» Site Navigation | | | |  | 
10-05-2009, 07:37 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Aledo, Illinois
Posts: 162
Thanks: 51
Thanked 68 Times in 42 Posts
| | | Seminaries' Eschatologies
Which of the following seminaries tend to lean toward postmil and what seminaries lean toward amil? What variations? Are certain well-known faculty either amil or postmil? I'm looking especially at GPTS and wondering if it is postmil, or who teaches there that is postmil, and what variation of postmil it is. I know that Gentry has been a guest there and is theonomic postmil. But I also want to see a census of the other seminaries' views on eschatology to see how they all line up.
Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary
Westminster Theological Seminary
Calvin Theological Seminary
New Geneva Theological Seminary
Reformed Theological Seminary
Whitefield Theological Seminary
Erskine Theological Seminary
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary
Birmingham Theological Seminary
Western Reformed Seminary
Mid-America Reformed Seminary
Covenant Seminary
__________________
Nathan Riese
Under Care, PCA
Trinity Presbyterian Church, Aledo, Illinois
Current student at MBBC
Future student of Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary www.gpts.edu
Last edited by Nathan Riese; 10-06-2009 at 01:00 PM.
Reason: I forgot to add Covenant, and i didn't want to offend because of its absence
| 
10-05-2009, 07:42 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,973
Thanks: 5,103
Thanked 2,644 Times in 1,604 Posts
| | |
I would say the only one that may lean Post-Mill would be Whitefield. All the others are squarely A-Mill.
| 
10-05-2009, 07:44 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Aledo, Illinois
Posts: 162
Thanks: 51
Thanked 68 Times in 42 Posts
| | |
I had always thought though, that at least some faculty of other seminaries would be postmil, especially those who are more strictly puritan perhaps? Am I off the wall on that guess?
| 
10-05-2009, 07:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,356
Thanks: 262
Thanked 602 Times in 318 Posts
| | |
Puritan claims to be amil; although they teach that the Jews will be restored.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to nleshelman For This Useful Post: | | 
10-05-2009, 07:54 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Aledo, Illinois
Posts: 162
Thanks: 51
Thanked 68 Times in 42 Posts
| | |
is amil really that dominant academically? I saw that GPTS on sermonaudio.com has a lecture by Gentry that is titled "Answers to Postmillennial Objections" is Pipa, Morton Smith, or any other of the faculty postmil at GPTS?
| 
10-05-2009, 07:55 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,973
Thanks: 5,103
Thanked 2,644 Times in 1,604 Posts
| | |
Ken Gentry does not teach at GPTS. However I HIGHLY recommend listening to his teaching on sermonaudio.
| 
10-05-2009, 08:07 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Aledo, Illinois
Posts: 162
Thanks: 51
Thanked 68 Times in 42 Posts
| | |
right, i know that Gentry doesn't teach there, but does anyone at GPTS espouse postmil? I know that postmil is a pretty common belief...how come it isn't espoused by any of the seminaries (besides Whitefield) mentioned above? -----Added 10/5/2009 at 08:07:09 EST-----
does anybody go to one of these seminaries who could clarify what their seminary teaches regarding eschatology?
| 
10-05-2009, 08:11 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,023
Thanks: 623
Thanked 673 Times in 438 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Riese I know that postmil is a pretty common belief.. | You and I must have different views of 'common'.
__________________
Edward
Deacon
PCA
Texas
| 
10-05-2009, 08:13 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Aledo, Illinois
Posts: 162
Thanks: 51
Thanked 68 Times in 42 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Riese I know that postmil is a pretty common belief.. | You and I must have different views of 'common'. | Right, I should have said, it's an eschatological view held by many presbyterians, perhaps not the majority, but it is a prevalent view of eschatology is it not?
| 
10-05-2009, 08:16 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Acton, Maine
Posts: 1,306
Thanks: 366
Thanked 381 Times in 243 Posts
| | |
I find it interesting that whenever Reformed seminaries are listed on the PB, Covenant Seminary tends to be left out.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Curt For This Useful Post: | | 
10-05-2009, 09:00 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plant City, Florida
Posts: 1,213
Thanks: 873
Thanked 251 Times in 144 Posts
| | |
Whitefield Seminary accepts other eschatologies, but not Pre-mil Dispensationalism. I am slowly working on an EdD. in Counseling and Education at Whitefield and the President, Dr. Kenneth G. Talbot, is also my pastor and often professor. Dr. Talbot is Post-Mil. I am on the fence between amil and postmil pending further study.
__________________
Carol
Plant City, Florida That I may gain Christ and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith.
Philippians 3:8,9 http://gettingoffthenicenesstreadmill.blogspot.com/ | 
10-05-2009, 09:36 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 795
Thanks: 91
Thanked 495 Times in 254 Posts
| | |
Hmm... I didn't take the eschatology class at GPTS, but I'm pretty sure Pipa is preterist post-mill and (not as sure about this) that Shaw is A-mill (I know he doesn't believe in a Jewish restoration, but that may not by itself decide the question). Willborn says it depends on how you draw the line. I think Dyer is futurist post-mill. I don't know about others. Anything I say should be checked with the professor before being repeated as a dogmatic assertion.
Cornelis Venema from MARS referred to himself as an optomistic a-mill at the GPTS eschatology conference.
__________________
Charlie Johnson
Downtown Presbyterian Church (PCA)
Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary, student
| | The Following User Says Thank You to CharlieJ For This Useful Post: | | 
10-05-2009, 11:31 PM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,100
Thanks: 2,777
Thanked 2,441 Times in 1,223 Posts
| | |
Erskine has at least one post-mil -- R.J. Gore.
| 
10-05-2009, 11:44 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Thankful...
Posts: 3,238
Thanks: 640
Thanked 1,057 Times in 606 Posts
| |
What didn't Dallas make the list?
__________________
John
Member
Christ Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Salt Lake City, Utah www.christpres.net | | The Following User Says Thank You to Blue Tick For This Useful Post: | | 
10-06-2009, 12:05 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 1,423
Thanks: 556
Thanked 316 Times in 204 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Curt I find it interesting that whenever Reformed seminaries are listed on the PB, Covenant Seminary tends to be left out. | Ya...whats up wit dat???!!
Covenant is a great seminary
| 
10-06-2009, 09:59 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Bangor, ME
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| | |
I thought Westminster taught premill dispensational.
__________________
Lukester 
Seminary Student
Pilgrim OPC 
Bangor, ME
Romans 8:28 And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good,for those who are called according to his purpose.
| 
10-06-2009, 10:03 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Forney, TX
Posts: 196
Thanks: 1
Thanked 54 Times in 37 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by lukeh021471 I thought Westminster taught premill dispensational. | I hope you are joking.
__________________
Kenneth Kneip
Member @ New St. Peter's PC (PCA), Dallas TX
Pastoral Intern @ New Covenant PC (PCA), Dallas TX
M. Div. student @ Redeemer Seminary, Dallas TX
| 
10-07-2009, 08:56 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Bangor, ME
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| |
lol yes I am | 
10-07-2009, 06:51 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,023
Thanks: 623
Thanked 673 Times in 438 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Riese Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Riese I know that postmil is a pretty common belief.. | You and I must have different views of 'common'. | Right, I should have said, it's an eschatological view held by many presbyterians, perhaps not the majority, but it is a prevalent view of eschatology is it not? | I've met some, but not many. But it's not something I search for. I'm more interested in hunting down the dispys. -----Added 10/7/2009 at 05:51:33 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick What didn't Dallas make the list?  | Perhaps he just wanted to list reformed seminaries.
| 
10-07-2009, 06:58 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Acton, Maine
Posts: 1,306
Thanks: 366
Thanked 381 Times in 243 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Riese Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward
You and I must have different views of 'common'. | Right, I should have said, it's an eschatological view held by many presbyterians, perhaps not the majority, but it is a prevalent view of eschatology is it not? | I've met some, but not many. But it's not something I search for. I'm more interested in hunting down the dispys. -----Added 10/7/2009 at 05:51:33 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick What didn't Dallas make the list?  | Perhaps he just wanted to list reformed seminaries. | Is that why Covenant isn't on the list?
| 
10-07-2009, 07:05 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,120
Thanks: 465
Thanked 185 Times in 116 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Curt I find it interesting that whenever Reformed seminaries are listed on the PB, Covenant Seminary tends to be left out. | As well as the first PRTS - Protestant Reformed Theological School
__________________
Bert Mulder
Elder of the First Protestant Reformed Church of Edmonton
Edmonton Alberta Canada
| 
10-07-2009, 08:53 PM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Lisbon, NY
Posts: 5,885
Thanks: 421
Thanked 635 Times in 294 Posts
| |
I believe Amil has gained the academic ascendency due to the influence of many Biblical Theology guys like Vos, Kline, Gaffin, Ridderbos, etc. Hendrickson as well made it popular and easy to understand. And Venema's recent book has basically brought it all together into an easily understood view which a lot of us were thinking but couldn't quite express. But again, that's just my limited observations and speculation on the issue.
__________________
Patrick
MDiv, RTS Jackson
Pastor, Grace Presbyterian Church (OPC), Lisbon, NY "He does well, that discourses of Christ; but he does infinitely better, that by experimental knowledge, feeds and lives on Christ." Thomas Brooks. "Let us not please ourselves that we have deep understandings, but let us shew our understandings by our practice." Richard Sibbes | 
10-07-2009, 09:04 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,023
Thanks: 623
Thanked 673 Times in 438 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Curt Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Riese
Right, I should have said, it's an eschatological view held by many presbyterians, perhaps not the majority, but it is a prevalent view of eschatology is it not? | I've met some, but not many. But it's not something I search for. I'm more interested in hunting down the dispys. -----Added 10/7/2009 at 05:51:33 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick What didn't Dallas make the list?  | Perhaps he just wanted to list reformed seminaries. | Is that why Covenant isn't on the list? | It is. And has been for a while.
| 
10-07-2009, 09:07 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Burke, VA
Posts: 100
Thanks: 10
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Riese Which of the following seminaries tend to lean toward postmil and what seminaries lean toward amil? What variations? Are certain well-known faculty either amil or postmil? I'm looking especially at GPTS and wondering if it is postmil, or who teaches there that is postmil, and what variation of postmil it is. I know that Gentry has been a guest there and is theonomic postmil. But I also want to see a census of the other seminaries' views on eschatology to see how they all line up.
Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary
Westminster Theological Seminary
Calvin Theological Seminary
New Geneva Theological Seminary
Reformed Theological Seminary
Whitefield Theological Seminary
Erskine Theological Seminary
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary
Birmingham Theological Seminary
Western Reformed Seminary
Mid-America Reformed Seminary
Covenant Seminary | I know that L. Anthony Curto from GPTS is a postmil.
__________________
JD Ketterman
Member of Grace OPC, Vienna VA
| 
10-07-2009, 09:56 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,973
Thanks: 5,103
Thanked 2,644 Times in 1,604 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Puritan Sailor I believe Amil has gained the academic ascendency due to the influence of many Biblical Theology guys like Vos, Kline, Gaffin, Ridderbos, etc. Hendrickson as well made it popular and easy to understand. And Venema's recent book has basically brought it all together into an easily understood view which a lot of us were thinking but couldn't quite express. But again, that's just my limited observations and speculation on the issue.  | The interesting thing at least to me in reading Venema's book The Promise of the Future is that Venema almost comes off as being Post-Mill in defending an "Optomistic A-Mill" point of view. In fact Venema is far fairer and pleasant concerning the Post-Mill view than many of his colleagues who write on eschatological topics.
| 
10-07-2009, 11:39 PM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Lisbon, NY
Posts: 5,885
Thanks: 421
Thanked 635 Times in 294 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian Quote:
Originally Posted by Puritan Sailor I believe Amil has gained the academic ascendency due to the influence of many Biblical Theology guys like Vos, Kline, Gaffin, Ridderbos, etc. Hendrickson as well made it popular and easy to understand. And Venema's recent book has basically brought it all together into an easily understood view which a lot of us were thinking but couldn't quite express. But again, that's just my limited observations and speculation on the issue.  | The interesting thing at least to me in reading Venema's book The Promise of the Future is that Venema almost comes off as being Post-Mill in defending an "Optomistic A-Mill" point of view. In fact Venema is far fairer and pleasant concerning the Post-Mill view than many of his colleagues who write on eschatological topics. | Yes, I think he's working to be more ecumenical, drawing on the strengths and common ground of both. The post-mils and amils have been learning from each other over the last century or so. | 
10-08-2009, 12:22 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 692
Thanks: 76
Thanked 240 Times in 153 Posts
| | |
Nathan,
Thank you for adding Covenant.
I am a student there and I don't know the answer to your question. I personally lean towards Amil but it's not something that occupies my mind so I never think to ask others or to speculate about others.
__________________
Donnie MacLeod
Crossroads Presbyterian Fellowship (PCA), Maplewood, MO
MDiv Student Covenant Theological Seminary
You filled my heart with greater joy
than others may have found
As they rejoiced at harvest time,
when grain and wine abound.Ps 4:7, Sing Psalms 2003
| 
10-08-2009, 12:27 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Curt I find it interesting that whenever Reformed seminaries are listed on the PB, Covenant Seminary tends to be left out. | Take this as anecdotal information, but the N.Cali Presb of the P C. A. has been receiving left-leaning seminarians for quite some time. In fact, it is filled with alumni, and is one of the most liberal Presbs in the P C. A.
Cheers,
__________________
Adam B., Wine Country, California, PCA
"I fear not to hold with Junius, de Politia Mosis cap. 6, that he who was punishable by death under that Judicial law, is punishable by death still; and he who was not punished by death then, is not to be punished by death now."
| 
10-08-2009, 10:57 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 423
Thanks: 2
Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts
| |
[quote=Christusregnat;698719] Quote:
Originally Posted by Curt Take this as anecdotal information, but the N.Cali Presb of the P C. A. has been receiving left-leaning seminarians for quite some time. In fact, it is filled with alumni, and is one of the most liberal Presbs in the P C. A. | Adam,
Please define what you mean by "left-leaning".
So,
1)North Cali presby. is filled with CTS alumni
2)North cali presby. is one of the most liberal presbys. in the PCA
Therefore, CTS is liberal?
Not addressed to you Adam, but rather just some general thoughts:
To piggyback on others in this thread who have stood up for CTS, I thought seminaries were to educate, not to follow graduates and enforce them to hold what they have been taught. I guess we are to assume that these graduates are "liberal" because it is what they have been taught? Or maybe it is possible that those who hold "liberal" views do so before they go to seminary and in spite of what they are taught in seminary. Perhaps the problem in the PCA of "liberal" pastors/elders is due to "liberal" presbyterys ordaining them and is not particularly at the feet of those who educate them?
I went to a university with a liberal and neo-orthodox religion department. I came out an orthodox reformed christian. There are too many variables involved to simply say: this student from a given institution believes x, therefore the institution teaches x.
I am no apologist for CTS, nor am I a student there, but I do live nearby. It may be that CTS has serious issues (I honestly don't know), but when all that ever seems to be given on here is anecdotal evidence without solid evidence backing it up, it effects some of us who are investigating the option of attending seminary there. I think if a place is so bad then one who is in the know should privately give solid reasons as to why because they care for the soul of the one who is pondering going there. That would be the charitable thing to do. But if one is not willing to go this far, than the criticism just rings hollow to some and may even be a stumbling block to others who simply don't know enough yet to make an informed decision. It also rings hollow when, being close by CTS, experience has shown that many criticisms on here just don't stick.
I am certainly not asking that criticism be disallowed. I just wish some would realize that hit and run criticisms are not an abstraction to those of us who may be trying to make decisions where the rubber meets the road and that this would be kept in mind before criticism so easily pours out. Otherwise, it is only fair to give solid evidence to back up such significant public statements. I have not seen where any PCA presbytery has demanded discipline of CTS (its own seminary), does this mean that the entire PCA is "liberal" or latitudinarian?
I am sorry to contribute to the derailing of this thread. It just irks me when this issue is treated as such an abstraction, as if the criticism just floats around without ever effecting the lives of others. Perhaps I am being thin-skinned or too sensitive in some eyes, but for me (and I am sure others) this is a flesh and blood issue. Please understand this is meant as nothing personal to anyone, just a plea for respect of consciences and for charity in how (not the disallowance of) criticism is given.
As to the original post, I know that Dr. Peterson of CTS is amillenial (based on a local conference he spoke at here about 7 years ago). I don't know about the other faculty.
__________________
Allan
attending CPC (PCA)
St. Louis, MO
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |