the End: A History of the Last Days
"Jonathan Edwards, considered by many to be the most eminent American theologian, believed the 1,260 days of Revelation chapter 12 were actually years. Assuming that the start of the 1,260 years began in 606 a.d., Edwards concluded that Christ would return in 1866." End Time Anxieties - Probe Ministries | 
04-25-2009, 01:07 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
Posts: 1,415
Thanks: 171
Thanked 205 Times in 81 Posts
| |
Oh come on guys I thought the answer was obvious: you are not a fully developed human being before the age of 25...
Joke. Please don't ban me.
__________________
Fraser,
Trinity Reformed Baptist Church
Hamilton, New Zealand.
| 
04-25-2009, 01:08 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,997
Thanks: 1,459
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Abd_Yesua_alMasih Oh come on guys I thought the answer was obvious: you are not a fully developed human being before the age of 25... | I knew there was hope! |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |