» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 82 | | 26 members and 56 guests | | AltogetherLovely, austinww, bouletheou, buggy, Chippy, christabella_warren, dannyhyde, dfranks, DMcFadden, Edward, Glenn Ferrell, Pergamum, Piano Hero, raekwon, reformed trucker, satz, Simply_Nikki, Titus35, TKarrer, Wayne, WaywardNowHome, Zenas | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
02-13-2009, 01:42 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 392
Thanks: 86
Thanked 99 Times in 54 Posts
| | | Question to the "Amill" PBers
When the Lord first saved me I became a dispy because I did not know there were any other options. When the Lord opened my eyes and I became reformed I then became postmill because I thought that was the answer to dispensationalism. I would say now I am a "justdon'tknowwhatthedealis-mill". With all of that I have a question for the amill PBers. I am still trying to learn about the amill position.
If amill believes in a tribulation and an antichrist, why would we not
look at the current world situation as a possible begining to this
tribulation?
What does amill really believe about the tribulation and antichrist?
__________________ John Blevins III
Chestnut Mountain Presbyterian Church
PCA
Gainesville, Georgia | 
02-13-2009, 01:48 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 4,869
Thanks: 1,906
Thanked 1,844 Times in 1,094 Posts
| |
I'm not familiar enough to confidently answer this.
However, we are studying through a book that is proving very helpful in understanding the amillennial position. It also takes a look at a few potential weaknesses of that position, within the context of advocating it as the most biblical and historical position of Christians.
A Case for Amillennialism
Kim Riddlebarger
__________________ Scott
PCA
North Carolina "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
Hebrews 10:23 | 
02-13-2009, 01:51 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 602
Thanks: 120
Thanked 206 Times in 129 Posts
| | |
Amill. believes we have lived, and presently live, in the tribulation (which is why John identifies himself as a "partner" with his audience and us in the tribulation in Rev. 1:9). As for the antichrist, there has historically been the two camps of those who take that to be symbolic language about a type of people or force, and the other group that believes this to be an actual person, typically the Pope.
I could be wrong, but that's what I gather from being an amillentialist and doing mild reading on it.
__________________
Jacob
Sovereign Grace Ministries Covenant Fellowship Church WTS M.A.R. in Theology student
West Chester, PA
"Grace renews nature; glory perfects grace." ~ John Owen
"Grace tried is better than grace, and more than grace. It is glory in its infancy." ~ John Flavel Blog - The Strasbourg Inn | 
02-13-2009, 02:41 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Macon, MS
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 29
Thanked 188 Times in 65 Posts
| |
Or not the Pope.  Paul seems to think AC would be an actual person who would appear just before the Second Coming.
I don't know. Before I was gloriously delivered from Dispensationalism myself I had all the eschatological answers. Now I consider myself something of an eschatological agnostic, a Pan-millenialist, even. (By that I mean, I believe Christ will return just like he promised, beyond that I figure it will all just pan out.) | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kevin.carroll For This Useful Post: | | 
02-13-2009, 03:04 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,256
Thanks: 155
Thanked 556 Times in 340 Posts
| |
I followed a similar path; in fact I'm rather amazed at how much dispensational, Armenian thinking I absorbed just by growing up in the south. On the other hand, now after years of post-mil thinking, I have trouble believing that Christ will come back to a defeated bride. But I am surrounded by those who take more of a middle ground.
I recently found this series of sermons on Revelation by Sinclair Ferguson to be extremely helpful. He doesn't overtly dwell on eschatology, but illuminates the broad themes regarding God's protection of the church, Christ's supremacy, and so forth. SermonAudio.com - First Presbyterian Church | 
02-13-2009, 03:12 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,124
Thanks: 468
Thanked 185 Times in 116 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Blev3rd When the Lord first saved me I became a dispy because I did not know there were any other options. When the Lord opened my eyes and I became reformed I then became postmill because I thought that was the answer to dispensationalism. I would say now I am a "justdon'tknowwhatthedealis-mill". With all of that I have a question for the amill PBers. I am still trying to learn about the amill position.
If amill believes in a tribulation and an antichrist, why would we not
look at the current world situation as a possible begining to this
tribulation?
What does amill really believe about the tribulation and antichrist? | We do live in the tribulation right now, and the pace is stepping up.
We hear His footsteps approaching.
Read this: Behold He Cometh, An Exposition of the Book of Revelation - Rev. Herman Hoeksema, SpindleWorks
__________________
Bert Mulder
Elder of the First Protestant Reformed Church of Edmonton
Edmonton Alberta Canada
| 
02-13-2009, 03:50 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 807
Thanks: 389
Thanked 206 Times in 127 Posts
| | |
From my reading, I don't think that there is an "amillennial" position on the details of the tribulation and the antichrist. Different prominent amillennial authors may hold to a certain understanding, but I think that there is a somewhat broad scope of answers that you may find. Someone help me out here, but isn't this more a question of preterism, historicism, futurism, etc.?
__________________
Bryan Peters Providence Reformed Church ( URCNA)
Des Moines, Iowa
Doctrinal truth should be preached always, openly, without compromise, and never dissembled or concealed. There is no offence in it; it is the staff of uprightness.
~Martin Luther~
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Dearly Bought For This Useful Post: | | 
02-13-2009, 04:13 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Stuarts Draft, VA 24477
Posts: 316
Thanks: 15
Thanked 67 Times in 38 Posts
| | |
Indeed. I know that Riddleberger is an Amillennial Preterist. I believe that Scott Clark is an Amillennial Futurist (Correct me if I'm wrong). They would have different views on the tribulation and antichrist.
| 
02-13-2009, 04:34 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas
Posts: 1,299
Thanks: 655
Thanked 375 Times in 208 Posts
| | |
Amillennialism fits best with historicism in my opinion. The reformers were historicist and amillenial.
__________________
[B]Manley Beasley[/B]
Southern Baptist Convention
Fayetteville, Arkansas
[B]Wir sein pettler. Hoc est verum (We are beggars. This is true.).--Luther's dying words[/B]
| | The Following User Says Thank You to ManleyBeasley For This Useful Post: | | 
02-13-2009, 05:51 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Bordentown, NJ, 08505
Posts: 940
Thanks: 226
Thanked 609 Times in 295 Posts
| | |
I am amil and have been for 30 years. IMO Riddlebarger is the best teacher on this subject.
I agree with Kim R that while the spirit of antiChrist has always been with us, we will probably see a final single one man who will be worse than any of them (Nero, Hitler, etc).
While the existence of physical Israel is not necessary to prophecy fulfillment about Israel (which is the church), Kim R is clear that when God fulfills the promise of Romans 11 about when the Jews turn to the Messiah, He may very likely use the existence of the physical nation and it is probably a means to that end. It could get nuked into oblivion and the rest of the Jews in the world convert, you don't need it, but it seems to be the most likely scenario.
As far as being at the very end before Jesus come back, as an amil, to me this is a no brainer. 2/3 of the world owes its existence to the electric grid.... 4 billion people. A solar flare, a pole shift, a big EMP over each continent, well, its a fragile situation. No electricity and we are dead.
The neutron was discovered in 1932. Fission was confirmed in 1939. The first atomic bombs were exploded in 1945. A couple dozen nations now have them in world with increasing Islamic hostility. I have no problem whatsoever as an amil to think that we or our kids are probably in the last generation. Between the electric grid reliance and the nukes, the world has never been like this (unless pre Noah they achieved this technology).
Amils believe that at the end of the mil Satan will be unloosed. I have no problem with thinking that it has started. UFO (demonic) sightings and activity, Islam, the fall of the west, proliferating sodomite perversions, abortion, etcetc.
So yeah, you can be amil and be thinking we are at the end of the end.
I think Riddlebarger's book will help you a lot. And his treatment of Daniel 9 (the basis for much dispy teaching) is fabulous- it is a prophecy of Jesus, not the antichrist.
__________________
Lynnie
PCA
Central NJ
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lynnie For This Useful Post: | | 
02-14-2009, 04:18 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 109
Thanks: 12
Thanked 26 Times in 20 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin.carroll Now I consider myself something of an eschatological agnostic, a Pan-millenialist, even. (By that I mean, I believe Christ will return just like he promised, beyond that I figure it will all just pan out.)  | That is a great way of putting it. Made me lol anyway.
| 
02-14-2009, 07:25 AM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 4,869
Thanks: 1,906
Thanked 1,844 Times in 1,094 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by puritan lad Indeed. I know that Riddleberger is an Amillennial Preterist. I believe that Scott Clark is an Amillennial Futurist (Correct me if I'm wrong). They would have different views on the tribulation and antichrist. | From my initial perusal of Mr. Riddlebarger's book, it doesn't seem he is a "preterist." He has a section that seems to refute that idea (that the second coming was when God judged and destroyed Israel in 70 A.D.). He even seems to refute the concepts behind it that might be part of "partial preterism."
| 
02-14-2009, 12:03 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Winter Haven, FL
Posts: 1,122
Thanks: 573
Thanked 107 Times in 76 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by puritan lad Indeed. I know that Riddleberger is an Amillennial Preterist. I believe that Scott Clark is an Amillennial Futurist (Correct me if I'm wrong). They would have different views on the tribulation and antichrist. | Actually Riddlebarger is not a preterist, since he believes that Matt 24 will happen again. He holds the double fulfillment view of prophecy and I agree after all Christ was the last OT prophet technically.
__________________
Richard W. Roldan "Ricky"
Member and Teacher of Iglesia Presbiteriana Reformada Berea (PCA)
Winter Haven, FL./ Under Care of the Southwest Presb.(PCA) "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations,...” Jesus " I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. I do it all for the sake of the gospel," Paul |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |